Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Proposed New suckler Scheme

«13456

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,146 ✭✭✭893bet


    I assume you can increase number but just your payment won’t adjust?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    That would be common scene and acceptable, but the line in the Argi Land article states "The scheme will prevent a participant increasing their suckler cow numbers over the course of the contract" and where you reduces numbers the new lower number will become the reference number. It seem all to be about getting cow numbers reduced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,146 ✭✭✭893bet


    What if they take the reference year as two years ago or last year and you had increased in the meantime.

    What if you got locked up with TB and a loaf of incalf heifers you planned on selling calved down etc.

    I think that it will be clarified.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,232 ✭✭✭Dozer1


    I'd kept my cow numbers up last 2 years and a new ref year had to be coming but even still they'll find a way of screwing it up



  • Registered Users Posts: 188 ✭✭Seanhorse91


    What do ye make of the fact we’d have to be Bord Bia approved? I never bothered with it before as we sell our cattle live, and I didn’t want the headache of all the paperwork.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    It has been a trend to add the QA to scheme. It was part of beam.

    Very little work needed to get QA sorted, Just in general a mindset, to get the paperwork in order and then it an easy job to keep it on top of it.

    Loads of boxes to tick and its just a matter off keeping them ticked.

    Lots of resources and aids out there to keep the records in orders. Even a simple thing like just having a separate email for the farm, vet will email statment and prescrtions, feed supplier now is gone paperless and emails statments and invoices, that will keep at lot of paperwork together in one place. Little and often is the key and doing it as you go is the key.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,258 ✭✭✭Grueller


    Any hints or leaks as to the proposed payment rates? That will be the detail the scheme succeeds or fails upon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    Looking at bdgp and beep you have a combo of approx 160/ head. Probably will see them drop it to sub 150/head to fund the other schemes. Doing this will slowly reduce suckler numbers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,348 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    It's really looking like an us and them type situation.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,760 ✭✭✭Birdnuts


    Don't see the point in this nonsense when the main expansion in numbers is via Dairy



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭grassroot1


    Unless QA is paid on slaughtered suckler cows they can shove Bordbia

    The suckler cow is being made the scapegoat for dairy expansion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,957 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The purpose of this is to support existing Suckler cows mainly west of the Shannon. However it also want to prevent expansion.

    I totally agree with preventing expansion. According to the rag there is a proposal to pay up to 300/ cow. If that proposal was enacted without any limit on expansion there is a lot of lads that would up cow numbers by far more than one or two.

    There is other options to expand keep cattle longer or go down the finishing route. Looking at AA prices and the fact that Suckler farmers can get the 20c bonus an R grading AA bullock at 300 kgs DW will gross 1400 euro. A 280 kg DW heifer will gross over 1300. A 370 kg DW bullock will gross 1700 euro. Sheep is another option. Hill lambs will make 2+/kg this Autumn.

    For lads on fairish land that has to be considered as an option. The reason ewes are not limited is that last year was we imported the 700k lambs in carcasse form for processing.

    The last thing we want is more beef so processor's can pocket the 100 -130 euro extra you get along with another 50-100 off every animal fattened from the dairy system actually think it a retrograde step. There should have been no extra money targeted at suckler's if anything reduce the money and let suckling wither on the Vine. The only reason the processors want them is for winter fattening.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,763 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    It's taking the precedent set by the Beam scheme and how the uptake was received.

    Post edited by Say my name on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    Lots of farms don't suit dairy so that isn't an option. I have no problem with a quota on the number of cows that are allowed in any scheme been capped at at a previous reference. But the idea that if you have an extra cow or two you will be penalised is wrong. I keep around 20 cows, some years I might only calf 18, others it could be 22. By the jist of this I would have a quota of 20, then the year I drop to 18 that becomes my new quota and I get penalised the following year when I am back up at 20. That's just not right. St Colmcille is reputed to have say the day will come when you will deny your own cow at your gate. This looks to be the start of it.....

    Post edited by Anto_Meath on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They need to look at Carbon in a more holistic sense for any farming enterprise.

    Its silly to pit farmers against each other.

    Plenty of farms could already be considered carbon neutral (or carbon efficient) if proper assessments were done.

    Say farmers that produce with low carbon inputs and high sequestration etc.

    Alternative options should be looked at. The EU subsidies to cut carbon have flopped.

    Why not scrap the likes of teagasc and instead push the money towards younger and innovative farmers.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Arent these just the same old ideas repackaged and fired out again?


    Why not subsidise a carbon survey and base payment around that?


    Classic lazy government solution, throw money at the problem instead of look at the bigger picture.


    People think dairying is this magic bullet solution to farming. If we all go milking cows then what will happen?


    Like a part time set up where someone like to work and farm wouldnt be ideal for dairying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,258 ✭✭✭Grueller


    I still have about 40 of them here alongside a dairy herd. I run them on an outfarm and calve them in the Autumn,from about now on.

