Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

I was asked for my religion today..

1356725

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,440 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    gurramok wrote: »
    So you base it on records, a dentist should care as after all they use a drill against my head. That can be fatal :eek:
    That post explains a great deal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    Holy crap... I feel like drilling a hole in your head now... you stubborn git!!! :D
    Should something happen they would send you to a hospital

    I wouldn't be able to speak?!:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,618 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    gurramok wrote: »
    Are you taking the mick?

    I was in to get a nonlife threatening examination and there was no need to ask my religion unless the doctors planned to kill me! :mad:
    Hospitals keep files on people and its best to keep a single file, not a new file for each complaint / procedure. Who knows, the next time you are admitted, maybe it will be life threatening.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭XxMCRxBabyxX


    gurramok wrote: »
    I wouldn't be able to speak?!:)

    And they would already have your religion on your records considering you've just told the fracture clinic. :P

    And if they didn't you would be considered an emergency patient and either try contact a family member to fill in the forms for you or try care for you and get you to fill in the forms later


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,440 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    gurramok wrote: »
    I wouldn't be able to speak?!:)
    Unconscious /dead people generally have difficulty communicating. Were you not aware of that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,331 ✭✭✭✭bronte


    That sounds like hell to me... full of hippies, crusties & hipsters. :p

    Ah...this Glastonbury is "golden pass" Glastonbury.
    You don't get any of that shite there...and it has actual toilets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭lmaopml


    robinph wrote: »
    If they don't want treating then get out of the hospital.

    Is the hospital only for 'special' people with a specific ideology? I'm by no means J.W. love modern science and advancements in medical science, but it doesn't come at a 'cost' of signing away the patients whole person, and saying fcuk that they're in 'hospital' now I own them..

    That's the idea of signing the damn form and the docs nurses etc. knowing exactly how to deal with said patient, if it becomes life or death it moves to another level, but it's just a 'form' when you are admitted no?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,786 ✭✭✭slimjimmc


    gurramok wrote: »
    Why ask it only in a hospital on a non-life threatening examination?

    Why not ask it in a dentist?

    Dentists don't have chaplains, hospitals do, so it's standard procedure for them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 559 ✭✭✭Ghost Estate


    I'm part vegetarian!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    Victor wrote: »
    Hospitals keep files on people and its best to keep a single file, not a new file for each complaint / procedure. Who knows, the next time you are admitted, maybe it will be life threatening.

    Eh, you saying something here?!
    And they would already have your religion on your records considering you've just told the fracture clinic. :P

    And if they didn't you would be considered an emergency patient and either try contact a family member to fill in the forms for you or try care for you and get you to fill in the forms later

    It was a non-life threatening procedure!
    Sardonicat wrote: »
    Unconscious /dead people generally have difficulty communicating. Were you not aware of that?

    No.
    slimjimmc wrote: »
    Dentists don't have chaplains, hospitals do, so it's standard procedure for them.

    Why don't dentist have chaplains, drilling into someone's head is freakily scary!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 613 ✭✭✭Misanthrope


    next time you're asked ,make up a bizarre religion and explain it in depth to them.Make them sorry for asking


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 559 ✭✭✭Ghost Estate


    gurramok wrote: »
    It was a non-life threatening procedure!

    In Soviet Russia, life threatens you!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭lmaopml


    gurramok wrote: »
    Eh, you saying something here?!



    It was a non-life threatening procedure!



    No.



    Why don't dentist have chaplains, drilling into someone's head is freakily scary!

    Be scared, be very scared mwah ha ha...

    ..just sign the damn form!


    lol..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,440 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    gurramok, if your dentist is drilling into your head instead of your teeth it explains why you seem incapable of understanding why a hospital would ask what your religious beliefs are for future reference. Are you sure your dentist didn't ask you what religion you are, maybe s/he hates atheists, or is a boardsie, maybe?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    Sardonicat wrote: »
    gurramok, if your dentist is drilling into your head instead of your teeth it explains why you seem incapable of understanding why a hospital would ask what your religious beliefs are for future reference. Are you sure your dentist didn't ask you what religion you are, maybe s/he hates atheists, or is a boardsie, maybe?

    Hey, i ain't gonna suffer extreme pain for no reason?!

    If a dentist who drills into my head never asks me my last rites, what hope is there?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭Tin Foil Hat


    orourkeda wrote: »
    People may object to certain treatments on religous grounds so on that basis the hospital may ask in order to know how best to proceed.

    "How best to proceed" is a medical consideration, not a religious one.
    I have no major objection to this question being asked of a adult (Adults who jeopardise their health on religious grounds being potential recipients of a Darwin Award).
    However, I know from experience that this question is also asked of parents on behalf of their kids. It is disturbing that the health of children is put at risk because of the superstitious beliefs of their parents.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    It is disturbing that the health of children is put at risk because of the superstitious beliefs of their parents.

    It isnt. In life saving/health-preserving situations, doctors are entitled & obliged to over-ride a parents wishes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,440 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    Gurramock, when you wake up tomorow, go and make another dental appointment. Their is obviously some more drilling to be done.:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    Sardonicat wrote: »
    Gurramock, when you wake up tomorow, go and make another dental appointment. Their is obviously some more drilling to be done.:rolleyes:

    Huh?

    My head is fine thanks :P :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭Tin Foil Hat


    drkpower wrote: »
    It isnt. In life saving/health-preserving situations, doctors are entitled & obliged to over-ride a parents wishes.

    In recent years doctors have had to go to court to get permission to give certain medical procedures (bloods transfusions/transplants) to children of Jehovahs Witnesses.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,207 ✭✭✭meditraitor


    I recent years doctors have had to go to court to get permission certain medical procedures (bloods transfusions/transplants) to children of Jehovahs Witnesses.


    Jehovah jehovah jehovah


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 559 ✭✭✭Ghost Estate


    Jehovah jehovah jehovah

    atheist is the new jehovah


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭lmaopml


    drkpower wrote: »
    It isnt. In life saving/health-preserving situations, doctors are entitled & obliged to over-ride a parents wishes.

    It's defo nice if they know what the patients wishes might be if they sign the form though?

    That's what the thread is about afterall....


    Are you for or against the dreaded, 'form'?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    In recent years doctors have had to go to court to get permission to give certain medical procedures (bloods transfusions/transplants) to children of Jehovahs Witnesses.

    Yes; because, given the time and the opportunity to go to court, that is the best option for everyone. But it doesnt change the fact that a doctor is entitled to override parental wishes in such a situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭Tin Foil Hat


    drkpower wrote: »
    It isnt. In life saving/health-preserving situations, doctors are entitled & obliged to over-ride a parents wishes.

    Anyway, so, why bother asking in the first place?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,440 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    lmaopml wrote: »
    It's defo nice if they know what the patients wishes might be if they sign the form though?

    That's what the thread is about afterall....


    Are you for or against the dreaded, 'form'?
    That really is all it is for. About respecting people's wishes and avoiding
    embarrassment or offense (e.g. protestants being offered communion).No one is expected to state RC and no one is bothered if the answer is agnostic/atheist.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,207 ✭✭✭meditraitor


    atheist is the new jehovah



    [spit/] athiests[/spit] are ok man, dont bad mouth them lads.........


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    Anyway, so, why bother asking in the first place?

    Asking what? Their religon? For the reasons given already, last rites/spiritual needs etc.

    Whether they will accept a blood transfusion etc? Because a parents views should always be sought and their consent should always be sought. But in certain serious circumstances, parental refusal can be overriden.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,207 ✭✭✭meditraitor


    drkpower wrote: »
    Asking what? Their religon? For the reasons given already, last rites/spiritual needs etc.

    Whether they will accept a blood transfusion etc? Because a parents views should always be sought and their consent should always be sought. But in certain serious circumstances, parental refusal can be overriden.

    I could be wrong but I think that is legislation has been passed already and rightly so!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    I could be wrong but I think that is legislation has been passed already and rightly so!

    No legislation yet sadly. All based on case law. Bear in mind that parents can legaly refuse treatment for their children for many many other non-life threatening/serious health threatening conditions/reasons, for religous or other reasons.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭XxMCRxBabyxX


    gurramok wrote: »
    It was a non-life threatening procedure!

    A fatal drill to someone's head is now non-life threatening? make up your mind!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,207 ✭✭✭meditraitor


    drkpower wrote: »
    No legislation yet sadly. All based on case law. Bear in mind that parents can legaly refuse treatment for their children for many many other non-life threatening/serious health threatening conditions/reasons, for religous or other reasons.

    Was there not a recent case were Jehovah witness parents where over ruled in their refusal to administer proper healthcare because of beliefs?

    Is the High court ruling not a president that allows common sense administration of said healthcare?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,440 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    drkpower wrote: »
    No legislation yet sadly. All based on case law. Bear in mind that parents can legaly refuse treatment for their children for many many other non-life threatening/serious health threatening conditions/reasons, for religous or other reasons.
    Are you saying that a parent has the right to refuse something like pain relief, for example? Would that happen frequently?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    A fatal drill to someone's head is now non-life threatening? make up your mind!

    It was near fatal

    Imagine a drill to your head? :);)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    Was there not a recent case were Jehovah witness parents where over ruled in their refusal to administer proper healthcare because of beliefs?

    Is the High court ruling not a president that allows common sense administration of said healthcare?

    Yes, but thats case law rather than legislation


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,067 ✭✭✭nomdeboardie


    I was similarly annoyed by this question a long time ago in the A&E of a UK hospital with a minor injury. I said that I didn’t want to state a religion, so the nurse said she would write “no religion”. I can’t remember if I argued that this was not the same thing, and to just to leave it blank or write what I actually said. Surely the best solution would be to simply ask the patient whether they wanted to state a religion.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭XxMCRxBabyxX


    gurramok wrote: »
    It was near fatal

    Imagine a drill to your head? :);)

    You just said it wasn't!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,268 ✭✭✭irishmotorist


    gurramok wrote: »

    Now, what frigging relevance is my religion in order to get treatment in a hospital?

    You clown. You're in a hospital cos there's something wrong enough with you to cause you to be in a hospital. MANY people have different religious beliefs that might mean different approaches.

    If you don't like being asked potentially pertinent questions, would you deny them your blood type, sex, age, recent ingestions?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    You just said it wasn't!

    Where?!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    You clown. You're in a hospital cos there's something wrong enough with you to cause you to be in a hospital. MANY people have different religious beliefs that might mean different approaches.

    If you don't like being asked potentially pertinent questions, would you deny them your blood type, sex, age, recent ingestions?

    How am i a clown? Do I have a painted face?:confused:

    How does blood type, sex, age, recent ingestions, relate to religion?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,440 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    gurramok wrote: »
    It was near fatal

    Imagine a drill to your head? :);)
    I'm imagining a drill to your head, ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,183 ✭✭✭dvpower


    I was similarly annoyed by this question a long time ago in the A&E of a UK hospital with a minor injury. I said that I didn’t want to state a religion, so the nurse said she would write “no religion”. I can’t remember if I argued that this was not the same thing, and to just to leave it blank or write what I actually said. Surely the best solution would be to simply ask the patient whether they wanted to state a religion.

    Has anyone got to the bottom of why they ask the question in the first place (wasn't that what the thread was about)?
    Is it for statistical reasons (why?) or clinical reasons (bigger why?)?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,207 ✭✭✭meditraitor


    drkpower wrote: »
    Yes, but thats case law rather than legislation

    Is case law effective in prosecution?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    Sardonicat wrote: »
    I'm imagining a drill to your head, ;)

    Why, thats cruel ? :P


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭XxMCRxBabyxX


    gurramok wrote: »
    Eh, you saying something here?!



    It was a non-life threatening procedure!



    No.



    Why don't dentist have chaplains, drilling into someone's head is freakily scary!

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=68756288&postcount=111

    there


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭XxMCRxBabyxX


    dvpower wrote: »
    Has anyone got to the bottom of why they ask the question in the first place (wasn't that what the thread was about)?
    Is it for statistical reasons (why?) or clinical reasons (bigger why?)?

    Anwered numerous times. In case you need someone to administer last rites


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    Is case law effective in prosecution?
    Yes; although you could say it is a little less certain than legislation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,440 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    gurramok wrote: »
    How am i a clown? Do I have a painted face?:confused:

    How does blood type, sex, age, recent ingestions, relate to religion?
    Depending on your religion, your age and gender could relate to your religion.

    It has been explained multiple times to you why this question is asked. You seem to take great offense at the idea that a hospital would try to respect your personal beliefs, whatever they are.

    It seems that you are dissapointed that the staff do not recoil in horror and shock when you state you are an atheist.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok



    "It was a non-life threatening procedure!". What part of that do you not understand?

    News to you that not all procedures/checkups in hospitals are life threatening, did you know that?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭XxMCRxBabyxX


    gurramok wrote: »
    "It was a non-life threatening procedure!". What part of that do you not understand?

    News to you that not all procedures/checkups in hospitals are life threatening, did you know that?

    The fact that I was clearly referring to the drill to your head that you mentioned and that I was replying to?

    Considering I am in hospital constantly have checkups to make sure I don't get a recurrence of cancer, yes I knew that quite well thanks.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement