Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Treyarch 'gimping' quick scoping...
Comments
-
Of course you can , its not an election, its a poll, and if i had to answer if i wanted it in or not i would say yes , just like another poster who voted the 3rd option. The debate was that someone said the majority wanted rid of quick -scoping , the poll shows here on boards so far that that is not the case.
If it was a majority then it would be over 50% , last time i checked thats what constituted a majority.
So you got some handy kills last night , i wouldnt be complaining , i'd be laughing.
So as I just replied to tallon there what would you suggest Treyarch do....
Leave it in... take it out ... or I dont care?
Which answer can they bring to the project head? Because in making a game you have to code for EVERYTHING, you ether include it or not there is no I dont care when making a game so they had to only choose based on if it was wanted or not. If we are to gleen their mentality and as such the mentality of the customers (assuming they actualy want to make a popular product in order to make money that is!) we can only count results which would have actually effected the decion in the game making process ie leave it in or take it out. Anything else is simply not applicable to making a game!!!!
Think of it this way.. you wake in the morn.. you vote to get up... stay in bed... or I dont care.... now if you choose I dont care wtf are you doing for the day????? Because you HAVE to do one or the other! Hence I dont care cannot count
That being the case the largest number want it out.
The second largest number dont give a flying one ... which would make for an intresting game review ..----> "what do you expect form this???? ... eh I dont know, the devs flipped a coin to see what to leave in or out"
The smallest number of people want it in.
Majorty decision wins!
*note I highlight DECISION becuase yes or no is a decsion , maybe is not applicable to the very definition making a decision.0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
hightower1 wrote: »its just taking advantage of poor coding / managemnet decisions and lucky for me Treyarch feel the same way and have done away with all of them.
Poor coding? LOL you've seen the code the game runs on? Sweet
Management decisions?
Leaving in one of the most enjoyable mechanisms in CoD is not a poor management decision.
Having such a smooth transition from hipfire to ADS is what has always set the CoD series apart from other series. Now that it's been expanded to consoles long enough for the kids to get good at it the rest of the kids are whining about it.
Skill up, and quit yer b1tching.0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Poor coding? LOL you've seen the code the game runs on? Sweet.
Yes actually, its a simple oversight caused by not encubering the turing speed of an avatar without the scope up and not encumbering the movement speed enough in transit.
Yes, magment are there to catch oversights like this before final production.Management decisions?.Leaving in one of the most enjoyable mechanisms in CoD is not a poor management decision.
In your opinion.
Also by the resuts of the poll ; the results of only a quarter of cod players here too.Skill up, and quit yer b1tching.
Again... in YOUR opinion. Flagrent provoking like that shows who is the "kid" here. Besides, I need not b1tch as you put it anymore, its gone. End off.0 -
-
-
-
-
-
Thats the thing , there are conflicting reports. I think we'll have to wait and see , one thing we can nearly count on is that if it is in there then it will be harder to do.
I'm sure that people will still figure out how to do it and then post Youtube vids. Once the news spreads then everyone will be at it and we'll be back to square one.
One interesting thing from this whole debate has been the fact that as has been mentioned, people who hate QS in the game never really talked about it until Treyarch mentioned they were getting rid of it (myself included)
I wonder what other aspects of the game people hate but generally don't talk about. To my mind the boosting, MLC, danger close no falling damage from commando pro etc, all overshadowed QS as game-rage factors but this does show that many people dislike QS. Whether you agree with the Treyarch decision or not doesn't take away from the fact that it's a tactic disliked by many.0 -
-
-
I'm sure that people will still figure out how to do it and then post Youtube vids. Once the news spreads then everyone will be at it and we'll be back to square one.
One interesting thing from this whole debate has been the fact that as has been mentioned, people who hate QS in the game never really talked about it until Treyarch mentioned they were getting rid of it (myself included)
I wonder what other aspects of the game people hate but generally don't talk about. To my mind the boosting, MLC, danger close no falling damage from commando pro etc, all overshadowed QS as game-rage factors but this does show that many people dislike QS. Whether you agree with the Treyarch decision or not doesn't take away from the fact that it's a tactic disliked by many.
While there are many broken things in mw2, i enjoyed it.
Boosting , doesnt bother me , i like to hunt them
Commando once again i think i'm the only one that s not bothered by it.
Danger close, now constant tubing with dc is one pain in the a55, there is no counter for it only to do it yourself.
People hate alot of things about the game , where to start , commando , qsing , tubing , dc , akimbo this akimbo that , ump , famas , m16 , lmg's, killstreaks etc etc:D
People are always going to complain , and because of the amount of perks made available there were more ways to exploit them, hence more complaints.0 -
Advertisement
-
I'm sure that people will still figure out how to do it and then post Youtube vids. Once the news spreads then everyone will be at it and we'll be back to square one.
One interesting thing from this whole debate has been the fact that as has been mentioned, people who hate QS in the game never really talked about it until Treyarch mentioned they were getting rid of it (myself included)
I wonder what other aspects of the game people hate but generally don't talk about. To my mind the boosting, MLC, danger close no falling damage from commando pro etc, all overshadowed QS as game-rage factors but this does show that many people dislike QS. Whether you agree with the Treyarch decision or not doesn't take away from the fact that it's a tactic disliked by many.
As they have gotten rid of commando, danger close, juggernoob, stopping power, painkiller, drop shotting, tactical insertion for ffa & no spam/spawn tubing, had they left quick scoping in there would be SH1TLOADS of people complaining about it in a few weeks. Like the lad says above there was so many other frustrating things in mw2 ahead of quick scoping it just seemed to have been pushed further down the list.
I've just re-read that and I'm not sure it made any sense :pac:
Basically what I'm trying to say is, had they left it alone for black ops........alot more people would be complaining about it in black ops in the coming months0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement