2020 US Presidential Election (aka: The Trump Coronation)

Kermit.de.frog

Overheal wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5w7kwtLJtVc

New ad from the Lincoln Project.

Meanwhile #BunkerBitch still hasn’t found his own voice yet. Still relegated to recycling quotes from talking heads who give him his opinions. #Leadership

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1267432507005448192?s=21

It really does take something for Republicans to be putting out ads like that.

Fair play to them. They know he is a cancer.

eagle eye

Kermit.de.frog wrote:

No one is going to care. No president wins with civil unrest, death and mass unemployment.

In normal circumstances they don't but we don't know how Biden is going to look in the debates. If he comes across as forgetful, confused and moody he could lose. If there's no confidence in him he isn't getting votes.

Kermit.de.frog wrote:

He is a dysfunctional president and these are the results.

Agree fully with this.

Overheal

eagle eye wrote: »

In normal circumstances they don't but we don't know how Biden is going to look in the debates. If he comes across as forgetful, confused and moody he could lose. If there's no confidence in him he isn't getting votes.


Agree fully with this.

The debates at this point can just be asking why was Trump hiding in a bunker retweeting Fox News and sending dogs to attack protesters instead of leading.

notobtuse

Igotadose wrote: »

I'd expect that of President Obama or soon-to-be-coronated President Biden. This guy? You're blowing smoke. Can't even spell.

Like when Obama said police acted stupidly in arresting a professor, or when he said if 'I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon,' or when he suggested the Baltimore police were to blame for the death of a young black man who died while in custody? You know history doesn’t start today, right?

MeMen2_MoRi_

notobtuse wrote: »

I’d say weighing his options, listening to advisors, seeing what jurisdiction and legalities the federal government must contend with, analyzing the impact and effect of the curfews and national guard, and not rushing to judgement. You know… presidential stuff.

Would these be the same jurisdictions legalities that he has told people he had, he's POTUS after all..

How many times does dumb need to be told?

Overheal

notobtuse wrote: »

Like when Obama said police acted stupidly in arresting a professor, or when he said if 'I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon,' or when he suggested the Baltimore police were to blame for the death of a young black man who died while in custody? You know history doesn’t start today, right?

And how many cities burned?

Derp.

notobtuse

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

It really does take something for Republicans to be putting out ads like that.

Fair play to them. They know he is a cancer.

Odd how you put so much credibility on a group of 10 , or so, guys. I think those ads only reach democrats and rouge republicans.

Overheal

So much for Notobtuse’s “common sense”

The WH has ridiculed the notion of the President of the United States addressing the nation in a moment of crisis.

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/kayleigh-mcenany-dismisses-call-for-trump-to-deliver-oval-office-address-a-speech-is-not-going-to-stop-antifa/

DrPhilG

Overheal wrote: »

The debates at this point can just be asking why was Trump hiding in a bunker retweeting Fox News and sending dogs to attack protesters instead of leading.

The debates "can be" that, but I do think it will be the aforementioned case of fighting with a pig.

Trump will ignore whatever Biden throws at him, behave like a child, push buttons and wait for Biden to crack up and respond in kind.

If that happens, it does more damage to Biden than Trump. Everyone already knows that Trump is a petulant child. They're looking to Biden for something else.

If Joe calls Trump fatty (or morbidly obese like Pelosi did) and offers him a fist fight he will have taken the bait.

OK that's the extreme example but like I said, that's how he behaved on the campaign trail when challenged.

Kermit.de.frog

https://twitter.com/DanRather/status/1267275102321696768

notobtuse

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

https://twitter.com/DanRather/status/1267275102321696768

LOL. Dan Rather ... disgraced journalist for pushing a fake story about a president, trying to stay relevant.

Carfacemandog

Overheal wrote: »

So much for Notobtuse’s “common sense”

The WH has ridiculed the notion of the President of the United States addressing the nation in a moment of crisis.

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/kayleigh-mcenany-dismisses-call-for-trump-to-deliver-oval-office-address-a-speech-is-not-going-to-stop-antifa/

This is why true Trump cultists tend to STFU until they get the official line to parrot from the White House, or at least their preferred right wing/far right media. Without fail, whenever they jump the gun and predict what he will do based off what they think he should do... he fails to live up to their expectations.

And one of the first rules of most cults is that the leader needs to basically be infallible, forever exceeding expectations, and never, ever made to look bad or contradicted by his followers.

ChikiChiki

notobtuse wrote: »

LOL. Dan Rather ... disgraced journalist for pushing a fake story about a president, trying to stay relevant.

Is he wrong though?

Answer that.

Overheal

notobtuse wrote: »

LOL. Dan Rather ... disgraced journalist for pushing a fake story about a president, trying to stay relevant.

And what high horse of credibility are you on to attack him for that?

eagle eye

Overheal wrote:

And what high horse of credibility are you on to attack him for that?

He made a statement of fact about Dan Rather, what's your problem with that?

notobtuse

ChikiChiki wrote: »

Is he wrong though?

Answer that.

Opinions can be right to some and wrong to others. I'd say he's wrong... as usual when he treads where he doesn't belong.

Overheal

eagle eye wrote: »

He made a statement of fact about Dan Rather, what's your problem with that?

I made a fair comment about Notobtuse and his history of repeatedly spewing bunk. What’s your problem with that?

Overheal

notobtuse wrote: »

Opinions can be right to some and wrong to others. I'd say he's wrong... as usual when he treads where he doesn't belong.

Why doesn’t he belong? Who are you to say?

Timberrrrrrrr

Thargor wrote: »

Always a tweet:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1162002141172633600

Yup

https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1267333905067257857?s=20

eagle eye

Overheal wrote:

I made a fair comment about Notobtuse and his history of repeatedly spewing bunk. What’s your problem with that?

But this comment he made was true so why attack that post?

Timberrrrrrrr

notobtuse wrote: »

I’d say weighing his options, listening to advisors, seeing what jurisdiction and legalities the federal government must contend with, analyzing the impact and effect of the curfews and national guard, and not rushing to judgement. You know… presidential stuff.

Have you heard about the audio of his calls to governors? Do you think that's "presidential" behaviour?

Overheal

Senator Cotton wants air strikes.

I can’t believe he is running unopposed.

https://twitter.com/jamiedupree/status/1267456995017318401?s=21

Overheal

eagle eye wrote: »

But this comment he made was true so why attack that post?

The comment I made is true so why attack it?

namloc1980

So any sign of the 2nd Amendment militias on the streets to fight against oppressive militarism and curfews?

Timberrrrrrrr

notobtuse wrote: »

LOL. Dan Rather ... disgraced journalist for pushing a fake story about a president, trying to stay relevant.

What was it you recently said about attacking the source?

Overheal

namloc1980 wrote: »

So any sign of the 2nd Amendment militias on the streets to fight against oppressive militarism and curfews?

Thankfully not from what I’ve heard.

ExMachina1000

namloc1980 wrote: »

So any sign of the 2nd Amendment militias on the streets to fight against oppressive militarism and curfews?

Unlikely. Those gun toting folk tend not to attack police and businesses.
This battle is a left teamed with black folk vs police.
The Patriots won't get involved

eagle eye

Overheal wrote:

The comment I made is true so why attack it?

I didn't attack it. I'm asking why you attacked a post which was true?
I'm sure there are plenty of his posts you could attack but you choose one where he tells the truth and has a good point.
I just don't understand your reasons for attacking that post.

MadYaker

namloc1980 wrote: »

So any sign of the 2nd Amendment militias on the streets to fight against oppressive militarism and curfews?

Nah they’re terrified of black people.

Overheal

eagle eye wrote: »

I didn't attack it. I'm asking why you attacked a post which was true?
I'm sure there are plenty of his posts you could attack but you choose one where he tells the truth and has a good point.
I just don't understand your reasons for attacking that post.

I just don’t understand the reasons for you attacking mine, when it seems to offend everything you claim to hold dear with no sense of irony when it comes to criticizing other posts.

A strange hill for you to die on but I am glad to help you wither there.