Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

14504514534554561111

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    How am I supposed to prove their motivation? How would my ability to explain their motivation change whether this is a legitimate act by the State or not? How would your subjective opinion matter to the objective question of whether there should be covid passes for indoor dining? I'm willing to accept that they are acting with the best of intentions. Who cares? They are as likely to be right or wrong regardless of intention. This is a side-show. The approach of demanding proof of the nefarious/conspiracy is also a step along the road to classifying moderate people such as myself as extremists/fringe elements/conspiracy theorists/loonies. No proof of a conspiracy = if you're against it you're a conspiracy theorist.

    You say "other people are comparing these measures to the Holocaust". So what? I am not. But lets talk about comparisions if you wish.

    Seatbelts have a huge practical benefit, as you are well aware, and requiring their use involves no meaningful encroachment on civil rights.

    Certainly nothing that stands comparison to preventing the exercise of the right to attend a lawful event, associate with other people etc. The penalty for non-use of seatbelt = a fine and penalty points.

    No one has been able to set out what the comparable practicable benefit of retaining the covid pass thing would be. Everyone appears to accept that it will not meaningfully reduce the spread of disease. Further you are far more likely to get infected by a vaccinated person (that's just statistics). To the extent that the "disproportionate burden" line is trotted out (enticing as it is on a superficial level) that has never been the basis for restricting participation in society before, and rightly so.

    To the extent that outlandish comparisons are being made, the comparison between the law on seatbelts and the requirement to hold a covid pass to attend a lawful event is entirely outlandish.

    (ps yes if you get too many penalty points on the road your licence to drive is suspended. Driving is, in law, a privilege and not a right. Further, you're not suggesting there should be a similar approach taken to covid passes)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,831 ✭✭✭Healio


    This is the second time you have mentioned seat-belts today.

    The proper analogy for this; would be manufacturers not putting seat belts in a car being sold to someone unvaccinated. Or not selling to them at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,977 ✭✭✭Russman


    I took it because I didn't want to catch or spread COVID and all faff that goes along with that, including the very small risk of death, and having elderly parents. Same reason I took the flu jab, not because I'm afraid of flu, but if it reduces the chance of symptoms, it hopefully reduces the chances of having to do the whole "isolation, get tested" thing etc down the line that I would need to do if symptoms did present themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    How about never mentioning seat belts ever again?!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,284 ✭✭✭Allinall


    What have the Italians achieved by protesting?

    Have you seen the restrictions still in place in Italy?

    http://www.italia.it/en/useful-info/covid-19-updates-information-for-tourists.html



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I don't think my posts are for you, if you can't follow them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,222 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    I don’t need 20 words only one “coercion” only brought in so people would get vaccinated against a virus which is low risk to the vast majority of people.

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    Since Trump has no longer been president, a lot of major news outlets in the US are struggling more given they used to love to hate him. I hope the media here; RTE, Indo, Journal etc. all suffer as well for their shocking PR pieces during covid rather than doing proper analysis. All the journalists building up their profile based on covid clickbait, including health editors, will quickly lose out on this gravy train revenue source hopefully. However, drunk on Trump and covid, what are the odds the media will create a new clickbait topic to hype up? The climate? The best thing to do is to not support them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 542 ✭✭✭PhoneMain


    I agree to this if everyone stops making comparisons to the Holocaust!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,222 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    That’s a funny one I was sitting beside a fellow patron only a couple of days ago ranting on and on about everyone should jabbed , witness the same filthy patron use the toilet but not wash his hands.

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,828 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I took it for the broader reason of bringing life back to a degree of normality

    But there is no bad reason to take a vaccine so kudos



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,876 ✭✭✭bokale




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2 Loughlinn321


    What the French deem worthy or unworthy of a protest wasn’t the purpose of the analogy. My point was that when they feel aggrieved by their governments actions they engage in mass protests to express their discontent. The government constantly act without any regard for Irish people and while we complain, we don’t really do anything about it; and that’s in a wider sense than just their response to Covid-19 i.e the bank bail-out, housing crisis.. the list goes on. We can hardly expect them to change their ways when our only response to their actions is voting them back in election upon election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭US2


    99.7% of the adult population in Waterford is fully vaccinated


    Meaning, 0.3%, approximately 17 people, are now banned from pubs


    That'll fix it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 292 ✭✭Derkaiser93


    Do you show your passport at the airport? Or your ID at a nightclub? Or your drivers licence to the gards?

