Freeman Megamerge

BlutendeRabe wrote: »

I'm actually a bit concerned that Article 47.2 is being deleted as well.
Most people should especially if they want to have a say on future EU referendums.

Shame that the crazies agree with me.

No more petitions to call for a policy referendum
Article 27 – under which a majority of Senators and one-third of TDs can petition the President and ask him to hold a referendum before legislation is signed – is deleted entirely.

(The reasoning here is that with the Seanad removed, it would only require a third of the Dáil – 53 TDs – to call for a referendum, and that this clause could be abused by an inflexible opposition trying to hamper the government from doing its job.

If the clause was changed so that half of all TDs were needed to sign any such petition, the clause would become redundant – as it would take the power away from the opposition and put it in the hands of the government, which already has that power in the first place.)

A related section – Article 47.2 – is also removed. That section dictates that in a referendum on a Bill called by the President, the No vote needs to be not only a majority of votes cast, but correspond to over a third of the total electorate. The removal of this provision suggests the government is happy for a simple majority to be enough to veto any bill, if it decides that a referendum should be held on passing it.

http://www.thejournal.ie/explainer-changes-seanad-abolished-940035-Jun2013/

Aka Ishur wrote: »

This is what he is talking about I think. Courtesy of google.

http://www.wisegeek.org/what-is-ucc-1-308.htm

It's just an extension of their insanity about everything being a commercial contract, etc., etc. Complete BS.

This is a long post. Sorry. This is another CLS email which is well worth reading. As its not online anywhere (though I can happily take screenshots) I can't really share without copying and pasting - my apologies for that. Anyway, read this and ... Weep?:

A Few Months Back;
we took fleeting interest in a summary (criminal) case (as observers), being heard in the District Court.

The case concerned a Man facing no less than eight (8) charges under various Road Traffic Acts.

Sufficed to say, the case was eventually dismissed and ALL charges therein swiftly were dropped, much to the bewilderment and frustration of An Garda Siochana, the DPP and the State.

How to Cross Examine …

Although the charges being put forward by the Prosecution were quite mundane and uninteresting the manner in which the Defence was conducted was quite refreshingly intriguing. As observers we got quite an insight and education in how to conduct a Defence in such related matters. Since then we have complied copious amounts of notes about this case, and have interviewed the Man himself.

Because we gave him a certain insight and some guidance in his early days, he has agreed that we can co-script a book with him concerning his adventure in the District Court.

Obviously we directed him to read and research a thing called a “Gary Doyle Order”, and we have written an article on this item here:http://www.thecommonlawsociety.com/must_see/WhatYouDontKnow.pdf

We also directed the Man to read critically ALL of the Acts in relation to the charges being brought against him. We gave him some direction on how to conduct his Cross Examination, and explained how important it was to find just ONE LIE in the Garda’s testimony and or statement. The Man went on to study everything that we suggested, leaving absolutely NO stone unturned, and subsequently went on to find not just ONE LIE, but numerous lies, contradictions and anomalies by the Garda concerned.

He also went on to uncover some highly contentious issues surrounding the actual legality and lawfulness of and concerning the Road Traffic Acts themselves, the Court Processes and Procedures, and the acts, behaviours and omissions of the Judiciary themselves.

At the First hearing the Man (Defendant) spent three (3) full hours Cross Examining the Garda concerned, and had notes and questions sufficiently prepared to continue for a further nine (9) or so hours. After the first three (3) hours, the Garda and pretty much the Judge were exasperated, so the Judge adjourned the hearing for another date and time. Five minutes or so into the Second hearing, the Judge began to realise where all this was heading, and decided quite abruptly to Dismiss the case and ALL charges therein.

Although we were happy for the Man, we knew that Justice had not been served.

The problem the Judge faced; whether or not the Garda realised it, the Man (Defendant) was leading the Garda himself to a place, with his questioning, whereby the whole legal and lawful validity of the Road Traffic Acts, and the alleged authority of An Garda Siochana to enforce said Acts would be in question.

The Judge knew it, the Man knew it, the attending audience knew it, but the Garda and his attending Inspector had no idea what was going on, and were stunned, shocked and amazed when the Judge struck the whole case out without explanation.

Suffice to say, there was NO PRESS in attendance in Court on that day.

That day we saw, heard and got “First Hand Knowledge” of how fragile and frail this whole patchwork quilt of legality was and still is. One case could in effect bring this whole legal façade tumbling down. More to the point, what we took from that particular day, was that ANY MAN or ANY WOMAN, with enough Time, Study, Knowledge & Confidence can work miracles, even under the most strained & pressurised of circumstances.

Once is enough to bring this whole mess down.

As we stated earlier, this Man has agreed to co-script a book with us, with a view to shining a very bright light upon a specific number of issues surrounding the State, and the way they go about extracting revenue from, and persecuting People in the Courts in relation to the Road Traffic Acts and other related summary issues.

This book also aims to clarify some of the interdependent relationships that exist between legality, the Law, the People, the Citizens, the Freemen and Sovereign perspectives and philosophies in relation to same. It is a non-partisan view on what happens within the Court system, and what you can do to protect yourself, no matter what perspective you come from. Our aim would be, to have this next book in print prior to Christmas … we have provisionally titled the book “The Gary Doyle Order”. We will update you all in relation to this pretty soon.

Sometimes we share this analogy:
Some People go into Court trying to play a game of “Snakes and Ladders” or even “Drafts”, when in reality the game being played in Court is generally more akin to that of a game of Chess, or the Chinese strategy game called “Go”. If you are playing “Snakes and Ladders” and the Court is playing “Chess”, then as far as the Court are concerned, you are not playing the game by the rules, and you will deemed to be breaking the rules and are in Contempt of the game. Therefore you will go to “Time Out” / Prison, until such time passes that you agree to play by the rules again, or purge your alleged contempt. If you do not agree to purge your alleged contempt, then as far as the game is concerned you will have to stay in “Time out” / Prison, which in effect is a life sentence.

Some of the best lessons are the toughest.

What if you find yourself in “Time Out”? There is very little that you can do to change things yourself. The People on the side-lines or that are not in “Time Out”, can of course direct the Court to bring you forward again, to readdress any perceived wrongs or breaches. But unless you are prepared to agree to play by their rules, or purge the alleged contempt, then you will go back into “Time Out”.

Remember: That choice always remains yours.

My preference would be, circumstance depending of course; to seek to purge any perceived or alleged contempt. That way, my Partner is far less annoyed with me, and my Family and Friends are far less perturbed about my circumstances and conditions. It also means more time with the books, and being in a more comfortable setting to research the law, & less time being locked away in a cold cell, and being isolated from a support structure.

On another note … some really great news to share:

In recent weeks we have had a massive success in the High Courts, whereby a Judge has found AGAINST a Bank as the Plaintiff, & for and in favour of a MAN as the Defendant, whose home the Bank were attempting to steal. The initial Order for Possession was Struck Out on appeal, and the Bank walked away with their tail between their legs. The Judge also found that the Bank and their agents had Misrepresented (lied) the facts, and did bring the Court into Disrepute. The Bank LIED about assigning/selling/securitizing the Mortgage/Contract.

A Win is a Win …

In relation to the above notes … The Common Law Society will be facilitating a one day School of Commonology, which aims to examine these issues and matters. In both cases, “the wins”, came down to the ability of the People involved; being able to Critically examine and study the law, submit appropriate legal paperwork, and being in a position to confidently prepare and Cross Examine the Plaintiff or the Accuser. Obviously we would love to share this information and education with as many People as possible.

Brief Outline of Day:

The areas that we would aim to deal with on the day are as follows: Dealing with Summons, Appearances, Defences, Affidavits & Statements/Endorsements of Claim, Addressing the Court, Adjourning, Getting Information, Presenting a Case, Discovery, Motions and Effective Cross Examination.

For more information and advanced booking of this one day School of Commonology, go to :www.CrossExam.eventbrite.com/

For your further enjoyment and entertainment.

Recently we were interviewed by John of Alchemy Radio, about the book www.IrishLifeAndMe.com/

The interview is over an hour, so get the Tea on and Bikkies open, sit back & relax :http://youtu.be/bYpvMBw8UUg

Our next Radio interview will be with Phoenix FM (a Dublin local radio)…at 10.30am of Friday 11th. October (Live). You can tune-in online at:
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/#!/D15Fridays | website: www.phoenixfm.ie/

FINALLY: We will be in Wexford this Saturday (12th. October 2013), at Coolcotts Community Centre, Clonard, Wexford, from 11am, to discuss matters relating to Irish Life And Me (the book), An ATT (an update), and to answer questions in relation to Civil matters/issues that you might be concerned with. We would ask that those People that have supported and attended the recent talks/meetings in both Cork and Roscommon attend this even also. We are building a fantastic momentum in relation to getting this knowledge and information disseminated to the People, and would like all events and talks of this sort to be well attended, and the information therein shared with everyone on the Island.

We will also be debriefing you all a on a legal mortgage solution ...

The very best for now.
Des: of The CLS : ¬ )

This message was sent to xxx@yyy.com from:
The Common Law Society | 12 Parnell Street | Waterford, Waterford County 0000, Ireland

In today's CLS missive:

This Saturday we were welcomed, and facilitated a great talk and discussion with some of the People of Wexford. There was in the region of ninety plus People in attendance. Today we got an email from one of the People that allegedly attended Saturdays talk. The man who emaied us, accused us of "being over-emotional", and perhaps we were, and perhaps we still are.

The man took umbrage (issue) with us referring to and talking about the Political Aristocracy, Bankers, the Judiciary, Perceived leaders and the Church & State Oligarchy as being Psychopaths. In retrospect we don’t think or feel that we said these things in an emotive state, or with any agenda other than to educate and inform People in an intelligent and intelligible way, form and manner. The message was and still is clear and demonstrable.

Most of the People that are currently assuming senior and or perceived positions of authority in Politics, the Financial Industry, the Judiciary, the Church, the State and the Semi-State bodies should go and get clinically tested in relation to measuring their Clinical Psychopathy, and their proclivity and or ability to experience empathy towards real People. We think that they will not fare very well, in relation to this test or measure. We are sticking by what we said, because it is the truth.