Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Peter Casey to contest the European elections

Options
1626365676874

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,887 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    They won’t be.

    recent tweets from count centre indicate he will actually be ahead of McHugh!


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,786 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    my figures are based on an exit poll. and of course they COULD be wildy inaccurate but they're probably not.
    Well it appears the exit polls results have been way out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 419 ✭✭Cryptopagan


    Riskymove wrote: »
    recent tweets from count centre indicate he will actually be ahead of McHugh!

    Link to them then.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 419 ✭✭Cryptopagan


    It is interesting to see how difficult Casey supporters find it to reconcile themselves to reality. It’s clear Casey’s bid for a seat in Europe is an abject failure, but they continue to insist that the exit poll is wrong, the tallies are wrong, the latest from count centre is that he’s actually doing well. Certainly not reflecting on the result and wondering if it’s them who are out of touch with reality and not everyone else.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,887 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    Link to them then.

    Here's one with his scribbled estimates based on examining the bundles

    https://twitter.com/patmcgrath/status/1132990859430027271


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    eagle eye wrote: »
    It's based on tallies. They could be wildly innacurate.
    No this is based on actual votes. He seems to have 56K in FPVs, she has 50K.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,786 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    It is interesting to see how difficult Casey supporters find it to reconcile themselves to reality. It’s clear Casey’s bid for a seat in Europe is an abject failure, but they continue to insist that the exit poll is wrong, the tallies are wrong, the latest from count centre is that he’s actually doing well. Certainly not reflecting on the result and wondering if it’s them who are out of touch with reality and not everyone else.

    There is no result yet, when we get a result of the first count then we can talk more.
    How on Earth do you know it's an abject failure before anyone in the count centre?
    What do you consider an abject failure. Is finishing fifth an abject failure in your mind or a close call?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 419 ✭✭Cryptopagan


    eagle eye wrote: »
    There is no result yet, when we get a result of the first count then we can talk more.
    How on Earth do you know it's an abject failure before anyone in the count centre?
    What do you consider an abject failure. Is finishing fifth an abject failure in your mind or a close call?

    That’s what exit poll indicated, and usually it’s accurate. If I’m wrong and he takes a seat or narrowly misses out, fair enough, it doesn’t change my view on him one bit. He’ll be an utterly useless MEP.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,887 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    RTE News reporting same Casey 5th and McHugh 6th

    I don't think he will win a seat though, difficult to see the transfers




    RTE also saying Mick Wallace will be 3rd in South...again very different from exit poll


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,786 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    That’s what exit poll indicated, and usually it’s accurate. If I’m wrong and he takes a seat or narrowly misses out, fair enough, it doesn’t change my view on him one bit. He’ll be an utterly useless MEP.
    I don't care what your view is on it and I don't care what he is like as an MEP either.
    Just hearing that it's likely going to come down to the transfers from FF to decide the last three seats.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 16,106 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I don't care what your view is on it and I don't care what he is like as an MEP either.
    Just hearing that it's likely going to come down to the transfers from FF to decide the last three seats.

    If McHugh is in sixth surely her transfers will be at least as relevant as FF's. And I'll stick my neck out and predict they would favour Walsh over Casey...


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,276 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    If McHugh is in sixth surely her transfers will be at least as relevant as FF's. And I'll stick my neck out and predict they would favour Walsh over Casey...

    massively so. I dont see much commonality between the greens and casey.


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    If McHugh is in sixth surely her transfers will be at least as relevant as FF's. And I'll stick my neck out and predict they would favour Walsh over Casey...
    The two FF will be eliminated before her and they will come to about 70K to be distributed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 42 yesnow


    If McHugh is in sixth surely her transfers will be at least as relevant as FF's. And I'll stick my neck out and predict they would favour Walsh over Casey...

    Only narrowly. I’d say they’ll both only get a handful of transfers from her. Her transfers will mainly go to Ming and Carthy, I think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 419 ✭✭Cryptopagan


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I don't care what your view is on it and I don't care what he is like as an MEP either.

    Thankfully, the vast majority of Irish voters do care what he’d be like, and don’t care about the “concerns” of his supporters.


  • Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Midlands NW Count.
    Sorry for the all-caps, writing on my phone

    ELECTORATE 1,224,888

    POLL 616,555

    INVALID 21, 628

    VALID 594,927

    4 SEATS
    Q = 118,986

    BRENNAN C/ SPBP 8,130
    CARTHY M/ SF 77, 619
    CASEY P/ IND 56,650
    FLANAGAN LM/ IND 85,034
    GREENE, P/ DDI 1, 352
    HANNIGAN D/ LAB 12,378
    HEALY EAMES F/ IND 15,991
    MAHAPATRA D/ IND 2,450
    MCGUINNESS M/ FG 134,630
    MCHUGH S/ GP 51,019
    MILLER J/ IND 1322
    MULCAHY D/ IND 789
    O'CONNOR O/ IND 3,132
    O'DOWD M/ REN 6,897
    RABBITTE A/ FF 30,220
    SMYTH B/ FF 42,814
    WALSH, M/ FG 64,500


  • Registered Users Posts: 42 yesnow


    Midlands NW Count.
    Sorry for the all-caps, writing on my phone

    ELECTORATE 1,224,888

    POLL 616,555

    INVALID 21, 628

    VALID 594,927

    4 SEATS
    Q = 118,986

    BRENNAN C/ SPBP 8,130
    CARTHY M/ SF 77, 619
    CASEY P/ IND 56,650
    FLANAGAN LM/ IND 85,034
    GREENE, P/ DDI 1, 352
    HANNIGAN D/ LAB 12,378
    HEALY EAMES F/ IND 15,991
    MAHAPATRA D/ IND 2,450
    MCGUINNESS M/ FG 134,630
    MCHUGH S/ GP 51,019
    MILLER J/ IND 1322
    MULCAHY D/ IND 789
    O'CONNOR O/ IND 3,132
    O'DOWD M/ REN 6,897
    RABBITTE A/ FF 30,220
    SMYTH B/ FF 42,814
    WALSH, M/ FG 64,500

    Is this the official first count?


  • Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    yesnow wrote: »
    Is this the official first count?
    Yep, that's official.

    Casey did better than expected, but it's Goodnight Venice.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,276 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Midlands NW Count.
    Sorry for the all-caps, writing on my phone

    ELECTORATE 1,224,888

    POLL 616,555

    INVALID 21, 628

    VALID 594,927

    4 SEATS
    Q = 118,986

    BRENNAN C/ SPBP 8,130
    CARTHY M/ SF 77, 619
    CASEY P/ IND 56,650
    FLANAGAN LM/ IND 85,034
    GREENE, P/ DDI 1, 352
    HANNIGAN D/ LAB 12,378
    HEALY EAMES F/ IND 15,991
    MAHAPATRA D/ IND 2,450
    MCGUINNESS M/ FG 134,630
    MCHUGH S/ GP 51,019
    MILLER J/ IND 1322
    MULCAHY D/ IND 789
    O'CONNOR O/ IND 3,132
    O'DOWD M/ REN 6,897
    RABBITTE A/ FF 30,220
    SMYTH B/ FF 42,814
    WALSH, M/ FG 64,500

    Same but rearranged in order of votes received. I think casey will struggle to make up the 9000 vote gap.

    MCGUINNESS M/ FG 134,630
    FLANAGAN LM/ IND 85,034
    CARTHY M/ SF 77, 619
    WALSH, M/ FG 64,500
    CASEY P/ IND 56,650
    MCHUGH S/ GP 51,019
    SMYTH B/ FF 42,814
    RABBITTE A/ FF 30,220
    HEALY EAMES F/ IND 15,991
    HANNIGAN D/ LAB 12,378
    BRENNAN C/ SPBP 8,130
    O'DOWD M/ REN 6,897
    O'CONNOR O/ IND 3,132
    MAHAPATRA D/ IND 2,450
    GREENE, P/ DDI 1, 352
    MILLER J/ IND 1322
    MULCAHY D/ IND 789


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,145 ✭✭✭✭Geuze




  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,167 ✭✭✭Fan of Netflix


    Incredible Casey outpolled Saoirse McHugh, the RTE exit poll was way off, they were lauding her and saying Ming would lose his seat. All media analysis reflected this as it was a done deal. Time for RTE to ditch their exit polls, their samples and margin of errors make it absurd.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,305 ✭✭✭Augme


    Very hard to see anyone challenging the top 4 there.


  • Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Same but rearranged in order of votes received. I think casey will struggle to make up the 9000 vote gap.
    Looking at transfer opportunities, I've about as much chance of winning as Casey does (I'm obviously not a candidate!)

    Labour and SPBP transfers will be interesting, Green candidate is unlikely to swing it, but still in with a shot. Casey's transfers may prove decisive. I wouldn't be surprised if Casey gets Carthy elected.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,167 ✭✭✭Fan of Netflix


    I actually feel sorry for Saoirse McHugh, RTE were making on her a celebrity and asking her her plans in the parliament based on their nonsense exit poll. It's not really fair, she seems a very nice person.


  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭ollkiller


    Looking at transfer opportunities, I've about as much chance of winning as Casey does.

    Labour and SPBP transfers will be interesting, Green candidate is unlikely to swing it, but still in with a shot. Casey's transfers may prove decisive. I wouldn't be surprised if Casey gets Carthy elected.

    Aye will be close but after McGuinness surplus you have about 36000 votes in the lower echelons and a lot could go to the greens from there. Could get very interesting.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,786 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Exit polls was way, way off. Major embarrassment for RTE.
    Looks like Walsh will get circa 8000 from McGuiness, interesting to see where the rest go.
    Then the 30000 or so from the stragglers come into play before the Labour candidate.
    If nobody is elected before the two FF'ers go out it's anybody's guess what way it will go.


  • Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I actually feel sorry for Saoirse McHugh, RTE were making on her a celebrity and asking her her plans in the parliament based on their nonsense exit poll. It's not really fair, she seems a very nice person.
    I know what you mean, but even if she falls short (she likely will), she deserves every compliment she's gotten from all quarters for her hard work, and for just being a good egg (organic, naturally).

    Incredible result for a candidate who was unheard-of 10 days ago.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,971 ✭✭✭normanoffside


    ollkiller wrote: »
    Aye will be close but after McGuinness surplus you have about 36000 votes in the lower echelons and a lot could go to the greens from there. Could get very interesting.

    I doubt it. Ming was tweeting 2nd preference tallies from the lower rung candidates yesterday and McHugh was transferring very poorly.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    I actually feel sorry for Saoirse McHugh, RTE were making on her a celebrity and asking her her plans in the parliament based on their nonsense exit poll. It's not really fair, she seems a very nice person.
    Rte are useless .


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    blinding wrote: »
    Rte are useless .
    RED C was the polling company. RTE just paid for the poll.

    Polls aren't supposed to replace the real thing; they merely identify trends.

    It's too early as yet to say how far-off the poll was, because the STV is factored into the calculation for the margin of error.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement