If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)

Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

When might Eircom to enable vectoring on their eFibre/VDSL service?

KeRbDoG · 2014-01-31 19:08:22

Just starting a thread to see when we might actually see vectoring being enabled by Eircom on their eFibre/VDSL service. I've heard February but has anyone seen/heard anything more solid than that?

Options

Comments

Options
#632 18-04-2014 5:20pm
AlanS181824

Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2012

Posts: 5473

leigh852 wrote: »

Rang eircom this morning to get them to update my line rate. Lovely gentleman popped me straight onto 100mb there and then.

============================================================================
VDSL Training Status: Showtime
Mode: VDSL2 Annex B
VDSL Profile: Profile 17a
Traffic Type: PTM Mode
Link Uptime: 0 day: 2 hours: 4 minutes
============================================================================
VDSL Port Details Upstream Downstream
Line Rate: 20.477 Mbps 102.395 Mbps
Actual Net Data Rate: 20.478 Mbps 102.396 Mbps
Trellis Coding: ON ON
SNR Margin: 16.1 dB 17.4 dB
Actual Delay: 0 ms 0 ms
Transmit Power: - 9.7 dBm 14.6 dBm
Receive Power: -21.1 dBm 4.6 dBm
Actual INP: 29.0 symbols 29.0 symbols
Total Attenuation: 11.3 dB 9.9 dB
Attainable Net Data Rate: 31.951 Mbps 128.268 Mbps
============================================================================

http://www.speedtest.net/result/3447465135.png

Those speeds have me so excited for when my Fibre finally gets installed! Looks great!

0
Options
#633 18-04-2014 5:47pm
SpaceTime

Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2013

Posts: 8866

bk wrote: »

BT trialling G.Fast + FTTdp in the UK with Huawei:

http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/huawei-gfast-fttdp-copper-bt-129855

Significant for us as Huawei is also Eircoms partner for their FTTC rollout.

BTW I'm not saying they will 100% use G.Fast/FTTdp, it is only on average 15% cheaper then FTTH. So more likely they will use it in combination with FTTB and FTTH depending on each install.

Given the very small % of people living in apartments in Ireland FTTB will have very little impact. We've the lowest % of apartment dwellers in the EU (by a long shot) only Noway (in the EEA) comes close.

We need to be looking at something pole mountable or that can be dropped into existing vaults.

In-fill mini cabinets might be a good interim step to get it down to at least a per street level.

I think beyond that you might as well go to FTTH as we mostly don't have sufficient density to get much beyond that with copper.

You could see limited applications for g.fast but to get it to work in Ireland would require ludicrous numbers of nodes. You might as well just have FTTH.

Apartment buildings seem to be the only logical place for G.Fast.

I still think coax and fibre are the best solutions for Ireland.

0
Options
#634 21-04-2014 12:11am
AlanS181824

Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2012

Posts: 5473

Has anyone actually managed to get above the infamous 100Mb speed test yet? I know the Max package is 100Mb but I wonder is it similar to UPC the way you can actually get more than the package you're on?

0
Options
#635 21-04-2014 1:43am
sparky63

Registered Users Posts: 160 ✭✭

Join Date: October 2013

Posts: 154

SpaceTime wrote: »

Actually mightn't be that bad in housing estates where wiring is carried to houses from the cabinet in ducts.

You could probably avoid digging anything

Direct buried phone lines (line laid in soil with no duct) is not common in Ireland.

Also in overhead areas you've usually got ducts feeding the poles so only the last short run goes overhead.

It's expensive, but I think it's quite doable.

In housing estates where the wiring is in ducts, cost is less. Digging would be minimal, but there are many ducts that have been damaged due to the installation of cobblelock driveways, a major headache and cost to rectify. Direct buried lines are more prevalent than one might think. In my estamation, most dwellings that pre date 1990 are fed either by buried armoured lead or overhead wire. There are some exceptions but most are buried, with no duct line. In overhead areas in estates, the wring to the pole would be in ducts, but elsewhere it would most likely be overhead cable to the pole. There are also a lot of estates fed by slung lead, these are wires fed from a distribution point at the end of a block and then fed along facias or gutters into each subsequent house. One would be surprised how many dwellings that are not ducted. FTTH is a massive undertaking with enormous costs coupled with competition from Eircoms competitors. Maximizing the copper rather than FTTH is going to be here for a while.

0
Options
#636 21-04-2014 5:49am
jca

Closed Accounts Posts: 8,585 ✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2009

Posts: 8557

sparky63 wrote: »

In housing estates where the wiring is in ducts, cost is less. Digging would be minimal, but there are many ducts that have been damaged due to the installation of cobblelock driveways, a major headache and cost to rectify. Direct buried lines are more prevalent than one might think. In my estamation, most dwellings that pre date 1990 are fed either by buried armoured lead or overhead wire. There are some exceptions but most are buried, with no duct line. In overhead areas in estates, the wring to the pole would be in ducts, but elsewhere it would most likely be overhead cable to the pole. There are also a lot of estates fed by slung lead, these are wires fed from a distribution point at the end of a block and then fed along facias or gutters into each subsequent house. One would be surprised how many dwellings that are not ducted. FTTH is a massive undertaking with enormous costs coupled with competition from Eircoms competitors. Maximizing the copper rather than FTTH is going to be here for a while.

I can see the Esb running into the same problems when they try to do ftth too. Maybe this is completely wrong, but could the Esb run fibre to their on street cabinets and use the mains cable to make the final run into the premises? Something like a home plug setup? A bit like the way UPC do it.

0
Advertisement
Options
#637 21-04-2014 4:24pm
ED E

Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: February 2007

Posts: 35405

jca wrote: »

I can see the Esb running into the same problems when they try to do ftth too. Maybe this is completely wrong, but could the Esb run fibre to their on street cabinets and use the mains cable to make the final run into the premises? Something like a home plug setup? A bit like the way UPC do it.

There is data over mains technology, but its not great. Unlikely anyone will try do broadband that way.

0
Options
#638 21-04-2014 5:36pm
SpaceTime

Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2013

Posts: 8866

Data over power lines wasn't every really that effective in trials.

The main reason being that power lines were never, ever designed for any kind of transmission of signals.

They're big, heavy duty, unshielded and often unbalanced wires carrying hundreds of amps.

You've also even got bleed from switch mode power supplies, electric motor control systems r etc etc making them quite noisy.

UPC use coaxial cables designed originally to carry very high bandwidth and sensitive analogue TV signals.

Eircom uses high quality twisted pair designed to carry voice and ISDN signals originally.

ESB lines would have more in common with your front gate than a phone line. They're big heavy copper or aluminium wires.

The connectors and junctions would be pretty crude too.

0
Options
#639 21-04-2014 11:38pm
kaizersoze

Registered Users Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2004

Posts: 6870

It was trialled by the ESB in Tuam a few years ago but it failed miserably.

0
Options
#640 22-04-2014 1:09am
GIMickey

Registered Users Posts: 175 ✭✭

Join Date: May 2010

Posts: 175

I think the forum is getting way off topic the last few pages.

0
Options
#641 22-04-2014 1:13am
OneEightSeven

Registered Users Posts: 1,339 ✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2014

Posts: 1314

GIMickey wrote: »

I think the forum is getting way off topic the last few pages.

I agree. The router stats should be posted here: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056971854&page=24

0
Advertisement
Options
#642 22-04-2014 7:44am
AlanS181824

Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2012

Posts: 5473

GIMickey wrote: »

I think the forum is getting way off topic the last few pages.

I've been partly to blame for that but I agree, we need to stay on topic! :P

0
Options
#643 22-04-2014 11:02am
SpaceTime

Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2013

Posts: 8866

I think my line is vectored but due to the length it looks like 60Mbit/s tops now.

0
Options
#644 22-04-2014 2:46pm
Nonoperational

Registered Users Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2005

Posts: 7185

Has your attainable reduced aswell? It still just seems strange to me that most peoples attainables really improved after vectoring, yet a group had a reduction.

I have asked Vodafone to set the SNR margin target to 6db on my line to see what happens to my speed. It is proving difficult though. At the end of the day the line checker says my line is capable of 50Mbit and that's what I am getting so nobody is interested in it beyond that. I suppose it is also possible that I have a line of poor quality, and there is definitely something a bit strange as my DS2 attenuation is higher than the DS3 and when INP was enabled it needs a better line than FEC and interleaving.

I'd love to have a pint with somebody at an Eircom network management level who actually knows exactly what's going on...

0
Options
#645 22-04-2014 4:06pm
ED E

Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: February 2007

Posts: 35405

Nonoperational wrote: »

I'd love to have a pint with somebody at an Eircom network management level who actually knows exactly what's going on...

Its the VDSL Engineers that you'd want to have a Guinness with, the NOC staff are on a level above that.

