Advertisement
We've partnered up with Nixers.com to offer a space where you can talk directly to Peter from Nixers.com and get an exclusive Boards.ie discount code for a free job listing. If you are recruiting or know anyone else who is please check out the forum here.
If you have a new account but can't post, please email Niamh on [email protected] for help to verify your email address. Thanks :)

Proposed New suckler Scheme

«1345678

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,094 ✭✭✭ 893bet


    I assume you can increase number but just your payment won’t adjust?



  • Registered Users Posts: 846 ✭✭✭ Anto_Meath


    That would be common scene and acceptable, but the line in the Argi Land article states "The scheme will prevent a participant increasing their suckler cow numbers over the course of the contract" and where you reduces numbers the new lower number will become the reference number. It seem all to be about getting cow numbers reduced.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,094 ✭✭✭ 893bet


    What if they take the reference year as two years ago or last year and you had increased in the meantime.

    What if you got locked up with TB and a loaf of incalf heifers you planned on selling calved down etc.

    I think that it will be clarified.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭ Dozer1


    I'd kept my cow numbers up last 2 years and a new ref year had to be coming but even still they'll find a way of screwing it up



  • Registered Users Posts: 124 ✭✭ Seanhorse91


    What do ye make of the fact we’d have to be Bord Bia approved? I never bothered with it before as we sell our cattle live, and I didn’t want the headache of all the paperwork.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 707 ✭✭✭ mr.stonewall


    It has been a trend to add the QA to scheme. It was part of beam.

    Very little work needed to get QA sorted, Just in general a mindset, to get the paperwork in order and then it an easy job to keep it on top of it.

    Loads of boxes to tick and its just a matter off keeping them ticked.

    Lots of resources and aids out there to keep the records in orders. Even a simple thing like just having a separate email for the farm, vet will email statment and prescrtions, feed supplier now is gone paperless and emails statments and invoices, that will keep at lot of paperwork together in one place. Little and often is the key and doing it as you go is the key.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,345 ✭✭✭ Grueller


    Any hints or leaks as to the proposed payment rates? That will be the detail the scheme succeeds or fails upon.



  • Registered Users Posts: 707 ✭✭✭ mr.stonewall


    Looking at bdgp and beep you have a combo of approx 160/ head. Probably will see them drop it to sub 150/head to fund the other schemes. Doing this will slowly reduce suckler numbers



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,907 ✭✭✭ Base price


    It's really looking like an us and them type situation.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭ grassroot1


    Unless QA is paid on slaughtered suckler cows they can shove Bordbia

    The suckler cow is being made the scapegoat for dairy expansion



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,239 ✭✭✭✭ Bass Reeves


    The purpose of this is to support existing Suckler cows mainly west of the Shannon. However it also want to prevent expansion.

    I totally agree with preventing expansion. According to the rag there is a proposal to pay up to 300/ cow. If that proposal was enacted without any limit on expansion there is a lot of lads that would up cow numbers by far more than one or two.

    There is other options to expand keep cattle longer or go down the finishing route. Looking at AA prices and the fact that Suckler farmers can get the 20c bonus an R grading AA bullock at 300 kgs DW will gross 1400 euro. A 280 kg DW heifer will gross over 1300. A 370 kg DW bullock will gross 1700 euro. Sheep is another option. Hill lambs will make 2+/kg this Autumn.

    For lads on fairish land that has to be considered as an option. The reason ewes are not limited is that last year was we imported the 700k lambs in carcasse form for processing.

    The last thing we want is more beef so processor's can pocket the 100 -130 euro extra you get along with another 50-100 off every animal fattened from the dairy system actually think it a retrograde step. There should have been no extra money targeted at suckler's if anything reduce the money and let suckling wither on the Vine. The only reason the processors want them is for winter fattening.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,554 ✭✭✭ Say my name


    It's taking the precedent set by the Beam scheme and how the uptake was received.

    Post edited by Say my name on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,031 ✭✭✭ Jjameson


    So Adam woods, the ifj, and meat industry Ireland want a full on suckler payment with no cap on numbers! For the benefit of whom!! The only cow should be a cow producing both meat and milk IMO bar pedigree, very marginal land/extensive enviro systems. This is money that that will wind up straight in the accounts of the processing cartel.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,031 ✭✭✭ Jjameson




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,031 ✭✭✭ Jjameson


    Keeping cows for social welfare payment for the production of subsidised beef for a cartel of processors is wrong. Cormac Healy would join the ifa in lobbying for 300€ payment free for all numbers.

    a bucket reared black whitehead will do as well on marginal land as a lactating cow and calf duo.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,214 ✭✭✭ Barktastic


    They need to look at Carbon in a more holistic sense for any farming enterprise.

    Its silly to pit farmers against each other.

    Plenty of farms could already be considered carbon neutral (or carbon efficient) if proper assessments were done.

    Say farmers that produce with low carbon inputs and high sequestration etc.

    Alternative options should be looked at. The EU subsidies to cut carbon have flopped.

    Why not scrap the likes of teagasc and instead push the money towards younger and innovative farmers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,214 ✭✭✭ Barktastic


    Arent these just the same old ideas repackaged and fired out again?


    Why not subsidise a carbon survey and base payment around that?


    Classic lazy government solution, throw money at the problem instead of look at the bigger picture.


    People think dairying is this magic bullet solution to farming. If we all go milking cows then what will happen?


    Like a part time set up where someone like to work and farm wouldnt be ideal for dairying.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,105 ✭✭✭✭ wrangler


    I'm sure if you kept your beef calves it's likely they were well bred, but there's ahuge amount of calves sold that are only screws and when they're on adlib milk for 4 weeks it's diffficult not to be caught out by them.

    But for that problem rearing calves is a lovely system, no night calving, wild cattle or dangerous cows to tolerate



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,031 ✭✭✭ Jjameson


    lets reduce the suckler herd that was only put there with subsidies, kept with subsidy, and is still has its advocates crying for more subsidy, and replace them with the dairy/dairy cross calves. Concentrate on extensive grass based tender,marbled quality British market beef rather than European spec commodity.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,239 ✭✭✭✭ Bass Reeves


    Whether any of us like it or not calves from dairy cows will be there as will the cull cows themselves. Neither the dairy industry nor the Irish beef industry or Irish agriculture in general can afford mass slaughter of calves. IMO yes like you have posted export of calves will come under pressure sooner rather than later.

    However look at the price Irish farmers paid for calves at stages this spring. Once again they out competed exporters for Friesian calves. For all the talk about quality it has bottomed out and is improving. I no longer see the large number of first cross JE around, the second cross is as good as run of the mill Friesians if done right.

    On DNA testing it would be more appropriate to DNA test dairy farmers stock bulls. However the big question is would marts display this infor and could your average run of the mill farmer interprete it. The only real pity about DBA testing in Agriculture is absolutely no DNA testing of farmers has taken place.

    Just one thing to remember when beef farming it takes 2okgs DW extra and a rise in grade excluding QA to make 100 euro extra on a carcasse

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,038 Mod ✭✭✭✭ blue5000


    As a suckler farmer I'm getting burnout from keeping up with all these schemes, I couldn't even begin to list them all. Our DG co-ordinator tells us of one lad who doesn't bother with any of them he just gets farm assist instead! I think a calf registration amnesty would simplify things.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,171 ✭✭✭ alps


    What do you mean by a calf registration amnesty?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,038 Mod ✭✭✭✭ blue5000


    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,239 ✭✭✭✭ Bass Reeves


    It never going to happen. It up to farmers to manage out of it themselves. Unless you are doing it accross a complete herd and are 3-5 months out of cycle it's not really an issue. It immaterial now with the bull game gone and while weight limits are not in place this year they could haunt us next year

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 644 ✭✭✭ Sugarbowl


    I don’t know any suckler farmer who has the exact same number of cows calving every year... it always fluctuates depending on culls/replacement heifer/recycled cows. Looks like with this if you drop any bit you will have to stay down.



Advertisement