Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ulster Team Talk Thread IV... Go On My Henderson...

14546485051210

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Agreed. Anyway, Ulster vs Dragons...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,024 ✭✭✭bayern


    Agreed. Anyway, Ulster vs Dragons...

    any chance Sexton plays?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭kingofthekong


    bayern wrote: »
    any chance Sexton plays?

    A lot of hype around Sexton, is he actually deserving of it? or is it just because of his sprinting backround?

    serious question i've never seen him play,

    But not even guys like Lyttle whos outstanding got talked about as much as Sexton who hasnt really done anything yet...


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭kingofthekong


    bayern wrote: »
    all are ex-leinster underage, some ex-academy bar O'Sullivan..

    Leinster squad is meant to be leinster academy & senior players but given injuries they can't field.

    Yep have been through the Leinster system bar O'sullivan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,812 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    A lot of hype around Sexton, is he actually deserving of it? or is it just because of his sprinting backround?

    serious question i've never seen him play,

    But not even guys like Lyttle whos outstanding got talked about as much as Sexton who hasnt really done anything yet...


    Sexton scored 7 tries in 5 games (I think) for the Ulster A team as a 17/18 year old schoolboy so he clearly has potential.

    I think he played a bit at 10 at school for what its worth. Again...schoolboy rugby is all well and good...but he seems to be more than just a fast runner.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Agreed. Anyway, Ulster vs Dragons...

    Just had a week off, now we have 6 weeks of rugby (+euro?). Still have a reasonably strong squad in comparison to some other teams over international window.

    Would maybe roll the dice a little more with the Dragons at home and have a stronger bench.


  • Registered Users Posts: 569 ✭✭✭Hands Like Flippers


    bayern wrote: »
    any chance Sexton plays?

    Nope


  • Registered Users Posts: 569 ✭✭✭Hands Like Flippers


    A lot of hype around Sexton, is he actually deserving of it? or is it just because of his sprinting backround?

    serious question i've never seen him play,

    But not even guys like Lyttle whos outstanding got talked about as much as Sexton who hasnt really done anything yet...

    Definitely has some super strengths but maybe wait and see a bit longer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Would rest Coetzee, start Lowry and McCann or Rea. Maybe start Milasinovich. Treadwell deserves a start over Carter. Continue with Moore and Hume.

    Ludik looks done - can anyone else play 15 to let Lowry start at ten? Faddes? Madigan?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Would rest Coetzee, start Lowry and McCann or Rea. Maybe start Milasinovich. Treadwell deserves a start over Carter. Continue with Moore and Hume.

    Ludik looks done - can anyone else play 15 to let Lowry start at ten? Faddes? Madigan?

    Wouldn’t mind seeing a Reidy, Murphy, Allison backrow. With Coetzee (used depending on score), Rea/McCann, Treadwell on bench to add some tempo from bench.

    Can’t decide about loosehead to Stick with Mcgrath/O’Sullivan or go with a O’Sullivan (60Mins+) then blood Reid. Really depends how much risk we take with back row.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    I don't think we ca go too biccies. I'd rather have experienced heads on the bench in case a rescue is required. Personally, I'm not sure why McGrath is starting ahead of O'Sullivan generally.

    I'm not sure what the crack is with Murphy. But I would be a bit concerned by a Rea Sr - Reidy - Allison backrow. Maybe that's not fair - Rea Sr is our first choice blindside now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    I don't think we ca go too biccies. I'd rather have experienced heads on the bench in case a rescue is required. Personally, I'm not sure why McGrath is starting ahead of O'Sullivan generally.

    I'm not sure what the crack is with Murphy. But I would be a bit concerned by a Rea Sr - Reidy - Allison backrow. Maybe that's not fair - Rea Sr is our first choice blindside now.

    Agree with the rescue plan, few changes to starters with a few big hitters for a rescue.

    Not sure Murphy has been right since that HIA, so few weeks of would of done him good! Just think against the dragons we might need Reidys work rate, especially if Coetzee is rested.

    A backrow of Reidy, Timoney, Murphy in the past would of been expected to compete against the Dragons and win.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,340 ✭✭✭Locke_Lamora


    launish116 wrote: »
    Wouldn’t mind seeing a Reidy, Murphy, Allison backrow. With Coetzee (used depending on score), Rea/McCann, Treadwell on bench to add some tempo from bench.

    Can’t decide about loosehead to Stick with Mcgrath/O’Sullivan or go with a O’Sullivan (60Mins+) then blood Reid. Really depends how much risk we take with back row.

    I like the look of that. Allison was up and running in the sevens and Rea + McCann got their minutes already, so I wonder if he's in line for a game. Might start Coetzee as we've had a week off but there is a run of games coming up and I guess it just depends which teams we want him playing against the most.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,812 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    I wouldn't be resting Coetzee...he could be gone until Christmas very soon, plus he just had a week off.

    First choice props, McBurney at Hooker, Super Al and Treaders in the row. Coetzee at 8, bring Jordi back, and maybe rest Matty Rea and start Reidy at 6.or possibly even Greg Jones. I'd have Allison on the bench to get him 20 minutes.

    Cooney at 9, its probably Bill Johnston's turn to start at 10. I wonder if McCloskey will be available? Either him or Moore at 12. Hume at 13. Lyttle and Gilroy on the wings and I'd maybe have a look at Madigan at FB.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    bilston wrote: »
    I wouldn't be resting Coetzee...he could be gone until Christmas very soon, plus he just had a week off.

    First choice props, McBurney at Hooker, Super Al and Treaders in the row. Coetzee at 8, bring Jordi back, and maybe rest Matty Rea and start Reidy at 6.or possibly even Greg Jones. I'd have Allison on the bench to get him 20 minutes.

    Cooney at 9, its probably Bill Johnston's turn to start at 10. I wonder if McCloskey will be available? Either him or Moore at 12. Hume at 13. Lyttle and Gilroy on the wings and I'd maybe have a look at Madigan at FB.

    To be fair never even considered Coetzee being called up. McCloskey being back could really help the case for academy backrowers getting abit more game time.

    Would Milasonvich maybe get the nod to start, in case Moore gets called up for Ireland in next few weeks? He needs game time and brought up to speed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    A lot of hype around Sexton, is he actually deserving of it? or is it just because of his sprinting backround?

    serious question i've never seen him play,

    But not even guys like Lyttle whos outstanding got talked about as much as Sexton who hasnt really done anything yet...


    Sexton is a big guy who does this.


    He ran the 100m in an astounding 10.49 seconds and followed it up with another Ulster schools' best time of 21.20 seconds in the 200m. He has gone faster than that in the 200m, clocking a time of 21.06 at the World U20 Championship last year.


    One thing that can't be coached is pace like that. Imagine the hype if he played at Leinster.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    jacothelad wrote: »

    One thing that can't be coached is pace like that. Imagine the hype if he played at Leinster.

    I’m looking forward to seeing him coming of the bench against a tiring team with space opening up.


  • Administrators Posts: 54,091 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    jacothelad wrote: »
    Sexton is a big guy who does this.


    He ran the 100m in an astounding 10.49 seconds and followed it up with another Ulster schools' best time of 21.20 seconds in the 200m. He has gone faster than that in the 200m, clocking a time of 21.06 at the World U20 Championship last year.


    One thing that can't be coached is pace like that. Imagine the hype if he played at Leinster.
    launish116 wrote: »
    I’m looking forward to seeing him coming of the bench against a tiring team with space opening up.

    All Sexton has to do is find a forward that he can beat on the outside and the southern rugby media will have him labelled as the greatest thing since sliced bread*.

    * this may only happen to Leinster players.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Yeah, I'd forgotten about Coetzee being called up as well. But my wanting to "rest" him was poorly phrased regardless - it's more about getting McCann, ReaJ or Allison more embedded in the team.

    To be honest, I'd forgotten about Timoney, which pretty unfair given what a stalwart he's been over the previous couple of seasons.

    All the Dragons' talk about coming over and beating Leinster was bullish and way off, but I am concerned that they're not the walkovers they have been.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sport/rugby/ulster-rugby/ulsters-young-midfield-pair-have-proven-quality-ahead-of-jamie-roberts-test-says-dwayne-peel-39649067.html

    Marshall and Billy Burns back in training as of yesterday. Name checks Stewart Moore, Hume and Lowry as "ready to step up".


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sport/rugby/ulster-rugby/ulsters-young-midfield-pair-have-proven-quality-ahead-of-jamie-roberts-test-says-dwayne-peel-39649067.html

    Marshall and Billy Burns back in training as of yesterday. Name checks Stewart Moore, Hume and Lowry as "ready to step up".

    Marshall could of been handy. Roberts could give us a few issues in midfield if it’s a Lowry, Stewart, Hume, partnership.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Yeah, I might have Lowry at fifteen. Roberts is still a beast, and there's not much experience between 10-12 with Lowry and Moore.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Yeah, I might have Lowry at fifteen. Roberts is still a beast, and there's not much experience between 10-12 with Lowry and Moore.

    No doubting them going forwards, be just worried defending. Would expect Roberts to be used to grab a foot hold and set some go forward.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,812 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Not sure I'd be keen to split up the Moore/Hume partnership, but then I think we've games every week for a while now, so they will have to do it at some point.

    McCloskey could yet be available as well.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,812 ✭✭✭✭bilston



    It probably wouldn't have been a good look given the situation at present, but as I've said before I was at the game two weeks ago and it felt perfectly safe to me...a lot safer than Tescos or any other shop I've been in recently.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,340 ✭✭✭Locke_Lamora


    bilston wrote: »
    It probably wouldn't have been a good look given the situation at present, but as I've said before I was at the game two weeks ago and it felt perfectly safe to me...a lot safer than Tescos or any other shop I've been in recently.

    Obviously social distancing rules could be better enforced in shops, but I think the main point is that a trip to watch the rugby is an entirely unnecessary risk (unlike shopping), and the lockdown is supposed to be minimising this. Some people might be alright with taking that risk, but a pandemic is a social issue and it affects everyone else - going to a rugby match requires travel and encourages friends to meet up (despite not being allowed to), both of which facilitates the spreading of the virus.

    If kind of waffling on but we can't think of just going to a rugby match as a singular event that seems safe enough. Keep in mind that everyone in the country has an event they'd like to just pop out to each week and things don't seem too safe again.

    Anyway, I've got confidence that our squad is strong enough to deal with the dragons...I'm less confident about our government and the virus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,812 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Obviously social distancing rules could be better enforced in shops, but I think the main point is that a trip to watch the rugby is an entirely unnecessary risk (unlike shopping), and the lockdown is supposed to be minimising this. Some people might be alright with taking that risk, but a pandemic is a social issue and it affects everyone else - going to a rugby match requires travel and encourages friends to meet up (despite not being allowed to), both of which facilitates the spreading of the virus.

    If kind of waffling on but we can't think of just going to a rugby match as a singular event that seems safe enough. Keep in mind that everyone in the country has an event they'd like to just pop out to each week and things don't seem too safe again.

    Anyway, I've got confidence that our squad is strong enough to deal with the dragons...I'm less confident about our government and the virus.

    I'm not denying all that

    Anyway as you say just hope Ulster get 5 points on Sunday


  • Registered Users Posts: 569 ✭✭✭Hands Like Flippers


    Obviously social distancing rules could be better enforced in shops, but I think the main point is that a trip to watch the rugby is an entirely unnecessary risk (unlike shopping), and the lockdown is supposed to be minimising this. Some people might be alright with taking that risk, but a pandemic is a social issue and it affects everyone else - going to a rugby match requires travel and encourages friends to meet up (despite not being allowed to), both of which facilitates the spreading of the virus.

    If kind of waffling on but we can't think of just going to a rugby match as a singular event that seems safe enough. Keep in mind that everyone in the country has an event they'd like to just pop out to each week and things don't seem too safe again.

    Anyway, I've got confidence that our squad is strong enough to deal with the dragons...I'm less confident about our government and the virus.

