Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Covid 19 Part XXXIII-231,484 ROI(4,610 deaths)116,197 NI (2,107 deaths)(23/03)Read OP

1242243245247248326

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    h2005 wrote: »
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/coronavirus-r-rate-school-closures-lockdown-lancet-study-b1251617.html?__twitter_impression=true

    Are we finally going to admit that schools lead to a significant hike in numbers? Once we do that at least we can begin the conversation on how we approach it (mitigate or choose to live with it). The nonsense of denying this is getting us nowhere and is only causing division.

    The study shows schools reopening increase the R number nearly as much as group gatherings.


    ... so gatherings of people in schools, increase the R number as much as gatherings of people in non-schools.

    What a shocker!

    Next we'll be told the €9 meal didnt fight off covid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,435 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    titan18 wrote: »
    At this stage I think continue with what's there til Easter, since that's only next Friday for their holidays but maybe unless cases come down, just let it at LC to go back and pull Primary.

    Pull primary? As in close primary schools for children in their formative years who already have had stop start schooling since March 2020?
    That what ya mean?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,564 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    jhegarty wrote: »
    I am going assume there was less routing testing which would push up the positivity rate.

    I'd buy this if overall positives were low. But 607 is a large number, even if the denominator is potentially artificially reduced.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 681 ✭✭✭redmgar


    tom1ie wrote: »
    Pull primary? As in close primary schools for children in their formative years who already have had stop start schooling since March 2020?
    That what ya mean?

    Primary cant close again, irrespective of case numbers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,435 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    redmgar wrote: »
    Primary cant close again, irrespective of case numbers.

    100%.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,564 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    tom1ie wrote: »
    Pull primary? As in close primary schools for children in their formative years who already have had stop start schooling since March 2020?
    That what ya mean?

    I don't get how people don't realise that in-person schooling is far far more important for primary school kids than Leaving Cert students.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,617 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    titan18 wrote: »
    At this stage I think continue with what's there til Easter, since that's only next Friday for their holidays but maybe unless cases come down, just let it at LC to go back and pull Primary.

    Jesus wept. That's unbelievable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,435 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Amirani wrote: »
    I don't get how people don't realise that in-person schooling is far far more important for primary school kids than Leaving Cert students.

    Absolutely agree, teaching from home for primary school students is pure bull****.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭Monster249


    tom1ie wrote: »
    100%.

    I love how everyone can quantify the damage closing schools will have on children but ignore the damage lockdowns have on the economy and individual livelyhoods and mental health.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Sanjuro


    Amirani wrote: »
    I don't get how people don't realise that in-person schooling is far far more important for primary school kids than Leaving Cert students.

    My six year old is back 2 weeks now and the difference in her demeanor is immediately apparent. She's far more upbeat and full of energy... which, to be honest... is testing us in the evenings! But I'd rather have her back in school. Her school have been absolutely brilliant at all stages since last March.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,618 ✭✭✭pauldry


    titan18 wrote: »
    At this stage I think continue with what's there til Easter, since that's only next Friday for their holidays but maybe unless cases come down, just let it at LC to go back and pull Primary.

    Thats nonsense. Kids need school.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,435 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Monster249 wrote: »
    I love how everyone can quantify the damage closing schools will have on children but ignore the damage lockdowns have on the economy and individual livelyhoods and mental health.

    Sorry but kids take precedence. They are the future workforce after all and primary is an extraordinarily important time for them to develop, which has already been messed up this last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭Monster249


    tom1ie wrote: »
    Sorry but kids take precedence. They are the future workforce after all and primary is an extraordinarily important time for them to develop, which has already been messed up this last year.

    If we're agreeing that kids take precedent then you have to use the same logic and agree that elderly should be the least of our concern no?

    What about the impact this is having on young adults?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    tom1ie wrote: »
    Sorry but kids take precedence. They are the future workforce after all and primary is an extraordinarily important time for them to develop, which has already been messed up this last year.

    Not going to need a workforce if we continue with the financially reckless carry on with these lockdowns.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭Monster249


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Not going to need a workforce if we continue with the financially reckless carry on with these lockdowns.

    Exactly, for every point supporting schools taking precedent there's an equally strong point opposing it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,435 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Not going to need a workforce if we continue with the financially reckless carry on with these lockdowns.

    Listen I’m not saying we should be locked down to the extent we are, I’m simply saying primary schools CANNOT close again.


  • Posts: 3,270 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Amirani wrote: »
    Martin Feely was a vascular surgeon. Completely inapplicable for anything to do with respiratory illnesses or public health. They're a famously specific specialty, hence why you don't see them speaking about healthcare outside their specialty. Feely did this based on his administrative role, not based on his medical background.

    Ronan Glynn is a member of the RCSI and the RCPI (quite uncommon for someone to achieve both). He has an incredibly accomplished medical CV; you mention that he has a BSc in Physiotherapy. You fail to mention that after that he got a Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery, PhD in Surgical Oncology and a Masters in Public Health.

    You were either unaware of that, or else you clearly have no knowledge of medical qualifications.

    Hang on, we can all be quite the wiki wonder, of course I know this, I'm as clever as you think I am stupid. So we agree Ronan has a great CV and then so has dolores Cahill and so have many others who don't sit on NPHET and yet anyone outside of the court de jour is labelled a heretic. The question is why do these people of great standing and medical prominence, decide to flush their achievements away over what most on here call, a Threat to national health.
    It doesn't add up and yet neither does a lot of the NPHET measures either...

    separately, can I send you my CV? you'd do well in public relations and promotions.;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭Monster249


    tom1ie wrote: »
    Listen I’m not saying we should be locked down to the extent we are, I’m simply saying primary schools CANNOT close again.

    I'm not disagreeing, I'm just saying that other facets of the economy are equally as important and have been discarded like sour milk so nothing would surprise me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,435 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Monster249 wrote: »
    If we're agreeing that kids take precedent then you have to use the same logic and agree that elderly should be the least of our concern no?

    What about the impact this is having on young adults?

    Not at all, I use the logic that the vulnerable should be protected. Kids without an education are vulnerable more so than young adults who have their education.
    That’s a hard truth but there it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 681 ✭✭✭redmgar


    tom1ie wrote: »
    Listen I’m not saying we should be locked down to the extent we are, I’m simply saying primary schools CANNOT close again.

    Exactly, they aren't both mutually exclusive.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,435 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Monster249 wrote: »
    I'm not disagreeing, I'm just saying that other facets of the economy are equally as important and have been discarded like sour milk so nothing would surprise me.

    Kids educations are more important than young adults outlook on things who already have gained their education.
    It’s extremely hard for all involved but there has to be a hierarchy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭Monster249


    tom1ie wrote: »
    Kids educations are more important than young adults outlook on things who already have gained their education.
    It’s extremely hard for all involved but there has to be a hierarchy.

    Who is anyone to say that kids going to school physically rather than remotely is more important than restoring the livelyhoods of hundreds of thousands of adults, many of whom have kids and families of their own who's lives have been destroyed by these restrictions?

    Neither is quantifiable anyway so this is all down to opinion and the Government share yours so anything I say is pointless!


  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    tom1ie wrote: »
    Kids educations are more important than young adults outlook on things who already have gained their education.
    It’s extremely hard for all involved but there has to be a hierarchy.

    The hierachy is the same as ever, young adults get **** on.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,564 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    rusty cole wrote: »
    Hang on, we can all be quite the wiki wonder, of course I know this, I'm as clever as you think I am stupid. So we agree Ronan has a great CV and then so has dolores Cahill and so have many others who don't sit on NPHET and yet anyone outside of the court de jour is labelled a heretic. The question is why do these people of great standing and medical prominence, decide to flush their achievements away over what most on here call, a Threat to national health.
    It doesn't add up and yet neither does a lot of the NPHET measures either...

    separately, can I send you my CV? you'd do well in public relations and promotions.;)

    I don't need Wiki, Glynn has worked with a number of friends of mine. Dolores Cahill's CV is inferior to Ronan Glynn's in medicine terms. But that's immaterial to the matter, her views are at odds to the rest of medical community (and that of her employer), that's her problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,435 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Monster249 wrote: »
    Who is anyone to say that kids going to school physically rather than remotely is more important than restoring the livelyhoods of hundreds of thousands of adults, many of whom have kids and families of their own who's lives have been destroyed by these restrictions?

    Neither is quantifiable anyway so this is all down to opinion and the Government share yours so anything I say is pointless!

    Yeah it’s my opinion, but can you honestly say the needs of a 6 year olds education do not outweigh a twenty something with a degree, who is waiting for the economy to open back up to get a job?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,617 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    No word yet on restarting AZ. Apparently there'll be a press conference at 5.30 about it. A full working day wasted. Unbelievable.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,564 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    icebabycc wrote: »
    In what way? He Graduated as a physio and done a masters in oncology

    Dolores has done a degree in Molecular Genetics and has PhD in Immunology, she co-founded a biotechnology company, has research, publication and patent record high content protein/antibody arrays and their biomedical applications.

    She might be a nut case, but she's alot more qualified in the field of virology, alot more.

    As my post says, inferior in Medicine terms. The other poster was trying to espouse Cahill's medical credentials, but what you've listed are scientific qualifications more than medical. A virology qualification is not a public health qualification.

    You've left out most of Glynn's qualifications for some reason, and got 1 of the 2 you listed wrong.


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    No word yet on restarting AZ. Apparently there'll be a press conference at 5.30 about it. A full working day wasted. Unbelievable.

    Do you not understand? It's not about the deaths that could be prevented by making sure the vaccine gets out there into people's arms.

    It's about the Irish authorities examining the issue, and considering things, and making decisions that make it look like they are the one's making assessments, not just relying on the real experts elsewhere.:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,955 ✭✭✭Hooked


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    No word yet on restarting AZ. Apparently there'll be a press conference at 5.30 about it. A full working day wasted. Unbelievable.

    Only a day...

    They wasted a BLOODY YEAR and did nothing of note with the hospitals (capacity).

    This virus is nowhere near as deadly as our piss-poor health system would have us believe!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Eod100




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement