Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

What evidence of Gerry Adams' IRA membership do people need?

Options
1235743

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 15,944 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Piliger wrote: »
    Did the GFA say they had to be voted for ? Read what I said.

    Read it again I was referring to immunity for killers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,309 ✭✭✭Technoprisoner


    Because for the past twenty years he's publicly lied about being a member of an illegal organisation which killed 1800 people. I see that as kind of a big deal.



    nelson mandela pleaded guilty to 156 acts of public violence including planting bombs in public places....Gerry Adams has never even been convicted of being a member of a terrorist organisation. yet nelson mandela was considered a peace activist


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭Tramps Like Us


    nelson mandela pleaded guilty to 156 acts of public violence including planting bombs in public places....Gerry Adams has never even been convicted of being a member of a terrorist organisation. yet nelson mandela was considered a peace activist
    Nelson Mandela considered Adams as being a brother in arms


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,309 ✭✭✭Technoprisoner


    Nelson Mandela considered Adams as being a brother in arms


    so why are people so determined to ruin his political career and all the good he has brought to the peace process in the north?


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,307 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    so why are people so determined to ruin his political career and all the good he has brought to the peace process in the north?

    The man is about to retire and has been pastured out to the Dail. It's a bit late to ruin his political career. A bit of honesty for a change would be welcome all the same.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Nelson Mandela considered Adams as being a brother in arms

    So even Mandela thought Adams was in the IRA!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭dashcamdanny


    so why are people so determined to ruin his political career and all the good he has brought to the peace process in the north?

    When he is dead and gone, he will be known as a freedom fighter and peace maker. Forever in our history.

    Can't see Enda and his money hungry goblins getting that title.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,307 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    When he is dead and gone, he will be known as a freedom fighter and peace maker. Forever in our history.

    1800 lives is a bit of a rich price tag for such a legacy. But then Paisley will be right in there under the same categories.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭dashcamdanny


    alastair wrote: »
    1800 lives is a bit of a rich price tag for such a legacy. But then Paisley will be right in there under the same categories.

    Yep. I would tend to agree.

    Hopefully the toll on lives is at an end. I doubt it though. Where I was brought up, there are a fair few headbangers still running around with a massive chip on their shoulder.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 203 ✭✭Lastlight.


    When he is dead and gone, he will be known as a freedom fighter and peace maker. Forever in our history.

    Can't see Enda and his money hungry goblins getting that title.
    Not to the Ulster Protestants he won't.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 572 ✭✭✭relaxed


    alastair wrote: »
    1800 lives is a bit of a rich price tag for such a legacy. But then Paisley will be right in there under the same categories.

    Did he shoot them all himself?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    relaxed wrote: »
    Did he shoot them all himself?
    Wasn't his role mostly as a 'director of terrorism' rather than a hands on terrorist?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 572 ✭✭✭relaxed


    Phoebas wrote: »
    Wasn't his role mostly as a 'director of terrorism' rather than a hands on terrorist?

    Never heard of him having that title before, care to backup that?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    relaxed wrote: »
    Never heard of him having that title before, care to backup that?
    There's a specific charge of 'directing terrorism' - I can't point to the specific legislation, but I'm sure you could google it.
    Anyone in any kind of leadership position in the IRA would be open to such a charge.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭dashcamdanny


    Phoebas wrote: »
    There's a specific charge of 'directing terrorism' - I can't point to the specific legislation, but I'm sure you could google it.
    Anyone in any kind of leadership position in the IRA would be open to such a charge.

    Or any kind leadership position in the British or US government as well. Lets not forget them for this new charge.

    Down with them all!!!!

    GRRRRRRR!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Or any kind leadership position in the British or US government as well. Lets not forget them for this new charge.

    Down with them all!!!!

    GRRRRRRR!!
    State sanctioned violence isn't subject to the same charge, being as it is, legal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 572 ✭✭✭relaxed


    Phoebas wrote: »
    There's a specific charge of 'directing terrorism' - I can't point to the specific legislation, but I'm sure you could google it.
    Anyone in any kind of leadership position in the IRA would be open to such a charge.

    Yes I am aware of the charge, but was Gerry Adams ever found guilty of said offence?

    If not then stop making false claims that he was directing terrorism.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭dashcamdanny


    Phoebas wrote: »
    State sanctioned violence isn't subject to the same charge, being as it is, legal.

    Yes indeed. But it all depends if the government is sending in troops to kick in your door, Im guessing Gerry may have questioned the legality of the way nationalists were being treated when he was younger.

    Not being a sheep, he may have turned to the republican movement as a way to rebel .

    I have no doubt personally he was involved in the IRA. But they will never pin it on him without a noted member standing in the witness box against him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    relaxed wrote: »
    If not then stop making false claims that he was directing terrorism.
    I made that claim? Was that inside or outside of your own imagination?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Not being a sheep, he may have turned to the republican movement as a way to rebel .
    Nice of you to label the majority of the nationalist people in N.I. who continued to support the SDLP all throughout the troubles as 'sheep'.
    I have no doubt personally he was involved in the IRA.
    Me neither.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭dashcamdanny


    Phoebas wrote: »
    Nice of you to label the majority of the nationalist people in N.I. who continued to support the SDLP all throughout the troubles as 'sheep'.

    I made that claim? Was that inside or outside of your own imagination?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 572 ✭✭✭relaxed


    Phoebas wrote: »
    I made that claim? Was that inside or outside of your own imagination?

    That's what you said in your post #133 anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,307 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    relaxed wrote: »
    Yes I am aware of the charge, but was Gerry Adams ever found guilty of said offence?

    If not then stop making false claims that he was directing terrorism.

    He was directing terrorism though. He had a leading role within a terrorist organisation. Kinda the job description.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    relaxed wrote: »
    That's what you said in your post #133 anyway.

    That wasn't a claim - it was a question.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 572 ✭✭✭relaxed


    Phoebas wrote: »
    That wasn't a claim - it was a question.

    Well then the answer to your question is no. There is a charge for directing terrorism and I am unaware of him ever being found guilty of it, so he remains innocent until proven guilty, the same right the rest of us enjoy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 572 ✭✭✭relaxed


    alastair wrote: »
    He was directing terrorism though. He had a leading role within a terrorist organisation. Kinda the job description.

    So much for innocent until proven guilty, you should be running North Korea.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    relaxed wrote: »
    Well then the answer to your question is no. There is a charge for directing terrorism and I am unaware of him ever being found guilty of it, so he remains innocent until proven guilty, the same right the rest of us enjoy.

    He's only innocent if he didn't direct terrorism. He's guilty if he did.

    The presumption of innocence is a legal construct - not to be confused with actual fact.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,307 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    relaxed wrote: »
    So much for innocent until proven guilty, you should be running North Korea.

    Is this a court of law? No it's not. So a question of innocence or guilt doesn't arise. Was he directing terrorism? Yes he was - he was a leading member of a terrorist organisation, and the buck stopped with him over many acts of violence.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 572 ✭✭✭relaxed


    alastair wrote: »
    Is this a court of law? No it's not. So a question of innocence or guilt doesn't arise. Was he directing terrorism? Yes he was - he was a leading member of a terrorist organisation, and the buck stopped with him over many acts of violence.

    Maybe you should furnish us with some evidence of his being a leading member so, before making such matter of fact statements.

    A few photos from the 1970's is far from evidence of him being a leading member of the Ira in the 1980's.

    We all know he may well have been, but it's evidence you need to back up your claims with.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 572 ✭✭✭relaxed


    Phoebas wrote: »
    He's only innocent if he didn't direct terrorism. He's guilty if he did.

    The presumption of innocence is a legal construct - not to be confused with actual fact.

    Well if you have some factual evidence that he was directing terrorism lets be having it.


Advertisement