    This place has been taken over by schizo conspiracy nuts. Sad state of affairs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,828 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Think your figure is a bit off... if 17 people represent 0.3% of the population then that's an adult population of a little over 5,600

    I know the population of Waterford is about 116,000 so if 25% are under 16 (being generous) would suggest 87,000 are adults and about 260 are unvaccinated

    But if what you mean is why introduce vaccine certs for these people then yeah I get you. The thing is that we need to move as a country because if you say restrictions only for Dublin then Dubliners will flock to neighbouring counties for example



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,831 ✭✭✭Healio


    Which vaccine is it for a drivers licence these days?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,051 ✭✭✭Shelga


    What logical and understandable reasons do you personally have for not getting vaccinated? Am genuinely curious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 292 ✭✭Derkaiser93


    Id love to know what some of you nutjobs think the conspiracy and plan behind the vaccine cert is? These people who go on that we need to be brave and stop living in fear are afraid of a qr code?

    I'm fascinated to see how were going to move from these certs, which are no different to any other ID or legal doc such a a passport or drivers licence, go concentration camps, authoritarian regimes etc...

    These same people, had they been around during ww2, when people were ushered underground to avoid bombing raids, told to turn off their lights at night to make it hard for bomber planes to find towns, would be resting and crying about the authoritarian regimes they were living under, despite the fact they were indeed fighting against nazi Germany.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Your apparently held view that you should, in the current circumstances, need proof that you have had the required medical treatments (as determined by your government) to be allowed to exercise your basic civil rights represents a sad state of affairs.

    Comparisons between this and the following are not accurate:

    • passports (to which you are entitled as of right based on citizenship),
    • ID at a nightclub (Proof of age is available to everyone, as of right, and is checked for the purpose of restricting access to such premises to people over a certain age achieving a legitimate societal benefit),
    • and driving licences - the clue is in the name - driving is in law a privilege granted to those who demonstrate they have the necessary skills, and have not had the privilege restricted due to misbehaviour)

    I'm no conspiracy theorist by the way. Labeling legitimate dissenting voices as conspiracy theorists is at attempt to polarise, to win the argument by having people shouted down, and is very insulting.

    Why don't you instead set out what exactly the justification for the covid pass thing is? Then we can debate that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so



    You could start by not calling people who disagree with you names. It tends to undermine any claim of reasonable discourse you might have. Not everybody thinks like you nor follows this type of thread of logic. They are not planned as permanent impositions on people. The aim is to ensure that anybody visiting a hospitality establishment is vaccinated, theoretically to limit the potential spread of COVID, a measure forced on the government BTW by NPHET.

    Some people just dislike the discriminatory nature of that, especially when some of those who are not vaccinated may not be able to get vaccinated. 



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Comparisons between covid pass and holocaust are not appropriate*.

    But fighting Covid is like fighting against nazi Germany.

    It gets confusing around here.


    *as I said before I think they are unnecessary and unedifying, joking aside.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Taoiseach in Sligo suggesting that physical distancing will remain beyond this Friday. That seemingly rules out 50,000 plus for both the Ireland v Portugal soccer match and the rugby autumn internationals at the Aviva. No chance of 100% capacity for outdoor and indoor events for the foreseeable, if you take MM’s comments at face value



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Never had to show vaccine papers and an ID to go in somewhere to have cup of coffee or a bite to eat before this summer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 292 ✭✭Derkaiser93


    Driving a car is as much of a "civil right" as going into an pub indoors. All those certs I named are "descriminatory" against different groups.... Passports against "illegal" residents, ID against youth, drivers licence and insurance all against those who cannot drive. They're all in place as mechanisms of some sort, usually as a form of safety and health.

    Certain vaccinations have been required to enter some countries for a very long time way before covid also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,943 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    How do covid certs protect the public health?

    They don't fully eliminate transmission, the country is already 92% vaccinated, instead of stating that as a fact please explain exactly what you mean by "measures in place to protect the public health".

    Or don't if you wish, but your point won't hold much weight if you can't even show the basics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    I presume your talking that from RTE. Wouldn't be like them to not give the actual quote... he was asked about whats under consideration and he gave the standard answer that's been given for the last few days. Nothing extra was given away

    Here's the quote,

    Speaking to reporters in Sligo on Monday, he said: “The continuation of the Covid certs is certainly an item on the agenda as is mask wearing and so on."



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I've already said why your so-called comparators are not valid (in my view of course).

    Just to reiterate, driving is not a civil right. It's a privilege granted to people who demonstrate they can drive, and have not been disqualified. Proof of your age is available as of right. The only other one you mentioned was passports. Again available as of right based on citizenship.

    The question was, how do you justify retaining this Covid pass thing in the current circumstances in Ireland. Is your answer seriously "because it seems to me it's a bit like some other things that are not encroachments on civil liberties/everyone puts up with"?

    It's very notable that you put civil right in quotation marks. These are important things that should not lightly be interfered with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 292 ✭✭Derkaiser93


    But you have to show papers to drive a car or go abroad or go into a nightclub. Why is that okay and not causing you to hyperventilate your whole life?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,495 ✭✭✭showpony1


    what does Michael mean by examining use of antigen testing? they are going to ask locals to set up a tent outside to test vaccinated people? surely just won't happen.



Advertisement