Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

No one slags off Vladimir... Opposition Leader Shot Dead.

13567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,782 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Russian state pointing blame at Islamic extremists, or people linked to the Ukrainian conflict.
    Putin deeply upset by his murder...yeah we believe that...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    In fairness, and despite the alarming rise of Putinocracy, Russia has still come a long way since the Communist era. Thirty years ago we would never have heard of such a murder, unless from a defector, there would be no such thing as an opposition leader.

    And now there is no such thing as an opposition leader. That's the point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭Gringo180


    You made a statement that was wrong Russia started at least two wars

    Let's take Russia invading Afghanistan that led to the taliban and left the country in a mess, perfect for bin Laden. Between the us and Russia there is wrong on both sides but come on anybody who crosses Putin ends up dead, it's not the tooth fairy doing it.

    Hold on a minute, your hardly blaming the Russians on Bin Laden are you? Don't forget who armed him and sent him to Afghanistan in the first place


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 415 ✭✭Alexis Sanchez


    Gringo180 wrote: »
    Hold on a minute, your hardly blaming the Russians on Bin Laden are you? Don't forget who armed him and sent him to Afghanistan in the first place

    They wouldn't have armed him if the Soviets didn't invade Afghanistan in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭Gringo180


    They wouldn't have armed him if the Soviets didn't invade Afghanistan in the first place.


    The Soviets invaded Afghanistan so they could rule them by proxy, exactly what the U.S has done and is trying to do all over the middle east.

    As I have said I am no fan of Putin but he is nowhere as near as bad as the likes of Bush, Blair, or Nethanyahu, yet the mainstream western don't slate these 3 as much as Putin.

    I would have Putin on the same level as Obama who is perhaps the most lawless president the U.S have ever had.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    Gringo180 wrote: »
    Okay I accept that. But lets get back to the hypocrisy of it all. Western powers are in outrage as Russia annexes part of Ukraine, meanwhile a few thousand miles away the state of Israel continue to annex and illegally build on another peoples land, with wait for it, the support of the same people who are in outcry at the Russians. It just doesn't make sense to me :confused:

    I for one am opposed to both. You could turn that argument around and ask why israeli invasions of other people's lands gets such antipathy from people ok with Russia.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    Gringo180 wrote: »
    The Soviets invaded Afghanistan so they could rule them by proxy, exactly what the U.S has done and is trying to do all over the middle east.

    As I have said I am no fan of Putin but he is nowhere as near as bad as the likes of Bush, Blair, or Nethanyahu, yet the mainstream western don't slate these 3 as much as Putin.

    I would have Putin on the same level as Obama who is perhaps the most lawless president the U.S have ever had.

    Obama is shooting opposition leaders now?

    You are right that the US is a bully externally. Internally some kind of rule of law exists.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭Gringo180


    I for one am opposed to both. You could turn that argument around and ask why israeli invasions of other people's lands gets such antipathy from people ok with Russia.

    I would think because the Russians don't massacre 1000s of innocent civilians in the process.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6 jackdempsey1


    love Putin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭Gringo180


    Obama is shooting opposition leaders now?

    No but he has violated and thrashed the 4th amendment of the American constitution by illegally spying and gathering online data of 100s of millions of innocent Americans and also spying in on almost everybody on the planet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭pueblo


    and it couldn't possibly have been the CIA...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,039 ✭✭✭B_Wayne


    pueblo wrote: »
    and it couldn't possibly have been the CIA...

    Ah the false flag folk have arrived..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Gringo180 wrote: »
    Hold on a minute, your hardly blaming the Russians on Bin Laden are you? Don't forget who armed him and sent him to Afghanistan in the first place

    That's not true for a Start .

    Bin Laden certainly wasn't trained or armed by any part of the US armed services


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Gringo180 wrote: »
    I would think because the Russians don't massacre 1000s of innocent civilians in the process.
    Chechnya and Afghanistan!!??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,598 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    Sickening needless murder. I'm not going to rush in and blame Putin, however, as I'm finding it hard to read an angle on this.

    Nemtsov, whilst a critic of Putin, didn't enjoy huge support so I'm finding it hard to see why Putin would wipe him out and bring more heat on the Kremlin.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,133 ✭✭✭Shurimgreat


    What is most alarming about these killings and persecution of the opposition in Russia is the general public by and large couldn't give a sh*t. As long as Putin holds the country together the people are happy and if the opposition suffers, who cares. I suppose they have learned not to ask difficult questions. The country really has retreated to the bad old days where you kept your mouth shut.

    Interesting to see Putin fans out this morning such as Egginacup to defend him to the hilt. I wonder what he'd have to do before they'd turn on him.

    Putin has powerful friends and I wouldn't be surprised if one or two of them wanted this critic bumped off because of this in particular.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/vladimir-putin/10581829/Sochi-Olympics-Nothing-but-a-monstrous-scam-says-Kremlin-critic.html

    Its also funny to see how the left in Ireland and elsewhere love Putin, and yet income inequality in Russia is the worst in the world. I guess the further left someone goes, the nearer to far right capitalists they actually become!
    And the statistics paint a disturbing portrait of Putin's Russia. In a report last year, the financial-services company Credit Suisse labelled wealth inequality in Russia the highest in the world, with the exception of Caribbean islands with resident billionaires.

    "Worldwide, billionaires collectively account for 1 – 2 per cent of total household wealth; in Russia today 110 billionaires own 35 per cent of all wealth," the Swiss company reported.

    Compare this with the situation in some of Russia's neglected regions, such as the southern republic of Kalmykia, where average salaries are £300 a month, around twice as low as in the capital, Moscow.

    The problem of wealth inequality pales, however, when compared to Russia's apocalyptic HIV infection rates. An estimated 1.3 million people are estimated to be living with HIV in the country, the highest number in the world outside Africa and India.

    In one Russian region, the South Urals, health officials reported last year that 11 per cent of all pregnant women were testing HIV positive.

    The World Bank estimates that Russia will need to spend at least £1.5 billion a year to stem the rapid rise in HIV infections. However, in 2013, the Kremlin allocated just £360 million on HIV treatment and testing. That's around 80 times less than Mr Putin has lavished on the Sochi Olympics


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Aidric wrote: »
    Sickening needless murder. I'm not going to rush in and blame Putin, however, as I'm finding it hard to read an angle on this.

    Nemtsov, whilst a critic of Putin, didn't enjoy huge support so I'm finding it hard to see why Putin would wipe him out and bring more heat on the Kremlin.
    Doesn't necessarily have to be Putin directly involved. Countries suffering poor economic conditions often become highly nationalistic, as politicians are great at blaming external issues and other countries for their woes.

    Coupled with strongly pro-Putin propaganda flying around 24x7, it means the only thing that comes out of Russia which probably isn't bull**** are the 80%+ approval ratings enjoyed by Putin.

    Thus, those in opposition are not only at risk from Putin, but also from highly nationalist and pro-Putin fringe groups who are so close to deifying him that they believe anyone opposing him should be killed.

    He already has an effective dictatorship, the only thing he now requires is an "emergency" to get the state to install him as the permanent head of state in order to keep the country "stable" while it deals with this "emergency". The UN or US intervening in Ukraine would probably be good enough.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Aidric wrote: »
    Sickening needless murder. I'm not going to rush in and blame Putin, however, as I'm finding it hard to read an angle on this.

    Nemtsov, whilst a critic of Putin, didn't enjoy huge support so I'm finding it hard to see why Putin would wipe him out and bring more heat on the Kremlin.


    The phemonena of 'working towards the Fuhrer' may be responsible, in that supporters presume it's what Vlad would want, and they do it on their own initiative.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,133 ✭✭✭Shurimgreat


    It's possible that Putin didn't order the killing. It's more probable a friend who wanted to impress him did however. That I imagine is how it worked in the past. That said its hard to dispute he's had a direct hand in a number of these murders.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭pueblo


    B_Wayne wrote: »
    Ah the false flag folk have arrived..

    I'm not a 'false flag folkster(?)' it just seems too clumsy a move even for Putin...

    So you would completely rule out the possibility that this was done to help (further) discredit Putin?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    Gringo180 wrote: »
    I would think because the Russians don't massacre 1000s of innocent civilians in the process.

    Oh I don't think that would stop the adulation. he could kill millions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    What is most alarming about these killings and persecution of the opposition in Russia is the general public by and large couldn't give a sh*t. As long as Putin holds the country together the people are happy and if the opposition suffers, who cares. I suppose they have learned not to ask difficult questions. The country really has retreated to the bad old days where you kept your mouth shut.

    Interesting to see Putin fans out this morning such as Egginacup to defend him to the hilt. I wonder what he'd have to do before they'd turn on him.

    Putin has powerful friends and I wouldn't be surprised if one or two of them wanted this critic bumped off because of this in particular.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/vladimir-putin/10581829/Sochi-Olympics-Nothing-but-a-monstrous-scam-says-Kremlin-critic.html

    Its also funny to see how the left in Ireland and elsewhere love Putin, and yet income inequality in Russia is the worst in the world. I guess the further left someone goes, the nearer to far right capitalists they actually become!

    The adulation for putin often comes from the nationalist right. Putin is seen as a strong nationalist leader unswayed by "cultural Marxism"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭pueblo




  • Posts: 4,824 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    It's sad really when you think about it. Russia was on a trajectory under Gorbachov and even Yeltsin to become a major, normal, open, friendly, progressive country.

    It has (or had as many people are now leaving) loads of technical expertise, loads of potential to harness a combination of things like energy reserves, massively complex aviation and aerospace skills, some of the world's best scientists and engineers in many areas.

    Yeltsin making a complete balls of the economy was rather unfortunate. Economically Putin was something of a stabilising factor in his first two terms; had he retired from public life after that, he'd probably be regarded today funnily enough as the man who rescued Russia! Alas, his ego and thirst for power proved far too great for that. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,598 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    seamus wrote: »
    Thus, those in opposition are not only at risk from Putin, but also from highly nationalist and pro-Putin fringe groups who are so close to deifying him that they believe anyone opposing him should be killed.
    Nodin wrote: »
    The phemonena of 'working towards the Fuhrer' may be responsible, in that supporters presume it's what Vlad would want, and they do it on their own initiative.

    Of course this is a possibility but as with most stories Russia related these days there are so many angles it's hard to form a concrete line.

    I'm just struggling to see an upside for Putin from this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    Aidric wrote: »
    Of course this is a possibility but as with most stories Russia related these days there are so many angles it's hard to form a concrete line.

    I'm just struggling to see an upside for Putin from this.

    What's the downside?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,133 ✭✭✭Shurimgreat


    Killings like this generally happen in very corrupt countries where people need a corrupt leader to stay in control as long as possible.

    Too many oligarchs have got rich and continue to do so under Putin, that they wouldn't actually let him step down even if he wanted to, not that he wants to.

    Corruption and killings of opposition members go hand in hand. Ultimately Putin is to blame.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,133 ✭✭✭Shurimgreat


    What's the downside?

    None. His most strident and eloquent critic has been bumped off. Nothing to touch those 80% approval ratings now. The Russian people who live in an information vacuam around such things as the cost of Sochi will go on believing Putin is great. And he has protected the country from such evils as democracy, free speech, political pluralism and other nasty concepts prevalent in the "weak" west.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭Precious flower


    Can't really see how this is the work of Vladimir Putin. Maybe it is but a shooting seems a messy way to get someone out of the way. Too much media attention and coverage for something like that unless he's making a statement and doesn't care. I feel though that he'd have more intricate, stealthy ways to deal with opposition rather than shooting them right out where a follow up investigation and arrests would be demanded.


Advertisement
Advertisement