The SNR target would be set from the port config, thats a 2nd/3rd level support operation and if there isnt a big problem it'll never get that far.

Have you compared stats with any neighbours? Itd be interesting to see if they're doing significantly better. If they were you might have a poor/damage drop wire from the pole/curb.

0

Options

#646 22-04-2014 6:46pm

jimmad

Registered Users Posts: 159 ✭✭

Join Date: February 2001

Posts: 152

So Still no sign of vectoring on my digiweb line here in letterkenny, but out home the eircom line has been upgraded and altho only on the 50 meg package is enjoying healthy pings with INP set to 29/29 with 0 delay.

I have taken the F1000 router from home and plugged it into my digiweb line to see the line stats compared to that given by the fritz box and low and behold

============================================================================
    VDSL Training Status:   Showtime
                    Mode:   VDSL2 Annex B
            VDSL Profile:   Profile 17a
            Traffic Type:   PTM Mode
             Link Uptime:   0 day: 0 hour: 2 minutes
============================================================================
       VDSL Port Details       Upstream         Downstream
               Line Rate:     20.477 Mbps       61.436 Mbps
    Actual Net Data Rate:     20.478 Mbps       61.437 Mbps
          Trellis Coding:         ON                ON
              SNR Margin:       10.0 dB           16.2 dB
            Actual Delay:          0 ms              0 ms
          Transmit Power:      - 2.4 dBm          12.4 dBm
           Receive Power:      -20.0 dBm          -8.6 dBm
              Actual INP:       29.0 symbols      29.0 symbols
       Total Attenuation:       17.6 dB           21.0 dB
Attainable Net Data Rate:     23.058 Mbps       82.628 Mbps
============================================================================
      VDSL Band Status    U0      U1      U2      U3      D1      D2      D3
  Line Attenuation(dB):  4.6    23.8    34.9     N/A    12.8    30.3    46.6   
Signal Attenuation(dB):  4.6    22.9    33.7     N/A    16.7    30.1    46.6   
        SNR Margin(dB): 10.2    10.3     9.8     N/A    16.3    16.3    16.2   
   Transmit Power(dBm):-16.1   - 6.6   - 4.8     N/A     7.9     7.8     7.2   
============================================================================

Compared to that of my digiweb line of the following.

Max. DSLAM throughput	kbit/s	61440	20480
Min. DSLAM throughput	kbit/s	1024	1024
Attainable data rate	kbit/s	57067	14122
Current throughput	kbit/s	57530	13447
Seamless rate adaptation		off	off
 			
Latency		4 ms	8 ms
Impulse Noise Protection		28	2
G.inp		on	off
 			
Signal-to-noise ratio	dB	9	9
Bitswap		on	off
Line attenuation	dB	17	13
 			
Profile	17a		
G.Vector		off	off
 			
Carrier record		B43	B43

If I had digiwebs settings I could connect the line properly using the eircom router, but digiweb are obviously telling fibs here in order to prevent a better more costly service, or maybe im missing something?

Options
#647 22-04-2014 6:59pm
Nonoperational

Registered Users Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2005

Posts: 7185

ED E wrote: »

Its the VDSL Engineers that you'd want to have a Guinness with, the NOC staff are on a level above that.

The SNR target would be set from the port config, thats a 2nd/3rd level support operation and if there isnt a big problem it'll never get that far.

Have you compared stats with any neighbours? Itd be interesting to see if they're doing significantly better. If they were you might have a poor/damage drop wire from the pole/curb.

I haven't compared VDSL stats with the neighbours, but I know that for ADSL 2+ I was actually doing a little better than the guys next door.

Maybe it's just the way the lines are joined coming into the apartment building that's giving the slightly odd attenuation figures, because I think it is costing me some attainable speed. Most people with a DS1 attenuation of 12 are getting attainables of over 80Mbit, mine ranges from 51 to 58 although before INP it was 62 Mbit with a much lower SNR (6.5db, now 10db). I am just assuming the changing of FEC and interleaving to INP gives better pings but needs a better quality line too and that would explain it.

My attenuations are DS1 12.1, DS2 41, DS3 39. I just don't know how significant the DS2 band is for VDSL.

It's a pity the Huawei can't show if vectoring is enabled or not, although I suspect it is since my SNR got a modest boost from 6.5 to 10.

Still a chance vectoring is not on on the cabinet yet, a few numbers I have checked close to the cabinet all say max 70Mbit at the moment and most of them 50Mbit even apparently very close to cabinet. Hmmmmmmm....

0

Options

#648 22-04-2014 7:55pm

jimmad

Registered Users Posts: 159 ✭✭

Join Date: February 2001

Posts: 152

Ok just to update. I managed to get digiwebs settings for the eircom router. my ping time has halfed and im getting full sync of 60/20 now with an attainable of 83/23.

Pinging boards.ie [89.234.66.108] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 89.234.66.108: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 89.234.66.108: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 89.234.66.108: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 89.234.66.108: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63

Ping statistics for 89.234.66.108:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 10ms, Average = 10ms

Digiwebs fritzbox does not seem to be picking up the new settings, must be a firmware issue.

Options
#649 22-04-2014 8:34pm
density

Registered Users Posts: 13 ✭

Join Date: July 2008

Posts: 10

I'm with Vodafone, and I've been watching the stats of my Huawei modem change over the past month. I have pasted in a few profiles below. The attainable rates have been falling steadily, whilst the SNRs have been going up and down. Line attenuation remains fairly constant. Does anyone have an explanation for or insights into this behaviour? The pings on the bestaccording to Speedtest.net results are consistently around 6ms now, where they would have been several times higher before the vectoring kicked in.

Line standard VDSL2
VDSL standard Profile 17a
Channel type None
02/04 00.21 02/04 19.35 10/04 10.25 15/04 07.25 22/04 18.57
Downstream line rate (kbit/s) 50170 50170 50176 50176 50176
Upstream line rate (kbit/s) 15358 15358 15360 15360 15360
Downstream attainable data rate(kbit/s) 107284 103812 94568 81992 70180
Upstream attainable data rate(kbit/s) 29077 28787 23542 23919 23017
Downstream SNR (dB) 20.8 19.4 25.8 23.9 18.8
Upstream SNR (dB) 13.7 13.5 14.3 14.7 14
Downstream line attenuation (dB) 12.4 12.4 12.5 12.5 12.5
Upstream line attenuation (dB) 4 4 4.1 4.1 4.1
Downstream output power (dBmV) 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1
Upstream output power (dBmV) -3.5 -3.5 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4
Downstream CRC 632 654 0 1 8
Upstream CRC 1 1 0 0 0
Downstream FEC 20771746 21899927 0 46261 61322
Upstream FEC 872807 933876 0 545 1542

0
Options
#650 22-04-2014 8:47pm
Nonoperational

Registered Users Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2005

Posts: 7185

Basically nobody is sure why the attainables are dropping for some people. My guess is that with the replacing of FEC and interleaving with Impulse noise protection the attainables drop. There is also a possibility that vectoring itself has not been turned on on all cabinets. If you check the eircom site, it appears to say your max speed is 100Mbit is the cabinet has vectoring enabled, bit that is not necessarily very accurate.

The attenuation will stay the same as it's based on line length and thickess.

0
Options
#651 22-04-2014 9:59pm
PeadarB

Registered Users Posts: 364 ✭✭

Join Date: June 2010

Posts: 358

Got moved to the "Rate Adaptive" Profile today after a wee wait. Almost a true 100/20 connection or as near as damn it!!!

=====================================================

Status 22/04/2014 11am

=====================================================
VDSL Training Status: Showtime
Mode: VDSL2 Annex B
VDSL Profile: Profile 17a
Traffic Type: PTM Mode
Link Uptime: 13 days: 6 hours: 19 minutes
=====================================================
VDSL Port Details Upstream Downstream
Line Rate: 20.477 Mbps 87.015 Mbps
Actual Net Data Rate: 20.478 Mbps 87.016 Mbps
Trellis Coding: ON ON
SNR Margin: 9.7 dB 16.3 dB
Actual Delay: 0 ms 0 ms
Transmit Power: -13.9 dBm 12.5 dBm
Receive Power: -24.7 dBm -1.7 dBm
Actual INP: 29.0 symbols 30.0 symbols
Total Attenuation: 10.8 dB 14.2 dB
Attainable Net Data Rate: 22.896 Mbps 111.708 Mbps
======================================================
VDSL Band Status U0 U1 U2 U3 D1 D2 D3
Line Attenuation(dB): 2.3 13.7 20.1 N/A 8.1 18.8 29.9
Signal Attenuation(dB): 2.3 13.4 19.3 N/A 10.6 18.6 29.9
SNR Margin(dB): 10.0 9.7 9.6 N/A 16.0 16.1 16.1
Transmit Power(dBm):-24.6 -16.1 -19.0 N/A 8.2 7.9 6.9
======================================================

Status 22/04/2014 21.30pm

======================================================
VDSL Training Status: Showtime
Mode: VDSL2 Annex B
VDSL Profile: Profile 17a
Traffic Type: PTM Mode
Link Uptime: 0 day: 8 hours: 27 minutes
======================================================
VDSL Port Details Upstream Downstream
Line Rate: 20.477 Mbps 97.517 Mbps
Actual Net Data Rate: 20.478 Mbps 97.518 Mbps
Trellis Coding: ON ON
SNR Margin: 9.9 dB 10.4 dB
Actual Delay: 0 ms 0 ms
Transmit Power: -13.6 dBm 12.3 dBm
Receive Power: -24.4 dBm -2.4 dBm
Actual INP: 29.0 symbols 29.0 symbols
Total Attenuation: 10.8 dB 14.7 dB
Attainable Net Data Rate: 22.877 Mbps 109.220 Mbps
======================================================
VDSL Band Status U0 U1 U2 U3 D1 D2 D3
Line Attenuation(dB): 2.3 13.9 20.5 N/A 8.2 19.0 30.6
Signal Attenuation(dB): 2.3 13.4 19.1 N/A 10.7 18.9 30.5
SNR Margin(dB): 9.9 9.9 9.9 N/A 10.1 10.0 10.1
Transmit Power(dBm):-24.3 -15.8 -18.8 N/A 7.5 8.0 7.0
======================================================

The Attainable Net Data Rates are ranging from 101Mbps earlier to 109Mbps now. The "lift" is about 10Mbps on both Attainable Net Data Rate and Actual Net Data Rate, SNR is around 10 dB Rx & Tx.

and before the bump

and -
Pinging boards.ie [89.234.66.108] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 89.234.66.108: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=60
Reply from 89.234.66.108: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=60
Reply from 89.234.66.108: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=60
Reply from 89.234.66.108: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 89.234.66.108:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 23ms, Average = 16ms

0
Advertisement
Options
#652 22-04-2014 10:30pm
kingtiger

Registered Users Posts: 1,740 ✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2012

Posts: 1663

I think Vectoring has been enabled on my line (about 600m to cab)

do you think I can get a faster profile?

0
Options
#653 22-04-2014 11:32pm
sparky63

Registered Users Posts: 160 ✭✭

Join Date: October 2013

Posts: 154

density wrote: »

I'm with Vodafone, and I've been watching the stats of my Huawei modem change over the past month. I have pasted in a few profiles below. The attainable rates have been falling steadily, whilst the SNRs have been going up and down. Line attenuation remains fairly constant. Does anyone have an explanation for or insights into this behaviour? The pings on the bestaccording to Speedtest.net results are consistently around 6ms now, where they would have been several times higher before the vectoring kicked in.

Line standard VDSL2
VDSL standard Profile 17a
Channel type None
02/04 00.21 02/04 19.35 10/04 10.25 15/04 07.25 22/04 18.57
Downstream line rate (kbit/s) 50170 50170 50176 50176 50176
Upstream line rate (kbit/s) 15358 15358 15360 15360 15360
Downstream attainable data rate(kbit/s) 107284 103812 94568 81992 70180
Upstream attainable data rate(kbit/s) 29077 28787 23542 23919 23017
Downstream SNR (dB) 20.8 19.4 25.8 23.9 18.8
Upstream SNR (dB) 13.7 13.5 14.3 14.7 14
Downstream line attenuation (dB) 12.4 12.4 12.5 12.5 12.5
Upstream line attenuation (dB) 4 4 4.1 4.1 4.1
Downstream output power (dBmV) 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1
Upstream output power (dBmV) -3.5 -3.5 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4
Downstream CRC 632 654 0 1 8
Upstream CRC 1 1 0 0 0
Downstream FEC 20771746 21899927 0 46261 61322
Upstream FEC 872807 933876 0 545 1542

Supposed to be issues with vectoring compatibility with some of the other operators modems. Downstream rate is not differing. Problem will be if they increase your profile as your max rate is varying widely.

