Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Proposed New suckler Scheme

1246

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭paddysdream


    My understanding is that he is saying that those who take umbrage at discussion which even mention the possibility of any change use tradition as a reason for continued support over and above other farming sectors .

    The lack of interest from current generation in your area will hardly change with a suckler cow payment .Think the issue is bigger than that .

    I would of course love to farm here like my forefathers did ;few acres of sugar beet ,malting barley and spring wheat ,couple of acres turnips ,multiple suckled BWH cows , some bucket reared calves ,a field of hay for sale ,flock of sheep ,maybe a few store lambs and of course a workman which was the standard here for many many years .

    Things change ,maybe not always for the better but thats life .

    If people were honest and went with the approach of the suckler cow sub being a support for social good rather than the best way to produce beef then perhaps ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,747 ✭✭✭Mac Taylor


    he actually mentions that there is no tradition of sucking until the 90's which is what I have issue with........I have no interest going back to way my father started farming or for that matter has he. For the exact opposite reason I have no interest in the factory farming that SOME of the dairy farmers are following...........tonne after tonne of fertiliser etc etc. What we do works well with the land we have......low input and high value output. I just dont want to be a tool for the dairy industry trying to put meat on greyhounds (and again NOT ALL dairy farmers). I really hope that milk prices stay strong for a long number of years and that the race to the bottom is a long way off. Either way I'm out..........long live the division of the Irish farmer, god help us if we worked together as one voice....we could actually achieve something worthwhile.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 625 ✭✭✭dh1985


    How is the dairy cow not subsidised. Do the farmers not avail of SFP or the butter intervention scheme a couple year back or avail of TAMs for all these new parlours milking the 200 cows. Maybe if these schemes didn't exist there would be less pressure on the beef industry also. There has been a 50% increase in dairy cows in the last decade, a 15% decrease in sucklers and yet the sucklers are the ones driving down the cost of beef. I understand the point you are trying to make but have you thought that if everyone went at the dairy calf to beef that the price of the calf would increase due to demand and drove any profit there is in that down also. And then we would be producing animals solely reliant on UK market that had just left the EU and are free to deal with anyone.

    Also struggling to see how the Olympics in Tokyo or even a subdued Euros has any real impact on the price of beef. The hot weather maybe but the summer wasnt actually that great in the uk this year compared to there standard. More likely down to reduced supply in UK and europe and also food inflation

    I wouldnt hold my breath for an improvement in dairy calves either. He is only interested in two things. Less work and more milk. Either of these are not achieved by switching to more beef favourable bulls. Easy calvings and short gestations will still leave the beef man with a group of coat hangers out in the field.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,514 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    While there was a tradition of some suckler's along the west coast pre 1990, there was no tradition on better land of Suckler cows. I came from a hill farm in Kerry. There was 10-12 Suckler cows, 100 mountain ewes, we would rear anything from 12-20 Cal es as well. At one stage in the late '70 we were milking 3-4 cows for the creamery along with 1-2 cows for the house because it was more profitable than feeding the milk to the calves. We would normally milk 4-5 cows for the bucket reared calves. Milk was so strong in price there was no bucket reared calves bought in we only had the ones off the cows.

    But most farmers were going to the creamery rather than suckler's with there 30-50 gallons of milk every day. Quota's and bulk tanks wiped out the smaller producer. Most lads forget that during the quota era while you had to pay through the nose for milk quota in Glanbia, Dairygold, Golden Vale ( the co-op on the better land) you got as much as you wanted in Kerry and Connaught Gold for nothing as smaller milk producers exited production and switched to believe it or not suckler's.

    The advent of them on better land was that as dairy farmers got more efficient at production they stopped selling there calves/ stores so the drystock farmer on better land had to either go into sheep or suckler's.

    Where I ordinated from there was 30 -40 small dairy farmers there is none there now

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,187 ✭✭✭minerleague


    The issue isn't about a farmer single suckling or not ( everyone free to farm as they please ) but whether one type of farming is entitled to an extra payment that another does not get. All farmers can apply to Tams Bps etc. I know tillage farmers feel hard done by at the moment anyway. No single suckling around here ( md west ) either as a matter of interest before subsidies.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,528 ✭✭✭✭wrangler




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,528 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    They'd be foolish to lobby against it, why should they give a damn about how the farmer feels about it.

    Farmers will take money from any scheme they can get it from...... well I would've done so if it suited my system when I was farming



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 625 ✭✭✭dh1985


    Subsidies are subsidies whether the are for the cow, the shed the cow goes in, the product the cow produces or the for the farmers that farms the cow. The point I was making was that dairy beef is also subsidised. Not directly as heavily as sucklers maybe but to portray as non subsidised and standing completely on it's own four feet is inaccurate.

    The cow is only half the equation. The easy calving bulls been used heavily is a bigger issue. Watched a video of farmer Phil on a farm walk a few weeks back and he said he compared the performance of freisian stock bulls to ai AA and HE bulls aimed at the dairy market and the stock bulls out performed them well. He was making the point that he was finding these AI dairy bulls been used as poor performers compared to even a friesian stock bull. That wouldnt fill a man with confidence on the future quality for the dairy calf.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭paddysdream


    Again with the "dairy industry " stuff .Is it a religious thing or what that people seem to have an objection to "dairy" beef ?

