Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXIII-33,444 in ROI(1,792 deaths) 9,541 in NI(577 deaths)(22/09)Read OP

1324325327329330334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    Fairly serious in the UK with the penalties and restrictions there and them being told it’ll likely last 6 months. Hopefully our 3 week one will sort it out. Also interesting to see him say that cocooning is a load of crap as it’ll get to old people anyway and overrun the system of measures not in place.


    As much domestic politics as anything else....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,740 ✭✭✭firemansam4


    Gradius wrote:
    It's actually quite bizarre seeing fiction come to life.

    Watched it back in March. Insane how alike to now it is.


    I watched it earlier in the year as well, while a lot of stuff had a lot of similarities. The main big difference was that the fatality rate of the disease in that film was something like 30% and not 0.05% or what ever the true rate is now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Very interesting thread. Some believe that since June, our testing methods have changed, and a higher amount of false positive tests are being returned.
    https://twitter.com/kilkelly/status/1307052803957960704?s=20


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    Looks like it's back in the nursing homes. Issue this time is staff moving between facilities. No doubt they'll blame the people in Oliver Bond and call for a lockdown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,462 ✭✭✭landofthetree


    polesheep wrote: »
    Looks like it's back in the nursing homes. Issue this time is staff moving between facilities. No doubt they'll blame the people in Oliver Bond and call for a lockdown.

    But that's literally how it gets into nursing homes.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Level 1 is incredibly unlikely before winter is over. Most optimistic bet would be that if a vaccine starts being rolled out and is seen as being effective that they'd move us to level 1 then and then after some time passes give the all clear and be done with levels altogether.

    When we get nearing that stage I reckon there will be some political "fun" going on. When a critical number (practically all vulnerable vaccinated and remainder vaccine program just commenced) we will be at that level, and then there'll be some hiccup or blunder about availability of further vaccines, with what would then be seen as an unnecessary continuation with any restrictions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    But that's literally how it gets into nursing homes.

    Which is it, staff moving between facilities or people having a Rave (applying a very loose definition of Rave).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,938 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Good point but have to factor in how good the motorway system is and how ****e some of our normal roads are.

    Yes roads up here to Belfast are great . That journey from Mitchellstown to Castletownbere is tougher going .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,128 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    polesheep wrote: »
    Looks like it's back in the nursing homes. Issue this time is staff moving between facilities. No doubt they'll blame the people in Oliver Bond and call for a lockdown.

    Or Tony Hoolahan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,176 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    polesheep wrote: »
    Looks like it's back in the nursing homes. Issue this time is staff moving between facilities. No doubt they'll blame the people in Oliver Bond and call for a lockdown.

    Illustrative again of how "just isolate the vulnerable" is easier said than done.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,544 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    Yes roads up here to Belfast are great . That journey from Mitchellstown to Castletownbere is tougher going .

    Will ye stop, what few dubs haven't been down the last few months will be down


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    niallo27 wrote: »
    Oh **** me, its like the 2 weeks behind Italy stuff from February. Have you anything remotely positive to say.

    Hard to say anything positive about Europe at this minute, it's a pretty rapid decline of the situation, over 400 ICU admissions in the EU in the last 48 hours. Some positive news is it is stabilising in much of South America, it is really good news there has been a lot of suffering there in recent months.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Some ICUs in Madrid are full.
    This already generates a very difficult problem for us to solve.
    We may be sending a non-infected person to catch the virus just because they have a cold,
    and send asymptomatic infected to the clean area. It has already happened to us several times.
    A person who comes for any ailment, you go to a clean area, you do the PCR like everyone else and it comes out positive.
    This puts health workers and patients at risk ”, indicate health workers.
    That the pictures are less severe, or even asymptomatic, does not mean that the virus is now less lethal.
    “A few days ago, a 19-year-old girl came to us with anxiety, that led to cardiac arrest and she died right there.
    She died of a massive thrombus. I have already had four cardiac arrests of people under 25 years of age due to thrombi,
    people who did not present unusual external symptoms ”.

    https://twitter.com/DrZoeHyde/status/1308372692857356288?s=20


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    But that's literally how it gets into nursing homes.

    You don't think rules around staff doing overtime in multiple facilities would be useful? You prefer to think that staff partying in Oliver Bond is the issue?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Fairly big development in the last hour.
    HSE admits that 70-80 cases per day (for 10000 tests) are false positives.
    Christ.
    https://twitter.com/DavQuinn/status/1308493818027741184?s=20


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    Arghus wrote: »
    Illustrative again of how "just isolate the vulnerable" is easier said than done.

    No, illustrative of how those responsible cannot protect those that are obviously the most vulnerable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    Fairly big development in the last hour.
    HSE admits that 70-80 cases per day (for 10000 tests) are false positives.
    Christ.
    https://twitter.com/DavQuinn/status/1308493818027741184?s=20

    Probably good reason to keep an eye hospitalisations and ICU admissions primarily over cases. How are they going?

    How do they know false positives are false positives in order to provide that 70-80 figure?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,135 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Fairly big development in the last hour.
    HSE admits that 70-80 cases per day (for 10000 tests) are false positives.
    Christ.
    https://twitter.com/DavQuinn/status/1308493818027741184?s=20

    That means nearly every day half (and maybe more) of all these positive cases are not positive yet we are killing the economy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,295 ✭✭✭jojofizzio


    Fairly big development in the last hour.
    HSE admits that 70-80 cases per day (for 10000 tests) are false positives.
    Christ.
    https://twitter.com/DavQuinn/status/1308493818027741184?s=20

    Ah FFS:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Based on the HSE response just now... we've had approx 600 false positives in the last 7 days..........


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,423 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Fairly big development in the last hour.
    HSE admits that 70-80 cases per day (for 10000 tests) are false positives.
    Christ.
    https://twitter.com/DavQuinn/status/1308493818027741184?s=20
    Is it really though?
    Tests can give false negatives as well as false positives.
    David Quinn acting like he has just uncovered a massive story....he really hasn't.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 466 ✭✭DangerScouse


    Based on the HSE response just now... we've had approx 600 false positives in the last 7 days..........

    :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    gmisk wrote: »
    Is it really though?
    Tests can give false negatives as well as false positives.
    We're using such a high PCR cycle I'm fairly certain the chances of false negatives are quite low.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    Based on the HSE response just now... we've had approx 600 false positives in the last 7 days..........

    You didn't mention the fact that they retest weak positives so this reduces false positives overall and unlikely that they're as high as you say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,605 ✭✭✭2ndcoming


    From the Twitter of the Director of the Iona Institute. Ask me hole.

    Here's a more substantiated explanation for anyone who still prefers their info in more than the out of context clippings of articles from lunatics' twitter pages.

    https://modernsocietyinitiative.org/latest-research/f/rr-why-false-positives-arent-driving-the-rise-in-covid-cases


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    :rolleyes:
    You want the math? Read the HSE response. For every 10,000 there's 70-80.
    We've done 90,000 past 7 days.
    Multiply 70-80 by 7.
    Between 490 and 560.
    Am I wrong?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,423 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    You didn't mention the fact that they retest weak positives so this reduces false positives overall and unlikely that they're as high as you say.
    Exactly


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,938 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Will ye stop, what few dubs haven't been down the last few months will be down

    ;) nah too far far away !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,135 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    You didn't mention the fact that they retest weak positives so this reduces false positives overall and unlikely that they're as high as you say.

    Where has it been said they are doing that? Going by the twitter attachment they are not doing it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    You want the math? Read the HSE response. For every 10,000 there's 70-80.
    We've done 90,000 past 7 days.
    Multiply 70-80 by 7.
    Between 490 and 560.
    Am I wrong?

    Yes, you're wrong. You didn't read the thing fully. They retest weak positives, so the figure for false positives quoted there is likely lower


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement