Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XX-26,644 in ROI (1,772 deaths) 6,064 in NI (556 deaths) (08/08)Read OP

17879818384333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭ShineOn7



    6 across all hosptials is great


    Is it fair to say that vast majority of those not hospitalised suffer no real lasting damage and recover within a few weeks?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,178 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly



    I lauged out loud reading that - are they crazy, is anyone wanting to go there sane


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,913 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    ShineOn7 wrote: »
    Is it fair to say that vast majority of those not hospitalised suffer no real lasting damage and recover within a few weeks?

    Not necessarily

    Report Suggests Some ‘Mildly Symptomatic’ Covid-19 Patients Endure Serious Long-Term Effects


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    What is it going to take for people in this thread to stop downplaying this.
    In the Netherlands, the Lung Foundation, together with the University of Maastricht and the CIRO group,* surveyed 1,622 Covid-19 patients who had reported a number of long-term effects from their illness. Ninety-one percent of the patients were not hospitalized, which indicates that the vast majority of the surveyed patients would fall under the category “mildly symptomatic.” The average age of the patients surveyed was 53.

    Nearly 88% of patients reported persistent intense fatigue, while almost three out of four had continued shortness of breath. Other enduring symptoms included, among other things, chest pressure (45% of patients), headache and muscle ache (40% and 36%, respectively), elevated pulse (30%), and dizziness (29%). Perhaps the most startling finding was that 85% of the surveyed patients considered themselves healthy prior to getting Covid-19. One or more months after getting the disease, only 6% consider themselves healthy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,178 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly



    The report is not based on a clinical study - even getting the flu can knock you for six for a long time (like many viruses) even for patients who "considered themselves healthy prior to getting" it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,178 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    s1ippy wrote: »
    What is it going to take for people in this thread to stop downplaying this.

    Using a percentage of all patients even tho 9% were hospitalized skews all credibitiliy of the following figures

    "Nearly 88% of patients reported persistent intense fatigue" - for how long exactly? Not exactly groundbreaking research saying that - was it a week, 2 weeks, 3 days or I still felt a bit crap after testing negative

    The posted link just links the word" study" to another news site - click bait headlines not even worth investing reading time on (wouldn't even call it a study without any real data)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,931 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Only 8 in hospital in a country of 5 million is truly brilliant and really should be highlighted more. It's been less than 15 for ages now, but is largely ignored when the media and everyone else is in panic mode.

    It’s great. But ‘celebrating’ is something that we don’t need to be doing. Just focusing on our discipline that got us to this stage is enough. Keep the train on the tracks, no detours, discipline.


  • Posts: 18,047 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    fritzelly wrote: »
    Using a percentage of all patients even tho 9% were hospitalized skews all credibitiliy of the following figures

    "Nearly 88% of patients reported persistent intense fatigue" - for how long exactly? Not exactly groundbreaking research saying that - was it a week, 2 weeks, 3 days or I still felt a bit crap after testing negative

    The posted link just links the word" study" to another news site - click bait headlines not even worth investing reading time on (wouldn't even call it a study without any real data)

    The figures are based on people who said they were suffering long term effects. We have no idea based on that quote what percentage of people that makes up.

    I have a feeling that poster skipped that part and doesn't understand that the entire sample size has actually reported having long term effects, and is apply those percentages to Covid-19 in general. As in incorrectly reading it as 88% of people who get Covid-19 get chronic fatigue.

    And long term medically means this stuff will impact you for a long time. It's far too early to start saying Covid-19 will leave you chronically fatigued for decades because these people reported still being tired a month after diagnosis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,346 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    fritzelly wrote: »
    Using a percentage of all patients even tho 9% were hospitalized skews all credibitiliy of the following figures

    "Nearly 88% of patients reported persistent intense fatigue" - for how long exactly? Not exactly groundbreaking research saying that - was it a week, 2 weeks, 3 days or I still felt a bit crap after testing negative

    The posted link just links the word" study" to another news site - click bait headlines not even worth investing reading time on (wouldn't even call it a study without any real data)

    I suppose some of us just don’t have the time and energy to be scraping the internet for every bit and morsel of scary stuff that may or may not have happened to one or two people.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 473 ✭✭ChelseaRentBoy



    Some leading doctors have been banging this drum for weeks now, very worrying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes


    I find this site a little sensationalised, but it pulls together studies very well.

    In this article they explain the worries of the medical establishment and references studies done in the same areas.

    6 months seems to be the time expected to recover from extreme fatigue, any longer and it maybe MS/CFS. So its too early to say at the mo. But the studies are pointing towards long term. That said, most studies in this article are hospitalised cases..

    https://www.thailandmedical.news/news/must-read-covid-19-long-term-effects-covid-19-survivors-could-suffer-chronic-medical-conditions-for-years

    The doctor below chronicles his own mild condition, still wirhin the 6 months, and references the dutch study...

    Indeed, I woke up with the familiar chest heaviness and utter exhaustion which gets worse by sitting at my desk to work.

    This has been a pattern since the start of my covid-19 symptoms in the second half of March. Of course, I was never tested because community testing stopped altogether in the UK on the 12 March so I have no proof of my infection other than the accounts of thousands of people who are describing a similar experience of prolonged, fluctuating, and debilitating symptoms lasting for months. We are the unrecorded. The pandemic has been measured in deaths and in hospital admissions. I struggle to find any precise case definition for “mild” covid-19, which is what I supposedly had and still have not fully recovered from.

    It seems common in many countries that anyone with symptoms, but not hospitalised is counted as a “mild” case, but the degree of covid-19 severity must be defined by the duration of ill health, not just the need for hospital admission. If symptoms last for more than a month and are debilitating to usual activities, it is unreasonable to call this a “mild” case. This misconception of “mild” is not ideal for prevention efforts during the pandemic. The infection is still depicted to the population as only affecting the elderly and those with a chronic condition, while “healthy” people would have no or brief symptoms if they get it. Evidence is emerging that for a significant proportion of those infected this is not true. A Dutch survey of more than 1,600 covid-19 patients, 91% of which were not hospitalised and 85% described their health as good before the infection, found that symptoms such as fatigue (88%), shortness of breath (75%), chest pressure (45%), headache (40%), muscle pain (36%) and palpitations (32%) last for months after initial infection. Nearly half of those surveyed said they were no longer able to exercise.

    https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/07/28/nisreen-a-alwan-what-exactly-is-mild-covid-19/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    s1ippy wrote: »
    What is it going to take for people in this thread to stop downplaying this.

    The definition of long term seems to be missed used in this context. That is what is putting people off these claims. A fews months is very short term after a serious viral infection.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes


    More red flags:

    https://twitter.com/DrZoeHyde/status/1249218084163842049

    Scroll down through these tweet replies, many studies referenced here:

    https://twitter.com/noawitheringly/status/1287847417002500100


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    The definition of long term seems to be missed used in this context. That is what is putting people off these claims. A fews months is very short term after a serious viral infection.
    True, however I'd say on an individual level it'd be wise not to hope for the best and deal with the information we have - which is that many people who have had even mild covid seem to be suffering long-term issues, and we don't know yet whether these will become chronic conditions or will ease off over time. It reminds me of the stories from older generations about TB, with people living with damaged or dead lungs for the rest of their lives. There's enough here to say that you want to avoid getting this virus.

    It's also head-scratching for me that the "anti-vax"/"open up" crowd seem to be willing to take their chances with this virus and the unknown impacts on short and long-term health, yet are terrified to take vaccines which will have months of testing and in most cases are based on existing technologies.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    I got to love the minimisers on here who stick there head in the sand daily about the seriousness this poses.

    I bet during aids HIV epidemic it was easier to be ignorant.

    any who I digress. I'd hope that there are no long term consequences for people. There clearly are people who got over this and are grand.
    There is no evidence that this can't fvck you up big time.

    This was the most morbidly interesting study I've read this week. (the peer reviewed airborne one coming in second)
    Based on the majority who recovered at home!!!!

    The study below is incredibly shocking. Most didn't go to hospital.
    This could absolutely explain some of the long term effects people are experiencing. (you kinda need your heart pumping on all cylinders.
    Now by all means go ahead and minimise, bull****, confound.
    I've highlighted the pertinent points for the non readers among us.

    Won't change the conclusion. If this doesn't make you take it seriously you didn't understand it.

    Main Outcomes and Measures

    • Demographic characteristics,
    • cardiac blood markers, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging were obtained.
    • Comparisons were made with age-matched and sex-matched control groups of healthy volunteers (n = 50) and risk factor–matched patients (n = 57).
    • Of the 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19, 67 (67%) recovered at home, while 33 (33%) required hospitalization.
    • At the time of CMR, high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) was detectable (3 pg/mL or greater) in 71 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 (71%) and significantly elevated (13.9 pg/mL or greater) in 5 patients (5%).
    • A total of 78 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 (78%) had abnormal CMR findings, including raised myocardial native T1 (n = 73), raised myocardial native T2 (n = 60), myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (n = 32), and pericardial enhancement (n = 22).
    • There was a small but significant difference between patients who recovered at home vs in the hospital for native T1 mapping (median [IQR], 1122 [1113-1132] ms vs 1143 [1131-1156] ms; P = .02) but not for native T2 mapping or hsTnT levels.
    • Conclusions and Relevance In this study of a cohort of German patients recently recovered from COVID-19 infection, CMR revealed cardiac involvement in 78 patients (78%) and ongoing myocardial inflammation in 60 patients (60%), independent of preexisting conditions, severity and overall course of the acute illness, and time from the original diagnosis.
    • These findings indicate the need for ongoing investigation of the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19.
    • The median (IQR) time interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and CMR was 71 (64-92) days. Of the 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19, 67 (67%) recovered at home, while 33 (33%) required hospitalization.
    • That's 9 and a half weeks to 13 weeks after test


    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2768916


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Some leading doctors have been banging this drum for weeks now, very worrying.

    Some


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,139 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    s1ippy wrote: »
    What is it going to take for people in this thread to stop downplaying this.

    Would you consider 2 or 3 months long term, i wouldnt.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I got to love the minimisers on here who stick there head in the sand daily about the seriousness this poses.

    I bet during aids HIV epidemic it was easier to be ignorant.

    any who I digress. I'd hope that there are no long term consequences for people. There clearly are people who got over this and are grand.
    There is no evidence that this can't fvck you up big time.

    This was the most morbidly interesting study I've read this week. (the peer reviewed airborne one coming in second)
    Based on the majority who recovered at home!!!!

    The study below is incredibly shocking. Most didn't go to hospital.
    This could absolutely explain some of the long term effects people are experiencing. (you kinda need your heart pumping on all cylinders.
    Now by all means go ahead and minimise, bull****, confound.
    I've highlighted the pertinent points for the non readers among us.

    Won't change the conclusion. If this doesn't make you take it seriously you didn't understand it.




    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2768916

    Not unique to COVID

    https://healthblog.uofmhealth.org/heart-health/when-a-virus-turns-deadly-what-you-should-know-about-myocarditis

    https://academic.oup.com/cardiovascres/article/doi/10.1093/cvr/cvaa117/5826367

    And up to 50% of cases of myocarditis are caused by infectious agents including the common cold

    https://www.cardiosecur.com/magazine/specialist-articles-on-the-heart/heart-muscle-inflammation-myocarditis


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,139 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    I got to love the minimisers on here who stick there head in the sand daily about the seriousness this poses.

    I bet during aids HIV epidemic it was easier to be ignorant.

    any who I digress. I'd hope that there are no long term consequences for people. There clearly are people who got over this and are grand.
    There is no evidence that this can't fvck you up big time.

    This was the most morbidly interesting study I've read this week. (the peer reviewed airborne one coming in second)
    Based on the majority who recovered at home!!!!

    The study below is incredibly shocking. Most didn't go to hospital.
    This could absolutely explain some of the long term effects people are experiencing. (you kinda need your heart pumping on all cylinders.
    Now by all means go ahead and minimise, bull****, confound.
    I've highlighted the pertinent points for the non readers among us.

    Won't change the conclusion. If this doesn't make you take it seriously you didn't understand it.




    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2768916

    The giant writing did it for me, you do the majority of us can not make any sense of this


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,461 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd



    I was actually just about to post one of them links.

    Some people don't understand that something like myocarditis was around before covid and caused by other illnesses apart from covid. As you point out the common cold also giving this risk.

    Its much like some studies that some users posted here about scaring of the lungs from covid without realising that multiple other typical illnesses also cause scaring of the lungs.

    Long term side effects of covid are unknown, a few months is not long term nor is it enough to draw conclusions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,054 ✭✭✭D.Q


    There has now been 20 threads of hysteria, with people painstakingly scouring the internet for deliberately rare, deliberately scare-mongering links.

    The fact that they are saying other people are burying their heads in the sand would be hilarious if it wasn't so sad.

    Pull your own head away from the "covid longterm damage" google searches, stop playing scientist and stick your head out the window instead. The sky is not falling. We have EIGHT people in ICU. We're doing grand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes


    2/2) Cough (43%) and fatigue (35%) were the symptoms least likely to have resolved. Of those with shortness of breath, it had not yet resolved in 29%.

    In comparison, 90% of outpatients with influenza recover by 2 weeks. Suggests recovery can be prolonged even in mild #COVID19.

    https://twitter.com/DrZoeHyde/status/1287298794732756994


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,382 ✭✭✭petes


    Your replies to anything that you disagree with are some of the most condescending I've ever seen on here.

    Point in case above

    The picture could indeed be pointed back as sticking their head in sand over anything that's refuted or questioned.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Your replies to anything that you disagree with are some of the most condescending I've ever seen on here.
    Point in case above

    I'm not disagreeing. It either is or it isn't. Do you understand the difference.
    I don't agree with racism.

    I can't say now I don't agree with it being airborne because it fvcking is.

    Let's get some things straight.
    I don't know you.
    I don't care about you.

    I do care about understanding this pandemic and pathogen.
    The scientific method removes you and your emotions from what is real and what is not real.
    I don't care for people who minimise in a professional or semi professional basis.

    Have fun counting the numbers whether they are bigger or smaller than you agree with. Spoiler alert. September will be bigger.

    Doesn't change how you get infected.

    It's only through education can people get on with their lives.

    https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1288523940046962688?s=20


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    2/2) Cough (43%) and fatigue (35%) were the symptoms least likely to have resolved. Of those with shortness of breath, it had not yet resolved in 29%.

    In comparison, 90% of outpatients with influenza recover by 2 weeks. Suggests recovery can be prolonged even in mild #COVID19.

    https://twitter.com/DrZoeHyde/status/1287298794732756994
    TBH this really gives the impression that none of this has ever happened before. There's an occasional persistent cough which emerges during the winter season, which can take weeks to clear. It's the nature of respiratory infections.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,054 ✭✭✭D.Q





    Let's get some things straight.
    I don't know you.
    I don't care about you.

    I do care about understanding this pandemic and pathogen.
    The scientific method removes you and your emotions from what is real and what is not real.
    I don't care for people who minimise in a professional or semi professional basis.

    Have fun counting the numbers whether they are bigger or smaller than you agree with. Spoiler alert. September will be bigger.

    Doesn't change how you get infected.

    It's only through education can people get on with their lives.

    https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1288523940046962688?s=20


    Your posts read like someone that has really and truly gone off the deep end.

    Just link after link. Really condescending to anyone with a different opinion. There's no need for the "giant writing" comments, or the "spoiler alerts" as if you have any more of a clue than anyone else.

    "I don't know you, I dont care about you, I care about this pathogen" is just bizarre and would be more suited to a straight to dvd disaster movie.

    I think both sides will find links to suit their narrative. the truth is somewhere in the middle most likely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Rob A. Bank


    A sad new record was set yesterday with 290,459 new cases being reported in one day.

    And ~190 thousand of the ~290 thousand new Covid-19 cases reported yesterday were from just three countries !

    Brazil, USA and India were responsible for 2/3rds of all the reported new cases..

    The government could and should reduce the obvious risk of seeding from these red hot virus hotspots by banning entry from those countries until their get their situations under control.

    Not doing so makes a complete mockery of all the hard work done by the Irish public over recent months.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    mandrake04 wrote: »
    Antibody tests only test for antibodies, antibodies can wane over time and at different rates in different people. If you are not presenting antibodies its not the fault of the test its just a part of life.

    I know. My point is that they are not a definitive tool for assessing whether or not a person had the virus. In the future there may be different way to test for that. But right now as a method for assessing how many people in a community were infected, they are probably not providing accurate results. The test in itself isn't wrong but it isn't the test that will provide the information being being looked for from it.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    D.Q wrote: »
    Your posts read like someone that has really and truly gone off the deep end.
    Oh yeah anyone who wants to learn about the realities of the virus now is just insane, that's perfect.

    Could we maybe have two threads, one for people who want to say how grand the pandemic is going but the government should really post lower numbers and the other for people who want to engage with the science behind what is happening to people who get covid?

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/sam-mcconkey-covid-19-is-grumbling-around-young-people-1.4317033

    McConkey has a great point here, that there seems to be a worrying amount of asymptomatic transmission in the community. This could quickly rip through the older population like the flu so easily does in the months we're now facing into.
    The current trend in confirmed cases is “very similar to what we had in February and March before we had large numbers of elderly people getting it, who sadly passed away from it,” he said.

    “This is the sort of grumbling of the virus among young healthy people, who are often minimally symptomatic.

    “The risk is that they inevitably meet with their parents and grandparents and older people and then in two or four weeks’ time it all goes wild in older people again.”

    Dr Ronan Glynn, the acting chief medical officer, said earlier this week that 75 per cent of cases are now among those under 45, with a median age of 33.

    While young people are unlikely to die from the virus, they are likely to spread it around, said Mr McConkey.

    I feel very fortunate to be working from home. There's no way I would put my family at risk by going in to some stuffy office and interacting with others who have been who knows where. It's out there freely circulating in a big proportion of society (many of whom are in complete denial like those in this thread so determined to shout down anyone discussing the seriousness of this virus) so now is the time to be incredibly vigilant and take care of yourself.

    I've a feeling in a couple more months, just like at the start of this, a lot of people will be a lot less dismissive. The next few months are going to be absolute mayhem.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement