Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Changes in the GAA - super thread

18788909293109

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Treble double




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭B2021M


    Does anybody know why they only want 8 teams in the knockouts? What difference would a few extra weeks allowing more teams in make in a 52 week year?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Treble double


    OK provincials played as a warm up competition, fair enough

    Then the leauge played as a normal leauge with relegation promotion and divisional winners, fair enough

    The leauge has no bearing on the championship apart from the fact that div 3 teams play in a secondary competition.

    So your Sam Maguire competition is a 20 team open draw straight knockout.

    So Kerry could draw Dublin in the first round and won of them is out after one game

    If you think that is superior to proposal b I give up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,741 ✭✭✭threeball


    Thats the nature of knockout competitions worldwide, thats why they call them knockout. The whole point is trying to remove the endless repetitive finals from the same 3 to 4 teams.

    And not getting to play in the all ireland is a pretty significant function of the league. Again all merit based. Every team has their own fortune in their hands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭B2021M


    Is there not only 8 teams in proposal B? How could the above not be superior to that?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,741 ✭✭✭threeball


    No idea, the whole idea is half assed. You're better off in division 2 as your chances of playing in the all ireland are far higher than if you play in division 1. For the yo yo teams, Roscommon, Cavan, Kildare etc. they get excluded at least every second year. Its a stupid format only slightly less stupid than we have at the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Treble double


    I don't understand, proposal b includes every county, results determine if you end up in Sam or Tailteann



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Treble double


    In proposal b everyone plays in the All Ireland competition, people are not getting their heads around this. The seven leauge games determine if you progress to the knock out stages or not



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,741 ✭✭✭threeball


    As do everyone in the proposal I made above except without the leap frogging. Its merit based. In proposal B, a team that plays leitrim, London,, Waterford, wicklow etc. gets favoured ahead of a team that had to battle against Dublin, Kerry, Tyrone etc. People very much have their head around it. Its the stupidity of the proposal they can't get their head around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Treble double


    In your proposal the leauge has no relevance to the championship only that division 3 teams aren't allowed compete in the main championship, the championship then is an open draw knockout which will have half the teams gone after 1 game. What we had pre covid was better than that.

    There is a reason why the majority of players are backing proposal b and I have explained it previously.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭B2021M


    Under proposal B 24 teams will be gone from the main championship before the first round. Do you understand that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭B2021M


    Results against teams of a different standard determine it. Not merit based at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Treble double


    I don't im afraid. This is how I understand it - The Premier competition guarantees every team in the country 7 games on a home and away basis in late Spring/early summer against teams of a similar standard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭B2021M


    And there is no longer a league as we knew it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭B2021M


    And you said to threeball above that half the teams would be gone after the first round under his proposal? Is his proposal not also a league giving teams games against teams of their own level in good weather? In fact they get more games with three divisions not four.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Treble double


    It is. But it has no bearing on the championship so its equivalent to what we have already only worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Treble double


    Exactly, the spring round robin provincial championship will replace the leauge as we knew it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Treble double


    As Colm O Rourke said in his colum today any county in the bottom 16 that doesn't vote for proposal b deserves to be left in outer darkness for all times.

    Michael Briody who headed up the CPA has also come on strongly in favour of it.

    Joe Brolly is against it as it diminishes the Ulster Championship, understandable, but one competitive province shouldn't hold back change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,741 ✭✭✭threeball


    To be honest after reading your post I think its you who doesn't understand how proposal B works. The 7 games in the league are the precursor to the knockout championship so teams get less games than in the format I mentioned (at least 3 less) and you also get 50% of the best teams dumped out for no reason other than it gives some division 3 and 4 teams a chance to get trounced by the big boys.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Treble double


    They are not the precursor to the championship, they are the championship and if you don't win enough of them you will be out of the championship, that's what gives them their prestige.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭B2021M


    This is the point.

    If the provincials are now not taken seriously then we will have a situation where three division one teams would really only play 7 matches in the whole year.

    As well as that, 6 teams in both div 3 and div 4 would be better off under the current system (with back door qualifiers)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,741 ✭✭✭threeball


    And how is that different to what I proposed above. You're clutching at straws now. Theyre both league based before a knockout stage. It seems you prefer to see teams leapfrogging others for no reason whatsoever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,741 ✭✭✭threeball


    I dont see how it improves the situation one bit. It only reduces hammering by reducing the number of weaker teams in the knockout stages. It also reduces the number of stronger teams. So we'll end up with farcical situations where the division 4 champs end up further into the competition than the bottom two teams in division one just so the smaller teams feel included. They'll still meet one of the top 5 in the first round in all liklihood and get a proper pasting from a team in full championship mode rather than going through the motions in May.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭B2021M


    I assumed the change (which is badly needed) would be more substantial while still being linked to the league.

    I just can't believe that the season will only now really comprise the league plus 7 knockout matches (main championship).

    There will be no serious intercounty competition from July to following April or May.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Treble double


    In your leauge where you finish in division 1 or 2 doesn't determine if you proceed further in the championship all teams go through to knock out, so I don't know why you have it tied in with the knock out competition, it has nothing to do with it.

    You are proposing a three division leauge, div 1 and 2 play for Sam in an open draw straight knockout competition and div 3 play in a separate knockout competition.

    Your championship is worse than what we already have



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 317 ✭✭Iecrawfc


    It seems some people are not grasping that the 7 games before the knock out phase are the championship, there is no point in having a round robin phase if all teams go through to the knockout phase anyway, teams and fans will treat those games as pre championship challenge games.

    I don't like the aspect of Div 3 and 4 teams getting into the playoffs or the fact that its easier to qualify from Div 2 than 1 though. I would have thought it might be better have Div 1 and 2 mixed together 8 in each and have top 4 in each going through, maybe also div 3 and 4 mixed with 8 in each, maybe the winners play off for entry to the Maguire Cup with both being promoted for the next year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Treble double


    Your spot on with your first paragraph

    In relation to your second paragraph, I would contend that there is no perfect solution to this but that proposal b comes nearest.

    Every team gets to compete for Sam

    Every teams gets the same amount of guaranteed games

    Weaker teams have a secondary competition when out of the main competition.

    The leauge phase games have real meaning because they determine your progression in the competition and will have real spice.

    It may be slightly weighted in favour of weaker teams, but I like it for this, it's about time that the weaker teams were giving a bit of hope.

    Yes 3 of the top 8 will be gone after the leauge phase and that seems a bit jarring, but they will be after playing 7 games against the contenders for the All Ireland and if they can't finish in the top 5 of these 8 teams obviously they are not good enough to win the competition and may as well be out at that stage as opposed to be beaten by one of the teams that finished ahead of them in the leauge phase later on in the knockout rounds.

    A Tyrone, Dublin, Kerry etc are still going to win the All Ireland but this structure gives a fair crack to all competitors.

    Plus I think it is proposed to have an all star team in every division which would be great and again give some exposure to the minnows



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,741 ✭✭✭threeball


    Of course there is reason to go as well as you can in a league. Why do teams bother trying to win a league now, because you become league champions or can get relegated, it also builds momentum. Teams in division 3 would be playing for the all ireland spot and have real momentum coming in. For division 2 teams a bad league could see you excluded from the championship for that year. Division one teams relegated will lose the meaningful competition in the top division if they get relegated and any chance of championship success is likely gone. Its not like to can flick a switch in July when the league ends and expect to be flying for the next 6 weeks to become champions. It just won't happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 683 ✭✭✭Rockfish


    Why are people still going on as if the championship is a separate competition than the league under proposal B? It's not, it is the league part of the championship, similar to group stages being part of the Champions league, World Cup etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    A lot of good points here by journalist Cahair O'Kane



    Shiny new championship has everyone smitten but it's not the right answer.



    "What is potentially coming in is not a bad system. It's close to being a very good one. It's just that its flaws are absolutely crippling. People have become completely smitten by the idea without studying the reality.

    Gaelic footballers are on the rebound from a decade of toxic defensive football and broken structures.


    Everyone’s looking at this brand new proposal for Gaelic football’s championship format, one that Tom Parsons says will “breathe new life” into the sport, and they’re comparing it to what we’ve had for so long.


    A pig in lipstick might still be a pig, but at least it has lipstick on.


    From the moment the GPA held their press conference and put their backing behind change, it has seemed almost inevitable that change is what will occur on October 23.


    The words of CEO Tom Parsons, co-chairperson Maria Kinsella and executive members Niall Morgan (Tyrone), Mickey Quinn (Longford) and Podge Collins (Clare) have never carried as much weight.


    No change in the GAA’s recent years has been more significant than the pace of change itself.


    An organisation that for so long had the whole place painted magnolia has gone full minimalist. There isn’t an autumn that passes now without some piece of the furniture being moved here or there.


    This is the mother and father of all changes though.




    Changing the championship structures so drastically after 130 years is not redecorating. It’s ripping it down to its foundations and starting over.


    Boardroom football stuff is exactly like politics. The average Joe takes a passing interest. They know what they hear on the news or read in the paper. They feel they have no voice. And they trust that people in positions of power and influence will do the right thing by them.


    On this occasion, I don’t blame the GPA one bit.


    Their comments are a true representation of the thoughts of the players they represent.


    A wave of momentum now moves behind changing the structures, one that will be hard for Special Congress to resist on Saturday.


    But in seeing all the flaws of what they currently have, are the players blinded by the shiny newness of what is now staring at them?


    Proposal B (as if GAA politics isn’t boring enough, they give it that sexy title) is very different from what we have at present.


    Moving the provincials into pre-season, de-linking them from the All-Ireland, and making that into a league-based competition ending with a last-eight knockout is about as radical a departure as you could imagine.


    The basic thinking seems to be that what we have hasn’t worked in quite a while, so no matter what you change it to, it can’t be any worse.


    It’s understandable and it’s not wrong.


    The proposal on the table is better than what we have at the minute.


    It has strong upsides. That it dilutes the provincial series, and de-links it from the championship proper, is the first prerequisite for meaningful change.


    The league has been far superior to championship for many years now and it only stands to sense that you should try to harness that in the process of revamping the championship structures.


    It would help bring greater balance to Kerry and Dublin’s ease of passage. They would be travelling into packed houses in Omagh, Clones, Ballybofey, Castlebar, and having to earn their top-four spot.


    The league portion of the championship, with the top teams repeatedly bashing off each other, will be great for spectators and players alike.


    And there are more games in a shorter timeframe, which means much fewer training sessions. That’s the best bit.


    There is no perfection in life, so getting a flawless championship structure will never happen.


    But we can still do better.


    What is potentially coming in is not a bad system. It’s close to being a very good one.


    It’s just that its flaws are absolutely crippling.


    People have become completely smitten by the idea without studying the reality.


    Firstly, a structure that rewards finishing top of Division Four above finishing sixth in Division One is not a good structure.


    A structure that gives the Division Four champions a tokenistic, undeserved place in the All-Ireland series is not a good structure.


    Secondly, repeated over even a few years, the siphoning of the better teams into their own mini eight-team league for seven games each is going to make breaking into that elite group more difficult than ever.


    Division One will be a diet of creatine and steak for the powerlifters, while the rest try to catch up using Pot Noodles and treadmills.


    Built into that, the lower tiers will receive even less attention than ever. Even if The Sunday Game was still on at breakfast time on Monday morning, it wouldn’t be long enough to show 16 football games every weekend.


    We do routinely and rightly genuflect at the altar of TG4 but their National League coverage is just as top-heavy as RTÉ’s championship coverage.


    When it comes to a potential weekend of Donegal v Tyrone, Dublin v Kerry, Armagh v Mayo and Kildare v Monaghan, who’s gonna want to watch anything outside the top tier?


    Taking the top 16 and bottom 16 back into the old 1A/1B/2A/2B, offering playoffs and making the knockout portion a last-16 rather than a last-eight would give the teams in what’s now Division Two and Four a far better chance of bridging the gap they face.


    Outside the established elites (Dublin, Kerry, Tyrone, etc), only two teams in the last decade have survived for more than two seasons in Division One. The jump is enormous and by the time Roscommon or Kildare or Meath are finding their feet, they’re relegated again.


    The question that it all poses is simple: Are we trying to affect change that makes the championship more attractive to an impatient younger generation drawn in by the bright lights of the big days?


    Or are we trying to make it a more equitable competition in the long-term, and ultimately protect football as a spectator sport for the next 50 years rather than the next five?


    Because the right glove doesn’t fit the left hand.


    The idea of change can quickly give way to the reality.


    Gaelic football is going into a marriage here, not a holiday romance. You don’t change your championship structures every turnabout. If football decides to go with this, we’re stuck with it.


    Footballers are notoriously as disinterested in boardroom politics as the general populace.


    How much does the GPA’s membership actually know about what they’re marrying into?


    This is too big a decision to get wrong.


    Special Congress should reject Proposal B, but on the premise that they go away, fix the glaring flaws and bring it back next year.


    Change is coming. We’ve waited 130 years for it. What’s one more to get it absolutely right?



Advertisement