Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid19 Part XVII-24,841 in ROI (1,639 deaths) 4,679 in NI (518 deaths)(28/05)Read OP

Options
1267268270272273324

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge



    Covid-19: face mask rules more political than scientific, says UK expert

    Study reveals cloth coverings reduce airflow but Covid-19 effectiveness remains unproven

    The wearing of cloth face masks by the public was becoming more about politics than science, one expert has argued, as a new study reveals potential benefits and problems of the coverings.

    Now a new study by researchers at the University of Edinburgh has looked into the impact of different types of face mask on airflow ejected by a wearer when they breathed or coughed, including standard surgical masks, FFP2 respirators and cloth masks.

    The researchers found all face masks without a valve, including cloth masks, reduced the distance exhaled air travelled in a forward direction by more than 90%. But they added that fit was essential, pointing out that “surgical, handmade masks, and face shields, generate significant leakage jets that have the potential to disperse virus-laden fluid particles by several metres,” and that such jets tend to be directed downwards or backwards.

    But Kolstoe said there was limited evidence about how effective cloth masks were, or whether they have a big impact. The upshot was a debate that was more political than scientific.

    “My feeling is that this is becoming more of a statement, a statement of solidarity. By going out and wearing a face mask you show that you are taking action, you show other people you are concerned about this, you are concerned about them, you are concerned about yourself. But perhaps conversely by not wearing a face mask that is also a statement as well,” said Kolstoe, pointing to a recent Politico article with the headline “Wearing a mask is for smug liberals. Refusing to is for reckless Republicans.”

    Describing homemade face coverings, Kolstoe said: “I don’t think it does any particular harm to wear, them I don’t think it does any particular good to wear them – and as a consequence you are going to get people jumping on either side of the bandwagon. [If there was evidence showing cloth masks] make a massive difference, then we wouldn’t be having this argument.



    513612.png[/QUOTE]

    Supermarket staff largely evade virus in Ireland


    Three big supermarket chains operating in Ireland have reported low levels of the coronavirus among staff, despite staying open throughout the pandemic.

    Lidl said that, of 5,200 staff, 11 in Ireland and three in Northern Ireland had tested positive for Covid-19 — just 0.3% of its workforce on the island.

    Aldi, another German supermarket chain, said 10 of its workforce of more than 4,000 had tested positive for Covid-19. Tesco, which has 13,000 staff in Ireland, declined to say how many had tested positive for the virus but said it was a “small number”.

    SuperValu said it had “a very limited number of cases” across its 223 stores in Ireland.

    Aldi said each of its 10 workers who had the virus had fully recovered and returned to work.


    “Given the number of people we employ in Ireland — more than 13,000 — some of our colleagues will of course be affected by the virus, and a small number have tested positive for Covid-19,” said a Tesco statement.

    “In these cases, our colleagues receive full sick pay from day one. All affected colleagues have recovered or are currently in recovery.”


    So, as they've extinguished transfer within the community, and supermarkets were open all along, it would appear reasonably safe to wear masks going into a shop? Be it to protect yourself, or to protect others. Same amount of shoppers in supermarkets regardless of restriction phases.

    On top of this, CDC now saying it's reasonably unlikely to catch virus from surfaces, and people have not been transferring it to each other in supermarkets or we would surely know about it. And if asymptomatic transmission is going on (and if the CMO is incorrect) surely hospital cases would be a lot more.




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    Strazdas wrote: »
    Watching an interesting interview with Cillian de Gascun on VM and he reckons big outdoor events could resume soon enough. He says if it was the case that there was very little Covid-19 circulating in Ireland, he doesn't think it would be particularly risky to go ahead with such events. He added that it would be impossible to have no risk of transmission but that would not be a reason to ban them.

    The idea of waiting for a vaccine before sport and outdoor events with crowds can recommence in Ireland is clearly a nonsense (a vaccine could be ten years away).
    Yeah, fantastic, because clearly *no outdoor events spread it, especially in the early days. Did he really say that or are you making it up, because I very much doubt he did.

    *Cheltenham, many football matches


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭normanoffside


    It Doesn't look like a Second wave is really a concern at the moment.
    I note that the new infections in the countries below are more or less where ours have been for the last week or so.

    https://twitter.com/ProfKarolSikora/status/1264500520313634817


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭Flickerfusion


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Yeah, people aren't spending money on unnecessary things like going to watch live sports, or live music, or consuming alcohol.
    I'm a huge sports fan by the way so I'm missing out big.
    A side effect, the economy might recover quicker with all this extra cash not going into the same pockets.
    We don't have to wait for a vaccine either. Quarantine all incomers until they pass a test and order everyone to wear facemasks in urban areas, shops, public transport etc. and we'll have no virus in a short while. Then you can start up all these activities again.

    The problem with that though is that one person's description of unnecessary spending is someone else's livelihood. Money moves within an economy by people spending on things that aren't essentials as well as essential goods.

    A lot of spend is also moving from local economy to internet retailers and a lot of Irish retailers really are not geared up to sell online.

    If the state had lashed a few million into funding an Irish online retail platform with a single log in for end users (like Amazon) to help small businesses sell online it would have helped a lot. The biggest issue for small retailers selling online isn't really the technicalities of getting a website up and running, it's getting people to visit their websites, register and spend and in a lot of cases, people will just go to amazon.co.uk and not spread their money around.

    You've also got a risk that consumer sentiment will take a while to come back, or may not come back to the level it was at. The Irish public have been through a fairly horrendous recession in 2008 - 2012, which saw a lot of lives turned upside down and now we (and most of the rest of the world) is back into what will almost definitely be another deep recession.

    I would just be a little concerned that many people will not start spending again, at least not for a year or so, which could result in the whole thing being a lot worse.

    I'm not saying throw caution to the wind and run out and party, but we need to be pragmatic and nuanced about what can be returned to normality or some kind of new temporary normality anyway.

    For example, I'm not quite understanding why, with travel restrictions, we can't regionalise the opening up. There are genuinely parts of the country that are a lot lower risk than others, yet we've just got this one national blanket policy and at the same time we've restriction of travel anyway. Doesn't really make a lot of sense. France did "Green zones" and "red zones" quite successfully.

    Although, Ireland quite literally has no real regional or local government devolved powers or any kind of health competence so, I would assume that could be a major part of the problem. We have always ranked as one of the most over centralised systems of government in the OECD.

    I'm also getting rather nervous about this lack of formation of a government. There's a huge risk we will just drift into indecisiveness with the civil service and HSE operating on autopilot. This caretaker arrangement is going on too long and none of the parties seem to be willing to take big leaps of faith and just get on with it. Disappointed with all of them tbh as it's showing a wide array of parties that are unwilling to take decisions in the national interest.

    The prospect of running a second general election in the middle of this is also worrying. It's impractical. Canvassing would be difficult. A lot of interaction could end up online. Voter turnout and engagement could be low and you could end up with some utterly weird result.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    It Doesn't look like a Second wave is really a concern at the moment.
    I note that the new infections in the countries below are more or less where ours have been for the last week or so.

    https://twitter.com/ProfKarolSikora/status/1264500520313634817


    a second wave needs time to build up, there won't be one for a while but surely numbers will increase eventually


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths




  • Registered Users Posts: 33,241 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    It Doesn't look like a Second wave is really a concern at the moment.
    I note that the new infections in the countries below are more or less where ours have been for the last week or so.

    https://twitter.com/ProfKarolSikora/status/1264500520313634817

    I think the poitn here is that easing of restrictions is safe at the moment, rather than a second wave. A second wave isn't expected soon and might not happen until September/October.

