Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XI *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

1116117119121122342

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    There is no formula of course and I'm not belittling your stance as such. But it must stand to reason that there is an unknown number of undetected infections. It has to be.

    No worries, it`s a discussion forum. You are quite entitled to question my stance and if I take it as personal that would be my problem not yours.
    I am not, or never have contested that there are unknown numbers of undetected infections. My problem with the number of unknowns is how it has been used by some attempting to sell the idea of natural herd immunity.
    I have never seen the point of IFR, or the accuracy if it had any point, as the infection rate is an unknown


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,249 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    5,000 at Croke Park in August. Mother of jaysis. And you get the impression that if they had it their way and there was no pressure on, NPHET would still want behind closed doors sport.

    The UK who are generally 1 month ahead of us are looking for full stadiums next month.

    I hope the GAA give them the F-U and host the All-Ireland finals in the North.
    It's gas as you say, UK are ahead - but only by 1 month / 6 weeks max, so why are we no where near where the UK were a month ago >?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    An almost entirely positive article on restrictions and surprise surprise, everyone focusing on the one negative element.

    Supposedly those who see a rationale for not having an immediate free for all are the doom mongers

    Its very unambitious targets in a lot of ways

    The targets seem to correspond roughly with level 1 target this year which is the best case scenario 'planned' for

    Yes they might be subject to change and hopefully they will

    Still 50 in July or 100 at a wedding in August with the vast vast majority fully vaccinated is very low bar


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Sobit1964


    https://medicine.wustl.edu/news/good-news-mild-covid-19-induces-lasting-antibody-protection/
    Good news: Mild COVID-19 induces lasting antibody protection
    People who have had mild illness develop antibody-producing cells that can last lifetime

    Well thats great news, I wonder what the number of people might be that had mild covid and didn't bother to get tested. I suspect we are further along this process than many suspect. This would be a good thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    The UK had their snooker final with no restrictions when they had 52% of the population with 1 vaccine.

    NPHET probably won't allow such an event until we're at about 80-85% (and thats when you're reaching the vaccine resistant)

    It is ****ing mental what is going on.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Find the stadium guidelines absolutely ridiculous. 5000 people in Croke Park in August. Embarrassing, honestly. Embarrassing.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    NPHET probably won't allow such an event until we're at about 80-85% (and thats when you're reaching the vaccine resistant)

    It is ****ing mental what is going on.

    I think it's probably a good sign that that we're now having to invent scenarios to get outraged over.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The UK had their snooker final with no restrictions when they had 52% of the population with 1 vaccine.

    NPHET probably won't allow such an event until we're at about 80-85% (and thats when you're reaching the vaccine resistant)

    It is ****ing mental what is going on.

    So what you are proposing is that gatherings should be allowed as long as everyone in attendance has a negative pcr test within 24 hours of the event. That’s far more restrictive than any proposal so far


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Graham wrote: »
    I think it's probably a good sign that that we're now having to invent scenarios to get outraged over.

    What's being invented? We'll be at around 70-80% come August? What do you mean by that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 999 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    charlie14 wrote: »
    No worries, it`s a discussion forum. You are quite entitled to question my stance and if I take it as personal that would be my problem not yours.
    I am not, or never have contested that there are unknown numbers of undetected infections. My problem with the number of unknowns is how it has been used by some attempting to sell the idea of natural herd immunity.
    I have never seen the point of IFR, or the accuracy if it had any point, as the infection rate is an unknown

    You may not see the point but epidemiologists have a use for IFR. It’s important to compare this virus to other known viruses, and an educated guesstimate of IFR is common practice in the scientific community.

    The fact that some may commandeer that number to sell herd immunity is your personal issue. It’s irrational to dismiss IFR out of hand as ‘gobbledegook’. Acknowledged unknown numbers of confirmed cases due to testing discrepancies worldwide and asymptomatic cases, does not trump unknown numbers of total infections. Both are inaccurate.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,245 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    The UK had their snooker final with no restrictions when they had 52% of the population with 1 vaccine.

    NPHET probably won't allow such an event until we're at about 80-85% (and thats when you're reaching the vaccine resistant)

    It is ****ing mental what is going on.

    And they had the first rounds with 33% capacity, that's how scaling up works.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 389 ✭✭Vaccinated30


    Any ideas when kids soft play will open. Dying to get the kids to the balls and slides for a play


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Any ideas when kids soft play will open. Dying to get the kids to the balls and slides for a play

    Looking like a lovely weekend. Lots or outdoor playgrounds etc open


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 248 ✭✭User142


    I am at a loss tonight. The serious limits on our freedom will still be here in August and possibly beyond despite the vaccination numbers and its being painted as a massive easing and NPHET having an upbeat outlook.

    This is insanity. Arbitrary numbers they have put on August outdoor sports events and other gatherings should be ridiculed not applauded at the bare minimum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,243 ✭✭✭MOR316


    hynesie08 wrote: »
    I'm a man of my word, your "source" is a lying ****ehawk

    That's your definition of "the high ground?"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 348 ✭✭Timmy O Toole


    User142 wrote: »
    I am at a loss tonight. The serious limits on our freedom will still be here in August and possibly beyond despite the vaccination numbers and its being painted as a massive easing and NPHET having an upbeat outlook.

    No difference atall from last summer despite every adult in the country being offered a vaccine by end of June.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    IFR is very relevant. It was always known, even in the earliest days, that the ifr was less than originally inferred through detections alone. It was an open question as to whether the actual infection rates were multiples of what we detected. If the fir had been closer to 0.2% we would be close to population immunity now in Europe

    For the continent of Europe if the IFR was 0.2% then we would have herd immunity, but the present estimate of 0.6% has little practical use that I can see.
    Whether 0.2% or 0.6% it`s a universal number. For individual countries I would look at their CFR as being of more practical use.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,245 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    MOR316 wrote: »
    That's your definition of "the high ground?"

    Yeah, easier to spot hawks up here.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    charlie14 wrote: »
    For the continent of Europe if the IFR was 0.2% then we would have herd immunity, but the present estimate of 0.6% has little practical use that I can see.
    Whether 0.2% or 0.6% it`s a universal number. For individual countries I would look at their CFR as being of more practical use.

    For individual countries Cfr is useless. Not least because testing criteria varies massively country to country and at different time periods within countries


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,243 ✭✭✭MOR316


    hynesie08 wrote: »
    Yeah, easier to spot hawks up here.

    OK...Fair enough...

    I'll take the even higher ground :)


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Cinemas in June and Croke Park at 6% capacity in August.

    :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,245 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    MOR316 wrote: »
    OK...Fair enough...

    I'll take the even higher ground :)

    My source said you won't


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,042 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    Find the stadium guidelines absolutely ridiculous. 5000 people in Croke Park in August. Embarrassing, honestly. Embarrassing.

    What’s embarrasing about it? We need to minimise the risks here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,974 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    What’s embarrasing about it? We need to minimise the risks here

    There’s minimise the risk and there’s 5,000 people in an 82,000 capacity stadium which is far too cautious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    You may not see the point but epidemiologists have a use for IFR. It’s important to compare this virus to other known viruses, and an educated guesstimate of IFR is common practice in the scientific community.

    The fact that some may commandeer that number to sell herd immunity is your personal issue. It’s irrational to dismiss IFR out of hand as ‘gobbledegook’. Acknowledged unknown numbers of confirmed cases due to testing discrepancies worldwide and asymptomatic cases, does not trump unknown numbers of total infections. Both are inaccurate.

    Guesstimating may be common practice in the scientific community.
    Where mathematics is concerned it`s gobbledegook.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,249 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    Find the stadium guidelines absolutely ridiculous. 5000 people in Croke Park in August. Embarrassing, honestly. Embarrassing.


    All of them fully masked up ?



    f*cking joke !!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,243 ✭✭✭MOR316


    Find the stadium guidelines absolutely ridiculous. 5000 people in Croke Park in August. Embarrassing, honestly. Embarrassing.

    The only embarrassing thing about that is the ginnits who will spend money to watch Dublin run away with it...Again!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,243 ✭✭✭MOR316


    What’s embarrasing about it? We need to minimise the risks here

    We were told that in sex ed...

    I can safely say about 99% of the population ignored that


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    I would say not necessarily with city, large town locations who have all year round trade but certainly Christmas /new year eve trade absolutely crucial.

    My real concern is the Tourist sector, Seasonal hospitality etc, they have a double whammy, the points I raised earlier but also the absence of any foreign visitors, Domestic Tourism will not on the slightest save them this year, its far to late.

    Do you think there will be no foreign visitors at all this year. Haven’t seen any around but maybe it’s different place to place.Not every country is on the mhq list so wonder would some still want to come here. The thing is with so much still closed in the way of recreation would it be off putting and am thinking would be very much so.Maybe People put off travel in general now. So awful for our not so long ago thriving tourist industry, and all the people employed in the sector. Really saddening.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,974 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    MOR316 wrote: »
    The only embarrassing thing about that is the ginnits who will spend money to watch Dublin run away with it...Again!

    Ah come on it’s only may ffs. At least let the other 31 dream for a bit longer. But yeah it’s not like there’ll be any change on that front. Btw I’ve not heard the word ginnit in years. My grandfather used to use it all the time. Great word.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement