Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Heineken & Amlin Cup 2013/14 General Discussion

Options
12346

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 30,308 Mod ✭✭✭✭.ak


    If both ASM and RM target the H-Cup they'll produce some incredible games.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Rightwing wrote: »
    If you swapped Leinster with Clermont, Leinster's odds for the H cup would drift dramatically. Same if they swapped with Ulster.

    Conclusion we can draw from this is, for the top seeds, there are only 2 tough groups this year.

    sigh. I have no idea why I am buying into this punishment.

    Firstly, simply putting something in italics does not render it fact.

    Secondly, I have no idea how you'd ascertain the above. Your thought processes have never been even inferable let alone explained.

    Thirdly, Even if the first two are totally true, that doesn't actually make the blindest bit of difference to the difficulty of the group that Leinster reside in, it would only say that Clermont's group is a more difficult group for Leinster to win the tournament from.

    If I tell you that A>C and A>D, what does that tell you about the relationship between C and D?
    If I then tell you that B>D, what does that tell you about B's relationship with A and C?
    Your statements continually imply that given information as above, we can extend and infer implications that simply aren't available given the info on offer.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    It was Rightwing who said Warburton would be lions captain, simply by looking at the odds move. My advice to everyone: Don't back on any team in Leinster's group, apart from Leinster. There's a reason why the bookies and I rate the Castres @ 55/1.

    No sighs needed here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,745 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Right that's it, I'm now imploring everyone to please, PLEASE, leave this die here and now. It's going nowhere. He's started talking about himself in the third person and that's never, ever, good.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I
    Get
    Noticeably irritated,
    Obviously
    Rattled
    Every time you post nonsense.

    ---

    T'end


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭Ugo Monye spacecraft experience


    Rightwing wrote: »
    It was Rightwing who said Warburton would be lions captain, simply by looking at the odds move. My advice to everyone: Don't back on any team in Leinster's group, apart from Leinster. There's a reason why the bookies and I rate the Castres @ 55/1.

    No sighs needed here.

    Oh lol

    Why don't you engage with the valid points emmet has made rather than patting yourself on the back for predicting the captain of a Lions tour three weeks out. A guy who was highly tipped to do so for about two years before the tour. You'd swear this prediction was some sort of brilliant call, it seems you didn't have much a clue at all about the captaincy though seeing as you claimed England would make up 50% of the squad and have the captain in February of this year:

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=83283584&postcount=272


    Also, can you please point to someone who's saying Castre are going to win the HC? If not please stop trying to imply people are saying anything more than Leinster have a hard group


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,624 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Neither Treviso or Zebre are going to be winning the HEC any time soon, but a group with Treviso in it is a damn sight harder than one with Zebre.

    Clermont's group is obviously the hardest one (and they are on too short odds overall imo). Ulster's and Leinster's is much of a muchness.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    I'll be backing Toulouse this time round, & I like the look of their group, should be good for a home q/f.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,189 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    molloyjh wrote: »
    Right that's it, I'm now imploring everyone to please, PLEASE, leave this die here and now. It's going nowhere. He's started talking about himself in the third person and that's never, ever, good.

    Buer believes this post makes sense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭Ugo Monye spacecraft experience


    Rightwing wrote: »
    I'll be backing Toulouse this time round, & I like the look of their group, should be good for a home q/f.

    How do you think Toulouse are going to get over their poor season last year? Where do you think the improvements will come?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    stop


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭Ugo Monye spacecraft experience


    In reality Toulouse will do well to get over Saracens and get out of the group. That said I wouldn't be surprised to see one of those sides get in as a best placed runner up


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,624 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I would feel a bit sad if Saracens topped a group with Toulouse in it, just in terms of rugby styles.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    If you're not too sure, read my posts yesterday.

    I think I've explained pretty clearly, but as you're not a WUM unlike others, I'd happily expand on the logic if asked.

    The odds suggest that Leinster are one of the best teams in the tournament, have a very difficult group with a lot of potential results, but even in the majority of cases, will still be able to progress and potentially win the tournament.

    Simple setup, as posited to Rightwing and ignored, If Castres and Scarlets swap groups tomorrow, what happens to the odds?

    Fair enough, I reckon my logic was busted somewhere when I made the argument.

    Swap Castres and Scarlets and I'd say we'd see a fair tightening of Leinster's odds and a slight drift to Clermont and Racing's odds plus a wry smile at 3 French teams in the one pool ;)

    Anyways it seems the argument has been fairly debunked at this stage so I'll stop being silly


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,309 ✭✭✭former legend


    How do you think Toulouse are going to get over their poor season last year? Where do you think the improvements will come?

    They've signed a few really good recruits; Joe Tekori, Chillboy Ralepelle and Hosea Gear, while the guys they've lost were probably past their best anyway (Bouilhou, Jauzion, Poux). Luke Burgess never really did it for them so Jano Vermaak could be key.

    We may see Toulouse focus on the Top 14 a bit more but they are a serious force to be reckoned with in the HEC. Plus, they have Saracens, Connacht and Zebre so will almost certainly be in the QFs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,189 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    I think Toulouse are in a wobbly position. Ralepelle is massively overrated, for me.There's a good chance he won't start though. Gear is a great player and I think will do well but very much an unknown quantity; he wasn't needed at all though with Clerc, Huget and Medard there. His brother was a massive flop when he moved to the NH so we'll see how he goes. Tekori is a good signing. He has been around a while and will deliver. He's not really in a position that they needed a signing in though given they already have RMC, Albacete and Maestri. That's three pretty serious locks.

    The players they've lost are past their best but they're guys that were the heartbeat of the side. It'd be like Leinster losing guys like Cullen and Jennings.

    To lose Poux, Jauzion, Bouilhou (who I think will be the biggest loss of all) and Servat (for the second time) in one go is a massive loss. I think they're set for a solid season but I think they'll be doing well to top their pool. In fact, I think Connacht should be targeting Toulouse as their big scalp to take. Unlikely but without their experienced heads, they'll be that little bit more vulnerable and have already been wobbly on the road as those guys have aged.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    Vermaak's very good. Might be SA's best scrum half. Ralepelle isn't someone I'd describe as a superstar but he's a nailed on starter in the Southern Hemisphere's finest club pack.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭Ugo Monye spacecraft experience


    matthew8 wrote: »
    Vermaak's very good. Might be SA's best scrum half. Ralepelle isn't someone I'd describe as a superstar but he's a nailed on starter in the Southern Hemisphere's finest club pack.

    Ya but he's a mile behind Bismarc and Strauss for the Boks, hence the move up North. Decent hooker but that's about it


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,308 Mod ✭✭✭✭.ak


    What's a decent punt at RM's first XV for the H-Cup?


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Buer wrote: »
    I think Toulouse are in a wobbly position. Ralepelle is massively overrated, for me.There's a good chance he won't start though. Gear is a great player and I think will do well but very much an unknown quantity; he wasn't needed at all though with Clerc, Huget and Medard there. His brother was a massive flop when he moved to the NH so we'll see how he goes. Tekori is a good signing. He has been around a while and will deliver. He's not really in a position that they needed a signing in though given they already have RMC, Albacete and Maestri. That's three pretty serious locks.

    Gear was signed as a medical joker for Clerc, who is recovering from knee surgery.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    .ak wrote: »
    What's a decent punt at RM's first XV for the H-Cup?

    Tonga'uiha, Szarzewski, Mujati, Metz, Kruger, Lydiate, Le Roux, Cronjé;
    Machenaud, Sexton, Imhoff, Roberts, Estebanez, Andreu, Hernandez


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,745 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Tonga'uiha, Szarzewski, Mujati, Metz, Kruger, Lydiate, Le Roux, Cronjé;
    Machenaud, Sexton, Imhoff, Roberts, Estebanez, Andreu, Hernandez

    Ah sure that's only all right... :o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭Ugo Monye spacecraft experience


    that Racing team is serious alright. Such an explosive backline, will be interesting to see how the adapt there play to Sexton


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,745 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    that Racing team is serious alright. Such an explosive backline, will be interesting to see how the adapt there play to Sexton

    With the former Castres coaches on the way as well I'm sure they'll have their own ideas on how they want to play. There's no excuse for not playing some serious rugby though, even in the T14.


  • Registered Users Posts: 327 ✭✭WorldRugby99


    the big signings made by montpellier and racing metro make for some pretty tough groups.Toulouse too may have had a bad time of it lately but on paper they still have a great team so wouldnt write them off totally.Add in toulon and clermont and that castres are french champs and its a very strong french contingent this coming season.
    There is a noticeable difference between pools 2,3 and 6 and the other 3.Pools 1,4 and 5 are pretty tough groups.
    Looking at irish teams-ulster have a tough pool with leicester and montpellier-ulster wil reallyl have to be back to their best to qualify.
    Leinster will be favourites but castres will be tough at home,saints recruited well and ospreys always a tough game.leinster should still come through group but maybe not with a home QF.
    Cant see connacht coming through a group with sarries,toulouse but ought to beat zebre home/away
    Munster have the easier group and will be expected to win it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭schools rugby


    I did this last year so i think il do it again . My top 8 of teams in Europe at the moment

    1 Toulon
    2 Clermont
    3 Leinster
    4 Montpellier
    5 Ulster
    6 Leicester
    7 Saracens
    8 Racing Metro


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭who_me


    The signings made by French clubs in recent years makes you wonder - just how sustainable are they? Can they all sustain that level of salary bill? Lots of the French clubs are from small-ish cities or towns, so perhaps are overly reliant on outside investment. But they can't all be successful..

    Either French teams are going to monster the Euro competitions, or suffer a financial collapse in a few years time. Either way, I'd be a little worried for Euro rugby.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    who_me wrote: »
    The signings made by French clubs in recent years makes you wonder - just how sustainable are they? Can they all sustain that level of salary bill? Lots of the French clubs are from small-ish cities or towns, so perhaps are overly reliant on outside investment. But they can't all be successful..

    Either French teams are going to monster the Euro competitions, or suffer a financial collapse in a few years time. Either way, I'd be a little worried for Euro rugby.

    Unfortunately they can, sugar daddys.

    I definitely agree with 2nd paragraph.


  • Registered Users Posts: 327 ✭✭WorldRugby99


    who_me wrote: »
    The signings made by French clubs in recent years makes you wonder - just how sustainable are they? Can they all sustain that level of salary bill? Lots of the French clubs are from small-ish cities or towns, so perhaps are overly reliant on outside investment. But they can't all be successful..

    Either French teams are going to monster the Euro competitions, or suffer a financial collapse in a few years time. Either way, I'd be a little worried for Euro rugby.

    As long as the rich backers are happy to basically get no return on their investment then it can continue indefinitely. I have no problem with it from a french league point of view but its the effect it has on the european cup and the widening gap between clubs with massive budgets(france),clubs with salary caps(england)and teams with little money(scots,welsh) that i dont like-its just become like football.
    We are just going to see a european cup where the teams with the biggest budget wins the thing every year.Leinster too are a pretty rich team with a big squad so i would include them too.
    Chances of an ospreys,harlequins winning now are pretty small which is a shame.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    As long as the rich backers are happy to basically get no return on their investment then it can continue indefinitely. I have no problem with it from a french league point of view but its the effect it has on the european cup and the widening gap between clubs with massive budgets(france),clubs with salary caps(england)and teams with little money(scots,welsh) that i dont like-its just become like football.
    We are just going to see a european cup where the teams with the biggest budget wins the thing every year.Leinster too are a pretty rich team with a big squad so i would include them too.
    Chances of an ospreys,harlequins winning now are pretty small which is a shame.

    Absolutely, sort of ruins the game. In the long run, it will have a devastating effect on Fr rugby.


Advertisement