Rangers FC On Field Gossip & Rumour Thread 2017 Mod Note in OP(Updated 14/08)

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Intifada wrote: »

But you have so far relied on his money what, 2 or 3 times in order to stay afloat. How would you be better off?

No that is wrong and if you read the facts properly you will see that. But let's be ho eat hear you don't give a **** about us so why this sudden interest if you want to read about it you will see the truth. Then again someone like you probably won't. Anyway try it you may surprise us all

Intifada

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

No that is wrong and if you read the facts properly you will see that. But let's be ho eat hear you don't give a **** about us so why this sudden interest if you want to read about it you will see the truth. Then again someone like you probably won't. Anyway try it you may surprise us all

Take a few deep breaths, stop trying desperately to insult me, and attempt to explain what position you'd be in without an £850,000 share purchase (his second) and £10m loan

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Intifada wrote: »

Take a few deep breaths, stop trying desperately to insult me, and attempt to explain what position you'd be in without an £850,000 share purchase (his second) and £10m loan

Sorry that was not an insult that was the truth and you and I both know it. Simply put Park and company had money on the table that did not have have ridiculous ties yet the board chose Ashley over it Now the information is out there I am not your secratery.
Also while you are looking that up look up the fact he cannot legally own anymore of Rangers than he does so ocher has control it is not acceptable why do you think the SFA are dmanding answers. Many fans now feel they have to take action.

Intifada

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Many fans now feel they have to take action.

Well good on ye lads!! Good to see you're all clued in and ready to move so quickly on this issue. Can only imagine how damaging it would be if you just stuck your heads in the sand for years and lashed out at everyone who was telling you the reality of the situation, convinced yourselves that they were all just obsessed etc. That would be awful. Take action, fellow bears, and save your club from liquidation

Jelle1880

The RST managed to get a court injunction to prevent the use of Ibrox as security for the Ashley loan.

Intifada

What sort of team do you think ye will go for on Sunday? Need to do my research or I won't know who I'm screaming abuse at

Is the match on BBC Scotland, live?

Broxi_Bear_Eire

zorro2566 wrote: »

Is the match on BBC Scotland, live?

Yeah 1:30 kick off mate

Cheers,not expecting a win but glad to see the rivalry with Celtic again after so long!

Broxi_Bear_Eire

zorro2566 wrote: »

Cheers,not expecting a win but glad to see the rivalry with Celtic again after so long!

To be straight mate if we can keep it to s respectable score I will be happy. We have yo many overpaid mercaneries who don't care in our side

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Team for today

Simonsen

Foster
McGregor
Jig
Wallace

Aird
Black
Law
Hutton
Smith

Miller

Jelle1880

Took longer than I expected, our team really are a bunch of wasters.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Took longer than I expected, our team really are a bunch of wasters.

Wasters is being to nice to them

Dempsey

Kenny Miller should be put out to pasture

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Dempsey wrote: »

Kenny Miller should be put out to pasture

Should have been put out to pasture a good five years ago. I would have him at the club but on the coaching side he is a model pro and I know the young players at Ibrox rate him highly

karma_

The sooner Rangers get back into the top flight the better. Scottish football has so very badly missed this fixture, it's exciting no matter which side you support of even for the neutral fan.

monkey9

Celtic need Rangers badly. They come as a pair.

Jelle1880

karma_ wrote: »

The sooner Rangers get back into the top flight the better. Scottish football has so very badly missed this fixture, it's exciting no matter which side you support of even for the neutral fan.

On the performance side of things I don't see how we'd be an addition though.

Big club ? Definitely.
But looking at this we're no better than your average Championship side.

Dempsey

monkey9 wrote: »

Celtic need Rangers badly. They come as a pair.

Drivel

monkey9

Dempsey wrote: »

Drivel

Nope.

Dempsey

monkey9 wrote: »

Nope.

Thanks for stopping by with your ignorant opinion. The facts say different but don't let that get in the way of a good brainfart

Oat23

First I thought Celtic needed them, but it turns out they don't.

Then I thought the league needed them, but with the way Aberdeen, Inverness and Dundee United are playing, I don't think the league needs them now either.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Oat23 wrote: »

First I thought Celtic needed them, but it turns out they don't.

Then I thought the league needed them, but with the way Aberdeen, Inverness and Dundee United are playing, I don't think the league needs them now either.

Really that would be why Parkhead is half empty for home games. :P:P

monkey9

Dempsey wrote: »

Thanks for stopping by with your ignorant opinion. The facts say different but don't let that get in the way of a good brainfart

What facts are these? The falling attendences? The choice of manager? The constant referring to Rangers from Celtic fans?

You's come as a pair.

Dempsey

monkey9 wrote: »

What facts are these? The falling attendences? The choice of manager? The constant referring to Rangers from Celtic fans?

You's come as a pair.

Celtic are posting record turnover 3 years after rangers was liquidated. They don't need them and conincidelly neither does any other SPFL club. World of evidence to support that aswell. There is no metric to support what you are saying. NONE

Madam

Daily Record were calling Dundee and Aberdeen the new old firm yesterday!!!! Lol

weldoninhio

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Sorry that was not an insult that was the truth and you and I both know it. Simply put Park and company had money on the table that did not have have ridiculous ties yet the board chose Ashley over it Now the information is out there I am not your secratery.
Also while you are looking that up look up the fact he cannot legally own anymore of Rangers than he does so ocher has control it is not acceptable why do you think the SFA are dmanding answers. Many fans now feel they have to take action.

‘The Three Bears’ deal considered: initially were offering £4m but increased that to £10m. With the £4m initial deal they wanted immediate pay back of full amount after 3 months through equity release. When 'Heads of terms' asked for, three bears reduced £10m offer to £6m with further funds raised through a debenture then a bond.'

The 3 bears talked big, but when it can to hard cash they didn't have it.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

weldoninhio wrote: »

‘The Three Bears’ deal considered: initially were offering £4m but increased that to £10m. With the £4m initial deal they wanted immediate pay back of full amount after 3 months through equity release. When 'Heads of terms' asked for, three bears reduced £10m offer to £6m with further funds raised through a debenture then a bond.'

The 3 bears talked big, but when it can to hard cash they didn't have it.

Lol rubbish the board and their master Ashley panicked when the RST threatened court action over Ibrox being security Ashley changed the terms and the board once again came out with their normal rubbish about it being the best deal. The three bears have no trouble with the 10m I don't know who is telling you this but it's no sense soundalike something Phil three names the sorry excuse for a journalist would come away with.
If you really believe Ashley is good for my club then fair enough. I have my doubts if you believe that though so the next month to six weeks should prove one of us right

weldoninhio

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Lol rubbish the board and their master Ashley panicked when the RST threatened court action over Ibrox being security Ashley changed the terms and the board once again came out with their normal rubbish about it being the best deal. The three bears have no trouble with the 10m I don't know who is telling you this but it's no sense soundalike something Phil three names the sorry excuse for a journalist would come away with.
If you really believe Ashley is good for my club then fair enough. I have my doubts if you believe that though so the next month to six weeks should prove one of us right

The Rangers Fan Board came out with this after meeting Llambias and Leach. Its been out since Thursday/Friday of last week. The 3 Bears have not refuted this at all.

I'm sure if the info was incorrect they'd have a statement out instantly, as it would be an open goal for them.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

weldoninhio wrote: »

The Rangers Fan Board came out with this after meeting Llambias and Leach. Its been out since Thursday/Friday of last week. The 3 Bears have not refuted this at all.

I'm sure if the info was incorrect they'd have a statement out instantly, as it would be an open goal for them.

Some of the fans board a meeting with the official board after they had called a motion of no confidence in the official board. At said meeting Ashleys two puppets on the board told the fans board this along with other fairy story's and tales meant to reassure the fans. To be fair it has'nt as for the three bears refuting there is no reason for them to do so as they had already spoke about the Ashley loan versus theirs. I feel confident as do the vast majority of Rangers fans that we don't want Ashley anywhere near our club the simple reasons being so far the deals done between the spivs and Ashley are not for the good of the club for example our shirt deal is a joke the club get pennies with the vast majority of the money going into Ashley's coffers.
So really stuff such as you have mentioned is of no consequence to the fans.