Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

Options
1…129130132134135…150

Comments

  • Options
    #3932
    Charles Ingles
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭Charles Ingles


    The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.
    She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.
    She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.
    First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment


  • Options
    #3933
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,284 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.
    She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.
    She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.
    First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

    what, in particular, has she been right about in the last few weeks?


  • Options
    #3934
    klaaaz
    Registered Users Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭klaaaz


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.
    She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.
    She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.
    First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

    Spoken like a religious conservative. Secularism is here to stay and get used to it!


  • Options
    #3935
    Cienciano
    Registered Users Posts: 14,251 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    Read the text on the screen here. This is not just normal batshít crazy. This is off the wall, alex jones on hgh and steroids crazy.

    https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1127312764811268096?s=19


  • Options
    #3936
    Skylinehead
    Registered Users Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

    Based on what exactly? You're not very democratic.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #3937
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.

    She's doing a pretty good job herself.
    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.

    In what way? She correctly guessed she was in a shopping centre? Or an airport?
    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.

    The mad hatters, yes.

    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

    How democratic to overrule 67% of the population.


  • Options
    #3938
    TheRepentent
    Registered Users Posts: 1,083 ✭✭✭TheRepentent


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.
    She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.
    She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.
    First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment


    Wanna support genocide?Cheer on the murder of women and children?The Ruzzians aren't rapey enough for you? Morally bankrupt cockroaches and islamaphobes , Israel needs your help NOW!!

    http://tinyurl.com/2ksb4ejk


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes

    https://www.btselem.org/



  • Options
    #3939
    Charles Ingles
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭Charles Ingles


    How democratic to overrule 67% of the population.[/quote]

    I think the vote would be drastically different in a second referendum.
    Biased media and the reality of the result and the reality of abortion on demand


  • Options
    #3940
    Nekarsulm
    Registered Users Posts: 11,194 ✭✭✭✭Nekarsulm


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    How democratic to overrule 67% of the population.

    Ithink the vote would be drastically different in a second referendum.
    Biased media and the reality of the result and the reality of abortion on demand[/QUOTE]

    Well Charles, the upcoming referendum will be useful as an indicator to the validity of your statement.

    If as you claim, people have now realised the error of their earlier vote, we can expect a backlash in the divorce referendum on the 24th.

    If there is a similar % vote in favour of shortening the period people must live apart to qualify as divorcees will you accept the result?
    Or will you blame a biased media for again misleading the population?


  • Options
    #3941
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nixonbot wrote: »
    Based on what exactly? You're not very democratic.
    Well, the Remain campaigners would beg to differ.

    The thing about this mad motley-crew of barely-disguised fascists is that they've taken some of their cues from mainstream and even left-wing political approaches.

    The widespread acknowledgement of how some minorities have been mistreated (which acknowledgement is way overdue), has somehow allowed them to rail against a culture of victimhood, whilst inadvertently giving them the courage to declare themselves 'victims'.

    And on the topic of referendums, it's hard for those of us who think Brexit is madness to favour a repeat referendum, and defend our own previous repeats, whilst denying the chance of a Referendum to amend Repeal.

    I think the reason why many of us find it difficult to understand the origins of these nutters, is because they've appropriated (and sometimes, but not always, mutated) some of the things that the left has itself been saying.

    In fact, to be really literal about it, calling left-wingers Communists is oddly akin to calling DDI supporters Nazis.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #3942
    AndrewJRenko
    Registered Users Posts: 28,650 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    jeremyj1968 wrote: »

    Let's be frank here, no person who wants a career in the media will espouse to having anything other than liberal views.
    You don't listen to Newstalk much, do you?
    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    People believe, that is, have faith that there is no voting fraud. You cannot definitively know there is none.
    So why don't you tell us all about the voting fraud that is happening in Ireland?

    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.
    Really? The 'political system' seems to be mostly ignoring her as a bit of a joke. What particular actions have you seen taken to 'try to take her down'?

    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.

    Really? What was she proven right on? The NZ false flag allegation? The Unicorn conspiracy? The rainbow muffin in Costa Finglas conspiracy?

    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.

    Hasn't she already done this with the ACI movement? The one that is getting 1% in the polls?

    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    I think the vote would be drastically different in a second referendum.
    Biased media and the reality of the result and the reality of abortion on demand
    And your view is based on ? Any opinion poll or objective measure?


    Any huge outcry about 'the reality of abortion' in Ireland (instead of fooling ourselves and exporting our 'problems' to the UK)?


  • Options
    #3943
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    I think the vote would be drastically different in a second referendum.
    Biased media and the reality of the result and the reality of abortion on demand

    Well it was 35 years between votes. Let's rerun it in another 35 years...


  • Options
    #3944
    klaaaz
    Registered Users Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭klaaaz


    I'm from a working class background, some of you saw my past posts to prove it :P Women from my background want freedom, they got it in the abortion referendum, it's women's bodies that Gemma and Charles want to control again. No you will not ever try to control people's bodies through your warped religious doctrine again. You have damaged women's lives for decades., never ever again. Get over it, secularism is here to stay.


  • Options
    #3945
    Birneybau
    Registered Users Posts: 10,244 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.
    She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.
    She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.
    First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

    Lol. And lol. And lol forever more. That's all your posts deserve.


  • Options
    #3946
    Charles Ingles
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭Charles Ingles


    klaaaz wrote: »
    I'm from a working class background, some of you saw my past posts to prove it :P Women from my background want freedom, they got it in the abortion referendum, it's women's bodies that Gemma and Charles want to control again. No you will not ever try to control people's bodies through your warped religious doctrine again. You have damaged women's lives for decades., never ever again. Get over it, secularism is here to stay.
    Control women's bodies never heard such nonsense.
    Abortion shouldn't be used as a form of birth control.
    Children dying has more to do with than just the mother
    What about the Father?? Every baby has one you know


  • Options
    #3947
    pjohnson
    Registered Users Posts: 23,317 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Birneybau wrote: »
    Lol. And lol. And lol forever more. That's all your posts deserve.

    Tbf he hasn't reached the 20th century yet. He's in for some nasty shocks before he even reaches the 21st Century


  • Options
    #3948
    Charles Ingles
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭Charles Ingles


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Well it was 35 years between votes. Let's rerun it in another 35 years...

    Abortion on demand what the people were hoodwinked into voting for.
    The second referendum will be within the next few years.
    Why so afraid of a second referendum


  • Options
    #3949
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    Abortion on demand what the people were hoodwinked into voting for.
    The second referendum will be within the next few years.
    Why so afraid of a second referendum

    That's what I was hoping for with my vote.

    I guess bodily autonomy is more important to me.

    Why so afraid of a second referendum? Because I campaigned with some amazing women that had to bring up horror stories from their past so it didn't affect future generations of women. That was torture for them, and to have to relive it, amongst all the vile lies that the anti-abortion crowd were up to was truly horrible.

    So again, I'm thinking of the women that this actually affected


  • Options
    #3950
    Ash.J.Williams
    Registered Users Posts: 20,929 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    Abortion on demand what the people were hoodwinked into voting for.
    The second referendum will be within the next few years.
    Why so afraid of a second referendum

    Nobody was hoodwinked. If you're thick enough to be hoodwinked you should lose your vote.


  • Options
    #3951
    ollkiller
    Registered Users Posts: 850 ✭✭✭ollkiller


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    People believe, that is, have faith that there is no voting fraud. You cannot definitively know there is none.

    Apart from small incidents like someone getting 2 polling cards or counting a few votes wrong (which recounts sort out) there's no voter fraud in Ireland. It's ridiculous to suggest there is.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #3952
    ollkiller
    Registered Users Posts: 850 ✭✭✭ollkiller


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    Abortion on demand what the people were hoodwinked into voting for.
    The second referendum will be within the next few years.
    Why so afraid of a second referendum

    Absolute nonsense. I researched my vote before I cast it as many did. Hoodwinked. Lol.

    And no there won't be a second vote within years. And if there was there would be a bigger yes vote.


  • Options
    #3953
    Charles Ingles
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭Charles Ingles


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    That's what I was hoping for with my vote.

    I guess bodily autonomy is more important to me.

    Why so afraid of a second referendum? Because I campaigned with some amazing women that had to bring up horror stories from their past so it didn't affect future generations of women. That was torture for them, and to have to relive it, amongst all the vile lies that the anti-abortion crowd were up to was truly horrible.

    So again, I'm thinking of the women that this actually affected

    There was no need to repeal the eight.
    Legislation was only needed to care for mother's who child had FFA or rape which I would have supported 100%.
    Abortion will now be used as a form of birth control unfortunately.
    Father's should have been given a say in law.
    It's their child too that is being killed.
    A healthy child been killed is so sad life is so precious


  • Options
    #3954
    frag420
    Registered Users Posts: 6,158 ✭✭✭frag420


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    There was no need to repeal the eight.
    Legislation was only needed to care for mother's who child had FFA or rape which I would have supported 100%.
    Abortion will now be used as a form of birth control unfortunately.
    Father's should have been given a say in law.
    It's their child too that is being killed.
    A healthy child been killed is so sad life is so precious

    They did unless you are saying that men were not allowed to vote in the referendum last year?


  • Options
    #3955
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    There was no need to repeal the eight.
    Legislation was only needed to care for mother's who child had FFA or rape which I would have supported 100%.
    Abortion will now be used as a form of birth control unfortunately.
    Father's should have been given a say in law.
    It's their child too that is being killed.
    A healthy child been killed is so sad life is so precious


    There are many other places to argue about abortion. This thread is more concerned with

    "according to some insiders, some AI will be structured to provide a home for evil spirits (Dead Nephilim, i.e. Demons?)."

    https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1127312764811268096?s=20


  • Options
    #3956
    AndrewJRenko
    Registered Users Posts: 28,650 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    Abortion on demand what the people were hoodwinked into voting for.
    Hoodwinked? Every possible angle of the law and proposal was pored over with intense detail. Who exactly was 'hoodwinked'? This is just sour grapes really isn't it?

    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    There was no need to repeal the eight.
    Legislation was only needed to care for mother's who child had FFA or rape which I would have supported 100%.
    Interesting - so you accept that any pregnant woman who says she was raped is entitled to abortion then? You realise that is - to use your own abhorrent term - abortion on demand?


  • Options
    #3957
    AndrewJRenko
    Registered Users Posts: 28,650 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Deleted User wrote: »
    There are many other places to argue about abortion. This thread is more concerned with

    "according to some insiders, some AI will be structured to provide a home for evil spirits (Dead Nephilim, i.e. Demons?)."


    Charles - is this one of things that Gemma is right about? That AI will be structured to provide a home for Dead Nephilim? [I loved their 3rd album].


  • Options
    #3958
    The Nal
    Registered Users Posts: 12,601 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Shes getting closer to being sectioned or having a full breakdown.

    source.gif


  • Options
    #3959
    Charles Ingles
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭Charles Ingles


    The Nal wrote: »
    Shes getting closer to being sectioned or having a full breakdown.

    Or closer to the truth.


  • Options
    #3960
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    Or closer to the truth.

    That artificial intelligence will be used to house demons?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #3961
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    Or closer to the truth.

    Yep, lizard people are secretly controlling our minds with chemtrails.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement