Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

new ICBF Proofs

«13456715

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭Farrell


    Does Progressive Genetics not own any of the Bull's on their Beef Catelogue?

    Does anyone know anything about this bull?, as in where can you get him? or was he any good?

    Code Breed Birth year Name Owner Index reliability within breed across breed Index reliability within breed across breed
    AAI CH 2005 ASHLEIGH ADMIRAL EUROGENE/LIC AI BULLS €169 81 5 5 €102 70 5 2.5


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,394 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    About 50rows down in the Dairysheet, there is a bull called s1465, with a production subindex of 266!!!! And Protein of +44kgs! Surely a mistake of some sort??

    The few I use like PBM, KSK and JKF all down 20points or so hmmm. Can't complain hugely though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    I saw that.

    His Protein % has jumped from 0.02 to .55. has to be a typo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    Farrell wrote: »
    Does Progressive Genetics not own any of the Bull's on their Beef Catelogue?

    Does anyone know anything about this bull?, as in where can you get him? or was he any good?

    Code Breed Birth year Name Owner Index reliability within breed across breed Index reliability within breed across breed
    AAI CH 2005 ASHLEIGH ADMIRAL EUROGENE/LIC AI BULLS €169 81 5 5 €102 70 5 2.5


    what makes you say that?

    He's a eurogene bull but I dont think he's available any more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    Proofs are up on bull search now


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭onyerbikepat


    I see that.
    I see that the limousin bull CASTLEVIEW GRINGO ET (GWO) is 6.1% (85% Rel) for calving for 250 calvings. That's not bad considering he is by Vantastic.
    I might be using him this year.:cool: He's a fine looking bull.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 533 ✭✭✭towzer2010


    I see that.
    I see that the limousin bull CASTLEVIEW GRINGO ET (GWO) is 6.1% (85% Rel) for calving for 250 calvings. That's not bad considering he is by Vantastic.
    I might be using him this year.:cool: He's a fine looking bull.

    You wont be sorry. I have a few class calves off him and am using him again this year plus they are the quietest Lims I've ever had.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 858 ✭✭✭tismesoitis


    don't be expecting to get milky females out of vantastic breeding!! milk is definatly not his strong point!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭Greengrass1


    Anyone see YAD? very good fert and milk


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭Farrell


    what makes you say that?

    He's a eurogene bull but I dont think he's available any more.

    He seams to look the part, only a 2005 so thought he should be still around.
    Eurogene rep never heard of him.
    I'd prefer to use instead of alu


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 533 ✭✭✭towzer2010


    Anyone have any calves from the lim bull from dovea kjb?

    Impressive looking bull with good figures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    Farrell wrote: »
    He seams to look the part, only a 2005 so thought he should be still around.
    Eurogene rep never heard of him.
    I'd prefer to use instead of alu

    no why did you say:
    "Does Progressive Genetics not own any of the Bull's on their Beef Catelogue?"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭tanko


    towzer2010 wrote: »
    Anyone have any calves from the lim bull from dovea kjb?

    Impressive looking bull with good figures.

    Haven't seen any calves off him, he looks the business on paper and looks good in the catalogue too. His calving difficulty figure has stayed low also along with good muscle and milk figures.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 533 ✭✭✭towzer2010


    tanko wrote: »
    Haven't seen any calves off him, he looks the business on paper and looks good in the catalogue too. His calving difficulty figure has stayed low also along with good muscle and milk figures.

    Ya he seems to have the whole package. I must see if my AI man has straws. I'll try him if he has.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭tanko


    Lennon frosty (FTY) has impressive figures too, apart from docility. Anyone have any calves off him?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭on the river


    heres some from P.G Facebook

    10013493_808962675798944_2039797696_n.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭onyerbikepat


    I don't get this. Lennon Frosty is by the well known Wilodge Cerberus (WGE).
    Now on the ICBf site. WGE is 18% within breed for docility (92% Rel).
    http://webapp.icbf.com/bull-search/view/700635323

    But according to Basco Data in the UK, he is +2.7 EBV. Not sure of teh exact percentile, but he is about or just above average (50% within breed). At 95% Rel aswell.
    http://www.semenstore.co.uk/limousin/products/wilodge-cerberus.html?section

    How do you explain that one?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭tanko


    The docility figure for FTY has a reliability of 31% so it's only really a guess. I was at a meeting recently where a well known rep from an Ai company said that unless any figure for a bull had a reliability over 90% the figure couldn't really be relied on for sure.
    Reliability is everything with icbf figures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭Farrell


    no why did you say:
    "Does Progressive Genetics not own any of the Bull's on their Beef Catelogue?"
    If you look down the list of Owners, they do not appear on it.
    Most of the other AI companies (Bova, Dova, Sligo, Eurogene) are there


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭vanderbadger


    towzer2010 wrote: »
    Ya he seems to have the whole package. I must see if my AI man has straws. I'll try him if he has.

    going trying him on a nice breeding cow now this evening and hope for a heifer..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    New proofs are up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭tanko


    New proofs are up

    GWO and FTY look very good on paper. Have you seen any calves off them yet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    Only photos. GWO seems to be throwing very good stock and not too hard calved.

    Haven't heard too much about FTY other than he's easy enough calved


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭tanko


    I just had a quick look, is there anything that surprised you on the beef side?


  • Registered Users Posts: 45 friesian13


    when are the ebi profiles goin to be updated?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,552 ✭✭✭stanflt


    friesian13 wrote: »
    when are the ebi profiles goin to be updated?


    Updated already


  • Registered Users Posts: 45 friesian13


    sorry i meant the ebi report for my own herd.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    tanko wrote: »
    I just had a quick look, is there anything that surprised you on the beef side?

    Didn't get to study that closely myself. KYA very good figures for such an easy calving bull

    TVR's calving gone up even higher!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,422 ✭✭✭just do it


    Didn't get to study that closely myself. KYA very good figures for such an easy calving bull

    TVR's calving gone up even higher!

    Went and had alook at those. How can KYA be 5 star terminal within breed and only be 1 star for carcase weight gain and confirmation within breed? Doesn't make sense


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    Calving ease has such a big barring on the stars now


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭onyerbikepat


    ...TVR's calving gone up even higher!
    This is what annoys me about the Limousin Society. Nearly every show has been won by a Vantastic son or daughter. What is the point of promoting such a hard calving bull? :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭tanko


    Calving ease has such a big barring on the stars now

    Yeah, too much of a bearing I think. Calving ease is important but it can influence the terminal and especially the maternal figures.

    What do you think of Fiston bogman?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭tanko


    This is what annoys me about the Limousin Society. Nearly every show has been won by a Vantastic son or daughter. What is the point of promoting such a hard calving bull? :mad:

    Dead right. I didn't hear anyone around the ring at tullamore talking about whether the heifers would have any milk or not.

    In fairness GWO doesn't seem to be hard calving and looks like a very good terminal bull.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,823 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    on dairy side ksk up from 268 to 287
    yad up from 340 to 342
    awb stayed the same at 225
    pbm up from 270 to 272
    psz down from 301 to 280
    abo down from 284 to 276


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    This is what annoys me about the Limousin Society. Nearly every show has been won by a Vantastic son or daughter. What is the point of promoting such a hard calving bull? :mad:

    The same old problem with breed societies; too much focus on the show ring!
    I think the recent wave of British sires being used over here are doing the breed damage.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    tanko wrote: »
    Yeah, too much of a bearing I think. Calving ease is important but it can influence the terminal and especially the maternal figures.

    What do you think of Fiston bogman?

    He's the business. Just looking his figures took a tumble but reliability is still very low. He'll be back up there


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,422 ✭✭✭just do it


    What's fiston's code? There's a load of bulls on icbf called fiston


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    Fsz


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭tanko


    He's the business. Just looking his figures took a tumble but reliability is still very low. He'll be back up there

    I've heard it said that his calves are born small and put on great muscle as they grow. Would you agree?
    Also, what do you think of Cavelands Fenian LZF in comparison to Fiston as regards calving difficulty and calf quality?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭Bodacious


    Fsz


    every man and his dog used fiston this year round here.. lims not making the money in the ring and was a big gap in the market for an easy calved char bull after Pirate.. 2nd calvers, older cows etc all got Fiston this year as opposed to good limo


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭onyerbikepat


    Guys finishing bulls early seemed to prefer Limousins. When the bull trade took a hammering, I guess Chars will be more in favour now. Back to the old 30 Month bullocks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭tanko


    Guys finishing bulls early seemed to prefer Limousins. When the bull trade took a hammering, I guess Chars will be more in favour now. Back to the old 30 Month bullocks.

    I wonder will the lowering of carcase weights count against Charolais cattle from now on tho. They finish best at heavy weights.
    No evidence of this in my local mart, CHX cattle are still the best sellers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,394 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    whelan2 wrote: »
    on dairy side ksk up from 268 to 287
    yad up from 340 to 342
    awb stayed the same at 225
    pbm up from 270 to 272
    psz down from 301 to 280
    abo down from 284 to 276

    PSZ the only one I've lost out on so!

    I used a fair bit of JKF also, he has jumped from 264 to 273.


  • Registered Users Posts: 430 ✭✭Bigbird1


    Used the two new bulls fsz and hzj myself this year,its hard beat the charolais at the end of the day.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭onyerbikepat


    Proofs for Dec 2014 now up on www.icbf.com in Excel format.

    http://www.icbf.com/?page_id=200


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭onyerbikepat


    Just looking through the figures there. The Charolais Cavelands Fenian (LZF) is only 5.5% Calving Difficulty (96% Rel). His weanling Price and Weanling weights look good too. Fiston (FSZ) is 7.1% (97% Rel). Not bad at all.
    On the other hand Inverlochy Gurkha (GKA) is a whopping 19.7% (74% Rel). It just shows how important it is to test a good few bulls together. There will always be good and bad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 651 ✭✭✭Nettleman


    Just looking through the figures there. The Charolais Cavelands Fenian (LZF) is only 5.5% Calving Difficulty (96% Rel). His weanling Price and Weanling weights look good too. Fiston (FSZ) is 7.1% (97% Rel). Not bad at all.
    On the other hand Inverlochy Gurkha (GKA) is a whopping 19.7% (74% Rel). It just shows how important it is to test a good few bulls together. There will always be good and bad.
    +1, I printed off the august ones from website, and hand wrote in the December ratings beside them. there are some serious swings, and I used FSZ last year, and had changed to LZF this year, eventhough I was advised to go with NPP. LGL ratings are getting worse, but some lads put a lot of weight in the looks, while some, like me, put high importance on calving difficulty. Is there any way to see different calving difficulty for cow versus heifer??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭onyerbikepat


    Nettleman wrote: »
    ... Is there any way to see different calving difficulty for cow versus heifer??
    No, not for the latest Excel proofs. You'll have to wait till they are up fully on the site, 22 Dec 2014.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭onyerbikepat


    Full proofs are up now. Must be working overtime at ICBF.:D


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,696 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    Have they shifted the weighting for milk kg? A good few of my cows have gone up.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement