Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Private profiles - please note that profiles marked as private will soon be public. This will facilitate moderation so mods can view users' warning histories. All of your posts across the site will appear on your profile page (including PI, RI). Groups posts will remain private except to users who have access to the same Groups as you. Thread here
Some important site news, please read here. Thanks!

Prince Andrew in jep?

  • 02-01-2015 3:45pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 7,939 ✭✭✭ Hitchens


    "Suggestion of impropriety with minors untrue," says Buckingham Palace after Prince Andrew named in US sex lawsuit

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30659629

    this is surprising if it's true


«13456735

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 17 llennocO


    Why surprising? There's been suggestion of this sort of thing at the top levels of UK society for quite some time now!


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,651 ✭✭✭ keeponhurling


    To be honest, stuff like this should keep all the names anonymous until something is proven


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭ Slicemeister


    Who leaks this shieit? Guilty until proved innocent.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Look what happened to Cliff Richard !


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,149 PizzamanIRL


    He's part of the royal family. He had an over-privileged upbringing so he thinks he can do whatever he wants. The poor lad.


  • Advertisement
  • Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,688 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭ Tokyo


    He's part of the royal family. He had an over-privileged upbringing so he thinks he can do whatever he wants. The poor lad.

    Perhaps wait until these accusations actually hold water before nailing him to a cross??


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,569 ✭✭✭✭ RobertKK


    Guilty until proven innocent, trial by media...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭ weldoninhio


    Hitchens wrote: »
    "Suggestion of impropriety with minors untrue," says Buckingham Palace after Prince Andrew named in US sex lawsuit

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30659629

    this is surprising if it's true

    Sure isn't only a week or two ago that Prince Charles stepped in to stop the BBC from airing a documentary on high level paedophilia.

    Some of the stories that I've read are horrific.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,939 ✭✭✭ Hitchens


    maybe the BBC don't want to be accused of a cover up like with the Saville creature?

    Andy seemed to be the most normal of the royals


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,440 ✭✭✭ Gran Hermano


    I wouldn't describe anyone that picked Fergie as their wife as normal.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,877 ✭✭✭✭ endacl


    I wouldn't describe anyone that picked Fergie as their wife as normal.

    He didn't pick her. The illuminati lizard people did.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,939 ✭✭✭ Hitchens


    I wouldn't describe anyone that picked Fergie as their wife as normal.
    I don't think royalty get to pick their spouses


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,939 ✭✭✭ Hitchens




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,286 ✭✭✭ Frankie Lee


    Its hardly a new story, his friendship with Epstein is well known and like his heir to the throne brother with Savile there is no way he didn't know what Epstein was up to. The picture of him with one of Epstein's victim is damning enough.

    Last years story, apologies for linking the daily mail but they have been on top of this case for years.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2597308/The-bombshell-court-document-claims-Prince-Andrew-knew-billionaire-friends-abuse-age-girls.html

    The 17 year old girl in that article doesn't seem to be the one in court now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,651 ✭✭✭ keeponhurling


    Hitchens wrote: »
    maybe the BBC don't want to be accused of a cover up like with the Saville creature?

    Andy seemed to be the most normal of the royals

    It's already reported in lots of media outlets, would be very dodgy if the BBC just didn't mention it.

    Just happens to be the BBC report that the OP references.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,926 ✭✭✭✭ anncoates


    Don't they have solid evidence about his unconventional sexual peccadillos?

    I watched his marriage on TV as a kid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,305 Cantremember


    Who's Jep?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,578 StormWarrior


    Wouldn't he have diplomatic immunity?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,769 ✭✭✭ Sir Osis of Liver.


    Jip?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,068 ✭✭✭ ceadaoin.


    Wouldn't he have diplomatic immunity?

    They have sovereign immunity and can't be prosecuted for a crime


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 ✭✭✭✭ Fratton Fred


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    They have sovereign immunity and can't be prosecuted for a crime

    Andrew doesn't.


  • Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 10,853 Mod ✭✭✭✭ MarkR


    I'm not clicking links til someone tells me what the hell jep is. Is it's jedwards winky, I'm not looking. Again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,318 ✭✭✭✭ Menas


    He has been named in a case by someone who claims she was forced to have sex with him at the age of 17...which was below the age of consent in that state.
    Meh, who knows if it is true or not...but certainly not fair to condemn them man until he has been convicted which is unlikely IMO.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭ Donkey Oaty


    Andrew doesn't.

    And as he's no longer a trade envoy attached to British Embassies, he can't try and claim immunity through that either.

    Peter Mandelson and Bill Clinton were also associates of Epstein's, along with may other high-profile people, so we can expect some serious digging as this case goes on.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,926 ✭✭✭✭ anncoates


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    They have sovereign immunity and can't be prosecuted for a crime

    He's not a monarch.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,086 ✭✭✭✭ Harry Palmr


    17? Fer petes sake. If that's a crime I'm a peccadillo


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,554 ✭✭✭ bjork


    Either way, when you lay with dogs don't be suprised when you get fleas


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,286 ✭✭✭ Frankie Lee


    17? Fer petes sake. If that's a crime I'm a peccadillo

    A 17 year old forced into sex work. If true he is a rapist scumbag. His good friend Epstein was using girls as young as 12 at his parties.


  • Registered Users Posts: 893 ✭✭✭ PLL


    Jep = Jeopardy. ?? No?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,086 ✭✭✭✭ Harry Palmr


    Another article on it here - Epstein obvious seems like a bit of a Wolf of Wall Street type scumbag but its a big leap in my mind,.

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/02/prince-andrew-named-us-lawsuit-underage-sex-allegations


Advertisement