0

Options

#654 22-04-2014 11:48pm

sparky63

Registered Users Posts: 160 ✭✭

Join Date: October 2013

Posts: 154

jimmad wrote: »

============================================================================
    VDSL Training Status:   Showtime
                    Mode:   VDSL2 Annex B
            VDSL Profile:   Profile 17a
            Traffic Type:   PTM Mode
             Link Uptime:   0 day: 0 hour: 2 minutes
============================================================================
       VDSL Port Details       Upstream         Downstream
               Line Rate:     20.477 Mbps       61.436 Mbps
    Actual Net Data Rate:     20.478 Mbps       61.437 Mbps
          Trellis Coding:         ON                ON
              SNR Margin:       10.0 dB           16.2 dB
            Actual Delay:          0 ms              0 ms
          Transmit Power:      - 2.4 dBm          12.4 dBm
           Receive Power:      -20.0 dBm          -8.6 dBm
              Actual INP:       29.0 symbols      29.0 symbols
       Total Attenuation:       17.6 dB           21.0 dB
Attainable Net Data Rate:     23.058 Mbps       82.628 Mbps
============================================================================
      VDSL Band Status    U0      U1      U2      U3      D1      D2      D3
  Line Attenuation(dB):  4.6    23.8    34.9     N/A    12.8    30.3    46.6   
Signal Attenuation(dB):  4.6    22.9    33.7     N/A    16.7    30.1    46.6   
        SNR Margin(dB): 10.2    10.3     9.8     N/A    16.3    16.3    16.2   
   Transmit Power(dBm):-16.1   - 6.6   - 4.8     N/A     7.9     7.8     7.2   
============================================================================

Compared to that of my digiweb line of the following.

Max. DSLAM throughput	kbit/s	61440	20480
Min. DSLAM throughput	kbit/s	1024	1024
Attainable data rate	kbit/s	57067	14122
Current throughput	kbit/s	57530	13447
Seamless rate adaptation		off	off
 			
Latency		4 ms	8 ms
Impulse Noise Protection		28	2
G.inp		on	off
 			
Signal-to-noise ratio	dB	9	9
Bitswap		on	off
Line attenuation	dB	17	13
 			
Profile	17a		
G.Vector		off	off
 			
Carrier record		B43	B43

G vectoring is off.

Options
#655 23-04-2014 11:02am
OcocO

Registered Users Posts: 113 ✭✭

Join Date: September 2013

Posts: 110

kingtiger wrote: »

I think Vectoring has been enabled on my line (about 600m to cab)

do you think I can get a faster profile?

I doubt it: it looks like you're with Vodafone and your down SNR is only a little over 9, which is the current minimum that the line will sync at (with Vodafone anyway).

0
Options
#656 23-04-2014 3:22pm
trister

Registered Users Posts: 23 ✭

Join Date: December 2013

Posts: 20

Hi,

Anyone in Ballsbridge/Shelbourne Road area noticed that vectoring has been switched on?

0
Options
#657 23-04-2014 5:46pm
irishgeo

Registered Users Posts: 9,419 ✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2001

Posts: 8807

is it live in castlebar yet?

0
Options
#658 23-04-2014 6:20pm
Deagol

Registered Users Posts: 1,709 ✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2003

Posts: 1617

Anyone think it's possible / worthwhile trying to start a list of exchanges / boxes with Vectoring enabled? Similar to the Efibre enabled list last year??

Is there even a definitive way to know? Looking at my F1000 I can't see anyway to tell unless you've recorded SNR's over time (which I haven't )

0
Options
#659 23-04-2014 7:11pm
OneEightSeven

Registered Users Posts: 1,339 ✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2014

Posts: 1314

Deagol wrote: »

Anyone think it's possible / worthwhile trying to start a list of exchanges / boxes with Vectoring enabled? Similar to the Efibre enabled list last year??

Is there even a definitive way to know? Looking at my F1000 I can't see anyway to tell unless you've recorded SNR's over time (which I haven't )

Will these do:

http://irelandoffline.org/mapbeta/#/main

http://www.eircomwholesale.ie/Our_Network/#nga-map

0
Options
#660 23-04-2014 7:19pm
Deagol

Registered Users Posts: 1,709 ✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2003

Posts: 1617

Neither of which tells you anything about vectoring old bean....

0
Advertisement
Options
#661 23-04-2014 8:01pm
trister

Registered Users Posts: 23 ✭

Join Date: December 2013

Posts: 20

Deagol wrote: »

Anyone think it's possible / worthwhile trying to start a list of exchanges / boxes with Vectoring enabled? Similar to the Efibre enabled list last year??

Is there even a definitive way to know? Looking at my F1000 I can't see anyway to tell unless you've recorded SNR's over time (which I haven't )

Yes, I think it would be useful to those who have modems that will not display whether vectoring is enabled or show the Attainable rate.

0