    Beef is beef no matter where it comes from .

    And your thing about the division in Irish farming ;that's a real "everybody's out of step with my Johnny " type statement .Its the suckler cow man having a tantrum that's gonna cause that .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭paddysdream


    Another who will stay at sucklers until they are losing money .Would 100 a cow sub. keep you at them if they were only breaking even ?

    If 20 cows can pay all the household bills ,pay for two cars and the holidays etc then what the fcuk are all the rest at ?

    Thats what ? 40/50k a year so a net margin of 2k per cow .If I knew sucklers could give that return then I would keep a few in the morning .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭paddysdream


    To a dairy farmer the calf is not the be all and end all of it .The milk production is what its about .Would a calf worth a bit extra be worthwhile to him if it meant milk production was lessened ?

    Yes ,I agree subs are subs no matter what they are dressed up as market support ,investment on farm ,environmental schemes etc etc .What we are then arguing about is the means to collect that sub .So if it was decided tomorrow morning that jersey cross calves would get all the subsidy payment would people be happy to keep them ?

    Betcha people would be out complaining about getting rid of their lovely cows with generations of breeding behind them and having to look at shivery little coloured rags in the field .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    I do three types of farming, I have suckler cows, I rear dairy calf to beef & I buy stores for beef. I sell between the Mart & the factory. Of the three the suckler is consistently the best preforming & takes up less of my time than the rearing dairy calves. My cows are average cows that have been bred on the farm for years, they are easy managed, quite & know when they see me opening gates that they are been moved & generally move along freely. From May until October, I walk thru them twice a day to ensure all is ok and that's about the height of the work. The next best paying is buying stores, but you need to be able to spend time around the ring for that, as there is skill in picking cattle that will go on for u. Never by group as there is always a dodge in there somewhere, you also need to keep an eye on movements & ages, loosing 20 -30 cent / kg on an animal can be the difference between profit & loss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 625 ✭✭✭dh1985


    That's the point I am making paddy regarding the calves. The dairy men want the best outcome for themselves, dont we all,and expecting them to start producing better beef calves for the beef man is a unlikely occurrence if it impact there bottom line regarding milk outputs. So the talk from bass of the diary calf improving in recent times is a false narrative.

    On the subs side of it I said i agree, disagree or even mention additional suckler subsidies. I was addressing the fact all sectors of farming are subsidised to a certain degree including dairy calf to beef.

    If the Jersey calf was subsidised there would be men to farm them too!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,514 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    This is it, the BETTER calf to beef farms were only set up in the last couple of years. There was absolutely no research done in the 2010-2016 period when Teagasc and Jack Kennedy were pushing the Greenfield model and the JE cross breds. There was multiple research done on rearing dairy heifers and huge attempt to try to encourage beef farmers to go rearing dairy heifers for these better dairy farmers. However the spending was miniscule compared to the spending on Suckler research.

    There has being absolutely no research done on dairy calf to beef until 2-3 years ago except for U16 month FR bulls. I actually had a discussion with a Teagasc advisor involved they were showing a margin of 10-150/ unit. I made the point that such a system was unsustainable, his point was you needed numbers. I made the point that 200 would leave you 25k.......for that you had to rear 200 calves and feed 200 bulls at the same time. After thinking about it for over a minute he just walked away. You need to be working at it full-time from Jan-May.

    All the research at present Is for finishing as many as possible off grass during the second season.....what a about all year around beef supply. Instead we seemed to be looking for an answer in the lowest priced time of year for beef. There is more research done on meal feeding to cattle( mainly Suckler bred) than on dairy X cattle production. It's hard to believe 65-70% of our total beef production is from the dairy herd.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,634 ✭✭✭Dunedin


    apologies, just to clarify that the household bills I was referring to were house insurance, electricity, broadband, Car (2) and jeep insurance, car and jeep tax, jeep DOE and circa 5k on holidays. There'd be other bits and bobs but that would be main parts. all in circa 10-15k. 60 acre farm, average 10 hours a week over the year. Being honest, I do enjoy the sucklers. have a decent set up so work is at a minimal and farm is all in one block which eliminates a lot of work that others might have with a fragmented farm. but I do invest a bit into the farm each year on facilities or anything I think will make life easier for me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,634 ✭✭✭Dunedin


    Including SFP. If I wasn’t farming I wouldn’t be getting a SFP. My neighbour owns a shoe shop and he doesn’t get it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,634 ✭✭✭Dunedin


    😂😂😂 cows are most definitely paying for themselves. And I’ll keep them until such time as they’re not. 😉😉



  • Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They should look at sequestration measures as part of any scheme.

    Doesnt take many trees to cover the carbon of a diesel car for a year.

    Why dont they look at retrofitting cars to run on gas and look in to biogas generation from agri? Could it be the fact that fuel is about 90 cent tax?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭Easten


    One point that people miss is that the Government does not have to provide a Suckler scheme. This could happen in the future as there is a lot of pressure coming from the climate change lobby groups now all over the world. And with all these new data centers being built they are going to have to reduce the carbon footprint somehow, and sur who's the easy soft target for them only the suckling farmer.Farmers already get a sfp which is decoupled from production. If the Government want to reduce the Suckler cow numbers in Ireland all they have to do is get rid of this scheme, and as an added bonus half of the farmers would end up planting the land if the throw a few quid extra in for them.


    The mad thing about it would be the poor oul suckler farmer would then be money in, the biggest losers would be Larry, the marts and Co-ops.

    Also the farmers journal as nobody would be buying that rag anymore!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,514 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    What you are saying makes common sense, but common sense is not that common. With a movement of BPS from the east of the country west there is a case for no further increase in Suckler cow funding. Most farmers along the west coast have seen an increase in there BPS over the last 5years and will again see an increase over the next few years. If a farmer wants to subsidize the Suckler cow and processor's out of his BPS so be it.

    I was down in Kerry a couple of weeks ago and there is an increased interest in sheep with the stronger sheep price. A lad able to wean 0.8-0.9 lambs per ewe is making a few bob. You would keep 8-10 mountain ewes where you keep a large Suckler cow. There would be less work. Store lambs are making over 2/kg. On 100ewes that is probably 6k plus in sales.

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,330 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    It’d not go to trees, the better will be leased to Dairy farmers or you’d see more dairy heifer rearing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,330 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    When you getting your flock number?

    Sheep farming isn’t easy, like all other farming in a good setup it can be ran alongside a full time job



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    other sectors may well rue the demise of the suckler cow.

    farming remains a political force in this country largely due to the large number of small beef farmers. 10 suckler Farmers with 10 cows each are worth more votes than 1 dairy farmer with 100



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 665 ✭✭✭josephsoap


    I often ‘tune’ into Elphin mart on a Monday evening - what I cannot understand is the price of in-calf sucklers heifers there - you rearly see one going for less than €2000.


    €2000 to €2500 seems to be a standard price.


    just thinking now - I would be better selling in calf heifers instead of running sucklers 😁



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 1,937 Mod ✭✭✭✭Albert Johnson


    Elphin caters mostly to lads farming better quality land (by West of Ireland standards) and is renowned for getting entries of top quality continental cattle. Therefore you wouldn't have much business showing middling type springers about it. There's lots of lads there to buy the tops of springers all year round, think of Martin O'Connors, Doorleys and more that have annual sales that achieve headline price's.

    That's not say that there's no good incalfs in any other mart around and indeed I often saw better value elsewhere for comparable stock. However you'd see a greater variety as regards quality in a few of the neighbouring marts. Take Castlerea for example there'd be a more mixed bag of springers about it and you're still in Co. Roscommon.

    As for producing springers it's not a simple task either imo. You'll have to buy the heifers to start with, anything nice and ready to bull straight away will be strong money all year round. If you want something flashy that will sell well again then you'll pay for them but lesser type heifers are harder sold and won't make the headlines when the time comes. Then you've to get them incalf (there'll be an odd expensive beef heifer no matter what you do) and carry to near calving. You'll have to hope that Tb doesn't become an issue or you'll be back at the suckling regardless of your wishes. Finally you'll have to get new homes for them and hope that they do the business to gain repeat custom. It will take a few years to get a name at the springer trade and as with everything you could sell 100 good ones and hear nothing but sell 1 bad one and watch what happens.

    It's not something I'd bother with tbh, between genomic ratings, stars, calving dates, calf sex, in vogue colours ect I don't know how lad's do it. There was a man locally who used to sell lots of springers year's back. He'd buy a nice heifer of any colour and put them with whatever mongrel of a bull he had at the time. When they'd start springing they'd land back into the mart again and announced as "Running with the half halfbred LM bull, time and appearance". No guarantee of times, no scanning or talk of stars etc and lad's would buy away at them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,514 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I see the Rag is trying to create panic again about Suckler farmers. Basically they are highlighting that full time intensive larger suckler's farmers will see there BPS payment fall. No mention that extensive, smaller part-time lads will see there's rise and similar with extensive sheep farmers. Once again they are taking the example of the 1-2 per parish as opposed to the majority.

    It an article by some Tool of a journalist so we should not be tool surprised. Selective analysis of a situation. The Rag must have some research done that only intensive Suckler farmers buy the rag

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭grassroot1


    God bass if it wasn't for yourself and Jameson running down suckler cows and supporters this thread would have died long ago



  • Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If you figure sheep are less work than sucklers, get a few. I could save you the experience by saying don't get them though. They're a ton of labour and meeting the neighbours.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    I noticed that Grassroot, they seem to have a dislike for suckler farmers and don't seem to understand that every farm isn't suitable for rearing the dairy industrys cast aways. I was over west for a few days & only suckler cows could turn anything out of this type of land

    20210818_123429.jpg




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,634 ✭✭✭Dunedin


    I had sheep from when I was 12 years old. Absolutely loved them and constant battle with the father to see could keep more ewes.

    got out in 2008 and if I got 100 ewes for nothing now, I firstly shoot the lad that gave them to me (in case he brought more) and similar faith to the ewes then.



Advertisement