Vaccine Megathread - See OP for threadbans

franciscanpunk wrote: »

obviously this has turned into a sh*tshow, no major surprise.

What I cant understand is how there is talk of not using AZ tomorrow. surely they are not going to suspend them for over 60s tomorrow, then in a few days say ok its safe now roll uo your sleeves! I'm Irish people will accept this as we now are happy to take any sub par service and explanation available but to me its a joke to come out and say over 60s all good nothing to fear but oh hang on a few days just need to double check.

Should open the portal tomorrow for over 60s to register for vaccine to show confidence in the vaccine and keep on track in the ultimate goal to get everyone vaccinated and open up - that is the goal i think though sometimes it seems that opening society and getting people back to work is nowhere on our agenda

Sanjuro wrote: »

Thanks Miike. Would have seemed insane to cancel everything.

Rebelbrowser wrote: »

60 to 69 cohort have most grounds for grievance I think. Ultimately, for a number of reasons, I think most of us would prefer the Pfizer vaccine

Deleted User wrote: »

Whats this now?

harr wrote: »

All this is purely political between the EU and vaccine manufactures , surely any covid deaths caused by this delay should outweigh the one in a million change of dying from a blood clot.. just can’t get my head around this decision.. it’s like it’s ok to have people die from covid but not from a clot ..

dominatinMC wrote: »

Maybe so, but Western regulators can afford (sort of) to be this cautious as we have the mRNA vaccines to rely on. A lot of third world countries don't have that luxury so they will have no choice but to crack on with AZ

funnydoggy wrote: »

So what's it gonna be today lol?

stephenjmcd wrote: »

180k won't be met this week is probably about all we'll hear.

I'd say it'll be tomorrow before whatever changes in rollout are announced

patnor1011 wrote: »

I guess that I wil wait for more studies particularly possible long time effect and delayed response. Folks at Harvard and MIT seems to stumbled onto something.

Researchers from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) are warning that the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology used in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” has the capability to forever alter recipients’ genomic DNA, making them more susceptible to disease and death.

Their December preprint paper contains findings about wild coronaviruses that challenge the CDC’s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) narrative that synthetic mRNA from Chinese virus injections cannot enter cell nuclei where DNA resides. It also questions the CDC claim that cells get rid of this synthetic mRNA “soon after it is finished using the programmed instructions.”

“Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (‘transcribes’) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make,” explains Children’s Health Defense (CHD) about how the process works naturally.

“By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm,” it adds about how the synthetic mRNA found in Wuhan flu shots functions.

Biochemist and molecular biologist Doug Corrigan, PhD, and his team say they were perplexed as to why many people who had already been injected for Chinese germs with synthetic mRNA still tested “positive” for them later on down the road. What they ultimately determined is that mRNA “vaccines” may be permanently altering human DNA through reverse transcription.

Their paper explains that SARS-CoV-2 RNA s “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” contrary to what the CDC claims. Further, “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed,” this being a phenomenon known as “retro-integration.”

n Corrigan’s view, the information contained in his preprint “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.” The DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not a one-way street like the CDC claims. Reverse transcriptase enzymes do, in fact, have the ability to convert RNA into DNA, which can then integrate back into cell nuclei DNA. More than 40 percent of mammalian genomes, it turns out, comprise the products of reverse transcription.

“The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome,” CHD explains.

The potential result of this, Corrigan and his team warn, is “a more severe immune response” among the “vaccinated” when they are exposed to wild-type illness – think cytokine storm or autoimmune disease.

https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/

https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2021/02/15/breaking-study-sheds-more-light-on-whether-an-rna-vaccine-can-permanently-alter-dna/

patnor1011 wrote: »

I guess that I wil wait for more studies particularly possible long time effect and delayed response. Folks at Harvard and MIT seems to stumbled onto something.

Researchers from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) are warning that the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology used in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” has the capability to forever alter recipients’ genomic DNA, making them more susceptible to disease and death.

Their December preprint paper contains findings about wild coronaviruses that challenge the CDC’s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) narrative that synthetic mRNA from Chinese virus injections cannot enter cell nuclei where DNA resides. It also questions the CDC claim that cells get rid of this synthetic mRNA “soon after it is finished using the programmed instructions.”

“Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (‘transcribes’) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make,” explains Children’s Health Defense (CHD) about how the process works naturally.

“By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm,” it adds about how the synthetic mRNA found in Wuhan flu shots functions.

Biochemist and molecular biologist Doug Corrigan, PhD, and his team say they were perplexed as to why many people who had already been injected for Chinese germs with synthetic mRNA still tested “positive” for them later on down the road. What they ultimately determined is that mRNA “vaccines” may be permanently altering human DNA through reverse transcription.

Their paper explains that SARS-CoV-2 RNA s “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” contrary to what the CDC claims. Further, “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed,” this being a phenomenon known as “retro-integration.”

n Corrigan’s view, the information contained in his preprint “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.” The DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not a one-way street like the CDC claims. Reverse transcriptase enzymes do, in fact, have the ability to convert RNA into DNA, which can then integrate back into cell nuclei DNA. More than 40 percent of mammalian genomes, it turns out, comprise the products of reverse transcription.

“The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome,” CHD explains.

The potential result of this, Corrigan and his team warn, is “a more severe immune response” among the “vaccinated” when they are exposed to wild-type illness – think cytokine storm or autoimmune disease.

https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/

https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2021/02/15/breaking-study-sheds-more-light-on-whether-an-rna-vaccine-can-permanently-alter-dna/