Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Are you concerned about the destruction of the natural world and climate change?

13468926

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,727 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    No one's saying to stop flying, I just mean things need to change, in my opinion, which means nothing really!



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    Anyone else think the likes of Concern jumping on the climate bandwagon is a shameless greenwash



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,857 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    Things seem to have become particularly apocalyptic the last few weeks and probably rightly so.

    Do I feel worried about it. Yes. I figure all things going well I've about 40-45 years before I check out so I hope it happens after that but some recent reports, especially a revisiting of an MIT paper from the 70s show that we've hit all the markers which show a societal collapse in the next 20 years. If that was true that's some scary ****. I mean even billionaires are hedging their bets by purchasing land on lifeboat countries that have been judged the best places to see this out. Luckily enough for us we're one of them but Ireland itself isn't particularly well adapted to deal with weather extremes. We look OK from afar with the amount of rain we get but we don't have the vegetation to deal with droughts and the like.

    I find it funny that people mention carbon capture technology etc. Its always some far flung idealist technology like nano mirrors that reflect heat or factories that suck carbon from the air. The moronic thing that trees, healthy soil, peatlands, the ocean.... have been doing it for millennia. They've had plenty time to perfect the process and in the last couple of hundred years we've decided to bulldoze everything in sight giving little credence to the minor things around us that play a part in that process. From the way I see it, we need cede a bit towards nature and give it a chance to recover. I think either way its going to happen with or without us.

    Do I think we can change? No. I think such is our standard of living that any change to that will be met with kicking and screaming. If I had kids, I'd be absolutely **** terrified!



  • Registered Users Posts: 43,024 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Where is that Ice Age today that primary school children were threatened with in the 1980’s?



  • Registered Users Posts: 733 ✭✭✭Heraclius


    It is true that some scientists in the 70s predicted we were imminently heading for an ice age but it was far from a majority position though it got a lot of media coverage. Some scientists being wrong in 1970 or even 1980 isn't a good argument against basically all climate science now though. Vastly more evidence has been gathered and analysed and show a world which is, on average, warming .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 256 ✭✭Crybabygeeks


    I find it extremely worrying and frustrating at the same time. It's the futility of individual efforts that's a killer. Sure every little bit helps but me recycling and cutting back on meat won't do s**t if there are billions burning coal all over the world. Change will have to be policy and government driven with the largest countries leading the way. Their appetite so far? Underwhelming :(



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,282 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Registered Users Posts: 733 ✭✭✭Heraclius


    Thanks for finding that! I was trying to put numbers on it but couldn't find a good source myself.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,795 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Ever think we might be nearer the end of that period of decades than the beginning?

    You know, as a race we are just so terribly arrogant. We believe now that we've managed to wreck the climate (and we have contributed) and we believe also that we can repair it. Maybe we can't.

    Twice in the 19th Century, two Volcanoes erupted in the South Seas, big enough to eliminate summer for a period after and create crippling winters and localised famine. That was when the population of Earth was less than 1 Billion.

    Just one more of those eruptions, say tomorrow and all that climate change will be reversed in an instant. Global agriculture would die off and everyone dependent on solar power would be fecked, at least for a while. In other words, let us not sweat the small stuff.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,282 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    "Twice in the 19th Century, two Volcanoes erupted in the South Seas, big enough to eliminate summer for a period after and create crippling winters and localised famine. That was when the population of Earth was less than 1 Billion."

    you mean a single volcano (on two separate occasions, thus providing a little bit of repeated proof) was able to measurably change the weather (or climate), but all the influence we can bring to bear, could not?

    surely a single volcano being able to have a measurable impact - even without our modern technology to measure the effects - could be used as proof as to how easy it could be for humans to have an effect?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,118 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,795 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    No, I don't. I mean Mount Tambora in 1815 and Krakatoa in 1883.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You don't have to go as far as the Amazon to see habitat destruction, just take a walk to your nearest river. The damage is here already. It's been a gradual process so people don't really see the decline year on year but our waterways as badly damaged. Likewise, despite our fields looking green, they really aren't all that healthy. Sad to think we're living in a dying landscape but we are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 733 ✭✭✭Heraclius


    I'm missing the point though. Just because large volcanic eruptions can cause temporary cooling doesn't mean that we shouldn't change our behaviours that are causing warming.



  • Registered Users Posts: 960 ✭✭✭Triangle


    This is by far the most progressive government on green initiatives - and all thanks to the handfull of greens in government.

    If you think all they have done is rollout a handfull of charging stations, you're letting your emotions cloud facts. Or just trying to spread trumpisms and misinformation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,727 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Funny how theres no one catching people or bringing councils to task about mowing hedges to nothing during nesting season. They dont seem to give a sh1t about biodiversity. Do provide examples where greens are doing anything beyond infighting, windowboxes and (lol) wolves and cheering an electric car I cant afford. I see some hooh hah about public transport, you know, for the poors but very little being actually done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,423 ✭✭✭jackboy


    They are frauds. They are doing very little to protect and restore habitats. Industrial scale destruction is still taking place. The greens are part of the carbon cult now and this is a priority for them over protecting the environment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,727 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    The carbon cult ffs. How do you suggest the minority Greens in gov restore habitats? CPO land? They'll be gone from Gov after the next election anyway, if you think lack of action is bad now it'll be even worse when they're gone.



  • Registered Users Posts: 733 ✭✭✭Heraclius


    They've also only been in government for four years in the whole history of the state so it seems weird to blame them and not mention FF and FG.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,282 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    the green party are in a weird situation where (many) people claim they're totally ineffectual, yet at the same time, credit them with being responsible for pretty much everything the person doesn't like.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,727 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    You see it all the time. Water pollution, closed swimming areas, rubbish on beaches, people start going on about it being the Greens fault because they in Government.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,783 ✭✭✭GoneHome


    OP to answer your initial question, I'd be more concerned about the destruction the Green Party are trying to bring to rural Ireland, the rules and regulations they are proposing in the name of climate action will cause absolute carnage to rural farming communities such as mine here in rural county Limerick, they haven't a god damn clue about rural Ireland, and as for that bell end Eamonn Ryan, don't even get me started. I intentionally gave the Green Party the very last number on my ballot paper at the last GE and I fully intend doing the same at the next GE.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,727 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Lol. Ok I'm not sure how that's relevant to the possible collapse of civilisation, it's hilarious people like you think the status quo can remain though .



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,857 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    Good to see the bigger picture being observed there. Any destruction the greens would make to rural Ireland are a drop in the ocean compared to changes in rainfall patterns here and the possible disappearance of our temperate climate.

    FFS there is a lad on the farming forum remarking how this year's weather has been all over the place being too cold/wet and warm/dry. That seems to be the issue with agriculture here, its too reliant on absolutely perfect conditions for growing feed/fodder and if it varies slightly from that (which it will do, they lads there themselves are remarking it themselves) the whole system falls apart. Then they have to start importing fodder. Christ the whole thing is mad when you think about it.

    What are the greens trying to do which is possibly more detrimental than that? As one poster above put it, they've barely ever been in power and they simultaneously get blamed for being too ineffectual whilst also having implemented disastrous policies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,727 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    If the rainfall patterns do change they'll still blame the greens for not doing anything when in power. It's pointless squabbling like this.

    I would think everyone's life would need to change in the western world, if we wanted to actually take action, whether living in a city or a rural farmer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,827 ✭✭✭acequion


    Op while you started a great thread here and an important topic to discuss I think you need to respect that some people, like that poster, are much more worried by real and current threats to their livelihoods and way of life than of possible apocalyptic scenarios in the future. Many people are already very overwhelmed with day to day worries and environmental issues come well down the list.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,727 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    And this is why we are screwed. People are only thinking in the short term and about themselves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,827 ✭✭✭acequion


    But that's human nature. You've stated you don't have kids. People who do are far more concerned about day to day issues such as providing for them as many people's livelihoods have been destroyed by the prolonged Covid regulations. I respect your worry for the planet but I'm simply pointing out that others have more immediate and more tangible worries and that's acceptable and understandable. Not a solution for the environment but still very understandable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,727 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    There's an article about climate change on the journal now and people are going on about it being a money grab and that they support green measures if it's cheap.

    I just don't get how any reasonably intelligent person can't grasp that we may need to live differently and be inconvenienced, it's so disheartening.



Advertisement