Rangers FC On Field Gossip & Rumour Thread 2017 Mod Note in OP(Updated 14/08)

Eirebear

lol

The BBC Trust uphold a complaint from Rangers fans and Celtic fans get upset about it.
Not quite in the same league as complaining to The Advertising Standards Agency, but it's not far off.

Mind you, we all know that official judgements mean nothing untill "Big Phil" says so, i mean, if they can argue the toss about legal decisions such as Lord Nimmo;s engquiry and the "Big" Tax Case...

blahfckingblah

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Agreed I certainly don't want to be falling out with one of the few tic fans I have respect for

get a room lads

premierstone

blahfckingblah wrote: »

get a room lads

Never had you down as the jealous type blah, don't worry lots of love to go around

Lennonist

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Think you will find most Bears don't really care what Traynor writes most if us didn't like his style of writing or him before he was employed and to be homes why should him working for the club change that.

I suppose from Traynor's viewpoint, working for Rangers doesn't change his view that they are a new club anyhoo. Probably a cushier number than when he was with The Record.

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Tell me is impossible for you lot to come in here and talk about football related things that have been posted

Isn't it football related? It's in relation to a football club(s).;)

Coillte_Bhoy

lubo_moravcik

Eirebear wrote: »

lol

The BBC Trust uphold a complaint from Rangers fans and Celtic fans get upset about it.
Not quite in the same league as complaining to The Advertising Standards Agency, but it's not far off.

Mind you, we all know that official judgements mean nothing untill "Big Phil" says so, i mean, if they can argue the toss about legal decisions such as Lord Nimmo;s engquiry and the "Big" Tax Case...

I wont believe a word of it until Leggo tells us.

Eirebear

lubo_moravcik wrote: »

I wont believe a word of it until Leggo tells us.

lol, you're kidding right?
That dude's every bit as insane as Phillip.

Jelle1880

It's been a while now, can we start using the 'obsessed' thing again or is it too soon ? :pac:

lubo_moravcik

Neil Alexander left on a free??

Broxi_Bear_Eire

lubo_moravcik wrote: »

Neil Alexander left on a free??

His contract was up and terms could not be agreed. He was asked to take a pay cut he didn't agree so off he goes.
I wish him all the best wherever he ends up.

Jelle1880

Sad to see him go, but wish him all the best.

In the meantime Ricky Foster has signed a two year deal.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Sad to see him go, but wish him all the best.

In the meantime Ricky Foster has signed a two year deal.

Happy enough with him he got some unfair stick the last time I feel

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Darren Cole has signed a new one year deal.
To be honest I find this a strange one the boy seems injury prone and hasn't looked particularly good when he has played

Jelle1880

New store in Glasgow Airport:

blahfckingblah

whats the "1872" for? haha

Pudders

blahfckingblah wrote: »

whats the "1872" for? haha

Its a days count down to when they get back in the SPL.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

blahfckingblah wrote: »

whats the "1872" for? haha

It's a Masonic thing

blahfckingblah

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

It's a Masonic thing

ah so I need to be one of "ra peepil" to get it, nevermind. enjoy

Broxi_Bear_Eire

blahfckingblah wrote: »

ah so I need to be one of "ra peepil" to get it, nevermind. enjoy

Nah even you can become aMason there seems to be a lot of misunderstanding about it

blahfckingblah

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Nah even you can become aMason there seems to be a lot of misunderstanding about it

is recruitment not against the charter?

Broxi_Bear_Eire

blahfckingblah wrote: »

is recruitment not against the charter?

Its against the OO charter anyone can be accepted into the Masons as long as you believe in a superior being. The RC church may have objections against us joining bit they would be very hypocritical

Lennonist

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Its against the OO charter anyone can be accepted into the Masons as long as you believe in a superior being. The RC church may have objections against us joining bit they would be very hypocritical

The Masons are right wing politically speaking in a general way in my experience when I've met them. Of course that in itself wouldn't preclude RC's joining them.

Jelle1880

New kits are out, I quite like the away kit.







And:

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Lennonist wrote: »

The Masons are right wing politically speaking in a general way in my experience when I've met them. Of course that in itself wouldn't preclude RC's joining them.

Well considering two of the biggest Masonic lodges are the Vatican City
I a pretty sure RC's join. But out with that I know RC's who are Masons

LiamoSail

In that last pic, is the tag still on the shirt, just tucked into the collar?

Jelle1880

http://www.uefa.com/memberassociations/uefarankings/club/index.html

Nr. 92 in the list.

LiamoSail

Was there not a pair of shorts that would fit the lad?

Pudders

LiamoSail wrote: »

Was there not a pair of shorts that would fit the lad?

Has he been taking viagra?

blahfckingblah

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Well considering two of the biggest Masonic lodges are the Vatican City
I a pretty sure RC's join. But out with that I know RC's who are Masons

Im not a very religious person..

Your current home top is nicer than that one.. although i dont envisage myself ever wearing either

Madam

Shorts? I thought they were a nice pair of culottes;)