Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XI *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

1108109111113114342

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,946 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    gozunda wrote: »
    This is the official HSE information on each of the different vaccines and when immunity kicks in. It varies for each of them.


    https://www2.hse.ie/screening-and-vaccinations/covid-19-vaccine/


    Indeed but its not what people are being told at the centres


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭speckle


    re ....at this stage I will just call 'them' a farce

    Numbers allowed..
    Age equality discrimnation re numbers of adults versus children at tables both transmit equally..actually kids will more regarding rollout.

    Also discrimnates against those with no children or even single..who might have sat at a bar to leave tables for groups...who is going to prioritised more when taking bookings understandable to make money?...

    Distance rule
    What happens if somebody is more rotund with a chair further back from the table does that break the rules?
    Do we put the thinner people on the sides next to the next table?
    Maybe we should all sit on stools they have have no chair back to measure the distance between persons?

    Time limits
    Just have lock ins ...less people for contact tracing to find if everyone is just in the one pub for the night...instead of pub crawl time limits

    Music
    No difference in catching covid from instrumental live music and the radio/CD...infact as long as you dont have metallica on your local pub no difference risk wise having someone singing as long as their not screaming their lungs off...

    Infact most singers use a microphone as it enables them to sing softer and at lower decibals...and the scientific research re the above has already been been done and dusted check Bristol University and others..we have gone backwards re live music since last year... Vintiners/pub assoc. have the above and so should the gov by now.. I know that for a fact.

    Paid looplahs with too much on their hands. Keep it simple...st*pid

    Angry with fire in my belly...apologies cant find smilie thingy bob that does justice or I would add it here...>

    edit: Need to go open the windows now for some ventillation to screaaaam :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 Hub D15


    The less restrictions the better. The less incompetent government the better. The majority of the rules they do/have/will come up with have substantial downside and very little upside. For example:

    Restrict how far people travel: Result people in urban areas all go to same crowded parks and streets.
    Close restaurants most of year and reopen them only in summer: Result restaurants when open are more crowded than usual.
    Close pubs/restaurants at 11pm: Result everyone goes at the same time


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 ionnn


    105 minute rule is just laughable, can anyone justify its purpose?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,229 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    From this timeline there seems to be a huge push against Martin from within his party

    https://twitter.com/McConnellDaniel/status/1397622651703676928


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,719 ✭✭✭celt262


    ionnn wrote: »
    105 minute rule is just laughable, can anyone justify its purpose?

    Get more paying customers through the door.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 ionnn


    The restrictions are being introduced by emergency powers intended to protect public health, if it's not serving that purpose and I cant see how anyone can say 105 minutes is somehow fine but 110 is to dangerous, then it should not exist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,228 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    speckle wrote: »
    re ....at this stage I will just call 'them' a farce

    Numbers allowed..
    Age equality discrimnation re numbers of adults versus children at tables both transmit equally..actually kids will more regarding rollout.

    Also discrimnates against those with no children or even single..who might have sat at a bar to leave tables for groups...who is going to prioritised more when taking bookings understandable to make money?...

    Distance rule
    What happens if somebody is more rotund with a chair further back from the table does that break the rules?
    Do we put the thinner people on the sides next to the next table?
    Maybe we should all sit on stools they have have no chair back to measure the distance between persons?

    Time limits
    Just have lock ins ...less people for contact tracing to find if everyone is just in the one pub for the night...instead of pub crawl time limits

    Music
    No difference in catching covid from instrumental live music and the radio/CD...infact as long as you dont have metallica on your local pub no difference risk wise having someone singing as long as their not screaming their lungs off...

    Infact most singers use a microphone as it enables them to sing softer and at lower decibals...and the scientific research re the above has already been been done and dusted check Bristol University and others..we have gone backwards re live music since last year... Vintiners/pub assoc. have the above and so should the gov by now.. I know that for a fact.

    Paid looplahs with too much on their hands. Keep it simple...st*pid

    Angry with fire in my belly...apologies cant find smilie thingy bob that does justice or I would add it here...>

    edit: Need to go open the windows now for some ventillation to screaaaam :D

    They don't give a **** about the lone drinker and would paint them all in the same brush of 'the lazy alcoholic wasters who spends all there time inside pubs and wont go out and get a job'

    Not all lone/day drinkers are like that and some are actually on there day off work/on holiday/going to/watching a gig/match etc

    Should i give up hope because of the cowards in charge ?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    JRant wrote: »
    Ah, these new rules will fit into modern Irish society quite nicely. Irish people love to make a booking for everything, breakfast, lunch or dinner.

    BBQ's and cold beers in the garden will be the order of the day. More relaxing and nobody watching you to see how long you've left at a table.

    You've obviously never lived in Ranelagh:-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭speckle


    PTH2009 wrote: »
    They don't give a **** about the lone drinker and would paint them all in the same brush of 'the lazy alcoholic wasters who spends all there time inside pubs and wont go out and get a job'

    Not all lone/day drinkers are like that and some are actually on there day off work/on holiday/going to/watching a gig/match etc

    Should i give up hope because of the cowards in charge ?

    No giving up... the minute they are open.. I am going by myself to have my usual cuppa tea and I will choose the largest table for myself ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,743 ✭✭✭Wanderer2010


    How often do 6 13yr olds book tables in restaurants?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭speckle


    How often do 6 13yr olds book tables in restaurants?!

    Thats made me think what if you book a table with a kid included in the numbers and at the last moment the kid cant go...homework..scratch on the knee..just tired..does the table get cancelled and the pub/ restaurant takings are lost as you cant 'legaly' go?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 Hub D15


    ionnn wrote: »
    105 minute rule is just laughable, can anyone justify its purpose?

    I believe its purpose is to make politicians - in the absence of positive ideas for the country such as on job creation - feel that they are still doing something. Even if that something is useless.

    It has the added bonus that later they can amend the limit to 120 minutes making them feel very busy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,094 ✭✭✭prunudo


    celt262 wrote: »
    Get more paying customers through the door.

    Absolutely, but that should be decided by the individual buisnesses not by people hiding behind health laws to make up rules as they go along.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    A husband and wife with two kids - that's a table done. They could meet their in-laws - chuck in two more parents and a couple more kids. Then maybe the grand parents. F*king hell lads, it's a good idea to allow family members to meet up without having to worry about "The Stasi."


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    ionnn wrote: »
    I cant see how anyone can say 105 minutes is somehow fine but 110 is to dangerous

    who said that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    VinLieger wrote: »
    Indeed but its not what people are being told at the centres

    People? I've been and was given a booklet which contained the same info as above.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,900 ✭✭✭✭bear1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Sobit1964


    Lads its only a little bit longer - just remember that every extra day, every extra odd ball rule, every extra 'careful now', every extra 1930s style trust the dear leader post, are just building energy in the eventual reverse swing of the pendulum.

    Its glorious to watch Boris and his gimp boy Hancock get savaged from all angles in the UK. The same is happening on the continent, and today we are starting to see rumblings in the eternally sleepy emerald isle. Its starting to look more and more grim for these political cockwombles who thought that they might come out of this with the same shimmering respect that actual nurses and doctors deserve.

    After everything that's been lost, its a small happiness that those who strode so tall on the backs of everyone may now get trampled into the dirt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,900 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    The fact you're hearing members of their own parties now lash out at the madness of it all made me smile.
    I'm really not sure how much longer the government can hold on before the revolts get louder but Friday will be critical for them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,062 ✭✭✭Fighting Irish


    I'm fully vaccinated #pfizer, if I go to Germany, do I have to hotel quarantine on my arrival back to Ireland?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,067 ✭✭✭Dickie10


    lads when you hear Richard Bruton of all men have misgivings as he said himself about some of these rules, you know the game is up. Friday could see skin and hair flying, rememeber as Uncle Albert famously said "its the little things that trip you up".......government could collapse over a row about time spent in a pub!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Dickie10 wrote: »
    lads when you hear Richard Bruton of all men have misgivings as he said himself about some of these rules, you know the game is up. Friday could see skin and hair flying, rememeber as Uncle Albert famously said "its the little things that trip you up".......government could collapse over a row about time spent in a pub!

    The government could collapse over a row about pubs.... spoiler for ya Dickie, they won't


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,140 ✭✭✭hamburgham


    Dickie10 wrote: »
    lads when you hear Richard Bruton of all men have misgivings as he said himself about some of these rules, you know the game is up. Friday could see skin and hair flying, rememeber as Uncle Albert famously said "its the little things that trip you up".......government could collapse over a row about time spent in a pub!

    About time he said something. His constituency has thousands dependent on the aviation industry and there hasn’t been a squeak out of him.Goner next time if he stands.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    bear1 wrote: »
    The fact you're hearing members of their own parties now lash out at the madness of it all made me smile.

    Job done for those members then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    From this timeline there seems to be a huge push against Martin from within his party

    https://twitter.com/McConnellDaniel/status/1397622651703676928

    Sounds more like somebody in FF is bored with John Mc Guinness running away with their contrarian of the year award each year, and has put up a few quid to make it more of a contest. Mc Sharry the younger will give Mc Guinness a good run for it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,813 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    From this timeline there seems to be a huge push against Martin from within his party

    https://twitter.com/McConnellDaniel/status/1397622651703676928

    In fairness, it just shows how ineffective Marc McSharry is compared to his father. He’s on the outside of his party’s inner circle but is lashing out will have no effect. See Barry Cowen and Jim O’Callaghan for further proof. One or all of them may ultimately wield the knife against MM but none will ever wear the crown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,229 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    bear1 wrote: »
    The fact you're hearing members of their own parties now lash out at the madness of it all made me smile.
    I'm really not sure how much longer the government can hold on before the revolts get louder but Friday will be critical for them.

    This is a very apt summary of it all (granted she is complicit having voted with restrictions all the way)

    https://twitter.com/JRD0000/status/1397681537420771330


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    interesting thinking from Leo

    "Earlier in the meeting, Mr Varadkar said the Government would announce on Friday what restrictions would be in place in June and July and that the aim was to get back to Level 2 where the country was at last summer before restrictions were reimposed in August.

    Under Level 2 restrictions, the majority of areas of economy and society - for example, schools, restaurants, pubs and gyms – are open with controlled indoor gatherings of up to 100 people allowed and 200 at outdoor gatherings.

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/holohan-positive-on-covid-outlook-but-warns-on-indian-variant-as-varadkar-raises-fear-of-fourth-wave-at-fine-gael-meeting-40473909.html

    That level 2 from last year is level one in the plan this year

    100 people indoors with a pretty much fully vaccinated country is not very ambitious and is pitifully low

    200 at matches is brutal when you have 500 over the border in the North


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Graham wrote: »
    who said that?

    Have you not visited this thread before Graham. Getting angry at stuff no one said is half the content


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement