Post Your Windows Experience Index result!

Scores

---

Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz 7.7 5.9
Memory (RAM) 8.00 GB 7.9
Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 7.8
Gaming graphics 4095 MB Total available graphics memory 7.8
Primary hard disk 20GB Free (90GB Total) 5.9

---

The graphics card also accesses up to the x amount of shared sytem memory (you can modify this value/the amount of memory shared as well ) which is added to your cards total memory so WEI repords total memory

dedicated memory + shared memory

the gtx 560 ti is still a damn good card :P ive the asus double heat sinked OC version :P


System

---

Manufacturer System manufacturer
Model System Product Name
Total amount of system memory 8.00 GB RAM
System type 64-bit operating system
Number of processor cores 4

Storage

---

Total size of hard disk(s) 2096 GB
Disk partition (C:) 20 GB Free (90 GB Total)
Disk partition (D:) 31 GB Free (220 GB Total)
Disk partition (E:) 29 GB Free (389 GB Total)
Media drive (F:) CD/DVD
Disk partition (G:) 153 GB Free (932 GB Total)
Disk partition (H:) 132 GB Free (466 GB Total)
Media drive (I:) CD/DVD

Graphics

---

Display adapter type NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Total available graphics memory 4095 MB
Dedicated graphics memory 1024 MB
Dedicated system memory 0 MB
Shared system memory 3071 MB
Display adapter driver version 8.17.12.8026
Primary monitor resolution 1768x992
Secondary monitor resolution 1440x900
DirectX version DirectX 10

glynf

Here's mine:



Intel I5-2500k (on stock intel cooler, waiting on an Antec Kuhler;))
MSI Z68A-GD65 G3
8 GB 8GB G.Skill DDR3 PC3-12800 Ripjaws
Crucial M4 128GB
MSI HD 7970 3Gb @ 1000MHz/1450MHz (had it up to 1125 & 1575 using CCC, but now doing it incrementally cos I can't afford to replace it )

TPM

Not wonderful considering the spec

FlyingIrishMan

TPM wrote: »

Not wonderful considering the spec

Everything except your HDD scored above 7 so you should be happy with that.
Its stupid how the overall score is based on the lowest score you get.

I'm guessing its a laptop too which makes it even better. Rare for laptops to score that well.

IrishMetalhead

I know right, I got a WD Velociraptor in my comp the fastest sata HDD out there and it still won't go over 5.9.
The only way past it is a SSD which I'm currently saving up to buy ATM same one as Glyn actually who ironically sold me the Velociraptor to begin with lol.



Specs:
CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 960T OC'd at 4.0GHz
RAM: 8GB Coirsair Vengence Blue Edition 1600MHz
Motherboard: ASRock 970 Extreme4
Graphics Card: 1GB Sapphire Radeon HD 6950
Boot Drive: 160GB Western Digital Velociraptor (as I meantioned before)

FlyingIrishMan

FlyingIrishMan wrote: »

Everything except your HDD scored above 7 so you should be happy with that.
Its stupid how the overall score is based on the lowest score you get.

I'm guessing its a laptop too which makes it even better. Rare for laptops to score that well.

@ TPM: Not a bad score for a mobile graphics card and for a laptop as a whole - basic Sata hard drives (using sata 3 or below) are always rated 5.9

---

Solid state drives will be higher and also raid configurations. solid states are still damn expensive for every gigabit of storage you get though so ive not got one as of yet. SSD's really come into their own when it comes to installing games or applications which really need fast read write between HD - in this case SSD and memory on the GPU or RAM as well as data transfer. Also if used as the boot drive with your OS on it it really makes a difference in terms of boot time and installation if you use your SSD as your install location.

More details about my computer


Component Details Subscore Base score
Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (not OC'ed but can be to 4.3GHz on stock - thats pushing it a wee bit because of stock cooler is average) 7.7
Memory (RAM) 8.00 GB 7.9
Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 7.8
Gaming graphics 4095 MB Total available graphics memory 7.8
Primary hard disk 18GB Free (90GB Total) 5.9
Windows 7 Ultimate

System

---

Manufacturer System manufacturer
Model System Product Name
Total amount of system memory 8.00 GB RAM
System type 64-bit operating system
Number of processor cores 4

Storage

---

Total size of hard disk(s) 2096 GB
Disk partition (C:) 18 GB Free (90 GB Total)
Disk partition (D:) 27 GB Free (220 GB Total)
Disk partition (E:) 42 GB Free (389 GB Total)
Media drive (F:) CD/DVD
Disk partition (G:) 132 GB Free (932 GB Total)
Disk partition (H:) 123 GB Free (466 GB Total)
Media drive (I:) CD/DVD

Graphics

---

Display adapter type NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Total available graphics memory 4095 MB
Dedicated graphics memory 1024 MB
Dedicated system memory 0 MB
Shared system memory 3071 MB
Display adapter driver version 8.17.12.9610
Primary monitor resolution 1804x1014
Secondary monitor resolution 1440x900
DirectX version DirectX 10

glynf

glynf wrote: »

Here's mine:



Intel I5-2500k (on stock intel cooler, waiting on an Antec Kuhler;))
MSI Z68A-GD65 G3
8 GB 8GB G.Skill DDR3 PC3-12800 Ripjaws
Crucial M4 128GB
MSI HD 7970 3Gb @ 1000MHz/1450MHz (had it up to 1125 & 1575 using CCC, but now doing it incrementally cos I can't afford to replace it )

You have a very high res monitor dude - is it a digital display port 4k screen? How do your games run FPS on such a high res?

IrishMetalhead

he's running 3 1680x1050 monitors in eyefinity which counts as a single display on the index

Tea_Bag

warlikedave wrote: »

You have a very high res monitor dude - is it a digital display port 4k screen? How do your games run FPS on such a high res?

its eyefinity.

I love how my 6990 scores lower than a 560Ti in WIE.
Ive got quite a few upgrades falling into place though. a 128gb Samsung 830 series SSD will solve my "primary hard disk" woes.

IrishMetalhead

by the looks of tho wei never seemed to like dual gpu cards when you think about what privious ones got on there scores aswell

the 560 ti is a modded version made by asus (dual fans with proper heat sink piping) - tis a far sight better than the reference card nvidia put out on the market and is majorly overclockable but i have it at stock at the moment WEI is never really that accurate in any case - it needs to be overhauled. Cant wait to see what the gtx 680 is gonna be like though.

AMD's latest releases have really pushed the boat out in terms of new technology and performance - shall be interesting to see how nvidia respond with the 600 series of geforce cards

TPM

warlikedave wrote: »

@ TPM: Not a bad score for a mobile graphics card and for a laptop as a whole - basic Sata hard drives (using sata 3 or below) are always rated 5.9

---

Solid state drives will be higher and also raid configurations. solid states are still damn expensive for every gigabit of storage you get though so ive not got one as of yet. SSD's really come into their own when it comes to installing games or applications which really need fast read write between HD - in this case SSD and memory on the GPU or RAM as well as data transfer. Also if used as the boot drive with your OS on it it really makes a difference in terms of boot time and installation if you use your SSD as your install location.

It has dual hard drives which probably isnt helping? RAID is as shipped, I havent looked at the setup of it

TPM

TPM wrote: »

warlikedave wrote: »

@ TPM: Not a bad score for a mobile graphics card and for a laptop as a whole - basic Sata hard drives (using sata 3 or below) are always rated 5.9

---

Solid state drives will be higher and also raid configurations. solid states are still damn expensive for every gigabit of storage you get though so ive not got one as of yet. SSD's really come into their own when it comes to installing games or applications which really need fast read write between HD - in this case SSD and memory on the GPU or RAM as well as data transfer. Also if used as the boot drive with your OS on it it really makes a difference in terms of boot time and installation if you use your SSD as your install location.

It has dual hard drives which probably isnt helping? RAID is as shipped, I havent looked at the setup of it

Dual HDD shouldnt affect ratings at all - if they are in a raid configuration you should get better performance but WEI some times doesnt show it plus it could depend on your raid config.

Raid - http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/132877/how_to_set_up_raid_on_your_pc.html

Bloodwing

Well here's mine.

Serephucus

@warlikedave: as far as I know, Win7 caps the score for any mechanical drive (RAID or not) at 5.9.

@neilos: Go on, just an extra 0.2. :P

Serephucus

Serephucus wrote: »

@warlikedave: as far as I know, Win7 caps the score for any mechanical drive (RAID or not) at 5.9.

@neilos: Go on, just an extra 0.2. :P

Thanking you kind sir

Bloodwing

Serephucus wrote: »

@neilos: Go on, just an extra 0.2. :P

I settled for 4.5Ghz until I saw 7.7! Why did I even bother running it. Well I guess I'm going to spend another 3 days finding a stable clock and testing it. It's not like I even need anything faster than 4.5!

dwighet

Neilos wrote: »

I settled for 4.5Ghz until I saw 7.7! Why did I even bother running it. Well I guess I'm going to spend another 3 days finding a stable clock and testing it. It's not like I even need anything faster than 4.5!

your right but 4.8ghz has a nice ring about it:cool:

Tar.Aldarion

Left mine at 4.5 on an arctic 7. Seems plenty fast
My chip took an annoying amount of voltage to be stable though.

Bloodwing

Tar.Aldarion wrote: »

My chip took an annoying amount of voltage to be stable though.

Yeah my CPU seems to be the same. What voltage are you at for a stable 4.5?

Anyone with an overclocked GTX580? What sort of clock are you running at and whats the max you'd be willing to up the core voltage to?

CS Hasuki

Serephucus

Neilos wrote: »

Anyone with an overclocked GTX580? What sort of clock are you running at and whats the max you'd be willing to up the core voltage to?

975 and 1.15V. That's about what it's max clock is. I usually keep it at around 950 and 1.138.

FlyingIrishMan

Haven't been able to run a WEI since I installed a new Hard Drive, any ideas why that might be?
It works fine up until the last part but then the hard drive goes crazy making loads of weird noises and then an error pops up telling me it can't read the speed or something along those lines.

Monotype

Maybe your hard drive is faulty. Did you do a full format?

You should do a full disk check as well (right-click on drive, properties, tools).

Tar.Aldarion

Neilos wrote: »

Yeah my CPU seems to be the same. What voltage are you at for a stable 4.5?

I'm not at home atm, but I think it was 1.352v.

Tar.Aldarion

Tar.Aldarion wrote: »

My 2500k @ 4.5 gets 7.7, so if you OC more you should get 7.8 or 7.9.



here is my main PC:



Why does my ram get 7.8
Maybe I shuld OC it? I want that 7.9 dammit! :-D

my 560ti does well for itself.





Second PC 5 years old:






Laptop - 5 years old now:

Bumped up my second pc a little. e6500 and 2gb ram -> q8300 and 4gb.
went from 5.6 -> 6.9 and 4.5 -> 5.5. Now time to OC. I actually made money by upgrading and my pc is way faster.

Tea_Bag

Tea_Bag wrote: »

I love how my 6990 scores lower than a 560Ti in WIE.
Ive got quite a few upgrades falling into place though. a 128gb Samsung 830 series SSD will solve my "primary hard disk" woes.

as promised, my new updates:


rig in sig.

Genghiz Cohen

2500k @ stock
Corsair 1333Mhz RAM
HD4870 @ stock
SATA 6.0 SSD

notBad.jpg

dun79

N64

Tea_Bag wrote: »

as promised, my new updates:


rig in sig.

My 6950 scores higher than your 6990? :eek: Did you install a new version of AMD drivers? It lowers the score for some reason. You have to rerun the test to get the proper score.