Chemical weapon used on civilians in Syria + Airstrikes

Gatling

Gringo180 wrote: »

America were also defeated in Afghanistan and the same in Iraq. They went home with there tails between there legs.

Not really no .

Still in Afghanistan and left Iraq under agreement only to come back to fight Isis .

Compared to the russian retreat in Afghanistan after they wrecked the country ,

Cheerful Spring

Discodog wrote: »

Of course it wouldn't. Putin is already losing money thanks to Trump's sanctions but he still has millions squirreled away. Russia would only ever consider Nuclear if Russian soil was in absolute danger.

Look what happened with the Cuban Missile Crisis. Launch one nuke & you end the World.

Oh & according to Sky New guess who sold chemical manufacturing equipment to Assad - Yes your old mate Kim

Actually, you're wrong. Putin publically has stated he would use nuclear weapons if the Russian homeland was threatened by nuclear weapons and Russian allies were threatened by nuclear weapons.

archer22

pitifulgod wrote: »

You're claiming the victims of a chemical weapons attack are the savages? Christ, your entire post is disgusting.

Oh ok Achmed whatever you say

Gringo180

Gatling wrote: »

Not really no .

Still in Afghanistan and left Iraq under agreement only to come back to fight Isis .

Compared to the russian retreat in Afghanistan after they wrecked the country ,

You really are the poster boy for the western warmongers and there heart eating jihadists.

Barry Badrinath

Gringo180 wrote: »

Are the Israelis just allowed to fly into Lebanese airspace without any authorisation?

Allowed? No.

Do they give a fcuk? No.

Will they keep doing it, yes.

There were up over Lebanon for about 4 hours today.

Gatling

Gringo180 wrote: »

You really are the poster boy for the western warmongers and there heart eating jihadists.

Your reaction said it all

If you don't like it .
don't post nonsense for some low level troll likes.

Gringo180

Barry Badrinath wrote: »

Allowed? No.

Do they give a fcuk? No.

Will they keep doing it, yes.

There were up over Lebanon for about 4 hours today.

And when Russia do it in British airspace the media goes into a frenzie.

archer22

Trump certainly done a good job of fooling the American people with his promise to stay out of foreign wars....he certainly is quite an accomplished liar.

Now Russia and China need to lift all sanctions on North Korea and increase military aid to Iran.

Gringo180

Gatling wrote: »

Your reaction said it all

If you don't like it .
don't post nonsense for some low level troll likes.

What nonsense. The former head of the Osama Bin Laden unit in the CIA said it himself the Americans were defeated in Afghanistan and Iraq. They hardly left with both countries a beacon of democracy, actually the total opposite, two failed states, ravaged with civil war, especially Iraq.

Elmer Blooker

Discodog wrote: »

Things have changed. The mujaheddin destroyed the Russian army with the most primitive weapons. Russia has never got involved in a fight involving even half decent opposition. The US are bullies but the Russians take it to a whole new level.

Oh dear! They were given the most sophisticated weapons available at that time, anything they wanted and more! Stinger missiles for example.
When the Soviets were eventually defeated the Afghans turned these weapons on each other.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet–Afghan_War#1986:_Stinger_Missile_and_%22Stinger_effect%22

Gatling

Gringo180 wrote: »

They hardly left with both countries a beacon of democracy, actually the total opposite, two failed states, ravaged with civil war, especially Iraq.

Explain Afghanistan let guess murica did this and murica did that,
But you will Conveniently forget the truth as to why Afghanistan is the it is today and it's not America's fault ,
It was a stable and open country that had international business ,they had universities , schools and normal education , women dressed in western clothes,
And they produced and supplied 70% of the worlds fruit and nuts ,
Till Moscow decided it wouldn't tolerate it ,

But that's this lesson concluded .

Now Syrian chemical weapons

Cheerful Spring

archer22 wrote: »

Trump certainly done a good job of fooling the American people with his promise to stay out of foreign wars....he certainly is quite an accomplished liar.

Now Russia and China need to lift all sanctions on North Korea and increase military aid to Iran.

I think Trump is guided by what he hears. His staff are convincing him this is the way to go, just bomb Syria. Trump is not an interventionist he does not want war. The decision to pull of Syria surprised me. I think the deep state and military industrial complex behind the scenes were not happy with this and decision was made to carry out another false flag in Syria. Trump just isn't aware this is a false flag.

Supergurrier

Pretty prophetic around the 3 minute mark

Cheerful Spring

Supergurrier wrote: »

Pretty prophetic around the 3 minute mark

Thanks for this video. This British ambassador is revealing the truth what happening in Syria. Pity there not more British politicians like him.

Grayson

Supergurrier wrote: »

Pretty prophetic around the 3 minute mark

That's over a year old. The chemical weapon attack he's talking about was investigated and wasn't a false flag operation.

Cheerful Spring

Grayson wrote: »

That's over a year old. The chemical weapon attack he's talking about was investigated and wasn't a false flag operation.

Yes, that's why he posted it his predicting future false flags in Syria and jihadists would use chemical weapons to drag in the west. The gullible Western media will fall for it. This event was a false flag he was spot on.

Cheerful Spring

In a statement, the Kremlin said Putin had held a phone conversation with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, during which the two "leaders exchanged opinions on the situation in Syria, including the accusations against Damascus by a number of Western countries of using chemical weapons.

"The Russian side stressed the unacceptability of provocation and speculation on this matter," the Kremlin added.

Elmer Blooker

Grayson wrote: »

That's over a year old. The chemical weapon attack he's talking about was investigated and wasn't a false flag operation.

It was a false flag.
If those bogus "aid workers" taking pictures of babies were involved then it was a false flag. Investigated by who? The UN had no monitors in Khan Sheiktoun and no journalist will go anywhere near jihadist held territory unless they have suicidal tendencies.

Gatling

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

In a statement, the Kremlin said Putin had held a phone conversation with German Chancellor Angela Merkel,

"The Russian side stressed the unacceptability of provocation and speculation on this matter the Kremlin added.

Because it's not like russia are telling the truth about chemical weapons now is it ,
Two separate chemical nerve agent attacks in the UK and multiple chemical weapons attacks in Syria when actually remind us all who said that they had no chemicals weapons and who Also claimed they had all of Syrian chemical weapons ..

But wait there have been multiple chemical weapons attacks since ..

Who said ...

Oh yeah russia

tigger123

Elmer Blooker wrote: »

It was a false flag.
If those bogus "aid workers" taking pictures of babies were involved then it was a false flag. Investigated by who? The UN had no monitors in Khan Sheiktoun and no journalist will go anywhere near jihadist held territory unless they have suicidal tendencies.

Why are there no UN monitors?

Surely if the rebels were False Flagging events Assad's regime would be only too delighted to have monitors and international media in there.

Elmer Blooker

tigger123 wrote: »

Why are there no UN monitors?

Surely if the rebels were False Flagging events Assad's regime would be only too delighted to have monitors and international media in there.

Simple explanation. The moderates would cut any monitor's throat quicker than you can say "Allahu Akbar"!

Cheerful Spring

tigger123 wrote: »

Why are there no UN monitors?

Surely if the rebels were False Flagging events Assad's regime would be only too delighted to have monitors and international media in there.

Reason Russia vetoes the resolution is the members have already laid blame who did it.

backspin.

Stefan Molyneux outlines it pretty well in this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAyeayfKnFE

Cheerful Spring

backspin. wrote: »

Stefan Molyneux outlines it pretty well in this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAyeayfKnFE

There is a lot of speculation on twitter Russian jets are harassing American warships on there way to Syria. This not confirmed could be a rumour. UN meeting happening now both sides very strong language.

Vladimir Poontang

Funny how every time Assad is on the verge of victory and Trump announces he is pulling troops out, Assad then feels compelled to gas people to draw them back in, like as if he is trying his best to lose.

BoJack Horseman

Vladimir Poontang wrote: »

Funny how every time Assad is on the verge of victory and Trump announces he is pulling troops out, Assad then feels compelled to gas people to draw them back in, like as if he is trying his best to lose.

It's just like what Sun-Tsu never said:



Yet people choose to believe the word of lying head-chopping jihadists over rationality

Gatling

Elmer Blooker wrote: »

Simple explanation. The moderates would cut any monitor's throat !

But why have we not seen any ????

Gatling

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

There is a lot of speculation on twitter Russian jets are harassing American warships on/quote]

The blacksea maybe but they wouldn't have the testicles to do it in open sea and international waters

BoJack Horseman

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

There is a lot of speculation on twitter Russian jets are harassing American warships on there way to Syria. This not confirmed could be a rumour.

Harassing isn't the right word.

"monitoring" would be better.

Yesterday I seen some tweets to the effect that 2 separate pairs of SU-24s were doing laps around the Mediterranean, keeping an eye on things.

The USS Donald Cook is the closest destroyer AFAIK.... just off Cyprus

Gatling

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

There is a lot of speculation

Kinda explains it .


According to Steven Hassan, a mental health counselor with experience on cults, "Partly what's going on with the people on the Internet who are indoctrinated, they spend lots of hours on the computer. Videos can have them up all night for several nights in a row. Molyneux knows how to talk like he knows what he's talking about, despite very little academic research. He cites this and cites that, and presents it as the whole truth. It dismantles people's sense of self and replaces it with his sense of confidence about how to fix the world."