    I can't understand people just giving up on all normal life including this sort of thing. The IRFU and UR are going well beyond Govn requirements and being very careful in training etc etc. No evidence that I know of saying watching UR last game was spreading virus.

    "Not a good look" etc is all part of the same mindset. Freedoms easily given up will be hard to regain. Schools clubs etc will be lucky to have any kind of season if we all go above and beyond what the Govn is asking.

    Obviously anyone who is nervous or chooses to shield can stay home as they see fit.

    Very disappointing decision.

    A family member plays at a good level and is very depressed about it all. Can see a lot of guys packing it in. Hearing reports of school coaching staff quite enjoying not having to stay after school to coach and regaining their time on Saturday mornings. Friend at 1 of the big 3 rugby schools in Belfast reckons he won't get all his coaches back now. Ballynahinch head coach packed it in earlier than planned last week. I can see the sport really suffering for an illness that barely affects the u40's who are statistically more likely to die in an accident.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    bilston wrote: »
    It probably wouldn't have been a good look given the situation at present, but as I've said before I was at the game two weeks ago and it felt perfectly safe to me...a lot safer than Tescos or any other shop I've been in recently.

    I don't think the actual match is the issue

    Locally in Dublin parents on school run are hanging around chatting in groups of 5-10

    Group training has gone to one parent bringing multiple kids to/from at local GAA club. No masks being worn

    HSE contact tracing made 23000 calls last week. How many of those are actually following isolation guidelines? Dungarvan GAA, Fermanagh (?) I think also. The Garda at the Dullard Press conference

    Only 50% of those who take a test as a result of being a close contact return for the 2nd test 7 days later. They have a 2% positivity rate. So if they aren't self isolating according to guidelines.

    I was on a bus to work yesterday morning. About 12 people on it (7am). I counted 7 or 8 with the mask not even covering their mouths properly.


    Everything that increases close contacts numbers is now a major problem.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    So South Africa aren’t defending the Championship and it’s looking like Coetzee will be available throughout international window, News Letter reporting.

    Dragons have lost 5 to Wales, with fullback Holmes returning and now available.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,812 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    launish116 wrote: »
    So South Africa aren’t defending the Championship and it’s looking like Coetzee will be available throughout international window, News Letter reporting.

    Dragons have lost 5 to Wales, with fullback Holmes returning and now available.

    Could give Coetzee a week off I suppose. Cardiff away (randomly at 6.15 on Mon 2nd November) is up next where we will definitely need him. But if Coetzee doesn't play against the Dragons then Murphy probably needs to come back in.

    Shame about the Springboks though, but good news for Ulster...and Munster...


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    bilston wrote: »
    Could give Coetzee a week off I suppose. Cardiff away (randomly at 6.15 on Mon 2nd November) is up next where we will definitely need him. But if Coetzee doesn't play against the Dragons then Murphy probably needs to come back in.

    Shame about the Springboks though, but good news for Ulster...and Munster...

    Dragons & Zebre are two games we could potentially rest Coetzee, without flogging for 6 straight. Having McCloskey for Sunday would really help.

    Would love to see 6/2 split

    1. McGrath
    2. McBurney
    3. Milasonovich
    4. Alan O’Connor
    5. Tread well
    6. McCann
    7. Murphy
    8. Coetzee
    9. Cooney
    10. Lowry > Johnston
    11. Little
    12. McCloskey > Stewart
    13. Hume
    14. Gilroy
    15. Madigan > Faddes

    16. O’Sullivan (If he starts, bench Reid 20mins)
    17. Andrew
    18. Moore
    19. Carter
    20. Reidy (2nd half @ 6)
    21. Allison (last 20-25 mins @ 8)
    22. Mathewson
    23. Faddes

    Think 10 & 15 could dictate the team. Appreciate a lot of academy there. Biggest concern would be that 12 channel against Roberts! Not a lot of experience without McCloskey. If we go for a 5/3 split bring sexton on to bench.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭kingofthekong


    launish116 wrote: »
    Dragons & Zebre are two games we could potentially rest Coetzee, without flogging for 6 straight. Having McCloskey for Sunday would really help.

    Would love to see 6/2 split

    1. McGrath
    2. McBurney
    3. Milasonovich
    4. Alan O’Connor
    5. Tread well
    6. McCann
    7. Murphy
    8. Coetzee
    9. Cooney
    10. Lowry > Johnston
    11. Little
    12. McCloskey > Stewart
    13. Hume
    14. Gilroy
    15. Madigan > Faddes

    16. O’Sullivan (If he starts, bench Reid 20mins)
    17. Andrew
    18. Moore
    19. Carter
    20. Reidy (2nd half @ 6)
    21. Allison (last 20-25 mins @ 8)
    22. Mathewson
    23. Faddes

    Think 10 & 15 could dictate the team. Appreciate a lot of academy there. Biggest concern would be that 12 channel against Roberts! Not a lot of experience without McCloskey. If we go for a 5/3 split bring sexton on to bench.

    Roberts is not the biggest issue for Ulster, Roberts is a fraction of the player he was and did a total of sweet damn all against an 85kg Timmy O'brien for 70 minutes againste Leinster- ulster shouldnt be worried about a young gun like Moore going up against an aged Roberts on his last couple seasons of pro rugby - this is the exact kind of growth and learning experience you want him to have...against an old wise head like Roberts, but hardly a terrifying prospect that he should be shielded from


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,024 ✭✭✭bayern


    Roberts is not the biggest issue for Ulster, Roberts is a fraction of the player he was and did a total of sweet damn all against an 85kg Timmy O'brien for 70 minutes againste Leinster- ulster shouldnt be worried about a young gun like Moore going up against an aged Roberts on his last couple seasons of pro rugby - this is the exact kind of growth and learning experience you want him to have...against an old wise head like Roberts, but hardly a terrifying prospect that he should be shielded from

    Tommy O'Brien is not 85kg


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭kingofthekong


    bayern wrote: »
    Tommy O'Brien is not 85kg

    Regularly seen him in person I'd be extremely skeptical about his Leinster profile listing of 95kg which i doubt hes even close to,

    Still doesnt change my point in the slightest of trying to shield S.Moore who is the same size as T.o'BRIEN from an aged Jaime Roberts


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,710 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    Regularly seen him in person I'd be extremely skeptical about his Leinster profile listing of 95kg which i doubt hes even close to,

    Still doesnt change my point in the slightest of trying to shield S.Moore who is the same size as T.o'BRIEN from an aged Jaime Roberts

    No way he's 95. But definitely more than 85 alright.

    Given he's 6'0" I reckon he's at about 90. Similar frame to Keenan and that's what Keenan is billed as


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭kingofthekong


    No way he's 95. But definitely more than 85 alright.

    Given he's 6'0" I reckon he's at about 90. Similar frame to Keenan and that's what Keenan is billed as

    yep about that Mullens Billed ad 90 and so is Frawley, here is is with both of those:

    ?width=630&version=3331015


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,812 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    No team announcement yet?

    Normally at 12 the day before (Friday for a Sunday match)
    ..I don't like change!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    bilston wrote: »
    No team announcement yet?

    Normally at 12 the day before (Friday for a Sunday match)
    ..I don't like change!

    Was wondering that also


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Bit of press for ReaJea over the last day or so wouldn't be surprised to see him start again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Bit of press for ReaJea over the last day or so wouldn't be surprised to see him start again.

    Treadwell also.

    In fairness Rea Jnr looked eager and aggressive.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Have been doing a bit of thinking this morning. (Unprecedented times, unprecedented measures.)

    I watched a toothless Scarlets struggle against the absolute bare bones of a Treviso team last night.

    We were finalists last season in the ProWhatever, and during this international window (which runs for over a month, am I right?) we are missing no more than four players to international call ups. Less than the Dragons.is there any other team less impacted?

    I have been saying for the last week that I want to see young lads bedded in. And I still think that's critical... But what an opportunity to try and establish an early lead in the league. Personally, I think it's a mistake not having Cooney in camp, and I'd also make the case for EOS. But as long as they're home with us... We should be pushing to absolutely maximise our points over the next month and a half.

    We're away to Cardiff on the 2.11, at home to Glasgow the 9.11, away to Zebre on 16.11, away to Scarlets 22.11, and at home to Edinburgh 30.11. That could be quite the run. Go much more locked and loaded against Cardiff, Glasgow and Edinburgh, we still get to let a younger team have a crack at Zebre. If we're canny, we could make a real push. Especially with Burns, Marshall and TOT at least returning from injury.

    I'll say it again though, we need Lewis Finlay to be there or thereabouts at the end of this season. Otherwise, that's a crucial area where we haven't progressed. Anyway, team at 12:00.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,340 ✭✭✭Locke_Lamora


    I'll say it again though, we need Lewis Finlay to be there or thereabouts at the end of this season. Otherwise, that's a crucial area where we haven't progressed. Anyway, team at 12:00.

    Half-back stocks are looking a little problematic aren't they? Don't see Matthewson staying another year, and I'd be worried if we go into next season with Shanahan as our main back-up scrumhalf.

    Johnston doesn't seem to be highly thought of by the coaches as they parachuted Madigan in, Lowry is probably too small, and Burns is inconsistent. Houston the only academy fly half and I'm uncertain he has a future here tbh.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Half-back stocks are looking a little problematic aren't they? Don't see Matthewson staying another year, and I'd be worried if we go into next season with Shanahan as our main back-up scrumhalf.

    Johnston doesn't seem to be highly thought of by the coaches as they parachuted Madigan in, Lowry is probably too small, and Burns is inconsistent. Houston the only academy fly half and I'm uncertain he has a future here tbh.

    Less worried about outhalf. I think Madigan's there to allow Johnston and Lowry to grow into it over this year. For Lowry, that's already started to happen (he might be too small at international level, but club level I'd be markedly less concerned). But we'd already be better off there than when Madigan arrived. Not so at nine.


  • Administrators Posts: 54,091 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    There are no excuses for Ulster not to rack up the points during the international window.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Ulster team to play Dragons, Guinness PRO14 Round 3, Sunday 25 October 2020, at Kingspan Stadium (kick-off 3pm, live on Premier Sports):

    (15-9) Rob Lyttle, Matt Faddes, James Hume, Stewart Moore, Louis Ludik, Ian Madigan, John Cooney.

    (1-8) Eric O’Sullivan, John Andrew, Marty Moore, Alan O’Connor, Sam Carter (Capt.), Sean Reidy, Jordi Murphy, Marcell Coetzee.

    Replacements: Adam McBurney, Kyle McCall, Ross Kane, Kieran Treadwell, Nick Timoney, David Shanahan, Bill Johnston, Michael Lowry.

    Disappointed, honestly. Five points should be possible, though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Lyttle at fullback.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Ulster team to play Dragons, Guinness PRO14 Round 3, Sunday 25 October 2020, at Kingspan Stadium (kick-off 3pm, live on Premier Sports):

    (15-9) Rob Lyttle, Matt Faddes, James Hume, Stewart Moore, Louis Ludik, Ian Madigan, John Cooney.

    (1-8) Eric O’Sullivan, John Andrew, Marty Moore, Alan O’Connor, Sam Carter (Capt.), Sean Reidy, Jordi Murphy, Marcell Coetzee.

    Replacements: Adam McBurney, Kyle McCall, Ross Kane, Kieran Treadwell, Nick Timoney, David Shanahan, Bill Johnston, Michael Lowry.

    Disappointed, honestly. Five points should be possible, though.

    Also disappointed no youth getting an opportunity.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    launish116 wrote: »
    Also disappointed no youth getting an opportunity.

    I was about to post "completely agree"... But then Stewart Moore is on his third cap, I think. It is possible we're being... hypercritical?

    This approach will be worth it if we come away with five points.

    Let's see what Lyttle's like at FB. And please, if Carter doesn't stand out, as a multi-capped Ozzie international against the Dragons, can we please just start Treadwell in the future?


Advertisement