Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Acceptable Covid death rates

2456712

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,203 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Unfortunately OP that means people like yourself may be housebound for years to come


    This is the thing though - the OP isn’t any different from anyone else in that they have to weigh up the risks and benefits of any given circumstances in the same way as everyone else is doing. It’s the same for anyone who chooses to go to a club or whatever else - the vaccine provides protection, it doesn’t make anyone invincible, and people know that, but they weigh the risk of spreading the disease against the benefits of being able to get out and enjoy themselves for a bit, and being able to get out and enjoy themselves for a bit wins.

    I’d someone say to me the other day that people who are refusing to be vaccinated are being discriminated against, as though it was unfair. It’s absolutely fair, as there are people like the OP for whom the vaccine is ineffective, and their risk of infection is reduced by people being vaccinated. In effect the OP isn’t housebound, but they mentioned people taking personal responsibility, and people are taking responsibility for themselves. The OP isn’t any different from anyone else in that respect in that they should practice what they preach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,379 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    The risk of dying from Covid in this country is absolutely miniscule. The fact that we have idiots who think we should spend years restricting our civil liberties and freedoms because of a disease that has been hyped-up to sell newspapers and generate clicks is depressing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 424 ✭✭Roger the cabin boy


    A hyper-wokist response to a perfectly good question.

    Nature cares not for your ideology.



  • Registered Users Posts: 729 ✭✭✭SupplyandDemandZone


    But it is here Skimpy and will be with us forever. The whole world can't stop because some people may catch it and die. The vast vast majority will catch it and it will be no more than a common cold to them.

    Sorry for your circumstances but the rest of us just want to get on with life.



  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭Shao Kahn


    The chances that you have not been in contact with this virus, to some degree, are pretty slim at this stage.

    It's in the air you breath, and it's literally everywhere at this stage. But viral load is very significant with this disease.

    I'm sorry for the predicament you're in OP, but life does have to go on at some point. That's not being cold or callous, it's just the harsh reality. You know yourself at this point, how to keep safe. But it's undoubtedly a very tough road to stay the course indefinitely.

    At least you do have the digital means to stay connected with the world, which is something people didn't have in past generations. And a much bigger scientific community working hard to find better solutions every day. Small crumbs of comfort perhaps, but still something to be optimistic about.

    "Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives, and it puts itself into our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." (John Wayne)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,223 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    It is not miniscule for the OP - far from it.

    I have a question for you. Pre-covid times there would often be people who would get on, for example, buses, and who would be clearly suffering from a cold or flu and who would just spend the entire trip sneezing and coughing openly on the buses, making no attempt to even cover their mouths. What would you honestly think of those people?......Or are you one of them?

    I used to work with a fella who was notorious for coming into work anytime he was ill and go coughing and spluttering all around the office. I think he was deluded that people would think he was great for making the sacrifice and still working when he was visibly ill so he made sure to go around to let everyone see he was ill. Again, he had no concept of even turning his head before he'd cough or sneeze at you if one came on him as he was talking to you. Other staff used to complain that the management wouldn't tell him to stay at home. It was stupid because the next week there would invariably be a handful of people off with whatever he had spread. The reason management wouldn't intervene was that your man was a complete oddball in general (and I suspect undiagnosed autistic).

    You would be fully in support of either of the above's "civil liberties" were you stuck beside them during their coughing episodes?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,223 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Some may be surprised to learn that society actually places many restrictions on driving in order to reduce the danger to other people (and to the driver themselves!)



  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭Shao Kahn


    @Donald Trump

    I know people who invariably get colds / flu every single winter without fail.

    Some people are just very susceptible to catching seasonal viruses.

    If these people were habitually missing from work for several weeks every winter season, surely some of their employers would start to lose patience with them. "Such and such is always out sick, can't rely on them!" etc etc.

    You can't win in some situations. Damned if you do/don't.

    "Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives, and it puts itself into our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." (John Wayne)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    Problem with asking the question of "what's an acceptable covid death rate" is that you will get answers ranging from logical and rationale to down right insane.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,223 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    I don't know whether you are deliberately trying to sidestep and twist the point or whether you genuinely didn't read it or whether you did, and decided to go off on some tangent

    Or is it the case that you'd react differently depending on the person's susceptibility to catching infection? i.e. if you are on a plane for example and a fella gets on and sits beside you and spends the whole time coughing and spluttering across you and making no effort to cover their mouth, you would try to ascertain their susceptibility to infection before coming to a conclusion on whether you were ok with them doing so?

    In my case when the (undiagnosed autistic) fella would go around advertising and making sure that everyone knew he was coming into work while sick, would you "ah I don't mind that Jimmy comes up to me just before he deliberately sneezes across me so that I can know he is sick because sure he gets sick a lot. Now if he only got sick once every few years, I'd be pissed off that he coughs in my face when he is, but seeing that he gets sick a few times a year I actually like to receive those veritable showers of infection"



  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭Shao Kahn


    It's part of the same wider discussion.

    I agree that someone should have the courtesy to cover their mouth / nose when coughing and sneezing.

    But it's not always practical for someone to take several weeks off every winter when they invariably get the sniffles. Some people can do it, but not everyone.

    Not to mention all the hidden illnesses that we are all in contact with every single day. You can only mitigate risk up to a point, after which it starts to become a bit nonsensical in the wider context of a functioning society.

    "Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives, and it puts itself into our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." (John Wayne)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,223 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Acknowledging that someone should cover their mouth while coughing is as much of a "civil liberty issue" as acknowleding that people should wear masks on public transport during a pandemic. I don't see how people accept the former but cannot accept the latter.


    I never mentioned anything to the effect that the fella I knew should be forced to take weeks off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    Government contributing to pressure on health service by cigarettes being legal. Ban them... complicit in thousands of deaths a year and pressure on the health service...

    Why is that so overlooked, when they are prepared to lock down the country for close to no deaths a week ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    People die. It's part of life. Whether it's flu, pneumonia, covid, cancer. We can't shut down the country because someone isn't well and a stiff breeze might kill them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭Shao Kahn


    Maybe it's because a mask stays on your face permanently all day, and is not a natural part of your anatomy. So can be quite irritating when required indefinitely. Although most people were, of course, willing to put up with this irritation in the short term to save lives.

    Putting your hand up to catch a sneeze or cough, is generally considered a minor courtesy that doesn't inconvenience people too much.

    Masks and social distancing, by their nature, are only really suitable as short term mitigation measures.

    You did intimate that staff in your workplace were unhappy that management didn't ask this individual to stay home when sick. Which is why I addressed this aspect of your point specifically.

    Look, if you're happy to social distance and wear a mask indefinitely - possibly for years - then work away. Nobody should criticize you for that decision. But I don't think it would be fair to ask society at large to do this. It's not realistic in the long term.

    "Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives, and it puts itself into our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." (John Wayne)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,903 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...the needs of the economy sometimes out way human needs, we really should have a long think about this one post covid, but we probably wont!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭DarkJager21


    At this stage it has to be accepted that people will die from it, we can't save everyone and neither can we stay under restrictions/lockdown scenarios forever to stop people dying. People die every day from a multitude of illnesses and causes, some are avoidable and some are not. The vulnerable need to be extra cautious with their own safety now as society reopens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,203 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    The Government at the time literally introduced a ban on smoking indoors in public places overnight. It’s not the same as introducing measures such as lockdowns in an attempt to prevent the spread of a highly infectious disease.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,903 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭DarkJager21




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    While I do sympathize with you, I agree with the author. It's been nearly two years, we have to move forward at some point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,203 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    He’s making the point that he was right. It’s an absolutely useless point, but sure he was right and that’s all that matters 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,217 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Yup, the time to move on back to normal has passed.

    Everyone who wants a vaccine has had one. Time to open up. We're at an acceptable threshold and have been for weeks if not longer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,903 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    theres no need for these deaths, and for wrecking the economy, it is possible to protect both, we just dont want to, we re just being dumb humans, programs such as 'personal responsibility' have serious limitations at times, probably most of the time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭DarkJager21


    It's not possible to do both unfortunately, if it was we would have never endured a lockdown. People die and there is nothing at all you can do about that fact. Personal responsibility is the name of the game now - if you are sick and at high risk from Covid, don't expect anyone else to look out for you. Take your own precautions and use common sense. Life has to move on and we can't keep all of the vulnerable wrapped in cotton wool forever along with normality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,203 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Surely you’re not that far up your own fundament that you imagine anyone who doesn’t share your opinions doesn’t care about protecting people or the economy? They’re not dumb either. They just don’t share your opinions, or how you imagine everyone else should think about their lives and what matters to them, according to your opinions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,903 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    again, i largely disagree, we are all in fact vulnerable in regards this virus, some more so than others of course, but we actually can try protect everyone, theres no need for this approach, we re just choosing it. we re defaulting to think this is how the world works, or should work, it doesnt actually have to be, for example, removing pandemic protective measures for both employees and employers is a choice, theres actually no need to do this, its actually dumb!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think that one traffic related death is one too many, therefore I propose we place limiters in every road vehicle to have a max speed of 10mph. That way, no one will die in a traffic accident again.

    I think that people choking on food and dying is an unacceptable risk. Therefore we should ban all solid food and only sell liquid meal replacements. That way, no one will choke on food again.

    Etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,903 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    take a step back and think about it, we re removing protective measures, measures of which we all need, now is this sensible?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭DarkJager21


    We've done 18 months of this, how long do you realistically expect anyone to keep going with that to "protect the vulnerable"? It's not possible - we have been there and done that and we have to get back to normality now. It's sad of course if anyone dies from it but that's just an acceptance that needs to be made to get back to normal life - which is this "default" state you talk of that we shouldn't be doing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,903 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    so we should remove protective measures, thats been proven to protect more, than expose more?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭DarkJager21


    Yes we should, 90%+ of the population have done what was asked of them - there's nothing more that should be asked of them. The country has to reopen now and life has to move on. Granted it may not be normal for the some of the seriously compromised for quite some time yet, but for the rest of us we have to get back to normality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,903 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    fair enough..... lets fcuk up the health system some more, and potentially cause a sh1t load of businesses to close permanently, should be interesting going forward....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,140 ✭✭✭Cordell


    First of all, you have my sympathy for your situation.

    But with covid, flu, any health condition and in general any human activity, there is a level of risk that is considered acceptable, and this level of risk leads to a death rate that is considered acceptable. Yes, it's cold, but that's the way it is. We don't have hospitals that are minutes away from everyone so there will be deaths from heart attacks and strokes that will only happen because they can't reach the hospital in time. We are accepting a small death rate from road accidents, we are trying to reduce it but we know there is no way to make it zero, so we accept some deaths for our comfort of driving. And so on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,203 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Having been forced to up-end our lives for the last two years has given people plenty of time to think about it. We’re scaling back on measures which were introduced to prevent the spread of an infectious disease which posed a significant threat to public health. The measures were introduced at great expense to our economy, so I don’t agree with the suggestion that we put our economy before people’s needs. In order to continue to meet people’s needs, the economy has to be opened up again and people have to be able to start living again, or you’re looking at the long term effects the measures will have on people’s mental health.

    It’s a balancing act which isn’t at all suggesting that the economy takes priority over people’s needs, when it’s patently obvious that what people need is to be able to live, rather than spend the rest of their lives in isolation dependent upon their income being a subsidised payment from the State.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭DarkJager21


    The health system is no concern of mine and I'm not sure it's the responsibility of anyone else either - they have had nearly 2 years to upgrade, increase capacity etc - you might remember that being the reason we initially entered restrictions in March 2020. Then they came along again in winter 2020 and it was yet again about "protecting the health service from being overwhelmed". We are now in November 2021 hearing the same thing again. If our health service is still a shambles given the time and money given to it to get it's **** together over the last 18 months that is nobodies fault but the health service. As I said in another thread, it's sink or swim time for them now.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,556 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    People die from various things. A benign government could introduce various draconian measures to prevent deaths from things like car accidents, smoking, etc but only with great expense and loss of freedom. We're going to have to learn to live with covid but we already tolerate deaths from lung cancer, strokes, drink-driving, etc. Why should covid be any different?

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,484 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    Nobody's stopping you from getting the best mask as you can, nobody's stopping you from wearing it, hell wear it all the time. Get all the PPE you want. Wear it everywhere. Nobody's asking you to go to packed pubs or nightclubs. Sorry you're classed as vulnerable but we can't stop the world for you. We all only get one life and we've all had the best part of two years stolen off us. We won't get them back, they're gone. It's time to open everything.



  • Registered Users Posts: 971 ✭✭✭bob mcbob


    There is emerging evidence that a (healthy) immune system especially of young children need to be exposed to potentially harmful virus's.

    Continuing restrictions could actually be damaging a generation of children.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,813 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    potentially cause a sh1t load of businesses to close permanently

    How is full reopening of the economy going to do this?



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nah fcuk it...the PMs arent worth it

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,903 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    we re effectively removing all safety measures that have been put in place to protect our economy and our society, we can already see whats more than likely to occur, an overwhelming of our health system, yet again, and a potentially even slower than normal slow down, post christmas, this is all very obvious right now



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Should we ban motor vehicles? If not, why do you think we should accept the inevitable yearly motor related fatalities?



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nah fcuk it,the PMs arent worth this


    (Pms were not from brianboru-dont want blame given to you)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,379 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    You'll find that the lads that are braying for more restrictions so they will feel 'safe' are the same clowns that engage in call sorts of risky behavior. I bumped into one of my neighbors waddling around our local supermarket with her trolley filled to overflowing with frozen pizza, cans of sugary drinks and packets of crisps - she proceeded to give out about the queues she had seen on Facebook outside Coppers - apparently the government should shut down the nightclubs again immediately- God knows when she will feel safe enough for them to ever reopen .

    These are the kind of people the government are pandering to.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,813 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    You think measures like shutting down construction, restricting restaurants to takeaway, keeping pubs & nightclubs closed were designed to protect the economy?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    I was in London this week, first time abroad since pandemic began.

    Difference in behaviour is stark ,hardly anyone wearing masks relative to here ,in M+S in Kensington the other evening and my partner and I were only customers with masks on.


    Never once asked for vaccination cert



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,556 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I live in London and, yeah, compliance is a complete joke. I've an NHS passport but I've not used it once.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    I actually do know that I will die if I get Covid. In late November 2018 I got the Flu shot and then I caught the flu. I did not get over the flu until early March 2019. My immune system is fuucked and I have no B Cells so if I do get Covid, I know to expect the worst.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    Damn right I am angry at how the article was worded and I am not talking about the actions being taken. For starters, we should have looked after our elderly more and made sure that people who were in hospitals did not return to nursing homes with Covid.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement