Woman accuses three men of rape after drunken romp

Mr McBoatface

Slapper goes out, loses control of herself, willingly shags three lads ..... wakes up regretting it so she accuses them of rape. After the lie is exposed and she is convicted she is only sentenced to 2 years in jail. Three lads have their life ruined and real rape victims will now be less willing to come forward.

If this mad women/bitch had have cut the 3 lads heads off and then claimed rape before the police had a chance to investigate certain people on this forum would say they deserved it. Maybe some of those folks on boards and else where who assume men accused of rape are automatically guilty will take note.

So After Hours is 2 years jail time enough?

Link

A 20-year-old woman who falsely claimed she was raped by three men because she regretted having sex with them has been jailed for two years.Rosie Dodd, of Nottingham, claimed the men, who were aged 21, 23 and 25, assaulted her at a home in Clifton, Nottinghamshire, in the early hours of a Saturday in June. The trio were arrested after Dodd claimed they had all raped her after she met them on a night out in the city - and they spent a total of nearly 50 hours in police custody before being released on bail.

The men maintained Dodd had willingly had sex with them - and police became suspicious after carrying out further inquiries, challenging Dodd about her account. Dodd then admitted she had made up the rape claims because she regretted having consensual sex with the trio, Nottingham Crown Court was told today.Detective Constable Gina Farrell led the investigation for Nottinghamshire Police and slammed Dodd after the hearing for never showing ‘an ounce of remorse’ for what she put the men through.

‘The three men accused of rape were quite badly affected by the damaging accusations and Dodd has never shown an ounce of remorse for what she put them through.’DC Farrell added that time the force’s specially-trained officers spent with Dodd could have been given to someone who ‘really needed our help’.Detective Inspector Stephen Waldram, head of the force’s rape investigation team, stated after the hearing that there was ‘no justification’ for Dodd’s lies and anyone doing the same ‘will be exposed’.

He said: ‘People lie that they’ve been raped for a multitude of reasons - like having regrets about having sex with a person, or as a way of getting back at someone.‘There is no justification for lying about something so serious and incredibly damaging and police actively investigate a false claim just as thoroughly as a genuine one to ensure innocent people are not convicted for something they didn’t do.‘It’s important to stress that anyone who contacts us to say they have been assaulted will be treated with the sensitivity and respect they deserve.’

Dodd was jailed for two years after previously pleading guilty to perverting the course of justice.

Ristiano Conaldo

Delightful thread

starbelgrade

I feel like I just walked into a staff meeting at the Daily Mail.

Agent Smith

She should have gotten a sentence in line with what the men would have got if they were guilty

ShamoBuc

Stupid bítch

Skid

jobyrne30 wrote: »

So After Hours is 2 years jail time enough?

No. She put three innocent men through hell, and would have happily seen them sent to Prison and their lives ruined.

Not nearly long enough.

Wee Willy Harris

Fwenz wit benefits!!

My name is URL

Agent Smith wrote: »

She should have gotten a sentence in line with what the men would have got if they were guilty

I dunno about that, other than to make some people feel better about these things, it doesn't make much sense to sentence somebody for lying to the same prison time as an actual rapist. Imo

hefferboi

Nice thread title.

nachocheese

No, 2 years isn't sufficient. She should receive the sentence that those men would have received had they been deemed guilty of raping her, as that is what she was sentencing them to with her lies.

Every time a woman does this it brings doubt to the credibility of other, genuine, victims both in the eyes of the police and society. These false accusers need to be made a massive example of.

longshanks

It's almost as if you're glad this happened OP, as it gives you a reason to go off on your own little rant.

Fromthetrees

I think the victims of crime should have more of a say in every case where there's a guilty verdict.
Obviously not the final say but if you lose your job or wife/family over a false rape allegation than it should have a direct impact on the sentence length.
False rape allegations are so serious. Louis Walsh was lucky the truth came out in his case early, could have ruined his tv career.

BunShopVoyeur

The thread title drew me in...

bijapos

hefferboi wrote: »

Nice thread title.

Indeed. Whatever about her rape story i find it interesting that a girl who gets 3 blokes into bed with her is a "slapper", whereas if a guy gets 3 girls into bed with him he's the country's biggest stud.:rolleyes:

Hande hoche!

BunShopVoyeur wrote: »

The thread title drew me in...

Big +1 on that.

mikom

Shove some garlic up her box, write the word apples on her knickers, and lets call it 6 years.

im invisible

not a bad lookin girl...

bijapos

bijapos wrote: »

a girl who gets 3 blokes into bed with her is a "slapper", whereas if a guy gets 3 girls into bed with him he's the country's biggest stud.:rolleyes:

If a lock can open many keys, then... No.. if a key has a combination lock and...

Sorry, I'm confusing myself, I'll go again;

If a key opens many locks, then buy a combination lock. Is that the saying?

Either way, Amazon usually have sales on locks and such. Worth a look.




What's going on?

Monty Burnz

bijapos wrote: »

Indeed. Whatever about her rape story i find it interesting that a girl who gets 3 blokes into bed with her is a "slapper", whereas if a guy gets 3 girls into bed with him he's the country's biggest stud.:rolleyes:

To be fair, it's a lot easier to get three guys into bed with a girl than it is to get three girls in bed with a guy.

humanji

I've edited the thread title to something a little less inflammatory, but I added the word "romp" in keeping with the Daily Mail style of OP. Please try and keep your outrage at the level of polite indignation.

mackg

I assume she will be put on the sex offenders list.

Micky Dolenz

mackg wrote: »

I assume she will be put on the sex offenders list.

Why?

She made a false accusation, she didn't sexual abuse/attack anyone.

MagicMarker

mackg wrote: »

I assume she will be put on the sex offenders list.

Why?

spankysue

She's mad, has to be. Cries rape after an amazing accomplishment like that? She should be proud! 3 at once! That takes skill.... I've heard

mike65

Maybe there should be false accuser database.

Handsome Bob

2 years and the obliteration of her reputation is enough for me. There's no need to be excessive as I think this sentence is more than sufficient in playing as a deterrent for future false accusations.

aaronjumper

Wow, those guys are lucky that she was found out.

py2006

What worries me is that there could be innocent men in jail because of 'ladies' like this one.

General General

I think when a woman signals that she wants to do-the-fuc.kle-buck with you & two of your mates, you should sense that something could go awry.

haulagebasher

+1 on this. I know two men in my town who were accused of rape by two no good girls. One was a taxi driver who brought home a girl who was scuttered and because she couldn't get out of the car he assisted/pulled/lifted her out at her home. Apparently this is rape. Went to court and he was done for it but the whole damn town knows full well it was 100% bogus. He got a suspended sentence. I know this guy and he is a well respected person in my home town and I don't believe he would do this. Has been taxing for years.

Another issue in my home town was where a brother in law was accused of raping some drunk young wan. Same young wan is known for being the parish slapper and is from a no-good never worked a day in their life family. The chap spent six months or so in gaol. I don't belive he done it. He's a sound lad.

Both of these guys are respected members of the town and involved in the community but their names are now tarnished by being on the register. Somthing will have to be done about young wans accusing fellas of rape.

THose young wans sould be ashamed of themselves accusing fellas of rape. They are only out for the compo and a handy buck.

py2006

Handsome Bob wrote: »

2 years and the obliteration of her reputation is enough for me. There's no need to be excessive as I think this sentence is more than sufficient in playing as a deterrent for future false accusations.

It doesn't make up for the pain and anguish and no doubt the horrendous time these have gone through and are most likely still going though.

Once you are accused of rape it sticks with you.

Tombi!

Will this be a record if she does try to falsely accuse again?

MaxSteele

longshanks wrote: »

It's almost as if you're glad this happened OP, as it gives you a reason to go off on your own little rant.

MaxSteele is certainly glad !

I know a guy who at 18, was compensated enough money to set himself up for life due to an amputation of his leg he received as a child because of a freak accident.

Brings a mot home one night, shags her. Then by coincidence of course, she presses charges of rape against him (which were luckily proved to be false) as soon as she discovers his bank balance. The bitch got off scott free regardless.

Delighted on behalf of the those three lads. Now that heartless c*nt can wallow in her own piss and shi*e in a 6 x 8 cell.

haulagebasher

Brutal Deluxe wrote: »

Will this be a record if she does try to falsely accuse again?

Probably, but in that case you could end up with some devious type seeing her as fair game for rape and he would more than likele get away with it because her case will be viewed with suspicion.
Still, probably serves her right if it were to happen. It would teach her a lesson at least. No excuse for what she did.

Wee Willy Harris

MagicMarker wrote: »

mackg wrote: »

I assume she will be put on the sex offenders list.

Why?

she offended sex by dismissing it as rape

Tombi!

haulagebasher wrote: »

Probably, but in that case you could end up with some devious type seeing her as fair game for rape and he would more than likele get away with it because her case will be viewed with suspicion.
Still, probably serves her right if it were to happen. No excuse for what she did.

I wouldn't say she deserves her future (really) cases of rape to be doubted if some rapist targeted her. But I would like more doubt to applied when stories don't match.

What does annoy me most is that the system is fecked up. I knew a girl that was physically beaten, wound up in the ER and raped and your man got away with it.
It's funny how the guilty are set free and the innocent put in jail.

Madam_X

haulagebasher wrote: »

Probably, but in that case you could end up with some devious type seeing her as fair game for rape and he would more than likele get away with it because her case will be viewed with suspicion.
Still, probably serves her right if it were to happen. No excuse for what she did.

No excuse at all for what she did - that is certainly true. But no, it wouldn't serve her right if she was raped. Wtf?!!

DazMarz

I wonder would the cops or anyone else take her seriously if she was unfortunate enough to be raped in the future? Boy who cries wolf and all that...

Those men are very, very lucky. Their lives could have been completely ruined, and in a minor way they will still be tarnished. Even though they have been completely exonorated, there will still be idiots who will be thinking "no smoke without fire" or some such nonsense. At least though, they will have a clean conscience and officially they have been cleared.

It is also damaging to genuine rape victims for people like her to be making false accusations. It makes genuine claims come under more scrutiny than they should. And it is due to this scrutiny that many rape victims remain silent; they fear the questions they will be asked and of course equally fear that they will not be believed. So many people suffer silently through the trauma of rape and this should not happen. They have been violated and degraded and deserve to have everyone supporting them.

Gauss

My name is URL wrote: »

Agent Smith wrote: »

She should have gotten a sentence in line with what the men would have got if they were guilty

I dunno about that, other than to make some people feel better about these things, it doesn't make much sense to sentence somebody for lying to the same prison time as an actual rapist. Imo

Look at it this way, she was quite willing to send three men to jail for x years each say, why not give her the punishment of attempted rape, that makes sense IMO.

haulagebasher

Probably, but in that case you could end up with some devious type seeing her as
fair game for rape and he would more than likele get away with it because her
case will be viewed with suspicion.
Still, probably serves her right if it
were to happen. It would teach her a lesson at least. No excuse for what she
did.

Madam_X wrote: »

No excuse at all for what she did - that is certainly true. But no, it wouldn't serve her right if she was raped. Wtf?!!

I'm not saying it is morally right, it's not. But all i'm saying that if she was raped in the future it would be a fitting punishment to teach her a lesson.

While it is wrong and I don't condone it, a devious rapist may prey on her becasue he knows he wil get away with it.

MrGeneric

Brutal Deluxe wrote: »

It's funny how the guilty are set free and the innocent put in jail.

Not particularly. It's just symptomatic of an imperfect system. Some get punished unfairly, while others avoid deserved punishment.

Red Hand

Madam_X wrote: »

No excuse at all for what she did - that is certainly true. But no, it wouldn't serve her right if she was raped. Wtf?!!

Like someone said above, I think they're are a few posters who were just itching to find something like this.

Tombi!

haulagebasher wrote: »

But all i'm saying that if she was raped in the future it would be a fitting punishment to teach her a lesson.

How can you even begin to think that?
Did you happen to watch the Amazon episode of Futurama and think death by snu-snu is actually fun?

How can even think rape is a good thing even as a punishment?

Vicar in a tutu

What a stupid little bitch, No man will touch her now anyway. I detest women like this, so flippant about destroying two mens lives just because she regretted sleeping with them, You cant just decide someone raped you?!

Brendog

jobyrne30 wrote: »

Detective Constable Gina Farrell led the investigation for Nottinghamshire Police and slammed Dodd after the hearing...

kind of hard to resist after hearing how easy she is...

haulagebasher

Brutal Deluxe wrote: »

How can you even begin to think that?
Did you happen to watch the Amazon episode of Futurama and think death by snu-snu is actually fun?

How can even think rape is a good thing even as a punishment?

I didn't say that it would be a good punishment. I said a devious type may see her as fair game and want to teach her a lesson by raping her. It's wrong, but I can see how someone would think that. But it's still illegal and i would not condone it at all.

Tombi!

haulagebasher wrote: »

I didn't say that it would be a good punishment. I said a devious type may see her as fair game and want to teach her a lesson by raping her. It's wrong, but I can see how someone would think that. But it's still illegal and i would not condone it at all.

You just said: "But all i'm saying that if she was raped in the future it would be a fitting punishment to teach her a lesson."!

How's that the same as "well some sick fúck of a rapist might be trying to teach her a lesson by raping her"?

Neewbie_noob

Gauss wrote: »

Look at it this way, she was quite willing to send three men to jail for x years each say, why not give her the punishment of attempted rape, that makes sense IMO.

+∞

py2006

Madam_X wrote: »

Perhaps. But it wouldn't serve her right.

I agree but what does serve this type of woman right?

Tombi!

py2006 wrote: »

I agree but what does serve this type of woman right?

Jail? Named and shamed? Her head removed and put on a pike?

Neewbie_noob

py2006 wrote: »

I agree but what does serve this type of woman right?

Sentencing that each of the men would have gotten (CUMULATIVE) , if each man would have gotten 10 years, then she should get 30.