Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Anti-vaxxers

Options
1…193194195196198

Comments

  • Options
    #5912
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    GT89 wrote: »
    Unrealistic and doesn't take normal human behaviour into account

    Vaccine passports and masks are unrealistic? What is unrealistic about them?


  • Options
    #5913
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Vaccine passports and masks are unrealistic? What is unrealistic about them?

    Vaccine passports are not unrealistic but aren't based on medical advice either these are decided by govt/EU policy not science. Masks and social distancing are unrealistic as it's unrealistic to expect people to stay apart and wear masks all the time.


  • Options
    #5914
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    GT89 wrote: »
    Vaccine passports are not unrealistic but aren't based on medical advice either these are decided by govt/EU policy not science. Masks and social distancing are unrealistic as it's unrealistic to expect people to stay apart and wear masks all the time.

    Minimising the chance of the virus passing from one region to another and is very much so being decided by the science. Mask wearing will cease to be mandatory as vaccination levels reach a good level, some will likely continue to wear them doing shop etc. And distancing is not permanent either. We're also over a year into it and masks have only seemed to have been treated as unrealistic expectations by conspiracy theorists...


  • Options
    #5915
    astrofool
    Registered Users Posts: 16,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    GT89 wrote: »
    Vaccine passports are not unrealistic but aren't based on medical advice either these are decided by govt/EU policy not science. Masks and social distancing are unrealistic as it's unrealistic to expect people to stay apart and wear masks all the time.

    Any reason you've time to post here and not answer any questions put to you on the conspiracy theory forum?

    I mean, you're pretty much just repeating the same bunkum you posted and ran away from there on this thread instead.


  • Options
    #5916
    dxhound2005
    Registered Users Posts: 20,730 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    GT89 wrote: »
    Vaccine passports are not unrealistic but aren't based on medical advice either these are decided by govt/EU policy not science. Masks and social distancing are unrealistic as it's unrealistic to expect people to stay apart and wear masks all the time.

    Speed limits must also be unrealistic, as it's unrealistic to expect people to drive that slow. Actually they are an example of government terrorism.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #5917
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Minimising the chance of the virus passing from one region to another and is very much so being decided by the science. Mask wearing will cease to be mandatory as vaccination levels reach a good level, some will likely continue to wear them doing shop etc. And distancing is not permanent either. We're also over a year into it and masks have only seemed to have been treated as unrealistic expectations by conspiracy theorists...

    People wear them going into shops/public transport they don't wear them going into each other houses where they're likely at more risk of getting covid


  • Options
    #5918
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    GT89 wrote: »
    People wear them going into shops/public transport they don't wear them going into each other houses where they're likely at more risk of getting covid

    You might not, but anyone I know wears one going into another person's house.


  • Options
    #5919
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    You might not, but anyone I know wears one going into another person's house.

    Younger folk like myself generally don't wear them in each others houses. I go to my friends house with like 5 lads none wearing masks.


  • Options
    #5920
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭paul71


    GT89 wrote: »
    Younger folk like myself generally don't wear them in each others houses. I go to my friends house with like 5 lads none wearing masks.

    Then it is quite likely that you or one of your ilk was the link resonsible in a chain of infections that killed someone.


  • Options
    #5921
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    GT89 wrote: »
    Younger folk like myself generally don't wear them in each others houses. I go to my friends house with like 5 lads none wearing masks.

    No one I know would be either stupid enough or that big a tool to do so.
    As you said yourself that's where people are more risk of catching it, so just stupid or a tool ?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #5922
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    No one I know would be either stupid enough or that big a tool to do so.
    As you said yourself that's where people are more risk of catching it, so just stupid or a tool ?

    I don't personally give a rats arse about a disease that has about a 0.001% of killing me. I'm probably more likely to die being hit by a car than getting covid.


  • Options
    #5923
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    GT89 wrote: »
    I don't personally give a rats arse about a disease that has about a 0.001% of killing me. I'm probably more likely to die being hit by a car than getting covid.

    Both then


  • Options
    #5924
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    paul71 wrote: »
    Then it is quite likely that you or one of your ilk was the link resonsible in a chain of infections that killed someone.

    You likely passed flu to someone who died from it pre 2020 in a chain of infections. As Greta would say how dare you.


  • Options
    #5925
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭paul71


    GT89 wrote: »
    I don't personally give a rats arse about a disease that has about a 0.001% of killing me. I'm probably more likely to die being hit by a car than getting covid.

    And you don't give a rats arse about passing that disease on to someone who it will kill either, typical murderous anti-vax anti-mask selfishness.


  • Options
    #5926
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    Both then

    I'm not stupid anyone who actually knows me would I'm very intelligent. Stupid people just blindly follow what the government tells them and doesn't question the narrative.


  • Options
    #5927
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭paul71


    GT89 wrote: »
    You likely passed flu to someone who died from it pre 2020 in a chain of infections. As Greta would say how dare you.

    I never ignored medical advice designed to protect others, you do which is typical selfish sociopath behaviour. How many are you prepared to kill because of your selfishness?


  • Options
    #5928
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    paul71 wrote: »
    And you don't give a rats arse about passing that disease on to someone who it will kill either, typical murderous anti-vax anti-mask selfishness.

    The minscule chance I passed a disease to someone who died from it is not defined as murder in law.


  • Options
    #5929
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    GT89 wrote: »
    I'm not stupid anyone who actually knows me would I'm very intelligent. Stupid people just blindly follow what the government tells them and doesn't question the narrative.

    Of course you are.


  • Options
    #5930
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    paul71 wrote: »
    I never ignored medical advice designed to protect others, you do which is typical selfish sociopath behaviour. How many are you prepared to kill because of your selfishness?

    I'd say your some craic


  • Options
    #5931
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    Of course you are.

    Speak to anyone who's ever met me


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #5932
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    GT89 wrote: »
    Speak to anyone who's ever met me

    Sure pass on their contact details


  • Options
    #5933
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭paul71


    GT89 wrote: »
    I'd say your some craic

    You'll never know but I do know you are a danger to elderly vunerable members of our society. A pure dangerous deluded conspiracy theory ladden menace.


  • Options
    #5934
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    paul71 wrote: »
    You'll never know but I do know you are a danger to elderly vunerable members of our society. A pure dangerous deluded conspiracy theory ladden menace.

    Lol but I actually wear a mask in shops where it's legally required just where it's not required. If that's the case then nearly everyone under 25 is likely a danger to every geriatric in the country. If the elderly/vulnerable don't want to catch covid they can just stay indoors if not they can quit moaning and accept the risk.


  • Options
    #5935
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭paul71


    GT89 wrote: »
    Lol but I actually wear a mask in shops where it's legally required just where it's not required. If that's the case then nearly everyone under 25 is likely a danger to every geriatric in the country. If the elderly/vulnerable don't want to catch covid they can just stay indoors if not they can quit moaning and accept the risk.

    So people should restrict their movements and imprision themselfs in their homes because you don't give a rats arse.

    Sociopathic does sound accurate, but sure you're great craic so you should be tolerated.


  • Options
    #5936
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭paul71


    GT89 wrote: »
    I'm not stupid anyone who actually knows me would I'm very intelligent. Stupid people just blindly follow what the government tells them and doesn't question the narrative.

    That sounds a familar "a very stable genius"


  • Options
    #5937
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    paul71 wrote: »
    So people should restrict their movements and imprision themselfs in their homes because you don't give a rats arse.

    Sociopathic does sound accurate, but sure you're great craic so you should be tolerated.

    Staying at home by choice is not imprisoning yourself. This is what many elderly/vulnerable people have been doing anyway regardless.


  • Options
    #5938
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭paul71


    GT89 wrote: »
    Staying at home by choice is not imprisoning yourself. This is what many elderly/vulnerable people have been doing anyway regardless.
    Not what you said, you said they should stay at home as a consequence of your selfish action to endanger them, leaving them with a potiential life or death decision because you want a bit of craic with your 5 mates in a house spreading a deadly disease.

    For a self proclaimed intelligant guy your are spouting an awful lot of contradictory guff.


  • Options
    #5939
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    paul71 wrote: »
    Not what you said, you said they should stay at home as a consequence of your selfish action to endanger them, leaving them with a potiential life or death decision because you want a bit of craic with your 5 mates in a house spreading a deadly disease.

    For a self proclaimed intelligant guy your are spouting an awful lot of contradictory guff.

    Most elderly/vulnerable are staying at home anyway so it's not like I'm putting them at risk


  • Options
    #5940
    AirBiscuit
    Registered Users Posts: 1,060 ✭✭✭AirBiscuit


    GT89 wrote: »
    actually knows me would I'm very intelligent.
    2 things here: Read what you actually typed out, smart fella.
    Secondly, this always holds true in my experience
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lwFK1ImzcA

    The only people I've encountered in person who reckoned they're smart to the point of telling everyone that they're smart are actually just thick as cow shít and not smart enough to know that's what they are.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #5941
    GT89
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    AirBiscuit wrote: »
    2 things here: Read what you actually typed out, smart fella.
    Secondly, this always holds true in my experience
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lwFK1ImzcA

    The only people I've encountered in person who reckoned they're smart to the point of telling everyone that they're smart are actually just thick as cow shít and not smart enough to know that's what they are.

    I'm using touch screen so it's easy to make mistakes


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement