Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Sub 4 Support Thread

1356723

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,306 ✭✭✭ariana`


    ewc78 wrote: »
    I tried one of the Wednesday Workouts on the meno plan today just to try it out. It's the one in Week 2 "Progression run"
    Wednesday session: 2 miles easy warm up followed by 8 minutes steady (MP + 3-4%); 8 milnutes @ MP; 8 Minutes @ HMP; 8 Minutes Hard (approx 10kpace); 2 miles c/d at the end. The run should be all continuous. Try not to overestimate the 'steady', and MP sections or it will get very difficult at the end. For the last 8 minute sesction pretty much go as fast as you can while retaining a constant pace. It will likely come in and around your 10k pace.

    First off I really enjoyed the run.
    Reason I'm posting about it though is to get advice re the paces I did for each step to see if I'm doing it right in relation to what I should be doing for a sub 4hr.
    These are the average paces I did.

    3km Warm up : 6:15/km
    8 min steady: 5:50/km
    8 min MP: 5:30/km
    8 min HMP : 5:10/km
    8 min Hard: 4:35/km
    3km Warm down: 6:00km

    I did find it hard to keep a constant pace on each and sometimes had to slow down or speed up so the above are averages.

    Good idea to try out a couple of sessions before deciding on a plan. I like the look of the progression run. I won't be doing meno but i like the idea of the variety as well. Well done :)
    seanin4711 wrote: »
    thats my friday after work session sorted!

    I am trying to focus on neg split sessions .
    first half of a typical friday afternoon sesh would be 16km steady but i will try to incorporate neg splits as in 8km easy and 2nd 8km mp.

    Is it not very early to be running half your run at MP :eek: I'm not planning to start specific dcm training for another 9 weeks so excuse me if i'm freaking out a tiny bit :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,171 ✭✭✭seanin4711


    Murph_D wrote: »
    That's quite a session - what's the rest of the week like?

    let me digress

    the workout posted is a great session,but i would not be coupling it another distance session.
    sorry for the confusion!

    Hows the training going in this ideal running weather?
    5 days a week for me

    Tuesday moderate 10-12km
    Wednesday speed session 8km approx 1km up 1km down x 3
    Thursday moderate 10-12km
    Friday 16km steady
    Sunday LSR 1hr 45min/half Mara

    ballpark 70km per week
    with 4/5 sessions done on cross country 1km loop.

    ;)

    i will keep it going with this plan as long as i can
    touch wood no niggles as yet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭skyblue46


    seanin4711 wrote: »
    let me digress

    the workout posted is a great session,but i would not be coupling it another distance session.
    sorry for the confusion!

    Hows the training going in this ideal running weather?
    5 days a week for me

    Tuesday moderate 10-12km
    Wednesday speed session 8km approx 1km up 1km down x 3
    Thursday moderate 10-12km
    Friday 16km steady
    Sunday LSR 1hr 45min/half Mara

    ballpark 70km per week
    with 4/5 sessions done on cross country 1km loop.

    ;)

    i will keep it going with this plan as long as i can
    touch wood no niggles as yet.

    Maybe I'm reading this wrong but have you no easy paced runs at all? Also is your LSR done at half marathon pace?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,171 ✭✭✭seanin4711


    skyblue46 wrote: »
    Maybe I'm reading this wrong but have you no easy paced runs at all? Also is your LSR done at half marathon pace?

    lsr is recovery easy zone - for me sub 140bpm

    friday is also very similar 16km with some fartlek thrown in.
    37 kms are low intensity workouts


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭skyblue46


    Ah I see. I thought the / half mara related to the pace of the run. Also on the pace chart I use moderate and steady paces are quite a bit faster than easy. Is it not recommended that 80/85% of weekly running should be easy/ low intensity?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 480 ✭✭ewc78


    I see DCM is selling our fast. How many here are doing it and have you decided on a plan?
    I'm 99% sure I'll be using the meno plan, would be great if a few others are also.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,021 ✭✭✭Kellygirl


    ewc78 wrote: »
    I see DCM is selling our fast. How many here are doing it and have you decided on a plan?
    I'm 99% sure I'll be using the meno plan, would be great if a few others are also.

    I’m doing it and more than likely the grads plan.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,511 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    Meno crew.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 582 ✭✭✭Pomplamousse


    ewc78 wrote: »
    I see DCM is selling our fast. How many here are doing it and have you decided on a plan?
    I'm 99% sure I'll be using the meno plan, would be great if a few others are also.

    Signed up and have decided I'll definitely follow the meno plan.
    Going to start my training 2 weeks early as I'll be away for 2 weeks in July and don't fancy the session runs in the heat. Will just do easy runs for those 2 weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,306 ✭✭✭ariana`


    I'm in and doing the Grads plan. Contemplating starting 1 week early as there's a race in August that i'd like to work into the plan so i can partially repeat a week then and i'll be back on track.

    I'm racing a good bit for the next month, then I'll do the final few weeks of the Base Plan. I've a week long holiday in July which i'll take off completely from running, i think my family need a week off from my running, before i start into it and the timing suits :cool:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 871 ✭✭✭DULLAHAN2


    Hey Guys Great idea for a thread. I recently ran a 1:47 half, as dublin will be my first marathon i just want to enjoy it. So i plan to go out with the 4hr pacers and take it all in while hoping to stay with them. I'm going to follow the boards plan starting in june. So looking forward to seeing everyone's progress


  • Registered Users Posts: 64 ✭✭Degsy123


    I like the idea of this thread. After coming very close on my first marathon 4:00:24, my next 5 were > 4:15 and last year my training was better and brought it back to 4:03:30 so maybe some advice from other sub-4 chasers might push me over that line!!.


  • Registered Users Posts: 64 ✭✭Degsy123


    Best tip I can give you, any anyone else, is to buy this book, read it from cover to cover and start training:

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Advanced-Marathoning-Peter-Pfitzinger/dp/0736074600

    It worked for me, and a lot of other runners. When someone talks about P&D, this is what they're talking about.

    Can I ask whether which of the schedules you followed and how rigidly you did so? I loosely followed the 55m plan last year - found it very tough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,340 ✭✭✭TFBubendorfer


    Degsy123 wrote: »
    Can I ask whether which of the schedules you followed and how rigidly you did so? I loosely followed the 55m plan last year - found it very tough.


    I initially followed the 55 mile schedule and got myself from 4:06 to 3:55, and for the next one I followed the 70 mile schedule and got myself to 3:28. I followed it very closely on both occasions.

    The first time I opened the book and looked at the 55 mile schedule I thought this was just insane, no way could I run that much. A year later I didn't even bat an eyelid when doing 70 miles. It's all relative and you get used to the workload.

    Note: I had the first edition of the book, and they might have tweaked the schedules since then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,489 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    Mileage is really only difficult when you don’t have the base. If you’ve been running 2,000 miles per year for a couple of years, the ramp up to 55 isn’t going to faze you. If you’ve been running much less, it could well break you. Choose the mileage version that you can comfortably sustain - whatever plan you follow.

    Another thing about Advanced Marathoning - read the book and understand the principles and the paces. Much better than just borrowing the schedule and hope for the best. It’s not an easy plan, and I’d say only suitable with at least 2 or three decent marathon efforts under your belt. (the clue is in the title). It’s certainly advanced for a sub-4 attempt. Maybe too advanced?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,340 ✭✭✭TFBubendorfer


    Murph_D wrote: »
    Another thing about Advanced Marathoning - read the book and understand the principles and the paces. Much better than just borrowing the schedule and hope for the best. It’s not an easy plan, and I’d say only suitable with at least 2 or three decent marathon efforts under your belt. (the clue is in the title). It’s certainly advanced for a sub-4 attempt. Maybe too advanced?

    I agree on 2 things: 1) definitely read the book and understand the principles instead of just following the schedule. What I learned from that book was the foundation of my entire running career. 2) Yes, it may well be a bit much for someone's first marathon. I missed 2 or 3 weeks of training for my first attempt with that book due to shin splints. I still broke 4, though.

    However, I disagree that it's too advanced for a sub-4 attempt, not least due to the fact that I did exactly that. In fact, I think the title is possibly the worst part of that book - as far as marathon training goes, it's actually not all that advanced (try any one of Lydiard's books if you want something advanced in comparison, or Canova for another level altogether)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,171 ✭✭✭seanin4711


    thats the target for me across all 5 sessions combined per week.
    low intensity high vol will make up 70% of that.(2 sessions)
    20% moderate (2 sessions )and 10% speedplay (1 session).

    nice and humid this eve around Loughrea.

    Hope your training is going well and injury free.

    DCM sold out btw!:o

    Berlin the target for me (Dublin option would have been nice!)

    22nd july.
    Half 25€ and full marathon 35€ in Boston Scientific Ballybrit Galway for chosen charity ability west.
    1 mile loops block marathon(not everyones cup of tea ,i know) using it as a training run -20miler and walk the last 6 miles.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 480 ✭✭ewc78


    So according to my calculations anyone doing the 17 week meno plan will be starting on Monday July 2nd.
    The very same day I go on holidays with the wife and 3 kids! Looks like I'll miss the first week of training bar maybe squeezing in a run or 2 while on holidays.
    Not an ideal way to start a training plan.!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    So start it now!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,511 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    Reminder re Meno says to throw a few hill sprints or strides into an easy run.

    Noting this now otherwise I'll forget.


  • Registered Users Posts: 29 backofthepack


    Joining in, ran DCM last year in 4:23, goal is under 4 this year.
    Running with a club so i've a coach's plan, i think i can do it if i stay injury free.
    My main goal is to enjoy it as much as i did last year, enjoyed every minute, amazing atmosphere.
    If i can enjoy it and hit under 4 i'll be thrilled!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭eyrie


    Question for those of you following (or planning to follow) the grads intermediate plan - how are you fitting in build up races? There aren't any in the plan but it seems like they're important to do, maybe?
    I'm still dithering about plans overall but curious about how this would work.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭skyblue46


    eyrie wrote: »
    Question for those of you following (or planning to follow) the grads intermediate plan - how are you fitting in build up races? There aren't any in the plan but it seems like they're important to do, maybe?
    I'm still dithering about plans overall but curious about how this would work.

    I'm doing this at the moment. Only race I have picked as a definite is the Tullamore half at the end of August. I will be avoiding the race series as if it were a locust ridden plague. I don't plan to taper for any races and to run them how I feel on the day. But like you I could be swayed by advice.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭eyrie


    skyblue46 wrote: »
    I will be avoiding the race series as if it were a locust ridden plague.
    :eek: :eek: So you wouldn't recommend them then?? :D
    skyblue46 wrote: »
    I don't plan to taper for any races and to run them how I feel on the day. But like you I could be swayed by advice.

    Interesting. I think I would want to run one or two as reasonably full race efforts (mini taper maybe?) to get a sense of how training is going. It all feels so unknown/unknowable really! :confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭skyblue46


    eyrie wrote: »
    :eek: :eek: So you wouldn't recommend them then?? :D



    Interesting. I think I would want to run one or two as reasonably full race efforts (mini taper maybe?) to get a sense of how training is going. It all feels so unknown/unknowable really! :confused:

    They don't do sandwiches!!! And I'm working every day they are on. And even if I took the day off parking is a pain.

    Thursday is easy miles on the plan, Friday is rest. For me the races will replace the weekend work.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭eyrie


    skyblue46 wrote: »
    They don't do sandwiches!!!

    And suddenly it all becomes clear... :pac: :D


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,511 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    Right out of the gate the race series doesn't hold huge appeal to me, tbh. Might do the FD10 again, dunno yet. Did it last year during the intermediate, weather was kinder than it was in 2016. It's an enjoyable race, tbf.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,414 ✭✭✭Testosterscone


    eyrie wrote: »
    Interesting. I think I would want to run one or two as reasonably full race efforts (mini taper maybe?) to get a sense of how training is going. It all feels so unknown/unknowable really! :confused:

    For including races I would usually say keep the week as is, drop session on Saturday for a recovery run (20 min very very light i.e about a min slower than easy) and Race Sunday. If you are only doing a handful of races then missing the long runs for longer races won't make too much difference.

    I would still say race full effort but i wouldn't worry too much about tapering you can still perform at a high level without the need to rest up for effectively a week. For the long races though (10m/HM) I would probably change the wednesday session after to an easy run with a few 1 min surges with good recovery.


  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭Hedgehoggy


    eyrie wrote: »
    Question for those of you following (or planning to follow) the grads intermediate plan - how are you fitting in build up races? There aren't any in the plan but it seems like they're important to do, maybe?
    I'm still dithering about plans overall but curious about how this would work.


    Did you decide on a plan? I'm dithering about a plan too... Can't make up my mind. Following a half marathon plan that I found someplace but I'm finding the session days a little easy so I'm trying to find something that suits me.....

    I'm also planning to do the tullamore half. Did it in 2014 and I thought it was a brilliant race. Thinking of basing my training around my half marathon pace for the time being then assessing where I'm at later in summer. But not sure if that's the right approach


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,489 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    Hedgehoggy wrote: »
    Did you decide on a plan? I'm dithering about a plan too... Can't make up my mind. Following a half marathon plan that I found someplace but I'm finding the session days a little easy so I'm trying to find something that suits me.....

    I'm also planning to do the tullamore half. Did it in 2014 and I thought it was a brilliant race. Thinking of basing my training around my half marathon pace for the time being then assessing where I'm at later in summer. But not sure if that's the right approach

    If you are doing Dublin marathon your specific training would be starting usually mid-July (assuming a 17-18 week schedule). I’d forget about a HM plan unless you’ve decided that a half is your goal race. I’d say it’s better to just concentrate on base mileage, a weekly speed session, the odd tempo (maybe at parkrun) and a longer weekend run until start of the marathon block. Stick to the knitting, and keep the main thing the main thing! ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭Hedgehoggy


    Murph_D wrote: »
    If you are doing Dublin marathon your specific training would be starting usually mid-July (assuming a 17-18 week schedule). I’d forget about a HM plan unless you’ve decided that a half is your goal race. I’d say it’s better to just concentrate on base mileage, a weekly speed session, the odd tempo (maybe at parkrun) and a longer weekend run until start of the marathon block. Stick to the knitting, and keep the main thing the main thing! ;)


    Thanks... Appreciate the advice. Guess I'm not really targeting the half but would like a decent performance before the marathon. Would be aiming for a time of 1:40.

    Would this sound like an OK base for the next few weeks?
    In line with the plan I was following, currently doing 2 runs of 50-55 mins. One of these might include a tempo effort for some of the session.
    1 interval /speed session (this week was 5 x 5mins)
    A long run (now up to 100mins - will increase this up to 2 hrs)
    A another run which currently 50 mins (planning on upping this each wk too by 10mins)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,489 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    Hedgehoggy wrote: »
    Thanks... Appreciate the advice. Guess I'm not really targeting the half but would like a decent performance before the marathon. Would be aiming for a time of 1:40.

    Would this sound like an OK base for the next few weeks?
    In line with the plan I was following, currently doing 2 runs of 50-55 mins. One of these might include a tempo effort for some of the session.
    1 interval /speed session (this week was 5 x 5mins)
    A long run (now up to 100mins - will increase this up to 2 hrs)
    A another run which currently 50 mins (planning on upping this each wk too by 10mins)

    Sounds mostly OK. Wouldn’t bother increasing the long run until you’re into the marathon block - better to introduce a sixth day of around 30-40 mins easy/recovery. Try to get up to at least 35 miles, preferably a little more.

    You can run a decent half during the marathon training. 1:40 sounds a tad ambitious for a 4-hr marathoner however, although everyone is different.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭skyblue46


    Murph_D wrote: »
    Sounds mostly OK. Wouldn’t bother increasing the long run until you’re into the marathon block - better to introduce a sixth day of around 30-40 mins easy/recovery. Try to get up to at least 35 miles, preferably a little more.

    You can run a decent half during the marathon training. 1:40 sounds a tad ambitious for a 4-hr marathoner however, although everyone is different.

    Agreed. Anything 1:45ish would be bang on. By all means aim for better but don't be disappointed if it's a wee bit more.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 480 ✭✭ewc78


    skyblue46 wrote: »
    Agreed. Anything 1:45ish would be bang on. By all means aim for better but don't be disappointed if it's a wee bit more.

    Are you saying someone who is going for a sub 4hr Marathon should be able run a 1:45 half?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭skyblue46


    ewc78 wrote: »
    Are you saying someone who is going for a sub 4hr Marathon should be able run a 1:45 half?

    No not exactly. It's not a necessity by any means.

    At the same time, to be able to face into the marathon with a fair degree of confidence, yes. I remember when I joined the novice thread last year I had a 1:48 half previously and the advice was that I should look to get it down a bit.
    If I recall correctly a few of us who did DCM in 3:47 to 3:57 had half times between 1:40 and 1:47 in the race series half.
    Of course people are different so I'm sure there are many who can go sub 4 off a slower half.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 480 ✭✭ewc78


    I would have thought anyone that can do a 1:45 half would be aiming for better than a sub 4 Marathon. Remember sub 4 is 3:59.59 which is what I would be happy with!
    Obviously to go even more under sub 4 would be great but me personally anything, even the bare minimum, under 4hrs is a success.
    I was going to aim for around a 1:50 half and will be using that pace equivalent when I do half marathon pace runs in training. Now obviously depending on how training goes I may be in a position to change those paces for a faster one but that's what I'm starting out with.
    Maybe I'm wrong on that and would be happy to be advised otherwise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    These threads compare people's half marathon times and marathon times


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 480 ✭✭ewc78


    RayCun wrote: »
    These threads compare people's half marathon times and marathon times

    Starting to think sub 4 might be beyond me from reading those threads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    On the half marathon time milestones for a 4hr marathon.

    I paced the Dublin Marathon twice for the 4hr group (3:59:50 and 3:59:30) and trained a large group of ladies for the second one. The question often popped up. In fairness context is everything.

    If the sub 4 attempt is your first marathon or you have brought the goal down from slower pervious marathons, then training miles at your marathon pace in the latter half of your long run is the key thing. You are putting the miles in general in training and have the capacity to belt out a half marathon in 1:40-1:50. That's all good. The problem is it does not come close to where your glycogen depletion will be after 3 hours. If your body is hurting after 90 mins of the half you only have to "suffer" for another 10-15 minutes and mentally this is not much when you are training for a marathon. With the effort biting at 3 hours in a 4 hours marathon that last hour is a very long time!

    That's why it is crucial to practice marathon paces miles after you have been on your feet for 2hrs+
    Your long runs for a 4hr marathon likely take you up to 19-20 miles or circa 3hrs. Being able to run your marathon pace for the second half of a 3 hour long run and finish feeling good would be a better indicator than a 1:45 half marathon in my opinion.

    So, while that half marathon is a good indicator that your training is going well and a benchmark that you are on track. It has little bearing on what your marathon result is likely to be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,088 ✭✭✭AntrimGlens


    RayCun wrote: »
    These threads compare people's half marathon times and marathon times

    Well that has properly put the frighteners on me, was hoping for sub 4 based on a 1.44 HM in April, think i'll stick to the 9 min mile pace rather than 8:45 and see what i have left with a few miles to go (if anything). Have now got PF also. :mad:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    as shotgun says, context is everything.

    The classic mistake novice runners make is that they only have one pace - they don't do faster intervals, and they don't do slow miles. Every run is just "go out and run". They don't really adapt to long runs, they just survive them. That makes them reasonably fit for a half marathon, but not ready for a marathon.

    If you train properly, know how to pace yourself, get the miles in, you don't have to be much slower in the marathon than the half.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,306 ✭✭✭ariana`


    Some great posts here, lots of food for thought. Thanks for those who have already broken 4 hrs and far beyond it too and who are taking the time to post their experience and knowledge to guide us :)

    I posted this link in the novice thread but posting it also here as it's a great marathon report and it touches on the subject of Half Marathon as an indicator of marathon time (or not!) also which is relevant here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭Hedgehoggy


    Thanks for advice. This is interesting discussion and gives some food for thought. Am maybe being a little ambitious with half time - my 10k pb is 44.2x so was basing a time of 1.40 off the mcmillan calculator. Think I would need to do at specific/focused training for it to achieve this...



    Just wondering about those 'progression long runs' (where you run at planned marathon pace for the last few mins - maybe they have a technical name?). Would you do this on every long run - for instance - I'm doing a 13 mile run this week - should I up the tempo for the last 4-5, and on every long run from here on in - or is it a strategy you use conservatively (e.g. every second or third run)?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,171 ✭✭✭seanin4711


    like to be in control of my own destiny,but its a risk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 582 ✭✭✭Pomplamousse


    Just catching up on this thread and it's put the fear in me too. Haven't raced a HM in over a year so not sure what I'm capable of.
    Just signed up for the DCM half after reading this:o


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 480 ✭✭ewc78


    Just catching up on this thread and it's put the fear in me too. Haven't raced a HM in over a year so not sure what I'm capable of.
    Just signed up for the DCM half after reading this:o

    Lol. I also just signed up for the Dublin Half after reading the last few posts!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭skyblue46


    Just one thing jumping out at me when I read a lot of these posts....train to your present fitness level. It's a mantra we have on the novices thread and it equally applies here. Train to your present capability not to some aspirational goal time. Use a recent race time to calculate training paces, train to this pace, race again, hopefully need a faster training pace. :)


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,511 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    Feeling rather sorry for myself since this morning as my right shin is intermittently sore. I was going to run this evening, but decided not to. I hope this is not the start of feckin' splints.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    pac_man wrote: »
    I wouldn't say it's wise to run with someone that is doing the even splits on a course like the Dublin Marathon as the course is quite undulating. I like to dictate my own pace rather than on someone else watch and I like a bit of breathing space. I could only image you'd be nearly
    tripping over people in the first half a 4 hour marathon pace group.

    On the other hand, you might be one of these runners that thrives in running with a big group. There's a sense of camaraderie that you're running with like minded people with the same objective of wanting to run
    a marathon in under 4 hours. You don't have to worry about splits or looking at the watch as the pacer is doing it. You'll also have pacers giving all the positive vibes which are helpful in the later stages of the marathon.

    You'll get conflicting views on this but ultimately it's down to personal preference.
    With my 4 hour pacer hat on you can have both. The 4hr pace group for DCM is huge. Its great fun but very busy and some did trip over. The balloons we had were huge and hard to miss. I don't understand the need to glue yourself to a pacer. Hanging back 50m may seem so far but its only 10secoinds away and you may have much more room. Just keep the pacer in sight. Much easier than running ahead and keep looking back to ensure you are not losing them. As the group thins out after 15miles you could reel in a few metres every mile, pass the pacers in the last mile leaving them behind knowing you've got it!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,306 ✭✭✭ariana`


    seanin4711 wrote: »
    like to be in control of my own destiny,but its a risk.
    I guess it's personal but from my experience last year i think i'd start behind which ever pace group you're interested in and let them get away a bit in the early miles and then reel them in during the middle miles and ideally whizz by them in last few miles to finish ahead of them in a strong finish. Different pace group but this is how it worked out for me last year, although i can't claim that i planned it that way, but it worked well and it's an approach i'd take again.


Advertisement