    After the last two days with these cooonts I will not apply for this scheme regardless if it offers €500 per eligible cow. They are pure and utterly hardship and as far as I can see, the only reason lads like them.is that they haven't tried any other farming system.

    I have kept on a batch of beef crosses from the dairy herd this year and they are a pure pleasure to deal with by comparison. I expect them to leave as much or more money as well for a small fraction of the workload and hardship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,224 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    I'm sure if you kept your beef calves it's likely they were well bred, but there's ahuge amount of calves sold that are only screws and when they're on adlib milk for 4 weeks it's diffficult not to be caught out by them.

    But for that problem rearing calves is a lovely system, no night calving, wild cattle or dangerous cows to tolerate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    Dairy beef breeding needs a serious step up. Keep selling crap and your market will disappear. If the DAFM want dairy beef they are going to have to put structures in place to serious improve quality.

    I think it's time to seriously look to DNA sampling calves at birth.having proof to dam and sire, when fed into the icbf database will seriously help sort the issue of calf quality. EBI needs to be weighted better to calf quality. I don't have the exact figure but I would hazard a guess that the average number of locations for a dairy cow is 4.5. That would mean that at about 3 of these calves are going to end up as beef.

    Going to throw it out there and I know I will be shot down by some, but it has merit. If dairy farmers had to keep calves to 42 days, I personally feel, it would change the mindset to calf quality greatly. Big difference in having to look at feeding a calf for an extra 30 days.

    I have both sucklers and dairy beef here and you will get caught out with a few screws of dairy calves. I would say that it is running at about 20%. These really hurts the bottom line as they are around for so long.

    Something has to change quickly with calf quality, or else calves are going to be left on dairy farms. I can see in the next 5 years the export of calves coming to a halt or the age at which export can happen being pushed out. If this came to fruition, where will this stock be kept. Oh wait let's reduce the suckler herd



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,957 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Whether any of us like it or not calves from dairy cows will be there as will the cull cows themselves. Neither the dairy industry nor the Irish beef industry or Irish agriculture in general can afford mass slaughter of calves. IMO yes like you have posted export of calves will come under pressure sooner rather than later.

    However look at the price Irish farmers paid for calves at stages this spring. Once again they out competed exporters for Friesian calves. For all the talk about quality it has bottomed out and is improving. I no longer see the large number of first cross JE around, the second cross is as good as run of the mill Friesians if done right.

    On DNA testing it would be more appropriate to DNA test dairy farmers stock bulls. However the big question is would marts display this infor and could your average run of the mill farmer interprete it. The only real pity about DBA testing in Agriculture is absolutely no DNA testing of farmers has taken place.

    Just one thing to remember when beef farming it takes 2okgs DW extra and a rise in grade excluding QA to make 100 euro extra on a carcasse

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,696 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    As a suckler farmer I'm getting burnout from keeping up with all these schemes, I couldn't even begin to list them all. Our DG co-ordinator tells us of one lad who doesn't bother with any of them he just gets farm assist instead! I think a calf registration amnesty would simplify things.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,086 ✭✭✭alps


    What do you mean by a calf registration amnesty?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,696 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,957 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It never going to happen. It up to farmers to manage out of it themselves. Unless you are doing it accross a complete herd and are 3-5 months out of cycle it's not really an issue. It immaterial now with the bull game gone and while weight limits are not in place this year they could haunt us next year

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 848 ✭✭✭Sugarbowl


    I don’t know any suckler farmer who has the exact same number of cows calving every year... it always fluctuates depending on culls/replacement heifer/recycled cows. Looks like with this if you drop any bit you will have to stay down.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,164 ✭✭✭MIKEKC


    QA paid up to 30 months for a reason. If it were to be paid on suckler cows the age limit would have to go. Not going to happen I'm afraid



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,957 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    And you are selling them as weanlings. Imagine watching them after weaning for pneumonia. You will be surprised at the returns off the dairy cross and even Friesians when if you start keeping them after the cooonts are gone. It will be a TimeV Return. There is an article in the journal from a part time lad with 20 cows, 60 ewes and some dairy cross calves. Hours worked varies from13-20 hours per week.

    When you have all dairy cross cattle on the out farm a lot of the time it will be a 20 minute visit on the place. Longest part will be going and coming from it. Not only that as cattle are quite you can get anybody to do it. Even if you do not call a day there is no panic

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭ZETOR_IS_BETTER




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks


    When you have all dairy cross cattle on the out farm a lot of the time it will be a 20 minute visit on the place. Longest part will be going and coming from it. Not only that as cattle are quite you can get anybody to do it. Even if you do not call a day there is no panic

    Seriously what sort of sucklers do you think we have?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭grassroot1


    Who made up the age limit? there is no reason why the bonus cannot be paid on cows



Advertisement