nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

lbc2019

Some of her posts on twitter lately seem to be off the charts.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Charles Ingles

The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.
She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.
She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.
First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

ohnonotgmail

Charles Ingles wrote: »

The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.
She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.
She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.
First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

what, in particular, has she been right about in the last few weeks?

klaaaz

Charles Ingles wrote: »

The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.
She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.
She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.
First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

Spoken like a religious conservative. Secularism is here to stay and get used to it!

Cienciano

Read the text on the screen here. This is not just normal batshít crazy. This is off the wall, alex jones on hgh and steroids crazy.

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1127312764811268096?s=19

Skylinehead

Charles Ingles wrote: »

First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

Based on what exactly? You're not very democratic.

[Deleted User]

Charles Ingles wrote: »

The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.

She's doing a pretty good job herself.

Charles Ingles wrote: »

She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.

In what way? She correctly guessed she was in a shopping centre? Or an airport?

Charles Ingles wrote: »

She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.

The mad hatters, yes.

Charles Ingles wrote: »

First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

How democratic to overrule 67% of the population.

TheRepentent

Charles Ingles wrote: »

The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.
She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.
She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.
First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

Charles Ingles

How democratic to overrule 67% of the population.[/quote]

I think the vote would be drastically different in a second referendum.
Biased media and the reality of the result and the reality of abortion on demand

Nekarsulm

Charles Ingles wrote: »

How democratic to overrule 67% of the population.

Ithink the vote would be drastically different in a second referendum.
Biased media and the reality of the result and the reality of abortion on demand[/QUOTE]

Well Charles, the upcoming referendum will be useful as an indicator to the validity of your statement.

If as you claim, people have now realised the error of their earlier vote, we can expect a backlash in the divorce referendum on the 24th.

If there is a similar % vote in favour of shortening the period people must live apart to qualify as divorcees will you accept the result?
Or will you blame a biased media for again misleading the population?

[Deleted User]

Nixonbot wrote: »

Based on what exactly? You're not very democratic.

Well, the Remain campaigners would beg to differ.

The thing about this mad motley-crew of barely-disguised fascists is that they've taken some of their cues from mainstream and even left-wing political approaches.

The widespread acknowledgement of how some minorities have been mistreated (which acknowledgement is way overdue), has somehow allowed them to rail against a culture of victimhood, whilst inadvertently giving them the courage to declare themselves 'victims'.

And on the topic of referendums, it's hard for those of us who think Brexit is madness to favour a repeat referendum, and defend our own previous repeats, whilst denying the chance of a Referendum to amend Repeal.

I think the reason why many of us find it difficult to understand the origins of these nutters, is because they've appropriated (and sometimes, but not always, mutated) some of the things that the left has itself been saying.

In fact, to be really literal about it, calling left-wingers Communists is oddly akin to calling DDI supporters Nazis.

[Deleted User]

jeremyj1968 wrote: »

Let's be frank here, no person who wants a career in the media will espouse to having anything other than liberal views.

You don't listen to Newstalk much, do you?

SafeSurfer wrote: »

People believe, that is, have faith that there is no voting fraud. You cannot definitively know there is none.

So why don't you tell us all about the voting fraud that is happening in Ireland?

Charles Ingles wrote: »

The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.

Really? The 'political system' seems to be mostly ignoring her as a bit of a joke. What particular actions have you seen taken to 'try to take her down'?

Charles Ingles wrote: »

She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.

Really? What was she proven right on? The NZ false flag allegation? The Unicorn conspiracy? The rainbow muffin in Costa Finglas conspiracy?

Charles Ingles wrote: »

She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.

Hasn't she already done this with the ACI movement? The one that is getting 1% in the polls?

Charles Ingles wrote: »

First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

Charles Ingles wrote: »

I think the vote would be drastically different in a second referendum.
Biased media and the reality of the result and the reality of abortion on demand

And your view is based on ? Any opinion poll or objective measure?

Any huge outcry about 'the reality of abortion' in Ireland (instead of fooling ourselves and exporting our 'problems' to the UK)?

[Deleted User]

Charles Ingles wrote: »

I think the vote would be drastically different in a second referendum.
Biased media and the reality of the result and the reality of abortion on demand

Well it was 35 years between votes. Let's rerun it in another 35 years...

klaaaz

I'm from a working class background, some of you saw my past posts to prove it :P Women from my background want freedom, they got it in the abortion referendum, it's women's bodies that Gemma and Charles want to control again. No you will not ever try to control people's bodies through your warped religious doctrine again. You have damaged women's lives for decades., never ever again. Get over it, secularism is here to stay.

Birneybau

Charles Ingles wrote: »

The political system is going into overdrive trying to take Gemma down.
She has been proven right time and time again over the last few weeks.
She should start a political party be great to have a true representative of the people in government.
First order of business repeal the repealing of the eight amendment

Lol. And lol. And lol forever more. That's all your posts deserve.

Charles Ingles

klaaaz wrote: »

I'm from a working class background, some of you saw my past posts to prove it :P Women from my background want freedom, they got it in the abortion referendum, it's women's bodies that Gemma and Charles want to control again. No you will not ever try to control people's bodies through your warped religious doctrine again. You have damaged women's lives for decades., never ever again. Get over it, secularism is here to stay.

Control women's bodies never heard such nonsense.
Abortion shouldn't be used as a form of birth control.
Children dying has more to do with than just the mother
What about the Father?? Every baby has one you know

pjohnson

Birneybau wrote: »

Lol. And lol. And lol forever more. That's all your posts deserve.

Tbf he hasn't reached the 20th century yet. He's in for some nasty shocks before he even reaches the 21st Century

Charles Ingles

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Well it was 35 years between votes. Let's rerun it in another 35 years...

Abortion on demand what the people were hoodwinked into voting for.
The second referendum will be within the next few years.
Why so afraid of a second referendum

[Deleted User]

Charles Ingles wrote: »

Abortion on demand what the people were hoodwinked into voting for.
The second referendum will be within the next few years.
Why so afraid of a second referendum

That's what I was hoping for with my vote.

I guess bodily autonomy is more important to me.

Why so afraid of a second referendum? Because I campaigned with some amazing women that had to bring up horror stories from their past so it didn't affect future generations of women. That was torture for them, and to have to relive it, amongst all the vile lies that the anti-abortion crowd were up to was truly horrible.

So again, I'm thinking of the women that this actually affected

Ash.J.Williams

Charles Ingles wrote: »

Abortion on demand what the people were hoodwinked into voting for.
The second referendum will be within the next few years.
Why so afraid of a second referendum

Nobody was hoodwinked. If you're thick enough to be hoodwinked you should lose your vote.

ollkiller

SafeSurfer wrote: »

People believe, that is, have faith that there is no voting fraud. You cannot definitively know there is none.

Apart from small incidents like someone getting 2 polling cards or counting a few votes wrong (which recounts sort out) there's no voter fraud in Ireland. It's ridiculous to suggest there is.

ollkiller

Charles Ingles wrote: »

Abortion on demand what the people were hoodwinked into voting for.
The second referendum will be within the next few years.
Why so afraid of a second referendum

Absolute nonsense. I researched my vote before I cast it as many did. Hoodwinked. Lol.

And no there won't be a second vote within years. And if there was there would be a bigger yes vote.

Charles Ingles

[Deleted User] wrote: »

That's what I was hoping for with my vote.

I guess bodily autonomy is more important to me.

Why so afraid of a second referendum? Because I campaigned with some amazing women that had to bring up horror stories from their past so it didn't affect future generations of women. That was torture for them, and to have to relive it, amongst all the vile lies that the anti-abortion crowd were up to was truly horrible.

So again, I'm thinking of the women that this actually affected

There was no need to repeal the eight.
Legislation was only needed to care for mother's who child had FFA or rape which I would have supported 100%.
Abortion will now be used as a form of birth control unfortunately.
Father's should have been given a say in law.
It's their child too that is being killed.
A healthy child been killed is so sad life is so precious

frag420

Charles Ingles wrote: »

There was no need to repeal the eight.
Legislation was only needed to care for mother's who child had FFA or rape which I would have supported 100%.
Abortion will now be used as a form of birth control unfortunately.
Father's should have been given a say in law.
It's their child too that is being killed.
A healthy child been killed is so sad life is so precious

They did unless you are saying that men were not allowed to vote in the referendum last year?

[Deleted User]

Charles Ingles wrote: »

There was no need to repeal the eight.
Legislation was only needed to care for mother's who child had FFA or rape which I would have supported 100%.
Abortion will now be used as a form of birth control unfortunately.
Father's should have been given a say in law.
It's their child too that is being killed.
A healthy child been killed is so sad life is so precious

There are many other places to argue about abortion. This thread is more concerned with

"according to some insiders, some AI will be structured to provide a home for evil spirits (Dead Nephilim, i.e. Demons?)."

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1127312764811268096?s=20

[Deleted User]

Charles Ingles wrote: »

Abortion on demand what the people were hoodwinked into voting for.

Hoodwinked? Every possible angle of the law and proposal was pored over with intense detail. Who exactly was 'hoodwinked'? This is just sour grapes really isn't it?

Charles Ingles wrote: »

There was no need to repeal the eight.
Legislation was only needed to care for mother's who child had FFA or rape which I would have supported 100%.

Interesting - so you accept that any pregnant woman who says she was raped is entitled to abortion then? You realise that is - to use your own abhorrent term - abortion on demand?

[Deleted User]

Deleted User wrote: »

There are many other places to argue about abortion. This thread is more concerned with

"according to some insiders, some AI will be structured to provide a home for evil spirits (Dead Nephilim, i.e. Demons?)."

Charles - is this one of things that Gemma is right about? That AI will be structured to provide a home for Dead Nephilim? [I loved their 3rd album].

The Nal

Shes getting closer to being sectioned or having a full breakdown.

Charles Ingles

The Nal wrote: »

Shes getting closer to being sectioned or having a full breakdown.

Or closer to the truth.

[Deleted User]

Charles Ingles wrote: »

Or closer to the truth.

That artificial intelligence will be used to house demons?

batgoat

Charles Ingles wrote: »

Or closer to the truth.

Yep, lizard people are secretly controlling our minds with chemtrails.