nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

The Andrew formally known as Prince in jep?

Hitchens

"Suggestion of impropriety with minors untrue," says Buckingham Palace after Prince Andrew named in US sex lawsuit

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30659629

this is surprising if it's true

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

AndonHandon

"The woman, who filed the motion anonymously"
http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/uk/prince-andrew-named-in-us-underage-sex-lawsuit-1.2053049

How the **** can she file such an application anonymously yet the alleged perpetrators can be named and reported? That is ludicrous.

Yurt2

Israel war crime apologist in chief, Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz implicated in the same case....

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/02/prince-andrew-named-us-lawsuit-underage-sex-allegations

EDIT: I should say named rather than implicated (implicated may imply guilt)

IsaacWunder

PLL wrote: »

Jep = Jeopardy. ?? No?

What is all the answers must be in the form of a question?

Donkey Oaty

PLL wrote: »

Jep = Jeopardy. ?? No?

The Duke of York may or not be in jep - however, Jeb is definitely in The Dukes of Hazzard.

Fratton Fred

ceadaoin. wrote: »

Whoops, misread something. According to Wikipedia members of the royal household can't be arrested in civil proceedings. I guess that doesn't apply here.

I'm sure nothing will happen to prince Andrew. There is no way the royal family will allow that can of worms to be opened.

He's not being charged with anything, he is just named in the lawsuit. Besides, it is in the US, so there is nothing the royal family can do about it.

ceadaoin.

anncoates wrote: »

He's not a monarch.

Fratton Fred wrote: »

Andrew doesn't.

Whoops, misread something. According to Wikipedia members of the royal household can't be arrested in civil proceedings. I guess that doesn't apply here.

I'm sure nothing will happen to prince Andrew. There is no way the royal family will allow that can of worms to be opened.

keeponhurling

PLL wrote: »

Jep = Jeopardy. ?? No?

I googled it and this came up.
doubt he's in this group, as the royal family wouldn't exactly be fans of religious diversity.

Maybe the Epstein lad is a member?
JEP - Jewish European Professionals

www.jep.eu/

Harry Palmr

Another article on it here - Epstein obvious seems like a bit of a Wolf of Wall Street type scumbag but its a big leap in my mind,.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/02/prince-andrew-named-us-lawsuit-underage-sex-allegations

PLL

Jep = Jeopardy. ?? No?

Frankie Lee

Harry Palmr wrote: »

17? Fer petes sake. If that's a crime I'm a peccadillo

A 17 year old forced into sex work. If true he is a rapist scumbag. His good friend Epstein was using girls as young as 12 at his parties.

bjork

Either way, when you lay with dogs don't be suprised when you get fleas

Harry Palmr

17? Fer petes sake. If that's a crime I'm a peccadillo

anncoates

ceadaoin. wrote: »

They have sovereign immunity and can't be prosecuted for a crime

He's not a monarch.

Donkey Oaty

Fratton Fred wrote: »

Andrew doesn't.

And as he's no longer a trade envoy attached to British Embassies, he can't try and claim immunity through that either.

Peter Mandelson and Bill Clinton were also associates of Epstein's, along with may other high-profile people, so we can expect some serious digging as this case goes on.

Menas

He has been named in a case by someone who claims she was forced to have sex with him at the age of 17...which was below the age of consent in that state.
Meh, who knows if it is true or not...but certainly not fair to condemn them man until he has been convicted which is unlikely IMO.

MarkR

I'm not clicking links til someone tells me what the hell jep is. Is it's jedwards winky, I'm not looking. Again.

Fratton Fred

ceadaoin. wrote: »

They have sovereign immunity and can't be prosecuted for a crime

Andrew doesn't.

ceadaoin.

StormWarrior wrote: »

Wouldn't he have diplomatic immunity?

They have sovereign immunity and can't be prosecuted for a crime

Sir Osis of Liver.

Jip?

StormWarrior

Wouldn't he have diplomatic immunity?

Cantremember

Who's Jep?

anncoates

Don't they have solid evidence about his unconventional sexual peccadillos?

I watched his marriage on TV as a kid.

keeponhurling

Hitchens wrote: »

maybe the BBC don't want to be accused of a cover up like with the Saville creature?

Andy seemed to be the most normal of the royals

It's already reported in lots of media outlets, would be very dodgy if the BBC just didn't mention it.

Just happens to be the BBC report that the OP references.

Frankie Lee

Its hardly a new story, his friendship with Epstein is well known and like his heir to the throne brother with Savile there is no way he didn't know what Epstein was up to. The picture of him with one of Epstein's victim is damning enough.

Last years story, apologies for linking the daily mail but they have been on top of this case for years.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2597308/The-bombshell-court-document-claims-Prince-Andrew-knew-billionaire-friends-abuse-age-girls.html

The 17 year old girl in that article doesn't seem to be the one in court now.

Hitchens

update: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30659629

Hitchens

Gran Hermano wrote: »

I wouldn't describe anyone that picked Fergie as their wife as normal.

I don't think royalty get to pick their spouses

endacl

Gran Hermano wrote: »

I wouldn't describe anyone that picked Fergie as their wife as normal.

He didn't pick her. The illuminati lizard people did.

Gran Hermano

I wouldn't describe anyone that picked Fergie as their wife as normal.

Hitchens

maybe the BBC don't want to be accused of a cover up like with the Saville creature?

Andy seemed to be the most normal of the royals

weldoninhio

Hitchens wrote: »

"Suggestion of impropriety with minors untrue," says Buckingham Palace after Prince Andrew named in US sex lawsuit

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30659629

this is surprising if it's true

Sure isn't only a week or two ago that Prince Charles stepped in to stop the BBC from airing a documentary on high level paedophilia.

Some of the stories that I've read are horrific.