nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

The Andrew formally known as Prince in jep?

Hitchens

"Suggestion of impropriety with minors untrue," says Buckingham Palace after Prince Andrew named in US sex lawsuit

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30659629

this is surprising if it's true

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

llennocO

Why surprising? There's been suggestion of this sort of thing at the top levels of UK society for quite some time now!

keeponhurling

To be honest, stuff like this should keep all the names anonymous until something is proven

Slicemeister

Who leaks this shieit? Guilty until proved innocent.

[Deleted User]

Look what happened to Cliff Richard !

PizzamanIRL

He's part of the royal family. He had an over-privileged upbringing so he thinks he can do whatever he wants. The poor lad.

Tokyo

PizzamanIRL wrote: »

He's part of the royal family. He had an over-privileged upbringing so he thinks he can do whatever he wants. The poor lad.

Perhaps wait until these accusations actually hold water before nailing him to a cross??

RobertKK

Guilty until proven innocent, trial by media...

weldoninhio

Hitchens wrote: »

"Suggestion of impropriety with minors untrue," says Buckingham Palace after Prince Andrew named in US sex lawsuit

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30659629

this is surprising if it's true

Sure isn't only a week or two ago that Prince Charles stepped in to stop the BBC from airing a documentary on high level paedophilia.

Some of the stories that I've read are horrific.

Hitchens

maybe the BBC don't want to be accused of a cover up like with the Saville creature?

Andy seemed to be the most normal of the royals

Gran Hermano

I wouldn't describe anyone that picked Fergie as their wife as normal.

endacl

Gran Hermano wrote: »

I wouldn't describe anyone that picked Fergie as their wife as normal.

He didn't pick her. The illuminati lizard people did.

Hitchens

Gran Hermano wrote: »

I wouldn't describe anyone that picked Fergie as their wife as normal.

I don't think royalty get to pick their spouses

Hitchens

update: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30659629

Frankie Lee

Its hardly a new story, his friendship with Epstein is well known and like his heir to the throne brother with Savile there is no way he didn't know what Epstein was up to. The picture of him with one of Epstein's victim is damning enough.

Last years story, apologies for linking the daily mail but they have been on top of this case for years.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2597308/The-bombshell-court-document-claims-Prince-Andrew-knew-billionaire-friends-abuse-age-girls.html

The 17 year old girl in that article doesn't seem to be the one in court now.

keeponhurling

Hitchens wrote: »

maybe the BBC don't want to be accused of a cover up like with the Saville creature?

Andy seemed to be the most normal of the royals

It's already reported in lots of media outlets, would be very dodgy if the BBC just didn't mention it.

Just happens to be the BBC report that the OP references.

anncoates

Don't they have solid evidence about his unconventional sexual peccadillos?

I watched his marriage on TV as a kid.

Cantremember

Who's Jep?

StormWarrior

Wouldn't he have diplomatic immunity?

Sir Osis of Liver.

Jip?

ceadaoin.

StormWarrior wrote: »

Wouldn't he have diplomatic immunity?

They have sovereign immunity and can't be prosecuted for a crime

Fratton Fred

ceadaoin. wrote: »

They have sovereign immunity and can't be prosecuted for a crime

Andrew doesn't.

MarkR

I'm not clicking links til someone tells me what the hell jep is. Is it's jedwards winky, I'm not looking. Again.

Menas

He has been named in a case by someone who claims she was forced to have sex with him at the age of 17...which was below the age of consent in that state.
Meh, who knows if it is true or not...but certainly not fair to condemn them man until he has been convicted which is unlikely IMO.

Donkey Oaty

Fratton Fred wrote: »

Andrew doesn't.

And as he's no longer a trade envoy attached to British Embassies, he can't try and claim immunity through that either.

Peter Mandelson and Bill Clinton were also associates of Epstein's, along with may other high-profile people, so we can expect some serious digging as this case goes on.

anncoates

ceadaoin. wrote: »

They have sovereign immunity and can't be prosecuted for a crime

He's not a monarch.

Harry Palmr

17? Fer petes sake. If that's a crime I'm a peccadillo

bjork

Either way, when you lay with dogs don't be suprised when you get fleas

Frankie Lee

Harry Palmr wrote: »

17? Fer petes sake. If that's a crime I'm a peccadillo

A 17 year old forced into sex work. If true he is a rapist scumbag. His good friend Epstein was using girls as young as 12 at his parties.

PLL

Jep = Jeopardy. ?? No?

Harry Palmr

Another article on it here - Epstein obvious seems like a bit of a Wolf of Wall Street type scumbag but its a big leap in my mind,.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/02/prince-andrew-named-us-lawsuit-underage-sex-allegations