Now Ye're Talking - to a swinger

I'm a swinger, AMA

Conservatory wrote: »

So you couldn’t care what the fella looks like at all as long as the wife is happy?

You’d never say anything like
“I’d love to watch an usain bolt lookalike and a tiny Inuit taking turns on you?

No... you asked about eyeing up guys on the street ... not in an actual swing scenario.

I (the wife) do not go with anything because it has a cock and my husband does not encourage or expect that and I certainly don't encourage or expect him to do anything with a vagina. Plenty of swingers are not as fussy as I am granted but c'est la vie. I'm not hard up for a cock to accept any cock.

I of course see fellas all the time who are good looking on the street but I'm not working as a recruiter so I don't approach them or chat them up. Likewise on a night out with girlfriends, I'm not hanging out of fellas

Conservatory

If you could pick one male and female famous person to swing with who would it be?

I'm a swinger, AMA

Sassygirl1999 wrote: »

do you have rules on use of condoms? if either of you broke the rules would this relationship be all over the front pages of the red tops?

I'm a swinger, AMA wrote: »

Yes of course, if either of us had sex with someone without using protection I would think it would have a serious effect on our relationship.

Hi .. wife here

This is a deal breaker and would absolutely be unforgivable ... in an age of sexual education where you can purchase condoms ANYWHERE, there is absolutely no excuse for anyone not to be protected ... I carry condoms so it's as much my responsibility.

Thanks so much for your participation x

I'm a swinger, AMA

Conservatory wrote: »

If you could pick one male and female famous person to swing with who would it be?

Scott Eastwood and Wilma from Buck Rodgers ;-)

Conservatory

I'm a swinger, AMA wrote: »

Scott Eastwood and Wilma from Buck Rodgers ;-)

You won’t get any private messages from anyone that looks like them here I wouldn’t say haha.

I know social classes etc are silly but would you share a bit of a background on your upbringing and where you are now.
For example born to a middle class family and quite well off now or father had a job once for a few weeks and now the husband gets a bit of labouring work into the hand when his mate is off sick.

minikin

Which of you get first dibs on Wilma?

I'm a swinger, AMA

minikin wrote: »

Which of you get first dibs on Wilma?

Both of us

I'm a swinger, AMA

Conservatory wrote: »

You won’t get any private messages from anyone that looks like them here I wouldn’t say haha.

I know social classes etc are silly but would you share a bit of a background on your upbringing and where you are now.
For example born to a middle class family and quite well off now or father had a job once for a few weeks and now the husband gets a bit of labouring work into the hand when his mate is off sick.

I'm not really sure why you'd like to know this? It doesn't really have anything to do with us swinging. But we're from normal backgrounds. Parents present, income, proper schooling, can string a sentence together etc..

Conservatory

I'm a swinger, AMA wrote: »

I'm not really sure why you'd like to know this? It doesn't really have anything to do with us swinging. But we're from normal backgrounds. Parents present, income, proper schooling, can string a sentence together etc..

I’m not suggesting you both had rough upbringings and this is why you do this. I’m more just interested if it’s a bunch of business execs or farm labourers.
I know you will say it takes all sorts but I’d imagine it’s mainly one main class type.

I really am a believer that as long as you aren’t harming anybody you should be able to do what makes you happy. Just Incase you think I’m asking loaded questions or anything like that.

I'm a swinger, AMA

Conservatory wrote: »

I’m not suggesting you both had rough upbringings and this is why you do this. I’m more just interested if it’s a bunch of business execs or farm labourers.
I know you will say it takes all sorts but I’d imagine it’s mainly one main class type.

I really am a believer that as long as you aren’t harming anybody you should be able to do what makes you happy. Just Incase you think I’m asking loaded questions or anything like that.

No it ranges from normal all the way to the law. No class type whatsoever. Anyone can swing. It's not an elite game.

mvl

I'm a swinger, AMA wrote: »

Who knows what we will be like in 25 years. We might bored of it by then so cant really answer it but I dont see why not.


I would imagine with our generation being the first that are Tech Savvy, I wouldnt imagine it being a problem still then.

Thanks,

My question was assuming humans only involved in this (e.g. no tech/synths).

What I have in mind is that in time there would be a discord between individuals who are interested in you, and the ones that you’d find attractive. So what would you do then ? e.g. between monogamous relationships, swinging and polyamory, sounds the one you prefer now is disadvantaged from longevity point of view (long term may be more difficult to find partners you find attractive, or no ?!?).

BTW, what is currently the age demographics in the group you have knowledge of, lets say baby boomers, genx, millennials – in percentages ? If any, have you been looked at the success rate of … baby boomers in finding partners ?

Conservatory

I'm a swinger, AMA wrote: »

No it ranges from normal all the way to the law. No class type whatsoever. Anyone can swing. It's not an elite game.

Are you saying a bank robber could be banging a guards wife here?

I'm a swinger, AMA

Conservatory wrote: »

Are you saying a bank robber could be banging a guards wife here?

If the guards were doing their job a bank robber would be biting a pillow behind bars

But I've really no clue.

It's not something you talk about in general

Seth Brundle

Conservatory wrote: »

Are you saying a bank robber could be banging a guards wife here?

...whist she is in the garda's handcuffs

canonball5

Seth Brundle wrote: »

...whist she is in the garda's handcuffs

Seriously, somebody needs to grow up!

Hotblack Desiato

Conservatory wrote: »

Are you saying a bank robber could be banging a guards wife here?

Worse. You could have FF voters having it off with FG voters and neither of them any the wiser.


:rolleyes:

Emme

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Worse. You could have FF voters having it off with FG voters and neither of them any the wiser.


:rolleyes:

Or Kilkenny supporters getting it on with Tipperary supporters

I'm a swinger, AMA

mvl wrote: »

Thanks,

My question was assuming humans only involved in this (e.g. no tech/synths).

What I have in mind is that in time there would be a discord between individuals who are interested in you, and the ones that you’d find attractive. So what would you do then ? e.g. between monogamous relationships, swinging and polyamory, sounds the one you prefer now is disadvantaged from longevity point of view (long term may be more difficult to find partners you find attractive, or no ?!?).

BTW, what is currently the age demographics in the group you have knowledge of, lets say baby boomers, genx, millennials – in percentages ? If any, have you been looked at the success rate of … baby boomers in finding partners ?

I am not really sure what sort of information you are looking for.



The demographics are wide spread. When we are in our 50s and if still interested in the life, there's plenty of people in that age bracket around, So, I dont imagine a period when we wouldnt find someone that we would interest us. In saying that, its not that important we just enjoy the world that we currently exist in. We achieved everything set out to do and more.


One other thing to not, regarding age bracket, there is definitely a lack of couples our age which is a tad bizarre. Most couple are mid 30s or under and over 45s, the early 40s are not that common for whatever reason, might be because a lot still have young children at the age.

mvl

I'm a swinger, AMA wrote: »

I am not really sure what sort of information you are looking for.



The demographics are wide spread. When we are in our 50s and if still interested in the life, there's plenty of people in that age bracket around, So, I dont imagine a period when we wouldnt find someone that we would interest us. In saying that, its not that important we just enjoy the world that we currently exist in. We achieved everything set out to do and more.


One other thing to not, regarding age bracket, there is definitely a lack of couples our age which is a tad bizarre. Most couple are mid 30s or under and over 45s, the early 40s are not that common for whatever reason, might be because a lot still have young children at the age.

thanks. have to say I also know of peeps early 40s with interest in alternatives to monogamy - that were quickly disciplined by the more conservative partners, so they do focus on kids ... for now .

charlie14

As you are a couple in the lifestyle would you say there is a growing trend nowadays of younger single females and M/F couples seeking older experienced males 50+ to join them or not ?

Hotblack Desiato

charlie14 wrote: »

As you are a couple in the lifestyle would you say there is a growing trend nowadays of younger single females and M/F couples seeking older experienced males 50+ to join them or not ?

Asking for a friend

I'm a swinger, AMA

charlie14 wrote: »

As you are a couple in the lifestyle would you say there is a growing trend nowadays of younger single females and M/F couples seeking older experienced males 50+ to join them or not ?

Its not something we have ever heard of as requirement. You would see younger couples with older couples but not with an older gent.



The older single man would definitely be one who would struggle for attention unfortunately. Also, a lot of them would be a little on the pervy/creepy side.



Thats just my opinion obviously.

Boards.ie: Niamh

Thanks for all the questions on this AMA, it's certainly been educational

200 posts from the OPs, that might be a record! (I'll have to check that)

Thanks again