Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Spider-Man: Far From Home [** SPOILERS FROM POST 240 **]

124678

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I'd have been more surprised if there was none; the trick now will be to maintain the perfect balance of character, emotion and action that first film managed. That it wasn't just a good thrill-ride, but also a really grounded, relatable story that managed to be more Spider-Man than the MCU Spider-Man was in its own right


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,149 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Mr E wrote: »
    Into the Spiderverse is on Netflix tomorrow I think.
    Looking forward to watching it again.
    Two words:
    Boo
    Yah!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,193 ✭✭✭ThePott


    Mr E wrote: »
    Into the Spiderverse is on Netflix tomorrow I think.
    Looking forward to watching it again.


    I hope I'm wrong but I think that's just America :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 890 ✭✭✭El Duda


    I hope you're right! I just forked out £30 for the 4K!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,537 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    No sign today anyway... balls.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Netflix UK & Ire had a video out of releases for June and July and it didnt feature, so i was doubtful anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,930 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Personally I hate the cynical introduction of the 'multiverse' in this movie.

    The joys - we'll be on our old age death beds and there will still be 3 Marvel movies per year coming out and they can keep going back to the well over and over again as much as they like because of the "multiverse"

    The studio cynicism takes the gloss off it for me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 48,990 ✭✭✭✭Lithium93_


    Personally i don't see how it's cynical introducing the multiverse, 23 films deep into the franchise. But that's the beauty of opinions I suppose.

    And I don't get this whinging about 3 Marvel films a year, it's not like anyone's holding a gun to your head, demanding you go see them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,193 ✭✭✭ThePott


    I don't get that. Multiverses were an inevitability as the franchise got older IMO. Not to mention if it means the possibility of weirder more original stories that don't necessarily take place in the main MCU narrative then that's a good thing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,255 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    I've purposely avoided spoilers but even based purely on the trailers, people have speculated that the multiverse might not be real. This is Mysterio after all, master of illusion etc...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Fury says 'everything you are about to see is real' in the trailer, just before Peter meets mysterio.

    None of it is real. That's not fury.


  • Registered Users Posts: 48,990 ✭✭✭✭Lithium93_


    Haven't dived into the rest of the soundtrack.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,303 ✭✭✭Temptamperu


    Peter-Tingle!

    This movie is awesome.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Advance preview?


  • Registered Users Posts: 48,990 ✭✭✭✭Lithium93_


    I keep thinking it's a week away, but tomorrow's actually the 1st of July :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭NUTZZ


    Lithium93_ wrote: »
    Haven't dived into the rest of the soundtrack.


    I actually just saw Michael Giacchino two weeks ago at the National Concert Hall and he debuted the new Far From Home suite which was a very welcome surprise for the audience! It's a great score.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,255 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    I know they're not spoilers as such but still I prefer listening to the music cues in the movie first before seeking them out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    That was decent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Just back. Saw it in 3D IMAX. Worth the big screen! Can probably live without the 3D.

    Very enjoyable. Felt like both a Spider-Man film and a MCU film.
    Good contributions to both.
    Decent baddie.
    Thought they handled the mixes of age groups very well.

    It had good action and lots of fun. Jake Gyllenhaal did well as Mysterio. The
    scenes in the illusions fighting Spider-Man were cool. That train was a bit of a shock. Then Peter overcoming it in the end was good.

    Definitely stay for the Mid Credits
    Peter Parker!
    :eek: Also:
    J. K. Simmons as J. Jonah Jameson!!
    :)
    Then the End Credits!
    Ben Mendelsohn back!
    :)
    Nick Fury in Space!
    Somethings going on!

    I burst out laughing at
    the start
    when they
    played Whitney Houston - I Will Always Love You
    . Link to that if you need it: :)Link to youtube


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Right
    So I couldnt have been more bang on about Mysterio or Fury. Hate to say i told ya so..... (but im rarely right about pre-movie predictions so i shall savour this one)

    Movie was grand. Missing some of the charm of the first one. Felt a bit rushed rather than fast paced. Spiderman felt kind of useless in it as well, for most of the movie. Maybe that was intentional.

    Loved the mysterio spiderman fishbowl scene.

    Love the MJ / Peter interactions.

    Mid credits and post credits scenes worth sticking around for.

    Overall, 3.5 webs out of 5.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,905 ✭✭✭✭Zero-Cool


    Loved it! I was very skeptical but only because Spidey is my fave comic character and spiderman 3 has me nervous for any film that has come out since.

    Highly exceeded my expectations and felt like the film came straight out of a comic, classic Spiderman story, characters, comedy, love story, action scenes etc.

    The mid credits scene might be my favourite of the whole mcu, had me grinning like an eejit.

    2nd half much better than the first half and I CANNOT WAIT for the next one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,576 ✭✭✭bennyl10


    Huge Spider-Man fan, thoroughly enjoyed that! Wonderful wonderful!

    The mid credit scene.. WHAT?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    I really enjoyed. Not sure if I like it as much as Homecoming but it's very enjoyable. I wish they'd found a better way to incorporate Spider-Man into the first few action scenes but I loved all the stuff with Peter and his classmates.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 2,609 Mod ✭✭✭✭horgan_p


    I enjoyed it. Not too heavy which makes a welcome break from endgame.

    Couple of things though :
    Did they just both invent and un-invent the multiverse inth eone film ? they'll realistically have to re-invent it unless they are going to do something really clever with the X-men / Fantastic 4

    I didnt really like the use of the
    Skrulls
    . I thought that was just pure comedy. Also with
    the Skrulls as "good guys"
    have they screwed themselves for
    Secret Invasion
    ?
    JJ Jameson
    though. I had no idea and it made me squeel with delight. Loved this.

    Not too sure about the revelation of
    Peter's identity
    though. It'll be interesting to see how they deal with it.


    I think (hope) that when they announce phase 4 (D23 I presume) a lot of things will become clearer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭Midnight_EG


    That jumped straight into my Top 3 Marvel movies, amazing :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    horgan_p wrote: »
    I enjoyed it. Not too heavy which makes a welcome break from endgame.

    Couple of things though :
    Did they just both invent and un-invent the multiverse inth eone film ? they'll realistically have to re-invent it unless they are going to do something really clever with the X-men / Fantastic 4

    I didnt really like the use of the
    Skrulls
    . I thought that was just pure comedy. Also with
    the Skrulls as "good guys"
    have they screwed themselves for
    Secret Invasion
    ?
    JJ Jameson
    though. I had no idea and it made me squeel with delight. Loved this.

    Not too sure about the revelation of
    Peter's identity
    though. It'll be interesting to see how they deal with it.


    I think (hope) that when they announce phase 4 (D23 I presume) a lot of things will become clearer.
    Multiverse was a red herring, i think. Dont think they were gonna go down that route anyway. They like to keep the science of the MCU fairly straightforward and accessable. Multiverse is inherently complicated as a concept. They could do a house of M with SW, or with the reality stone to get Xmen / FF in, i think

    The skrulls we have seen are good guys. Not to say every Skrull out there is. Same as there are heroes and villains on Earth, i think there will be good and bad Skrulls too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 286 ✭✭abcabc123123


    Enjoyed it but not as much as Homecoming. There was something just a little off about it that I struggle to put my finger on... possibly the pacing or editing, but also the humour. It wasn't used as well in this as in Homecoming, and it fell into the GOTG2 trap at times, undercutting moments of drama with the humour. The supporting cast of school kids were short changed in this as well - Ned in particular serving as little more than over the top comedic sidekick; he served this role in the first one too, but also brought more real teenage struggles in that film, and reacted far more believably to extreme danger than he did in this. Indeed I think that's a recurring problem in this; the way Aunt May and co react to Peter continually risking his life strains credulity.

    Fun though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,681 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    one reviewer said, great characters, great interaction, villain pretty good but that the film was boring , unnecessary humor?

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,207 ✭✭✭hightower1


    Really enjoyed the flick TBH. Felt better than Homecoming IMO. I really felt Peter taking small steps into being more of an adult but not giant leaps into full blown "being a grown up" which was a tricky balancing act.

    Two issues stood out to me though -
    The drones looked nothing like Stark Tech so I found it very difficult to believe he was the source of the movies "McGuffin" as it were.

    Also, there were promises of how they'll address the 5 year time gap - in reality they simply mentioned it twice but that was it. They even went as far as downplaying it to a "blip"? Felt tonally weird considering we opened End Game with a full blown support group full of broken people crying recanting stories during dinner dates and desperate to reach out to others... now everyone's back it's all forgotten and even just called a "blip"?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,905 ✭✭✭✭Zero-Cool


    I'm really glad how the
    multiverse
    and
    blip
    was handled.
    Multiverse would have been so messy and there's no need for them to go down the blip rabbit hole, better to gloss over it and carry on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,910 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Really liked
    how they showed the blip in alternative real life settings such as the Marching band scene
    so there is no multi verse and it was all a lie made up by Mystero ??
    guess were not getting Oscorp or the Osborns in this version of Spider man ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 758 ✭✭✭Somedaythefire


    Zero-Cool wrote: »
    I'm really glad how the
    multiverse
    and
    blip
    was handled.
    Multiverse would have been so messy and there's no need for them to go down the blip rabbit hole, better to gloss over it and carry on.
    Multiverse was essentially explained by the Ancient One in Endgame. They can still use it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭Beric Dondarrion


    Enjoyed it! The
    mid credits scene sets up all sorts of possibilities for future Spider-Man movies - sinister six, spiderverse ,Miles Morales etc

    I thought the level of humour was fine in it too. Nice way to close out the MCU's Phase 3 set of movies too.

    A solid 4 out 5!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,193 ✭✭✭ThePott


    Brief thoughts; Enjoyed it overall, think it came in a bit under Homecoming for me. Thought Mysterio was amazing especially that scene. I did think the film took some time to get going though. Credits scenes were amazing. I'll probably see it again with friends and might do a proper review then.

    Did a little video on the credits scenes here if anyone wants to check it out too :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,992 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    anyone else worried about Jacob Batalon (actor who plays Ned Leeds) health


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,905 ✭✭✭✭Zero-Cool


    Nice easter egg video, riddled with spoilers of course.

    Will spoil the thumbnail just in case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    anyone else worried about Jacob Batalon (actor who plays Ned Leeds) health

    In what sense?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,318 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Baggly wrote: »
    In what sense?
    He is errr "husky"?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,318 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Quick question for anyone who has seen it....no spoilers.
    Are there post credit scenes if so how many?
    Basically how long after the film is done do I need to watch, thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,804 ✭✭✭Sirsok


    Baggly wrote: »
    In what sense?

    I would imagine the fact he is obese, i was looking at press interviews andd i had no idea who he was for awhile with extra weight amd ball head, when i realised who it was i genuinely felt concerned for this guy i dont know.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,467 ✭✭✭5star02707


    gmisk wrote: »
    Quick question for anyone who has seen it....no spoilers.
    Are there post credit scenes if so how many?
    Basically how long after the film is done do I need to watch, thanks

    make sure to stay till the end ;)

    1 mid credit scene
    1 post credit scene


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Oh right. Nope not worried. Not really my concern. Im sure if his health is in jeopardy as a result, he can spend some spiderbucks to lose some weight, should he want to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,318 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    5star02707 wrote: »
    make sure to stay till the end ;)

    1 mid credit scene
    1 post credit scene
    Will do thanks :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Like the very very end. Worth it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,992 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    Baggly wrote: »
    Oh right. Nope not worried. Not really my concern. Im sure if his health is in jeopardy as a result, he can spend some spiderbucks to lose some weight, should he want to.


    give him the extension of his character get him on a regime.


  • Registered Users Posts: 310 ✭✭Ethereal Cereal


    Zero-Cool wrote: »
    I'm really glad how the
    multiverse
    and
    blip
    was handled.
    Multiverse would have been so messy and there's no need for them to go down the blip rabbit hole, better to gloss over it and carry on.

    At what point can we unspoiler this thread?

    I didn't like that they
    glossed over the blip. Took any dramatic impact from these movies for me. The effects of half the population disappearing for 5 years would be beyond catastrophic, but thats just ignored here. They just made light of it by calling it "the blip" rather than "The Decimation", "10/14", "The Snap", "The Dissapearing", etc....

    Example 1: How is air traffic not now more heavily regulated. If 1,250 planes fell from the sky 5 years ago (there are 5,000 planes in the sky at any time. On average, a quarter of these lost both their pilot and their co-pilot), there would be so many checks put in place on future commercial flights, it wouldn’t be viable to fly 30+ school children on a holiday to Europe, yet alone for their parents to be agreeable to send their kids via airtravel.

    Example 2: how was there not more completely ruined buildings in Manhattan from this event, even 5 years later. The rebuild would take decades, if you dont take into account starvation, famine, rioting, looting, lawlessness, government collapse, etc etc.

    I know these movies are meant to be lighthearted, I get that, but then don't wipe out half the population of the universe in a movie. Or if you do, undo it with a time travel handwavey resolution. I'm sure I'll get stick for this opinion, I think I might just be getting too old for the MCU :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    At what point can we unspoiler this thread?

    I didn't like that they
    glossed over the blip. Took any dramatic impact from these movies for me. The effects of half the population disappearing for 5 years would be beyond catastrophic, but thats just ignored here. They just made light of it by calling it "the blip" rather than "The Decimation", "10/14", "The Snap", "The Dissapearing", etc....

    Example 1: How is air traffic not now more heavily regulated. If 1,250 planes fell from the sky 5 years ago (there are 5,000 planes in the sky at any time. On average, a quarter of these lost both their pilot and their co-pilot), there would be so many checks put in place on future commercial flights, it wouldn’t be viable to fly 30+ school children on a holiday to Europe, yet alone for their parents to be agreeable to send their kids via airtravel.

    Example 2: how was there not more completely ruined buildings in Manhattan from this event, even 5 years later. The rebuild would take decades, if you dont take into account starvation, famine, rioting, looting, lawlessness, government collapse, etc etc.

    I know these movies are meant to be lighthearted, I get that, but then don't wipe out half the population of the universe in a movie. Or if you do, undo it with a time travel handwavey resolution. I'm sure I'll get stick for this opinion, I think I might just be getting too old for the MCU :(

    Example 1: what kind of checks?? "I'm sorry, sir, do you have plans to fade into dust during this flight?" How could air traffic possibly count for it?

    Example 2: Did you see Homecoming? There's no way they could have gone from John Hughes teen comedy to The Leftovers, it would completely jar.

    They were never going to address the snap the way you wanted, not in this movie.


  • Registered Users Posts: 758 ✭✭✭Somedaythefire


    At what point can we unspoiler this thread?

    I didn't like that they
    glossed over the blip. Took any dramatic impact from these movies for me. The effects of half the population disappearing for 5 years would be beyond catastrophic, but thats just ignored here. They just made light of it by calling it "the blip" rather than "The Decimation", "10/14", "The Snap", "The Dissapearing", etc....

    Example 1: How is air traffic not now more heavily regulated. If 1,250 planes fell from the sky 5 years ago (there are 5,000 planes in the sky at any time. On average, a quarter of these lost both their pilot and their co-pilot), there would be so many checks put in place on future commercial flights, it wouldn’t be viable to fly 30+ school children on a holiday to Europe, yet alone for their parents to be agreeable to send their kids via airtravel.

    Example 2: how was there not more completely ruined buildings in Manhattan from this event, even 5 years later. The rebuild would take decades, if you dont take into account starvation, famine, rioting, looting, lawlessness, government collapse, etc etc.

    I know these movies are meant to be lighthearted, I get that, but then don't wipe out half the population of the universe in a movie. Or if you do, undo it with a time travel handwavey resolution. I'm sure I'll get stick for this opinion, I think I might just be getting too old for the MCU :(
    No, you're not. These Spider-Man films are just badly written.


  • Registered Users Posts: 310 ✭✭Ethereal Cereal


    FunLover18 wrote: »
    Example 1: what kind of checks?? "I'm sorry, sir, do you have plans to fade into dust during this flight?" How could air traffic possibly count for it?

    Example 2: Did you see Homecoming? There's no way they could have gone from John Hughes teen comedy to The Leftovers, it would completely jar.

    They were never going to address the snap the way you wanted, not in this movie.

    Example 1:

    Just off the top of my head:

    Increased precautions in all airplanes that should another snap level event occur there would be technical safety implementations to minimise causalities on the ground and in the plane.

    Highly essential only air travel. Where possibly use technical conferencing tools to work globally, minimise vacation travel, where possibe use ferry travel

    etc. etc.

    Example 2:
    Yes,I've seen it. Both these movies exist in a shared universe. While the movies may thematically be differing, they can not ignore major events from other movies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    Example 1:

    Just off the top of my head:

    Increased precautions in all airplanes that should another snap level event occur there would be technical safety implementations to minimise causalities on the ground and in the plane.

    Highly essential only air travel. Where possibly use technical conferencing tools to work globally, minimise vacation travel, where possibe use ferry travel

    etc. etc.

    Example 2:
    Yes,I've seen it. Both these movies exist in a shared universe. While the movies may thematically be differing, they can not ignore major events from other movies.


    Apologies for the tone of my original response, it was unnecessarily snarky.

    I don't think it's possible to address the snap in the way you would have like in a two hour movie. The vast majority of the audience just don't care about all that minute detail. It would have dragged the narrative down trying to shoehorn in references to all the changes and it would have added unnucessary cost to the production budget to show the level of destruction you believe the snap would have caused. They do reference the massive homeless crisis caused but in reality you'd need a TV show to address the fallout, maybe we'll get that on Disney+.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement