Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

[Eve] Alliance Current Events Smackfest Megathread.

Options
  • 06-03-2008 6:08pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭


    Post all your CAOD type rants/trolls here regarding current events.


«13456718

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭Raspberry


    There's currently nothing of interest happening in EvE worth mentioning in this thread.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,473 ✭✭✭R0ot


    MC wardec PURE, 21mins later 1 corp leaves PURE :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 186 ✭✭Glippo


    R0ot wrote: »
    MC wardec PURE, 21mins later 1 corp leaves PURE :D

    Epic Lulz


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭kyp_durron


    R0ot wrote: »
    MC wardec PURE, 21mins later 1 corp leaves PURE :D

    Yeah, they must have seen you in the alliance tourny and shat themselves.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 328 ✭✭Statso


    kyp_durron wrote: »
    Yeah, they must have seen you in the alliance tourny and shat themselves.

    OMG burn! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    We suck at tourneys.

    We really wanted to field either a Battle Badger fleet or a swarm of T1 frigs, but neither is allowed :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 186 ✭✭Glippo


    kyp_durron wrote: »
    Yeah, they must have seen you in the alliance tourny and shat themselves.

    More-Epic lulz


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,473 ✭✭✭R0ot


    Zillah wrote: »
    We suck at tourneys.

    We really wanted to field either a Battle Badger fleet or a swarm of T1 frigs, but neither is allowed :(

    Yeah MC are the same, we don't have great luck in tournys. But I couldn't think of a good setup for a tourny match so I dont criticise the ones that do it for our alliance. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭Raspberry


    Glippo wrote: »
    More-Epic lulz
    Wow, talk about using internet catchphrases completely out of context.


  • Registered Users Posts: 186 ✭✭Glippo


    Raspberry wrote: »
    Wow, talk about using internet catchphrases completely out of context.

    Do explain, oh gooniest of goons


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭Raspberry


    Glippo wrote: »
    Do explain, oh gooniest of goons
    The context of what you said was not the context it is usually used in and as a result it has made you look silly. Was that simple enough for you?


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    R0ot wrote: »
    Yeah MC are the same, we don't have great luck in tournys. But I couldn't think of a good setup for a tourny match so I dont criticise the ones that do it for our alliance. :D

    I thought the Logistics + Stealth Bomber combo was fuckinging awesome! I started spamming the thread on the forums saying we should do that. They did on, I think the third day, and low and behold we get out first win.

    Marauders are fucking lol btw.

    Also, while we're inter-alliance smacking: Haha Seleene's Mothership was saved by Goons! They gooncannoned to get there, and then caught a MC titan launch back. All the goons involved said they found it sureal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭kyp_durron


    Using 'Epic lulz' in its applicable context is more of a art then a science. You most take your time and lurk moar :|


  • Registered Users Posts: 186 ✭✭Glippo


    Raspberry wrote: »
    The context of what you said was not the context it is usually used in and as a result it has made you look silly. Was that simple enough for you?

    lulz = plural of lol, a corp leaving pure as soon as MC dec them is funny, how is it incorrect use??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭Raspberry


    Glippo wrote: »
    lulz = plural of lol, a corp leaving pure as soon as MC dec them is funny, how is it incorrect use??
    "lols" is the plural of "lol". "Lulz" is a retardation of the word "lol", used in a very specific context. As Kyp said, there an art to using it, and you are clearly not a master of that art. Go read a couple of pages of ED and learn how to use the catchphrases if you're going to use them at all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 186 ✭✭Glippo


    Raspberry wrote: »
    "lols" is the plural of "lol". "Lulz" is a retardation of the word "lol", used in a very specific context. As Kyp said, there an art to using it, and you are clearly not a master of that art. Go read a couple of pages of ED and learn how to use the catchphrases if you're going to use them at all.

    Ok, why dont you provide me with an example of the correct use of lulz for future reference.......(sarcasm btw)


  • Registered Users Posts: 538 ✭✭✭Maddzy


    Glippo wrote: »
    Ok, why dont you provide me with an example of the correct use of lulz for future reference.......(sarcasm btw)

    This very accurate Fox News report should clear things up for you http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNO6G4ApJQY


  • Registered Users Posts: 186 ✭✭Glippo


    Maddzy wrote: »
    This very accurate Fox News report should clear things up for you http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNO6G4ApJQY

    Lol that was...em.....interesting......"even bought a dog" lmao.
    Tho i still fail to see how this hacker group or w/e searching for there lulz, means my use of lulz was incorrect?


  • Registered Users Posts: 538 ✭✭✭Maddzy


    Glippo wrote: »
    Lol that was...em.....interesting......"even bought a dog" lmao.
    Tho i still fail to see how this hacker group or w/e searching for there lulz, means my use of lulz was incorrect?

    Watch it again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭kyp_durron


    Maddzy wrote: »
    This very accurate Fox News report should clear things up for you http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNO6G4ApJQY


    That is a very accurate report Glippo, you would do well to heed it's warning.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    Maddzy wrote: »
    This very accurate Fox News report should clear things up for you http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNO6G4ApJQY

    AHAHAHAHA.

    "They do it for what they call lulz *INSERT HUGE TEXT "Lulz" ACROSS SCREEN".

    AHAHAHAHA.

    "Anonymous gets BIG LULZ from pulling random pranks".

    "But TRULY EPIC LULZ come from raids and invasions..."

    I'm laughing my fucking ass off. These guys are clearly Goons.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,473 ✭✭✭R0ot


    Maddzy wrote: »
    This very accurate Fox News report should clear things up for you http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNO6G4ApJQY

    THATS FECKING HILARIOUS! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭Raspberry


    Zillah wrote: »

    I'm laughing my fucking ass off. These guys are clearly Goons.

    Anonymous actually base themselves on 4chan and other chans. If you want goons in action, look up the series of Gorgeous George pranks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,549 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    4chan are Goon/SA derived though arent they?

    Meh, either way - that Fox report was hilarious. I kept on thinking it must be a skit - that the "victim" and the "ex-anon" guy must have been in on it - but seems they actually ran the story. The "doing it for the lulz" part was the best. Plus the repeated footage of the van being blown up - like WTF did that have to do with guys pulling pranks on the internet?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭Raspberry


    Most of the stuff on 4chan originally came from SA. As far as I'm aware, 4chan was started by exiles from SA, as was ED. Not completely sure of the link. They share the same humor, only SA has more original content, less furries and fewer pedos.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 132 ✭✭Bill Andrex


    R0ot wrote: »
    MC wardec PURE, 21mins later 1 corp leaves PURE :D

    That was Purely coincidental :D (pardon the pun) Have to say i've been enjoying the fights with you guys, lets all hope CCP have sorted the lag a little.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20 AKitty


    oll her
    Raspberry wrote: »
    "lols" is the plural of "lol". "Lulz" is a retardation of the word "lol", used in a very specific context. As Kyp said, there an art to using it, and you are clearly not a master of that art. Go read a couple of pages of ED and learn how to use the catchphrases if you're going to use them at all.

    LULZ is a corruption of lol , not a retardation.
    Protip , don't believe everything you read on ED , its a satire site.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭Raspberry


    AKitty wrote: »
    oll her



    LULZ is a corruption of lol , not a retardation.
    Protip , don't believe everything you read on ED , its a satire site.
    This is just about the dumbest post I've read on boards.ie. Why are you searching my post history? Butt hurt much?


  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭mamolian


    Paging mr molle to this thread.

    http://mollephone.ytmnd.com/


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭kyp_durron


    I see MC have war decced Smash. Quite a step up from Pure, I expect many losses from MC and their pvp rep in ruin before this war is over. o7 Smashkill.


Advertisement