    There's also the idea that it won't be as bad becasue countries will be ready for it. I read somewhere that the smart money is on it being more infectious but less deadly, so more cases but not as many serious ones.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭Flickerfusion


    Good opinion piece in the Times.

    That call was met with just formalising the self-isolation requirement though. The idea of quarantining people entering the country in specialist facilities was not taken up. A lot changed in the few days since that was written.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,676 ✭✭✭Worztron


    For someone who lives with at risk people -- how dangerous is it to get multiple buses to and from work these days? I heard on the radio a few days ago that only 1% of passengers on buses & trains wore masks.

    Mitch Hedberg: "Rice is great if you're really hungry and want to eat two thousand of something."



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭normanoffside


    I think the poitn here is that easing of restrictions is safe at the moment, rather than a second wave. A second wave isn't expected soon and might not happen until September/October.

    There's also the idea that it won't be as bad becasue countries will be ready for it. I read somewhere that the smart money is on it being more infectious but less deadly, so more cases but not as many serious ones.

    This is bound to be the case with countries testing capacity, contact tracing systems etc already built up.
    New cases should be easily identified and isolated.
    The stories of the outbreaks in Restaurants and churches in Germany if anything prove this- they've been able to Locate, contact and test all the people affected.

    Compare that to back in February and March when we were so overwhelmed and unable to even test people with symptoms that the simple thing was to just tell everyone to stay at home.

    That appears to have worked so we should just get on with it now with caution.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,209 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    I think the poitn here is that easing of restrictions is safe at the moment, rather than a second wave. A second wave isn't expected soon and might not happen until September/October.

    There's also the idea that it won't be as bad becasue countries will be ready for it. I read somewhere that the smart money is on it being more infectious but less deadly, so more cases but not as many serious ones.

    A second wave might not even happen. Nobody really knows.

    If there was one we're much better prepared now, we had no idea how to combat it back in March hence the lockdowns


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,866 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    The problem with that though is that one person's description of unnecessary spending is someone else's livelihood. Money moves within an economy by people spending on things that aren't essentials as well as essential goods.
    I spoke about sporting events, live music events and pubs. I wasn't talking about shops
    A lot of spend is also moving from local economy to internet retailers and a lot of Irish retailers really are not geared up to sell online.
    In all fairness that's an issues for the Irish retail business. In this day and age of you are not set up for online sales you are behind the times.
    If the state had lashed a few million into funding an Irish online retail platform with a single log in for end users (like Amazon) to help small businesses sell online it would have helped a lot. The biggest issue for small retailers selling online isn't really the technicalities of getting a website up and running, it's getting people to visit their websites, register and spend and in a lot of cases, people will just go to amazon.co.uk and not spread their money around.
    Again this is all pointing to a very amateur business approach.
    You've also got a risk that consumer sentiment will take a while to come back, or may not come back to the level it was at. The Irish public have been through a fairly horrendous recession in 2008 - 2012, which saw a lot of lives turned upside down and now we (and most of the rest of the world) is back into what will almost definitely be another deep recession.
    I don't agree with this at all. It will take families time to catch up after a rough financial period for everybody but this whole pandemic is going to create thousands of jobs worldwide because we were all caught unprepared and there'll be huge money put into trying to prevent something like this ever happening again.
    I would just be a little concerned that many people will not start spending again, at least not for a year or so, which could result in the whole thing being a lot worse.
    I think it'll only take a month or two. Most people have had a mortgage repayment pause so things aren't that bad.
    I'm not saying throw caution to the wind and run out and party, but we need to be pragmatic and nuanced about what can be returned to normality or some kind of new temporary normality anyway.
    Huge difference in sober people going to shops or restaurants.
    Festivals, sporting events and pubs bring together people who consume drugs and alcohol. It's no harm giving those a good long break.
    For example, I'm not quite understanding why, with travel restrictions, we can't regionalise the opening up. There are genuinely parts of the country that are a lot lower risk than others, yet we've just got this one national blanket policy and at the same time we've restriction of travel anyway. Doesn't really make a lot of sense. France did "Green zones" and "red zones" quite successfully.
    You clearly don't understand Irish people. You create green zones and they'll be packed with people from red zones.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭Flickerfusion


    Well back in February to March there was a realistic possibility that we were facing something like what hit Italy, Spain, the UK or New York. Luckily and due to having reduced contacts we did actually avoid that nightmare scenario.

