Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Sub 3 Support Thread

Options
13132343637119

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 347 ✭✭dukeraoul


    ooter wrote: »
    Well I was due to do an 8-15k tune up run/race this Saturday (was thinking of doing a flat out 5 miler) and then 17 miles Sunday,could I ditch the Saturday run and try and nail that session that kc suggested on Sunday?

    Would be interested in KC's thoughts on it but sounds sensible enough to me...


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,304 ✭✭✭viperlogic


    ooter wrote: »
    Well I was due to do an 8-15k tune up run/race this Saturday (was thinking of doing a flat out 5 miler) and then 17 miles Sunday,could I ditch the Saturday run and try and nail that session that kc suggested on Sunday?

    Looks like you are doing the P&D plan. For that 8-15K tune up race, I did a 10 mile race. What did you do two weeks previously as there is a another 8-15K tune up race in the plan followed by a 18 mile run?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭ooter


    viperlogic wrote: »
    Looks like you are doing the P&D plan. For that 8-15K tune up race, I did a 10 mile race. What did you do two weeks previously as there is a another 8-15K tune up race in the plan followed by a 18 mile run?

    Yeah I did 10k 2 weeks ago and then 17 miles the following day.
    I was hoping for a new PB but I just barely got in under 40 mins which was disappointing to be honest,I put in a faster 10k during the HM on Saturday.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,504 ✭✭✭✭Krusty_Clown


    ooter wrote: »
    Yeah I did 10k 2 weeks ago and then 17 miles the following day.
    I was hoping for a new PB but I just barely got in under 40 mins which was disappointing to be honest,I put in a faster 10k during the HM on Saturday.
    Just my viewpoint, but determining your marathon pace (and getting some practice at it) is probably more beneficial than running a flat-out 5 mile (on your own I presume?). The latest P&D plans are pretty skimpy on marathon pace sessions, so at worst, your getting a decent session done. At best, you'll figure out that the pace is manageable and cement your mind on your target, with enough time left in the schedule to do some more work at this pace, so it feels a little more natural. If you put in a faster 10k in the half, then I wouldn't worry too much about the original 10k. Just sounds like a bad day at the office.

    Worth remembering, that you managed 13.1 miles @6:38 pace, so 5-4-3-2-1 @6:50/mile should be manageable. A race environment is definitely easier than going out and hitting a pmp session on your own, so there's a lot of value in making sure you can comfortably hold the pace outside of the race environment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Toblerone1978


    Cheers KC. I'm obviously following the same P&D plan as ooter and I was going to do the 10km in Moone on Saturday, then the "5-4-3-2-1" session on Sunday.

    But after your note above, I probably would be compromising the "5-4-3-2-1" session too much, especially with attending the hurling AI on the Saturday evening. I think I just do a recovery 10km on Saturday morning.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 701 ✭✭✭PaulieYifter


    nerraw1111 wrote: »
    Starting to consider going for 2.50 this year

    :eek: :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,504 ✭✭✭✭Krusty_Clown


    Cheers KC. I'm obviously following the same P&D plan as ooter and I was going to do the 10km in Moone on Saturday, then the "5-4-3-2-1" session on Sunday.

    But after your note above, I probably would be compromising the "5-4-3-2-1" session too much, especially with attending the hurling AI on the Saturday evening. I think I just do a recovery 10km on Saturday morning.
    Hi Toblerone, are you in a similar position? i.e. trying to determine your optimal marathon pace strategy? If not, sticking to your plan may be the best bet. Not trying to derail anyone's marathon plans here! It's a really good session, but there's also benefit to trusting in your existing plan. Certainly racing a 10k and trying to do a tough marathon pace session the next day would be ill-advised.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭nerraw1111


    KC, is there a time limit for doing that session?

    Thinking of doing it Sunday week, which would be three before marathon?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭nerraw1111


    :eek: :)

    Ha. One day its "sure I'll be delighted with a 2.58 pb," other days it's "sweet jesus, why am doing this at all."

    Did the half at the weekend and it was a bit of confidence booster.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,304 ✭✭✭viperlogic


    Just to add another data point for those following the P&D plan, like myself, I did the two 8K-15K tune up races. I did a half marathon and a 10mile of which I ran a 1:23:33 (hilly) half and a 1:02:13 (flat) 10 mile which was a great guide of what pace/time to do for the Amsterdam marathon. These equate to around 2:55. I would highly recommend to do the tune up races. The half was a bit more than the prescribed distance but was 7 weeks out from the marathon so was safe enough.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,016 ✭✭✭Itziger


    viperlogic wrote: »
    Just to add another data point for those following the P&D plan, like myself, I did the two 8K-15K tune up races. I did a half marathon and a 10mile of which I ran a 1:23:33 (hilly) half and a 1:02:13 (flat) 10 mile which was a great guide of what pace/time to do for the Amsterdam marathon. These equate to around 2:55. I would highly recommend to do the tune up races. The half was a bit more than the prescribed distance but was 7 weeks out from the marathon so was safe enough.

    In about 9 out of 10 cases, I'd say a 1.23.33 half would be nearer to a 2.59.xx marathon than a 2.55.

    Any cases on here?


  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Toblerone1978


    Hi Toblerone, are you in a similar position? i.e. trying to determine your optimal marathon pace strategy?


    If I understand your question correctly KC, not really. My plan is to run a sub 3 hour and the strategy is to loosely follow the sub 3 hr pacers. There is no plan B for me - if I can run a sub 3 hr, it's borderline but I'm comfortable with myself to go for broke and if I blow-up, I blow-up. I have a PB of 3.05.23 and I'm not bothered getting another unless it's under 3 hours!


    But your advice makes sense that it would be wrong to do a 10k on Saturday followed by the "5-4-3-2-1" session on Sunday. Which would be better, do a recovery run on Saturday morning and a "5-4-3-2-1" session on Sunday or race 10k and do an easy 18 miles on Sunday.


    I ran the Athlone 1/2 marathon two weeks ago and I intend to do a 5k race (Parkrun) on Saturday fortnight so I feel that "5-4-3-2-1" session would be more beneficial - but I welcome any advice on this one!! I think Viperlogic would suggest to do the 10k race?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 347 ✭✭dukeraoul


    Itziger wrote: »
    In about 9 out of 10 cases, I'd say a 1.23.33 half would be nearer to a 2.59.xx marathon than a 2.55.

    Any cases on here?

    Yup. But people are different. I blew up to a 3:16 off of a 1:22 a couple years ago. Then again my endurance was poor. I'd just be careful about being over confident and going out too hard...


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,514 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    Itziger wrote: »
    In about 9 out of 10 cases, I'd say a 1.23.33 half would be nearer to a 2.59.xx marathon than a 2.55.

    Any cases on here?
    When you say a 1:23:33 half, do you mean a specifically targeted half (i.e. proper taper, targeted training), or are you including a half that was part of a larger marathon training plan (e.g. a tune-up race, full effort on the day, but not specifically prepared)?

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,016 ✭✭✭Itziger


    28064212 wrote: »
    When you say a 1:23:33 half, do you mean a specifically targeted half (i.e. proper taper, targeted training), or are you including a half that was part of a larger marathon training plan (e.g. a tune-up race, full effort on the day, but not specifically prepared)?

    Hmmmm. Well I don't know if many people really aim for and taper for a Half, do they? It seems to be part of build up to marathon for so many. Your question is a good one though. If you could do the 1.23 in the middle of heavy training I'm sure you'd be more confident than if it had been your target race for the year/six months.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,120 ✭✭✭Gringo78


    Itziger wrote: »
    In about 9 out of 10 cases, I'd say a 1.23.33 half would be nearer to a 2.59.xx marathon than a 2.55.

    A 1:23 is good for a 2:55, clearly pace is there, only thing it doesn't tell you is what your endurance is like. Simple endurance test is add your 5 longest runs of last 12 weeks together, less than 100 and you need to start adjusting your target.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,304 ✭✭✭viperlogic


    Itziger wrote: »
    Hmmmm. Well I don't know if many people really aim for and taper for a Half, do they? It seems to be part of build up to marathon for so many. Your question is a good one though. If you could do the 1.23 in the middle of heavy training I'm sure you'd be more confident than if it had been your target race for the year/six months.

    Yes, in my case that was in the middle of marathon training. The following day I did a 15 mile LSR
    Gringo78 wrote: »
    A 1:23 is good for a 2:55, clearly pace is there, only thing it doesn't tell you is what your endurance is like. Simple endurance test is add your 5 longest runs of last 12 weeks together, less than 100 and you need to start adjusting your target.

    Just looking back at my training, I have done 99 miles if taking the 5 longest runs of the last 12 weeks. What I believe is of huge benefit, for me anyways, is a long mid week run also, this has greatly improved my endurance.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭ooter


    Gringo78 wrote: »
    A 1:23 is good for a 2:55, clearly pace is there, only thing it doesn't tell you is what your endurance is like. Simple endurance test is add your 5 longest runs of last 12 weeks together, less than 100 and you need to start adjusting your target.
    That's interesting, never heard that before.
    I'm at 93.:(
    Sunday week it'll be 96, 3x20 and 2x18.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,504 ✭✭✭✭Krusty_Clown


    nerraw1111 wrote: »
    KC, is there a time limit for doing that session?

    Thinking of doing it Sunday week, which would be three before marathon?
    Hi Warren, there's no hard and fast rules, just what works for the individual. Personally, I'll be aiming for one big last session three weeks out from my goal, which will probably take the form of 18 miles with 15@mp (which is part of the JD Plan A I am following), which I wouldn't recommend unless someone has done the ground-work (i.e. built up the mp miles). In my view, the Tergat session would make a good final '3 weeks out' session, providing you have done the necessary ground-work to build up to it. It's not some form of magic elixir. It's just a session that will give the runner a decent amount of marathon pace miles, without the strain of having to do them all in one go. If your plan already has a decent spread of mp-paced miles, or there is an equally good session in the plan you are following, then there is no reason to do this workout.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,120 ✭✭✭Gringo78


    ooter wrote: »
    That's interesting, never heard that before.
    I'm at 93.:(
    Sunday week it'll be 96, 3x20 and 2x18.

    Mines at 62.....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,340 ✭✭✭TFBubendorfer


    Gringo78 wrote: »
    A 1:23 is good for a 2:55, clearly pace is there, only thing it doesn't tell you is what your endurance is like. Simple endurance test is add your 5 longest runs of last 12 weeks together, less than 100 and you need to start adjusting your target.

    It's different for everyone

    I had to get my half PB down to 1:23:xx in order to go 2:59, and endurance definitely wasn't the issue. Somehow I always found it impossible to translate my shorter times into marathon times (I basically always have to add up to 5 minutes to what the MacMillan calculator predicts), yet for longer than marathon distances my performances are improving exponentially.

    On the other hand, I know someone who ran a 2:57 full after a 1:26 or 1:27 half, though that is definitely unusual.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,120 ✭✭✭Gringo78


    It's different for everyone

    I had to get my half PB down to 1:23:xx in order to go 2:59, and endurance definitely wasn't the issue. Somehow I always found it impossible to translate my shorter times into marathon times (I basically always have to add up to 5 minutes to what the MacMillan calculator predicts), yet for longer than marathon distances my performances are improving exponentially.

    On the other hand, I know someone who ran a 2:57 full after a 1:26 or 1:27 half, though that is definitely unusual.

    Totally agree. I have always struggled with half marathons. I have only broken 1:30 3 times - twice in the one 2:59 marathon and have a 1:26 first half split from another. Had never broken 1:30 before running sub 3.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭nerraw1111


    Hi Warren, there's no hard and fast rules, just what works for the individual. Personally, I'll be aiming for one big last session three weeks out from my goal, which will probably take the form of 18 miles with 15@mp (which is part of the JD Plan A I am following), which I wouldn't recommend unless someone has done the ground-work (i.e. built up the mp miles). In my view, the Tergat session would make a good final '3 weeks out' session, providing you have done the necessary ground-work to build up to it. It's not some form of magic elixir. It's just a session that will give the runner a decent amount of marathon pace miles, without the strain of having to do them all in one go. If your plan already has a decent spread of mp-paced miles, or there is an equally good session in the plan you are following, then there is no reason to do this workout.

    Cheers KC, really appreciate it. There's a lack of MP miles later in the plan so will slot this in. Thanks again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭ooter


    Doubt I'll be doing that 54321 session this weekend lads,legs are really tired after the HM.
    Struggled to do 11 miles this evening in 8:42/mile average.:(


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭KielyUnusual


    ooter wrote: »
    Doubt I'll be doing that 54321 session this weekend lads,legs are really tired after the HM.
    Struggled to do 11 miles this evening in 8:42/mile average.:(

    ....its Wednesday.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,174 ✭✭✭Bahanaman


    Had never broken 1:30 before running sub 3.

    I hate you!!!;-)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭davedanon


    Agree about halves. My best remains a 1:30:30 from 2011. Last year I DNF'd in both RnR and Race Series; in between I had a massive pb of 66.21 in the RS 10. This year I finished both at least, but recorded a 1.37 and 1.34; in the 10 I had 68-something. I keep telling myself it's a Derry hangover, and it'll all come right on the day.


  • Registered Users Posts: 471 ✭✭paddybarry


    Did the patented 5-4-3-2-1 yesterday. Wednesday and Sunday would be days I would do some long runs. I would incorporate some PMP miles into one of these.

    Doing Rathfarnham 5k on Sunday so will miss my LSR this weekend. Normally do a Parkrun on a Saturday.

    Im thinking of the following for the three weeks beginning monday 29th
    Week 1:
    Wednesday (20 miles with last 8 at PMP)
    Sunday (21 LSR)

    Week 2:
    Wednesday (20 miles with last 8 at PMP)
    Sunday (21 LSR)

    Week 3:
    Wednesday (15 miles with 8 at PMP)
    Sunday (18 LSR)

    Will do easy running other days (Parkrun on Saturday/Tempo 5k).

    Anything I should do different?
    Thanks.
    PB


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 347 ✭✭dukeraoul


    paddybarry wrote: »
    Did the patented 5-4-3-2-1 yesterday. Wednesday and Sunday would be days I would do some long runs. I would incorporate some PMP miles into one of these.

    Doing Rathfarnham 5k on Sunday so will miss my LSR this weekend. Normally do a Parkrun on a Saturday.

    Im thinking of the following for the three weeks beginning monday 29th
    Week 1:
    Wednesday (20 miles with last 8 at PMP)
    Sunday (21 LSR)

    Week 2:
    Wednesday (20 miles with last 8 at PMP)
    Sunday (21 LSR)

    Week 3:
    Wednesday (15 miles with 8 at PMP)
    Sunday (18 LSR)

    Will do easy running other days (Parkrun on Saturday/Tempo 5k).

    Anything I should do different?
    Thanks.
    PB

    Paddy- wayyy too much. Doubling up on 20s in a week with one having a good few MP miles in it isn't a great idea at all and will leave you wrecked at DCM.

    I'd run 20 -22 a couple days after Rathfarnam, 18-20 the week after then 16 into the taper. You want to go into the race fresh and IMO the plan you're putting out there is a perfect blueprint for over cooking!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 471 ✭✭paddybarry


    dukeraoul wrote: »
    Paddy- wayyy too much. Doubling up on 20s in a week with one having a good few MP miles in it isn't a great idea at all and will leave you wrecked at DCM.

    I'd run 20 -22 a couple days after Rathfarnam, 18-20 the week after then 16 into the taper. You want to go into the race fresh and IMO the plan you're putting out there is a perfect blueprint for over cooking!
    Thanks,
    Should I incorporate PMP in the 20-22, 18-20 and the 16? Should I substitute the other long runs with an easy 13/14?


Advertisement