Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Austria hits panic button.

1131416181926

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,598 ✭✭✭Harika


    Fun fact from Austria, the far right party demanded within 5 minutes

    "Stop all asylum seekers at the border to save our police from the unvaccinated"

    "No mandatory vaccines"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭growleaves


    How about big posters everywhere:

    'You're in my Hospital Bed' with a person making a stern face

    Operation Goldilocks and the Three Bears



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    When were you forced to get in a car?

    That's kidnapping, you should call the police next time that happens.

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    If someone infected someone else on purpose then that would be a bad thing to do, as would making someone take the vaccine, not sure what your point is?

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    Should we do that for smokers occupying a bed in the oncologist ward?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,676 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭growleaves


    I was only joking btw.

    There should be no stigma of anyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭growleaves


    The thread is about mandatory vaccination which Austria are bringing in in February 2022.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    Great, so you agree nobody should be forced to get one.

    That took a while but we can all agree it's wrong now and close the thread if everyone else who had your view has also come to their senses 👍️

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,676 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    How often does the fuel tank have to be topped up?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,676 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    You’re so clueless


    of course I don’t agree with mandatory vaccination. But I do agree that if someone makes that decision, societal privileges that they get should be curtailed to minimise the covid risk to society.


    the choice is still with the individual



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,277 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    And the situation right now would be much worse if we hadn't had so many people vaccinated. Indeed, vaccination is the main reason we've had six months of relative normality. I don't know about you'd, but to me, the best solution so probably the one that identifies contributing factors to the problem and attempts to address them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    We've established for some time now that vaccinated people spread the virus. Why curtail societal privileges for only the unvaccinated?

    At least we're all in agreement that vaccine mandates are wrong despite them being introduced in Austria and in all likelihood Germany and Ireland will likely follow soon after



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,521 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    It's like going around in circles.

    But I'll put it as simply as it can possibly be put.

    The unvaccinated are taking up ~50% of the adult hospital and ICU capacity for dealing with COVID.

    This means we can handle ~12 vaccinated cases of COVID to 1 unvaccinated COVID case and have the same pressure on the system.

    The COVID cert keeps the unvaccinated away from some high risk (not all) areas to reduce the number of unvaccinated becoming infected and taking up hospital beds.

    When the number is 1:1 then COVID certs are no longer needed.

    Or when the pandemic is no longer putting such pressure on the health system.

    Those are the facts and that is why.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,715 ✭✭✭hometruths


    But irrespective of the proportion of vaccinated, surely the reason there are so many people in hospital/ICU is because the virus is spreading like wildfire?

    And with 93 odd % of adults vaccinated is it not clear that the vaccine is ineffective at stopping the transmission? 100% vaccinated is not going to stop transmission, and if the ICU capacity cannot cope with the numbers is that OK because everybody is vaccinated? Doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

    There are a couple of different ways to solve the problem of pressure on the health system:

    a) get a better health system

    b) get a better vaccine

    Importantly both will produce better results than piling on the unvaccinated.

    And either is infinitely preferable than the thin end of the edge that is covid passports and mandatory vaccines.



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 78,477 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    They spread it much less than the vaccinated. They also take up a lot fewer hospital and ICU beds on a pro-rata basis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    There will always be a minority of scroungers who won't do their bit and are happy to sit up on the backs of others' efforts.

    All the while trying their best to piss down on them


    Society has to call them out on it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,353 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    We apply similar restrictions here already. We don't mandate smokers should give up smoking but we restrict their rights to be indoors with others smoking. But it's easy to distinguish and apply because everyone can see and smell smoke. They are restricted because of the potential harm they can do to others with their secondhand smoke.

    But we can't see nor smell covid so the only thing we can do is apply restrictions via the only means we have to identify the risky behaviour, you have proof of vaccination or a test then you're at lesser risk to others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,521 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I tried to make it simple, but essentially 100% vaccinated would let us drop COVID certs and reduce the COVID pressure on the health system by 50%.

    Both options you outline are not achievable over Winter months, countries with more capable health systems are going back into restrictions and lockdown our high vax rate has mostly kept Ireland out of it so far.

    The virus has an R rate of about 1.1 in Ireland, that is not wildfire, wildfire is the exponential growth that was seen last year without vaccines, now we see linear growth and the vast majority of vaccinated people aren't having severe symptoms when infected, reducing the burden on the health system. Unvaccinated are putting 12x more pressure per person on the system, hence more restrictions on them.

    But this is re-treading old ground, the question was why still COVID certs, the answer is because the unvaccinated are taking up way more hospital space per head then vaccinated so we need measures to stop them getting infected.

    You can argue that the current measures aren't enough but proportionately the unvaccinated will be more restricted until that 12:1 figure changes to 1:1 (or the health system pressure abates).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    You will find that these figures will change very quickly and abruptly as we progress through this wave. There cannot be much of an unvaccinated adult pool left at this stage and the virus will have "gone through" this pool which I feel is nearing now.

    What then?

    This is what should have happened much earlier in the vaccination programme instead of getting double-whacked with natural Winter surges of illness on top of Covid circulating rampantly across the country, but the apparent wise heads thought otherwise.

    Instead of faffing about regarding re-opening, it should have been let rip starting in July/August and have had our 4th wave peak over and done with before the dark days of November. Heck, even the schools could have been brought back a few weeks earlier to encourage spread. England seems to have done this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    It would be better to have mandatory vaccines.

    If making them mandatory is not possible then bundle them in with access to public health care. If you want to be on the eligible list for covid treatment then get your vaccine. Else go and do your own thing and if you catch it, deal with it yourself. No public hospital bed or public ICU bed or access to public doctors. You're either a part of the system or you aren't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,521 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Give us a shout when you invent a time machine to enact this master plan.

    When the number changes to 1:1, COVID cert will be pointless, we should have opened in August after our vax rollout was basically done, you're correct (I also said that at the time).

    If the numbers go to 1:1 and the health system still can't cope, the restrictions come back.

    If the numbers go to 1:1 because there is now much less pressure on the health system, we reopen and pandemic is basically over.

    The other variables are boosters, top ups (for immuno compromised), viral pills and future vaccines that reduce transmission.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    I'd say you'd have been doing some fighting for freedom alright.

    More likely to be hiding in a basement typing on a message board crying about your right not to take part and sneering at the "sheeple" for making an effort. 🤣 Probably collaborating with the oppressors too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    In your own little Stalin world, would these citizens be allowed claim their taxes back from a system that no longer honours their payments in?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Dole effectively isn't really taxed for most people my friend.

    They'd be still availing of plenty of other services. Just not covid healthcare given that they have decided to opt out of it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    Don't need a time machine - it should be obvious that eventually the vast majority unvaccinated will have succumbed to the virus and either beat it or sadly not.

    You say that "If the numbers go to 1:1 and the health system still can't cope, the restrictions come back" - If that happens, then there is alot of egg on alot of faces. And what then? Who will be left standing to get the blame? Considering the level of abuse thrown at the unvaccinated there will be a big void left to fill...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Irish people don't have basements.

    Could you be any more of a breakfast-roll and Sun clod, you're even synthesising your dislike of welfare recipients and people who decline to take a pharmaceutical product. Great connect-the-dots there.

    Doctors and nurses have commitments to humane medicine, they aren't going to refuse medical treatment to people because some randomer hang em and flog em merchant says so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Well if ICUs get clogged or resources need to be rationed and decisions need to be made on who gets access to them, then the first filter should be whether the person bothered to get a vaccine. ICU fills up - well keep the machines for those more likely to pull through i.e. those vaccinated. Unplug the unvaccinated and wheel them out to the fresh air in the carpark and come back later on to see which ones make it and which don't.

    If they didn't care enough about what would happen to then to bother getting a vaccine when it was offered to them, why should anyone else care



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭growleaves


    We are redefining human beings themselves as a biological hazard based on a hypothetical risk. That is ethically fraught hence why we've been assured the certs are temporary and many people will never accept them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,521 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    You seem to be of the opinion that this whole thing is about being right and saving face, it's not, it's a dynamically changing pandemic against a relatively non-lethal virus that puts huge pressure on health systems.

    If the health systems still can't cope then it's likely that herd immunity is impossible as well as immunity will be waning faster than people become infected again, barring better medicines and vaccines (or more frequent vaccines), that would cause a massive change in society.

    I don't think it will come to that, but boy, there will be egg on my face if it does and you'll be laughing about it from our newly restricted society (??!?) that's the important thing here.



Advertisement