Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Knock/Eirtrade thread

1222325272830

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,246 ✭✭✭✭joujoujou
    Unregistered Users


    I've no knowledge in that matter at all, so correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it's not the best idea to keep engines outdoors just wrapped in plastic, hence they do their best to remove them asap. Apart from aforementioned ownership thingy, of course. ;)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    joujoujou wrote: »
    I've no knowledge in that matter at all, so correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it's not the best idea to keep engines outdoors just wrapped in plastic, hence they do their best to remove them asap. Apart from aforementioned ownership thingy, of course. ;)

    Eh why ? Clouds, hail, humidity, fog, rain, snow, ice, flooded runways. They are extremely durable engines, sitting on a wing in a nacelle with engine covers isn’t going to harm them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,246 ✭✭✭✭joujoujou
    Unregistered Users


    Why? I believe quite similar to any sophisticated stuff. It's perfectly fine while it's working. Not so when lying idle for longer period. Anyway, just my thoughts, so thanks for clarification. :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Teebor15


    joujoujou wrote: »
    I've no knowledge in that matter at all, so correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it's not the best idea to keep engines outdoors just wrapped in plastic, hence they do their best to remove them asap. Apart from aforementioned ownership thingy, of course. ;)

    But don't they spend nearly all their life outdoors, what difference does another few months make.

    No, the real reason they are taken off first is to prevent some ethic minority sneaking in and removing them first...imagine what one of them engines would do to improve the performance of a sulky!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,421 ✭✭✭easygoing39


    The engines have been spotted in the past few weeks heading down the N11 on the back off artic's.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,379 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    If you want to store engines for any period of time they should be preserved in accordance with the maintenance or shop manual. Yes they spend their life outdoors but they are also running everyday, when they are sitting they need to be preserved.

    If you are buying an engine that's been taken off wing, one of the first things you look for is evidence of preservation.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,379 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    Teebor15 wrote: »
    But don't they spend nearly all their life outdoors, what difference does another few months make.

    No, the real reason they are taken off first is to prevent some ethic minority sneaking in and removing them first...imagine what one of them engines would do to improve the performance of a sulky!

    I've seen the inside of hundreds of engines, fresh from a flight, sitting preserved for months, and sitting not preserved for months, there is a huge difference and you can tell straight away if and engine has been poorly preserved, particularly is harsh environments, the build up of salt on the blades is incredible, and that's just the gaspath.

    If the fuel system hasn't been purged and filled with preserving fluid and it's sitting for a good period of time, you may strip out the whole system and replace it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,162 ✭✭✭Comhrá


    Teebor15 wrote: »
    But don't they spend nearly all their life outdoors, what difference does another few months make.

    No, the real reason they are taken off first is to prevent some ethic minority sneaking in and removing them first...imagine what one of them engines would do to improve the performance of a sulky!


    Amazing! Never knew aero engines contained copper piping.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭hopeso




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭Car99


    joujoujou wrote: »
    I've no knowledge in that matter at all, so correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it's not the best idea to keep engines outdoors just wrapped in plastic, hence they do their best to remove them asap. Apart from aforementioned ownership thingy, of course. ;)

    Engines spend 99.9% of their working lives in all types of extreme environments , being stored outside IAW the manufacturers approved procedures would not be a problem. They remove them asap because they are a valuable asset.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭Silent Running


    hopeso wrote: »

    Just looking at Knock airport on Google Earth. They'll need to get slicing and dicing if they're going to fit another A380 there, especially if they've now got a 737 there as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,246 ✭✭✭✭joujoujou
    Unregistered Users


    They already do. When I was there, noticed diggers tirelessly working around the place, now I know why. :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 702 ✭✭✭eastmayo


    Just looking at Knock airport on Google Earth. They'll need to get slicing and dicing if they're going to fit another A380 there, especially if they've now got a 737 there as well.

    There is also 2 no a320 that arrived today to be scrapped. Alot off work to do before we see the next A380.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,165 ✭✭✭Cosmo Kramer


    Went up there yesterday for a look. The SAS 737 is great in terms of giving some perspective to the size of the A380.

    There were a couple of diggers at work on the ground beside the A380, perhaps this is to enlarge the tarmac area for more arrivals.

    Will be plenty of planes getting scrapped in the next couple of years I'd imagine.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    perhaps this is to enlarge the tarmac area for more arrivals.

    ;)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Next one due August 12th 1300 F-HPJD

    Usual health warnings on date and time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,016 ✭✭✭Pat Dunne


    Next one due August 12th 1300 F-HPJD

    Usual health warnings on date and time.

    I feel a road trip coming on! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭leex


    Best pic from a visit on Sunday.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 561 ✭✭✭whodafunk


    Next one due August 12th 1300 F-HPJD

    Usual health warnings on date and time.

    Thanks for that info. I’m about 50km from Knock around that time and considering a visit with the kids. How likely is this to take place? Also is there just 1 runway or where is the best place for viewing?

    Thanks again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,776 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    How are they making a profit out of this, with the number of A380's being grounded and indeed scrapped, the market for parts must be flooded?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,240 ✭✭✭Lurching


    Inquitus wrote: »
    How are they making a profit out of this, with the number of A380's being grounded and indeed scrapped, the market for parts must be flooded?

    They may not make huge profit initially, but there isn't really much of an alternative. Harvesting the green-time out of the engines will be valuable in the long term.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,273 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The alloy content alone must be worth a fair bit.

    Also if AF (or the lessor) parked it up and left it to go derelict somewhere they'd still have to pay parking fees.

    The engines are usually leased from the engine manufacturer so the scrappers don't get anything out of that (except presumably a fee for removing them)

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,982 ✭✭✭✭scudzilla


    Inquitus wrote: »
    How are they making a profit out of this, with the number of A380's being grounded and indeed scrapped, the market for parts must be flooded?

    At 35euro a keyring, quite easily i'd say


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,898 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    scudzilla wrote: »
    At 35euro a keyring, quite easily i'd say

    That racket wont last and likely the scrap company sold on the section of fuselage to keyring company for normal value, nothing close to the 35 per keyring price.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭masit


    Is the second A380 still coming tomorrow? Haven’t heard as much about it as the first 1.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    masit wrote: »
    Is the second A380 still coming tomorrow? Haven’t heard as much about it as the first 1.

    I’m sorry I don’t know. I haven’t heard anything since the last information. If the weather is ok then there is a good chance it will. But as always as this is merely a delivery flight with no passengers waiting the days and times can change radically.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    masit wrote: »
    Is the second A380 still coming tomorrow? Haven’t heard as much about it as the first 1.

    According to the Knock spotters Facebook group the flight has been cancelled until further notice.


  • Posts: 379 [Deleted User]


    Growler!!! wrote: »
    According to the Knock spotters Facebook group the flight has been cancelled until further notice.

    Could you PM me a link to the Facebook group, or put up the link here?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭masit


    Growler!!! wrote: »
    According to the Knock spotters Facebook group the flight has been cancelled until further notice.

    Thanks, anyone know the reg so I can put it into flightradar alerts


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭leex


    masit wrote: »
    Thanks, anyone know the reg so I can put it into flightradar alerts

    Possibly F-HPJD

    https://westernpeople.ie/2020/07/14/knock-airport-expecting-another-big-visitor/#.XzKSHChKiUk


Advertisement