    It's an evolving situation and we know a lot more than we did then but we still face unknowns and unknowable unknowns that could be both positive or negative.

    The more likely best case scenario is probably that this just fizzles back to a low level and we manage it until we get to a vaccine, but it's still very unpredictable and a second wave is most definitely not something anyone can rule out at this stage.

    My sense is that if we keep up the social distancing and hygiene measures the winter might not be that bad. It's very likely that the same measures will also prevent widespread flu infection and people will very likely get the flu vaccines in much higher numbers than usual, so it could end up being a rather calm winter, assuming we all don't totally lose the run of ourselves and move forward pragmatically rather than in knee-jerks.

    Actually many of the measures that we are now building into nursing homes and other such facilities and the greater awareness of infection risks could have huge healthcare benefits in general by reducing transmission of other deadly (albeit it less so) infections like flu, norovirus and maybe even MRSA.

    If the vaccines arrive in 2021, we could be writing this off to the history books as that weird year of the pandemic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge



    Covid-19: face mask rules more political than scientific, says UK expert

    Study reveals cloth coverings reduce airflow but Covid-19 effectiveness remains unproven

    The wearing of cloth face masks by the public was becoming more about politics than science, one expert has argued, as a new study reveals potential benefits and problems of the coverings.

    Now a new study by researchers at the University of Edinburgh has looked into the impact of different types of face mask on airflow ejected by a wearer when they breathed or coughed, including standard surgical masks, FFP2 respirators and cloth masks.

    The researchers found all face masks without a valve, including cloth masks, reduced the distance exhaled air travelled in a forward direction by more than 90%. But they added that fit was essential, pointing out that “surgical, handmade masks, and face shields, generate significant leakage jets that have the potential to disperse virus-laden fluid particles by several metres,” and that such jets tend to be directed downwards or backwards.

    But Kolstoe said there was limited evidence about how effective cloth masks were, or whether they have a big impact. The upshot was a debate that was more political than scientific.

    “My feeling is that this is becoming more of a statement, a statement of solidarity. By going out and wearing a face mask you show that you are taking action, you show other people you are concerned about this, you are concerned about them, you are concerned about yourself. But perhaps conversely by not wearing a face mask that is also a statement as well,” said Kolstoe, pointing to a recent Politico article with the headline “Wearing a mask is for smug liberals. Refusing to is for reckless Republicans.”

    Describing homemade face coverings, Kolstoe said: “I don’t think it does any particular harm to wear, them I don’t think it does any particular good to wear them – and as a consequence you are going to get people jumping on either side of the bandwagon. [If there was evidence showing cloth masks] make a massive difference, then we wouldn’t be having this argument.



    513612.png

    Supermarket staff largely evade virus in Ireland


    Three big supermarket chains operating in Ireland have reported low levels of the coronavirus among staff, despite staying open throughout the pandemic.

    Lidl said that, of 5,200 staff, 11 in Ireland and three in Northern Ireland had tested positive for Covid-19 — just 0.3% of its workforce on the island.

    Aldi, another German supermarket chain, said 10 of its workforce of more than 4,000 had tested positive for Covid-19. Tesco, which has 13,000 staff in Ireland, declined to say how many had tested positive for the virus but said it was a “small number”.

    SuperValu said it had “a very limited number of cases” across its 223 stores in Ireland.

    Aldi said each of its 10 workers who had the virus had fully recovered and returned to work.


    “Given the number of people we employ in Ireland — more than 13,000 — some of our colleagues will of course be affected by the virus, and a small number have tested positive for Covid-19,” said a Tesco statement.

