Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

SF now the largest political party in the north.

Options
11819202123

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    fryup wrote: »
    Can someone answer this - But, is it true that catholics in the north have large familes on purpose so as to out number the protestants? or is that just a myth created by the unionists
    gerajella wrote: »
    fryup. No, even when Catholics did have large families, it had nothing to do with politics, and that theory of things is well out of date now anyway.
    NI population vis a vis Catholic/Protestant margin is closing but with smaller Catholic families now, it will take much longer to create a significant Catholic majority, than it has taken to close the gap from the 1921 2-1 protestant majority..

    so i take from that, that from 1921 onwards catholics did have large familes so as to close the gap...so maybe there is some truth in it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    fryup wrote: »
    so i take from that, that from 1921 onwards catholics did have large familes so as to close the gap...so maybe there is some truth in it

    There is no truth to it. That's a ridiculous claim. Unless you have birth records of catholic families for the past 200 years to validate it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    dlofnep wrote: »
    There is no truth to it. That's a ridiculous claim. Unless you have birth records of catholic families for the past 200 years to validate it.

    Proof; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0kJHQpvgB8


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    Camelot wrote: »

    if you're looking for thanks you ought to post that in AH....


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    aDeener wrote: »
    if you're looking for thanks you ought to post that in AH....

    Agree probably somerepublican loser. FYp Do you seriously think that Catholics would do that. Repulicans wouldn't even do that and they are as bitter as hell. That us just stupid if they did and if there was a competition the Protestants would be in it too!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    fryup wrote: »
    so i take from that, that from 1921 onwards catholics did have large familes so as to close the gap...so maybe there is some truth in it

    Nope. As Terence O'Neill said if you treat Catholics like Protestants they'll behave like Protestants(paraphrasing).

    Now that there's pretty much equal rights/information education Catholics in the North will have similar sized families to Protestants.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    Nope. As Terence O'Neill said if you treat Catholics like Protestants they'll behave like Protestants(paraphrasing).

    Now that there's pretty much equal rights/information education Catholics in the North will have size families to Protestants.

    what are you trying to say?:mad:


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    owenc wrote: »
    what are you trying to say?:mad:

    That Catholics having larger families in the past was due to socioeconomical reasons rather than an attempt to bridge the gap between Protestant/Catholic numbers.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    That Catholics having larger families in the past was due to socioeconomical reasons rather than an attempt to bridge the gap between Protestant/Catholic numbers.

    seems like a more sensible answer than trying to increase numbers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    More off-topic mush deleted, responsible parties notified appropriately. On-thread requests to avoid moving into tangents aren't made merely for kicks and giggles.

    /mod


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 462 ✭✭SlabMurphy


    Listening to Miriam O'Callaghna this morning ( and it's over on politics.ie ), the latest Red C polls in the Sunday Bus. Post say SF are back to 10%. So it seems that their excellent results in the six counties have had the knock on effect down here.

    Gee, the born again unionists will be foaming at the mouth again :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,604 ✭✭✭Kev_ps3


    Great to read.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    SlabMurphy wrote: »
    Listening to Miriam O'Callaghna this morning ( and it's over on politics.ie ), the latest Red C polls in the Sunday Bus. Post say SF are back to 10%. So it seems that their excellent results in the six counties have had the knock on effect down here.

    Gee, the born again unionists will be foaming at the mouth again :)

    While the opinion polls aren't very reliable - it is positive to see. Sinn Féin is going from strength to strength across Ireland. It will be interesting to see how they fair in the next poll. I'm willing to bet that they may drop back to around 8%. If they still on 10% however, it will be noteworthy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 462 ✭✭SlabMurphy


    dlofnep wrote: »
    While the opinion polls aren't very reliable - it is positive to see. Sinn Féin is going from strength to strength across Ireland. It will be interesting to see how they fair in the next poll. I'm willing to bet that they may drop back to around 8%. If they still on 10% however, it will be noteworthy.
    Well something I have started to wonder about. When Joe Higgins very narrowly took the seat from Mary Lou, the usual on here were forecasting the end of SF, down south anyway. Now I got to admit I, like many others, voted for Joe giving Mary Lou no.2 as I wanted to see Joe get a good vote but didn't expect him to win.

    My point been, it looks like SF's drop down here to Joe Higgins Socialists and the SWP's front People Against Profit only a temporary loss of SF's vote ? And surely the overall left/protest vote will be up in the next election ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    I think Joe's vote was genuine. He's a hard worker, and that's why he was elected. I say that as a Sinn Féin voter. It's hard to say what way the votes will swing to be honest. Will have to wait and see.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    owenc wrote: »
    Agree probably somerepublican loser. FYp Do you seriously think that Catholics would do that. Repulicans wouldn't even do that and they are as bitter as hell. That us just stupid if they did and if there was a competition the Protestants would be in it too!

    i have no idea what on earth you are trying to say


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    SlabMurphy wrote: »
    Well something I have started to wonder about. When Joe Higgins very narrowly took the seat from Mary Lou, the usual on here were forecasting the end of SF, down south anyway. Now I got to admit I, like many others, voted for Joe giving Mary Lou no.2 as I wanted to see Joe get a good vote but didn't expect him to win.

    My point been, it looks like SF's drop down here to Joe Higgins Socialists and the SWP's front People Against Profit only a temporary loss of SF's vote ? And surely the overall left/protest vote will be up in the next election ?

    That seat was basically a three way between eoin ryan, mary-lou and joe. I think joe won it from previous fianna fail voters protesting and deciding they liked higgins as a person more than mary lou. Don't really see it as a vote for socialism. Mary-lou also had an appauling attendence record which might have pissed her previous voters off.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    aDeener wrote: »
    i have no idea what on earth you are trying to say

    sorry?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭philstar


    dlofnep wrote: »

    This is a great day for Sinn Féin.

    and a kick in the teeth to victims of IRA violence


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭weepee


    philstar wrote: »
    and a kick in the teeth to victims of IRA violence
    Or its a good day for victims of IRA violence, knowing that there need be no more victims. Your anti Republicanism is apparent.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    weepee wrote: »
    Or its a good day for victims of IRA violence, knowing that there need be no more victims. Your anti Republicanism is apparent.
    More like anti-terrorism.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,847 ✭✭✭HavingCrack


    Where did the Catholic/Protestant debate come from in this ?!???! :confused:

    How many Northerners give a ****e what religion you are these days anyway? (an there is a difference between religion and politics despite what some boardsies seem to believe.)

    As to the OP I', suprised so many people vote Sinn Fein because apart from the Untied Ireland stance their political policies are pretty ****e in my opinion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭weepee


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    More like anti-terrorism.
    Maybe if you expand your post, I would understand what your saying.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    weepee wrote: »
    Maybe if you expand your post, I would understand what your saying.
    You wrote:
    Or its a good day for victims of IRA violence, knowing that there need be no more victims. Your anti Republicanism is apparent.

    I wrote:
    More like anti-terrorism.

    Notice the part in bold print.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭weepee


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    You wrote:


    I wrote:


    Notice the part in bold print.
    Simply anti Republicanism then-ok.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    Perhaps our fellow posters might be more content if the peace process was ended. At least then, they would have something to genuinely have a gripe with.

    Sinn Féin is the largest party in the north, and they have a strong following for their work both in the past and present. Get over it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 324 ✭✭Chriskavo


    Even people in SF do not see Mr Adams as a good financial rolemodel the man has not got a clue on economics. He tried to fiddle the accounts of the Bobby Sands Trust.

    Can you provide us with a link or a source for this?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    Where did the Catholic/Protestant debate come from in this ?!???! :confused:

    How many Northerners give a ****e what religion you are these days anyway? (an there is a difference between religion and politics despite what some boardsies seem to believe.)

    As to the OP I', suprised so many people vote Sinn Fein because apart from the Untied Ireland stance their political policies are pretty ****e in my opinion.

    Not as much now but they still do, just not as bitterly as years ago, i mean you can't go anywhere without someone going "what school did you goto,what religion are you, whats your surname"!


  • Registered Users Posts: 289 ✭✭Jaap


    dlofnep wrote: »
    Sinn Féin is the largest party in the north, and they have a strong following for their work both in the past and present. Get over it.

    I wouldn't think they would have a large following due to their work in the past...:confused:....were they not linked to one of Europe's and the world's most blood thirsty terrorist groups the IRA???
    I think after the Good Friday Agreement and the peace process...when they realised that they were not going to get anywhere with terrorism (after September the 11th)...and they realised that Northern Ireland's control and destiny is in the hands of its people...that is when people who were appalled at the party's history softened their stance to them and maybe gave them their vote!!!
    I still think Sinn Fein and other republican parties...and unionist parties...they all cause a massive divide in Northern Ireland...until people start voting for the Alliance Party or middle of the road parties (which are yet to exist in NI) we are still going to encounter very serious problems politically for years to come!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭weepee


    Jaap wrote: »
    I wouldn't think they would have a large following due to their work in the past...:confused:....were they not linked to one of Europe's and the world's most blood thirsty terrorist groups the IRA???
    'worlds most blood thirsty terrorist groups'' Sometimes you have to fight evil with evil. Ive never seen terror administrated as effectively as when the state uses it.
    Jaap wrote: »
    I think after the Good Friday Agreement and the peace process...when they realised that they were not going to get anywhere with terrorism (after September the 11th)...and they realised that Northern Ireland's control and destiny is in the hands of its people...that is when people who were appalled at the party's history softened their stance to them and maybe gave them their vote!!!
    The armed struggle lead to the 'Good Friday Agreement'.
    Jaap wrote: »
    in and other republican parties...and unionist parties...they all cause a massive divide in Northern Ireland...until people start voting for the Alliance Party or middle of the road parties (which are yet to exist in NI) we are still going to encounter very serious problems politically for years to come!!!
    Republicans have a right to vote for whoever they wish, as do Unionists.
    On the Republican side, people feel nothing British about themselves, the opposite can be said of Unionists, they feel nothing Irish-thats a fact.


Advertisement