Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2700s return

Options
  • 06-10-2016 8:29pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭


    I think the 2700s need a new thread now having previously spoke about the current status of the rumoured 2700 return recently.

    I'm told fron a reliable source that 20 2700s will indeed be returning to service in 2017 following board approval after a costings exercise, but apparently they won't simply be receiving the minimum work required, they are to be overhauled and receive electrical modifications.

    Apparently a tender will be issued soon for their overhaul with first set due on test in Q2 2017.

    Watch this space.


«13456710

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,669 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    GM228 wrote: »
    I think the 2700s need a new thread now having previously spoke about the current status of the rumoured 2700 return recently.

    I'm told fron a reliable source that 20 sets will indeed be returning to service in 2017 following board approval after a costings exercise, but apparently they won't simply be receiving the minimum work required, they are to be overhauled and receive electrical modifications.

    Apparently a tender will be issued soon for their overhaul with first set due on test in Q2 2017.

    Watch this space.

    Such an overhaul is the most sensible. Wonder will they try and have a setup where they are like the 2600, 2800 or 2900?


  • Registered Users Posts: 87 ✭✭Cravens


    So what's the plan? These refurbs heading off Limerick?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Cravens wrote: »
    So what's the plan? These refurbs heading off Limerick?

    Rumour is they will be based at Drogheda to supplement the commuter fleet, to enable better ICR utilisation by removing ICRs from certain commuter work, enabling full ICR operation on the Rosslare line and increase some train lenghts accross the Network.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 657 ✭✭✭Musketeer4


    Oh, this is good news. I had figured they were destined to eternally operate the Inchicore sound barrier.

    How many 2700 railcars are there? I assume if they are bringing only a portion back on line it will involve selection of the best and a lot of cannibalisation of other units for parts in order to control costs.
    I even though the fleet would already have been cannibalised since the engines are the same as in the 2600 and 2800s. Will the cannibalised remainder be doomed to the cutters torch? Would the ITG have any interest in a few?


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,987 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    GM228 wrote: »
    Rumour is they will be based at Drogheda to supplement the commuter fleet, to enable better ICR utilisation by removing ICRs from certain commuter work, enabling full ICR operation on the Rosslare line and increase some train lenghts accross the Network.

    meh, i will believe that when i see it!!
    full ICR operation on the rosslare line providing the basic standard of comfort the users of this line actually pay for would be a huge shock indeed. we were supposed to get it years ago.
    Musketeer4 wrote: »
    Oh, this is good news. I had figured they were destined to eternally operate the Inchicore sound barrier.

    ah well they have a number of modern locomotives and other stuff to do that.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,297 ✭✭✭savagethegoat


    they don't have any modern locomotives, newest over 20 years old


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 657 ✭✭✭Musketeer4


    That's relatively new in locomotive money.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9 hurricanemk1c


    20 2-car sets = 40 vehicles

    Full fleet is 27 vehicles + 2 bicab vehicles

    My information was 10 sets, that would go down to Limerick and replace the 2800s, which would then transfer north for the Phoenix Park Tunnel service, releasing up to 5 ICR sets in the morning/evening peaks.

    20 years old is mid-life there abouts in locomotive terms. Although the engine technology (barring the EM2000) is about 50 years old in the 201 fleet (soon to be changed)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 657 ✭✭✭Musketeer4


    Whats the EM 2000?

    Are the 201s going to be re-engined?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    20 2-car sets = 40 vehicles

    Full fleet is 27 vehicles + 2 bicab vehicles

    My information was 10 sets, that would go down to Limerick and replace the 2800s, which would then transfer north for the Phoenix Park Tunnel service, releasing up to 5 ICR sets in the morning/evening peaks.

    20 years old is mid-life there abouts in locomotive terms. Although the engine technology (barring the EM2000) is about 50 years old in the 201 fleet (soon to be changed)

    10 sets is correct, PPT services will be ICRs, 14 MkIVs (2 sets) are being reintroduced to release the ICRs for this.

    I'm told the 2800s will stay in Limerick as they are regarded as a common fleet with the 2600s which makes perfect sense.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Musketeer4 wrote: »
    Whats the EM 2000?

    The computer system on the 201s


    Musketeer4 wrote: »
    Are the 201s going to be re-engined?

    Yes, project has recently been approved.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9 hurricanemk1c


    The tender is on e-Tenders and closed 22/04/2016 @ 1200

    EM2000 is the loco management computer, monitoring performance and logging faults

    The only times I remember (more than willing to be corrected though) 26s and 28s interworking from current depots was the swap over for leaf fall season as 2600s didn't have sanders (now fitted). Apart from that 2600s only go to Limerick for exams.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 657 ✭✭✭Musketeer4


    What type of engine will be fitted? Who was awarded the contract?

    Does this mean an end to ying ying ying ying?:(:(


  • Registered Users Posts: 9 hurricanemk1c


    Musketeer4 wrote: »
    What type of engine will be fitted? Who was awarded the contract?

    Does this mean an end to ying ying ying ying?:(:(

    Tender hasn't been awarded yet so we don't know. Multiple options including multi-engines, and whispers of both MTU and Caterpillar


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    The only times I remember (more than willing to be corrected though) 26s and 28s interworking from current depots was the swap over for leaf fall season as 2600s didn't have sanders (now fitted). Apart from that 2600s only go to Limerick for exams.

    2800s can often be found working the Cork diagrams when 2600s are undergoing maintenance.

    From a maintenance/parts storage point of view more so than an operational point of view it makes more sense to keep the 2600/2800 maintenance together in Limerick and the 2700s in Drogheda.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9 hurricanemk1c


    Equally how do the 2700s fit in at Drogehda, with no common parts at all with the 29000 fleet? Any heavy work goes to Inchicore anyway.

    I understand what you are saying about spares allocation, but I believe 2800s are preferred for PPT due to faster acceleration required around there


  • Registered Users Posts: 87 ✭✭Cravens


    The only reason besides convenience of not having to train maintenance crews at Limerick on a different type again that I could have thought of was that with 10 sets of 2700s being brought back, that'd still be two more sets than the 2800 fleet ever had built. Hence it could be a less strained fleet than the 2800s in Dublin.

    I don't know about the acceleration figures, how much time savings would we be talking about here?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Equally how do the 2700s fit in at Drogehda, with no common parts at all with the 29000 fleet? Any heavy work goes to Inchicore anyway.

    I understand what you are saying about spares allocation, but I believe 2800s are preferred for PPT due to faster acceleration required around there

    ICRs are to be used on the PPT services, there are no plans at present to use anything else.

    Most heavy work on the DMUs is actually carried out at Limerick and Drogheda bar the most heaviest work such as collision damage and structural repairs.

    Limerick based sets usually only visit Inchicore for wheel turning (wheel turning also happens at Portlaoisr) and major electrical work.

    To base the 2700s in Limerick will require the spare parts being in Limerick with the 2600/2800 spres being split between Limerick and Drogheda as most are common parts. Half the 2600/2800 parts don't need to move if they stay where the are, the 2700 parts (which are mostly in storage in Inchicore) need to be moved either way.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Cravens wrote: »
    The only reason besides convenience of not having to train maintenance crews at Limerick on a different type again that I could have thought of was that with 10 sets of 2700s being brought back, that'd still be two more sets than the 2800 fleet ever had built.

    There are 10 sets of 2700s returning and 10 sets of 2800s, not 8 sets of 2800s.


  • Registered Users Posts: 87 ✭✭Cravens


    GM228 wrote: »
    There are 10 sets of 2700s returning and 10 sets of 2800s, not 8 sets of 2800s.

    Ah, I fell victim to inconsistent info on the infallible wikipedia. In one place it says 8 units and the other it says 10 units.

    Misinformation aside, I suppose it'd be sensible enough for whatever stock returns to the Dublin area to have their cab-end gangways restored?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Cravens wrote: »
    Ah, I fell victim to inconsistent info on the infallible wikipedia. In one place it says 8 units and the other it says 10 units.

    Misinformation aside, I suppose it'd be sensible enough for whatever stock returns to the Dublin area to have their cab-end gangways restored?

    Gangways won't be restored. There's no need.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,987 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    GM228 wrote: »
    Gangways won't be restored. There's no need.

    i have to disagree. they allow movement between sets. more efficient to have them then to not. but whatever IE feels is best.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭XPS_Zero


    Excuse my ignorance. What's the big difference between these and the normal commuter setts ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,669 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    XPS_Zero wrote: »
    Excuse my ignorance. What's the big difference between these and the normal commuter setts ?

    The set up is different i.e. engines/parts and so on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,987 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    XPS_Zero wrote: »
    Excuse my ignorance. What's the big difference between these and the normal commuter setts ?

    they are 2 car sets, so allow greater flexibility in terms of sets. you can have 2 4 6 or (all be it a rare occurrence) 8 car sets. engines and other equipment will be different i should think. they all have the same cummins generators though i believe.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭IE 222


    Five 4 car sets would run docklands services in the morning. Split a set off peak to run the shuttle with a 2 car set.

    Evening only needs 4 sets to cover services. Two 6 car sets and two 4 car for evening services or swap the two 6 cars onto maynooth for extra capacity and put two 2900s onto docklands evening.

    Is there any hope of the 2750s making a come back or are they first to be cannibalise


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭Thrashssacre


    So if the whole point of bringing them back into service is too free up ircs which are working commuter services shouldent 20 units leave them with 27000s and some ircs spare? Will these be used to lenghten existing services or will a timetable increase be on the cards for some routes?


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,987 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    So if the whole point of bringing them back into service is too free up ircs which are working commuter services shouldent 20 units leave them with 27000s and some ircs spare? Will these be used to lenghten existing services or will a timetable increase be on the cards for some routes?

    god only knows with IE. if we are lucky they might go to operating all services on the couple of long distance lines which should have had that years ago like they were supposed to but didn't get them in full because "reasons"

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Some more details on the 2700 return in the NTAs 2016 review which was recently published.

    It shows 11 sets returning (and potentially destined for PPT services) instead of 10 and a later re-introduction (2018). Tender should be issued next month.

    https://www.nationaltransport.ie/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/151116_2016_Rail_Review_Report_Complete_Online.pdf
    4.1 Class 2700 DMU reintroduction 14 x 2 car DMU class 2700 fleet were withdrawn from service in 2012 as part of the fleet strategy project to optimise capacity and reduce costs. It is proposed to re-introduce this fleet into service on a phased basis during 2018/ 2019 and release ICR sets to other services. Each vehicle requires interior and exterior refurbishment, as well as modifications and heavy maintenance across a range of systems to bring them to a condition suitable for service. Initial estimates suggest the cost of the works will be in the region of €200,000-€300,000 per vehicle depending on the scope chosen.

    The most expedient option would be for the work to be offered as a turnkey to a major contractor. In this scenario, it is envisaged that the procurement timeline for contract award and critical path material supply would take up to 12 months, followed by an additional 24 months for the refurbishment program
    The re-introduction of the 14 x 2 Class 2700 DMU fleet, (11 sets for service and 3 retained for maintenance holdings) would assist in providing additional and a more suitable Commuter Rolling Stock to Phoenix Park services and would allow the reallocation of 4 ICR sets to other services.
    Subject to IE Procurement process commencing in January 2017 and critical path material availability, the best possible timeline indicated by the market would be for delivery to take place in stages from Q2 2018 to Q2 2019, with entry into service from Q4 2018. These timeframes will be confirmed following tender process and contract award




    P.S. The report also reveals IEs best kept secret, 41new centre ICR cars to create more 4 and 5 car ICRs subject to some legal issues to be confirmed!
    Subject to contract award in Q1 2017, Mitsui have indicated delivery could take place in phases from Q1 2019 to Q3 2019, with entry into service from Q2 2019. These will be confirmed on contract award


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,987 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    GM228 wrote: »
    Some more details on the 2700 return in the NTAs 2016 review which was recently published.

    It shows 11 sets returning (and potentially destined for PPT services) instead of 10 and a later re-introduction (2018). Tender should be issued next month.

    i reccan the hybrid won't return and the 2 bubble cars. basically the normal sets will return. in relation to the hybrid what happened the other vehicles of their original sets? scrapped or were they simply spare single vehicles?
    GM228 wrote: »
    P.S. The report also reveals IEs best kept secret, 41new centre ICR cars to create more 4 and 5 car ICRs subject to some legal issues to be confirmed!

    i had heard about this actually. it is welcome but in the great scheme of things what we actually need is more complete sets. or even better more appropriate stock for the heuston suburbans. no chance of those though.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



Advertisement