    “In these cases, our colleagues receive full sick pay from day one. All affected colleagues have recovered or are currently in recovery.”

    So, as they've extinguished transfer within the community, and supermarkets were open all along, it would appear reasonably safe to wear masks going into a shop? Be it to protect yourself, or to protect others. Same amount of shoppers in supermarkets regardless of restriction phases.

    On top of this, CDC now saying it's reasonably unlikely to catch virus from surfaces, and people have not been transferring it to each other in supermarkets or we would surely know about it. And if asymptomatic transmission is going on (and if the CMO is incorrect) surely hospital cases would be a lot more.



    For me anyway, I was happy to hear that supermarket staff were/are not catching the virus in any great numbers whatsoever despite lack of masks. I have friends/family that are very concerned about doing a shop, mainly because of all of those lap experiments showing the virus creeping over aisles and infecting everyone.

    That does not appear to have happened at all, pointing to ad hoc contact for short amounts of time being pretty much safe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,157 ✭✭✭sonofenoch


    Well back in February to March there was a realistic possibility that we were facing something like what hit Italy, Spain, the UK or New York. Luckily and due to having reduced contacts we did actually avoid that nightmare scenario.

    It's an evolving situation and we know a lot more than we did then but we still face unknowns and unknowable unknowns that could be both positive or negative.

    The more likely best case scenario is probably that this just fizzles back to a low level and we manage it until we get to a vaccine, but it's still very unpredictable and a second wave is most definitely not something anyone can rule out at this stage.

    My sense is that if we keep up the social distancing and hygiene measures the winter might not be that bad. It's very likely that the same measures will also prevent widespread flu infection and people will very likely get the flu vaccines in much higher numbers than usual, so it could end up being a rather calm winter, assuming we all don't totally lose the run of ourselves and move forward pragmatically rather than in knee-jerks.

    Actually many of the measures that we are now building into nursing homes and other such facilities and the greater awareness of infection risks could have huge healthcare benefits in general by reducing transmission of other deadly (albeit it less so) infections like flu, norovirus and maybe even MRSA.

    If the vaccines arrive in 2021, we could be writing this off to the history books as that weird year of the pandemic.

    In what fashion? from a numbers perspective we were never going to reach their numbers purely on demographics .....do some people actually believe we were in threat of having 100's or 1000's die daily from this virus :rolleyes:

    for us the equivalent would be maybe 100 dying a day......and we never really got close to that


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,547 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    sonofenoch wrote: »

    for us the equivalent would be maybe 100 dying a day......and we never really got close to that

    And that was because...…?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭Flickerfusion


    sonofenoch wrote: »
    In what fashion? from a numbers perspective we were never going to reach their numbers purely on demographics .....do some people actually believe we were in threat of having 100's or 1000's die daily from this virus :rolleyes:

    for us the equivalent would be maybe 100 dying a day......and we never really got close to that

    Rolls eyes : we all know how per capita works and even on a per capita basis, Ireland did not actually do very well on this. We've had more deaths per capita than many of the places we've been sneering at, including the USA.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Rob A. Bank




    For me anyway, I was happy to hear that supermarket staff were/are not catching the virus in any great numbers whatsoever despite lack of masks. I have friends/family that are very concerned about doing a shop, mainly because of all of those lap experiments showing the virus creeping over aisles and infecting everyone.

    That does not appear to have happened at all, pointing to ad hoc contact for short amounts of time being pretty much safe.

    Are you seriously postulating that this virus is not very infectious ?

    It only went from one case to greater than five million reported cases in around 6 months worldwide.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Rob A. Bank


    Modelers find that tens of thousands of U.S. deaths could have been prevented.

    Columbia University disease modelers have estimated that if the United States had begun imposing social-distancing measures one week earlier in March, about 36,000 fewer people would have died in the pandemic. (up to May 3rd)

    And if the country had begun locking down cities and limiting social contact on March 1, two weeks earlier than when most people started staying home, a vast majority of the nation’s deaths — about 83 percent — would have been avoided.

    The 'How Earlier Control Measures Could Have Saved Lives' graph on this page is telling.

    The lesson is clear... if you wait until the numbers begin to accelerate (as we did) it's already too late to avoid a calamity.

    During the relaxation of restrictions phase, it is essential to closely monitor infections and immediately clamp down on any new flare-ups, otherwise we are back to square one very quickly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭Flickerfusion


    eagle eye wrote: »

    Again this is all pointing to a very amateur business approach.

    .

    That is an extremely condescending post and shows absolutely no knowledge of the realities of most small retail businesses.

    Many, many businesses function quite happily and successfully without having significant online presence, as the majority of their trade reliably came from people walking through their door.

    Overnight, their world has been turned upside down and customers are suddenly unable to walk in their door and this was caused by a once in a century outbreak of a highly contagious virus.

    To say that their business approach is amateur is just vicim blaming.

    Many of those local retailers had as much need to be online as your average householder had to have two giant larder freezers in the garage and stockpile of hand sanitiser and PPE.

    Practical supports around helping small businesses to get online are needed, and in a way that does not throw them into huge generic platforms like Amazon would make a hell of a lot of sense right now.

    The government made funds available for this, but they need to be a lot more targeted and probably need to work with state bodies like Bord Bia, LEOs industry bodies etc etc to push out some kind of platform for Irish retail.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,157 ✭✭✭sonofenoch


    Rolls eyes : we all know how per capita works and even on a per capita basis, Ireland did not actually do very well on this. We've had more deaths per capita than many of the places we've been sneering at, including the USA.

    sneering you say? rolls eyes :


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    Churches need to stay closed in Ireland. They should be on the list of last things to open.

    I agree they are not essential or indeed do not really contribute into the economy.

    Conversely Trump has just declared them essential. America has quite a few fundamentalist religions where people believe they will be saved by their God etc. I'd expect that idiocy to drive some fairly big outbreaks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Rob A. Bank


    The importance of early lockdown is also well illustrated in Europe by Slovakia – 5.4 million people – 1504 cases and 28 deaths to date.

    Land borders on all sides but yet the lowest number of deaths per capita from the coronavirus in Europe.

    According to mobile phone data, about 50,000 Slovaks traveled to coronavirus-stricken northern Italy during the second half of February and early March, but Slovakia didn’t experience its own significant outbreak after they returned.

    How they did it...

    (1) National lockdown on March 16th… 10 days after first confirmed covid-19 case.
    (2) Universal compliance with mitigation measures by the population.
    (3) Universal use of face masks.

    Now shops and hotels are open and restaurants and bars can serve patrons outdoors since May 6th.

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/05/06/slovakia-coronavirus-pandemic-public-trust-media/


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    Supermarket staff largely evade virus in Ireland


    Three big supermarket chains operating in Ireland have reported low levels of the coronavirus among staff, despite staying open throughout the pandemic.

    Lidl said that, of 5,200 staff, 11 in Ireland and three in Northern Ireland had tested positive for Covid-19 — just 0.3% of its workforce on the island.

    Aldi, another German supermarket chain, said 10 of its workforce of more than 4,000 had tested positive for Covid-19. Tesco, which has 13,000 staff in Ireland, declined to say how many had tested positive for the virus but said it was a “small number”.

    SuperValu said it had “a very limited number of cases” across its 223 stores in Ireland.

    Aldi said each of its 10 workers who had the virus had fully recovered and returned to work.


    “Given the number of people we employ in Ireland — more than 13,000 — some of our colleagues will of course be affected by the virus, and a small number have tested positive for Covid-19,” said a Tesco statement.

    “In these cases, our colleagues receive full sick pay from day one. All affected colleagues have recovered or are currently in recovery.”



    For me anyway, I was happy to hear that supermarket staff were/are not catching the virus in any great numbers whatsoever despite lack of masks. I have friends/family that are very concerned about doing a shop, mainly because of all of those lap experiments showing the virus creeping over aisles and infecting everyone.

    That does not appear to have happened at all, pointing to ad hoc contact for short amounts of time being pretty much safe.
    Are you seriously postulating that this virus is not very infectious ?

    It only went from one case to greater than five million reported cases in around 6 months worldwide.

    Where did I say it wasn't very infectious or didn't go to 5m reported cases worldwide?

    All I can see from my post is that 3 supermarket chains operating in Ireland have reported low levels of the coronavirus among staff, despite staying open throughout the pandemic. Presumably because of social distancing measures being implemented.

    I said that I was happy to hear that supermarket staff were/are not catching the virus in any great numbers whatsoever despite lack of masks - are you saying my interpretation is incorrect?

    For the record, I of course believe it is very infectious. And would fully support masks in crowded areas where people are in close contact with the same potentially infected people for periods of time. I just don't believe there is much risk from doing a casual shop. And that appears to be borne out by the very low figures affecting supermarket staff, and perhaps aligns with the idea of a period of time to be in contact with people. Other than direct sneeze/coughs of course.

    I hope you don't mind me having that opinion. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭normanoffside


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    And that was because...…?

    I am certainly not questioning the efficacy of lock downs initially to control the spread of an already rampant Virus.
    To be perfectly honest it appears that the earlier the lock down the better.

    My only issue is the slow easing of restrictions when the disease is under control and experience of other countries is already showing it doesn't bring a second wave.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,296 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    jams100 wrote: »
    Have a link for that? was it on the news or tonight show?

    'Best of Ireland AM' : I think it's repeated again on VM One tonight


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,778 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    Interesting piece in today's times by Mark Tighe.

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/supermarket-staff-largely-evade-virus-in-ireland-zs2wbb9xr

    Given the volumes through stores one would expect a higher level of infection, interesting that this hasn't been the case at all.
    according to themselves


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    according to themselves

    Do you think the main shopping chains are lying?

    The above article quotes Lidl as saying that, of 5,200 staff, 11 in Ireland and three in Northern Ireland had tested positive for Covid-19 — 0.3% of its workforce on the island.

    Interestingly, (well interestingly for me but perhaps not others), in the USA/Canada, the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, which represents approximately 1.3 million workers in the United States and Canada in industries including retail and meatpacking has recently concluded:

    "According to the UFCW’s internal reports, there have been at least 72 worker deaths and 5,322 workers directly impacted among the UFCW’s 1.3 million members who work in grocery, retail, pharmacy, meatpacking, and other essential industries."


    I calculate those figures as suggesting that 0.4% of their members in those industries have been directly impacted. Which isn't a lot different than the figures Lidl is quoting?


  • Registered Users Posts: 39,865 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I am certainly not questioning the efficacy of lock downs initially to control the spread of an already rampant Virus.
    To be perfectly honest it appears that the earlier the lock down the better.

    My only issue is the slow easing of restrictions when the disease is under control and experience of other countries is already showing it doesn't bring a second wave.

    People really need to calm down, week one isn't even up yet.

    Any data we are getting on new infections are people who picked up the virus roughly 2 weeks ago.

    Any potential easing of restrictions has to be based on our data, not on what some "insert random country" are doing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭normanoffside


    Boggles wrote: »
    People really need to calm down, week one isn't even up yet.

    Any data we are getting on new infections are people who picked up the virus roughly 2 weeks ago.

    Any potential easing of restrictions has to be based on our data, not on what some "insert random country" are doing.

    So if our stats remain the same or similar (or even improve) you'd be in favour of the restrictions being eased a bit quicker?

    If so we are on the same page.

    If someone in power could just say this, then I think everyone would be happy.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement