Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Samsung Run Dublin @ Night 28th April

1235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭WHIP IT!


    I found it very enjoyable but I'd like to see more obvious marker signs at the various km points. I didn't see one before 3km, saw the 5km one, never saw a 6k or a 9k marker. It was my first 10k and I'd agree that it seemed a bit longer than 10k as the time I reached the 8k marker suggested I would reach the finish about a minute faster than I eventually did... still, enjoyable and well run and a unique chance to run the streets of Dublin at night like that... well done to all involved...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,420 ✭✭✭Ososlo


    Just back from being a spectator at this. Fantastic sight to see John Coghlan bombing down the quays to arrive in at 30.29. At 30:30 he had a microphone and camera stuck in his face. No time for a sup of water for poor John! he said he ran it as a tempo run!
    The congestion at the end was ridiculous. Took about 25 minutes for the poor wrecked runners to get to the drinks area. It was actually dangerously congested. Over-subscribed obviously. Would put me off doing it next year. Heard that the congestion coming running towards the finish line was ridiculous too. Hard to do a good sprint finish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,416 ✭✭✭fletch


    Ososlo wrote: »
    . Took about 25 minutes for the poor wrecked runners to get to the drinks area.
    There was a drinks area??? I never saw it. Then again I was heading for the luas so stayed north side after the race.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,824 ✭✭✭vitani


    I saw no km markers at all, but tbh, I didn't mind that so much because I could convince myself there wasn't too much more to go.

    I enjoyed the course, although it was a little more congested than was comfortable. I also would have loved some water at the end rather than Powerade. Nice medal, though.

    I thought the waves were well organised, in terms of who went where but they could have made it more obvious as to which wave was which. The warmup was a bit ridiculous - far too packed to do the moves comfortably and I got kicked in the knee by the man in front of me when he tried to stretch his quads.

    Fair play to the people out clapping and cheering.

    I did enjoy it though - had to laugh to see John Coughlan tearing along to the finish when we still had most of the course in front of us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭cloneslad


    I didn't like all the turns and found it very congested until the o2, then it was okay until we were back in the narrow winding streets.

    I wanted to get in at 45:xx ended up at 46:10 which is annoying..... The race results are showing me as 45:40, I don't know where they are getting that time from!?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Birdie Num Num


    [QUOTE=Went over on my ankle in a pothole coming onto the quays tonight (6/7 k in), thought I'd broken it, but after a bit of recovery I was able to go on, great race though!![/QUOTE]

    Was just spectating but never saw so many in a road race fall or hurt themselves. Suppose it comes with the territory with so many twists, so many people and running in the dark. Hard to get a sense of the atmosphere as a spectator but seems like folk enjoyed themselves.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,420 ✭✭✭Ososlo


    fletch wrote: »
    There was a drinks area??? I never saw it. Then again I was heading for the luas so stayed north side after the race.

    yeah eventually :rolleyes:
    it was just at the far (south) side of the Sean O'Casey Bridge. By the time you'd get there though, the thirst would be gone...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,070 ✭✭✭✭Tusky


    Just want to say thanks to anyone stewarding at this. Really nice to volunteer time for others to compete. This was my third 10k, but first competitive one. 48.05 - reasonably happy with that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭WHIP IT!


    cloneslad wrote: »
    I didn't like all the turns and found it very congested until the o2, then it was okay until we were back in the narrow winding streets.

    I wanted to get in at 45:xx ended up at 46:10 which is annoying..... The race results are showing me as 45:40, I don't know where they are getting that time from!?

    Where can we see the results?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Birdie Num Num


    Tusky wrote: »
    Just want to say thanks to anyone stewarding at this. Really nice to volunteer time for others to compete. This was my third 10k, but first competitive one. 48.05 - reasonably happy with that.

    Club members. They always do it, for their own clubs, for championship races, for the Dublin Marathon, for Women's mini marathon for... Giving up bank holiday days, evenings, weekend mornings and happy to do it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 82 ✭✭emco


    cloneslad wrote: »
    I didn't like all the turns and found it very congested until the o2, then it was okay until we were back in the narrow winding streets.

    I wanted to get in at 45:xx ended up at 46:10 which is annoying..... The race results are showing me as 45:40, I don't know where they are getting that time from!?

    46.10 was the time you had going under the finishing sign I presume? The time on the results is your chip time so it doesn't count the time it took you to reach the starting post. Congrats you did run your target time!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭CardinalJ


    Overall thought it was good but between 8 and 10k was just all over the place, turning every 150m. Some open drain covers down around the o2 which was crazy. Hope no one ended up in them!

    Results here http://www.precisiontiming.net/result/racetimer?v=%252Fen%252Frace%252Fshow%252F1227%253Flayout%253Dprecision_timing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    WHIP IT! wrote: »
    Where can we see the results?

    precisiontiming.net


  • Registered Users Posts: 316 ✭✭sureitsgrand


    Yeah, thanks to all the volunteers. Great contribution. :)

    Pissed of here, though. Only my split time seems to have been recorded - no final result. My garmin was on the fritz tonight as well.

    Just quite annoying when you you're aiming for a time and know you're only gonna get it/miss it by a few seconds. Was on target judging by split time, too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭cloneslad


    WHIP IT! wrote: »
    Where can we see the results?

    The precision timing website. They have a link for it on the samsung night run Facebook page. I can't link it cos my phone won't let me copy the address from the app


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,420 ✭✭✭Ososlo


    emco wrote: »
    46.10 was the time you had going under the finishing sign I presume? The time on the results is your chip time so it doesn't count the time it took you to reach the starting post. Congrats you did run your target time!

    Your chip time is the time from when you actually crossed the start line to when you crossed the finish line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭cloneslad


    emco wrote: »
    46.10 was the time you had going under the finishing sign I presume? The time on the results is your chip time so it doesn't count the time it took you to reach the starting post. Congrats you did run your target time!

    46.10 was the time I had on my garmin, started it when I crossed the start point, stopped it when I crossed the finish line.

    My chip time is showing 46;40, it should match my watch time


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭WHIP IT!


    CardinalJ wrote: »
    Overall thought it was good but between 8 and 10k was just all over the place, turning every 150m. Some open drain covers down around the o2 which was crazy. Hope no one ended up in them!

    Results here http://www.precisiontiming.net/result/racetimer?v=%252Fen%252Frace%252Fshow%252F1227%253Flayout%253Dprecision_timing

    Damnit, wish I hadn't checked!.... it's showing me four precious seconds slower :D:D

    EDIT: Also did the first 5k and second 5k in almost identical time which is kinda cool...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭Phibsboro


    I was using Runkeeper on my Nexus 4. The distance was 10.01km and the time was exactly one second off the chip time. I wonder what distance was recorded for the people whose chip time seems off?


  • Registered Users Posts: 198 ✭✭npresto


    They obviously took note of the moans and complaints from last year. Much improved and thoroughly enjoyable race. Got myself a nice shiny PB too. Can't wait for next year!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 77 ✭✭runwithme


    Great race. Really enjoyed it overall. Yet there was a lot of twisting and turning and I also saw somebody fall at around 7k. Thankfully he got moving again but pulled up just before the finish line. He tripped over something and really smashed his arm. Hope he is ok. Very Very congested overall and I seem to constantly be in somebody's way. I got a PB:D just by a few seconds so im happy with that. Good race overall and I hope to be back again next year. Well done to all involved and the runners of course


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭BenMicheal


    statss wrote: »
    this was much improved on last year.route was actual better, start and finish area's better located. credit where credit is due. will be back (provided they dont raise the price again!)

    I agree about the start and finish being much better located but the last 3 k's of the course was a nightmare and the way the road narrowed intermittently where they tried to double up on the route was shockingly annoying!

    Good race though in general. If they got that last 2-3k sorted it would be a top TOP race in my opinion!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,518 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    Just back home there now from the race. Stopped off in McDonalds on Kylemore road on the way home. Looks like I wasn't the only one going by the number of luminous yellow tops in there!!

    Did the run in 48:14 which I'm happy enough with as it was my second ever race after the 6k i did back in January The race was well run maybe except for the start and finish as there were a few bottlenecks. I'll know for the next one to get up closer to the start line so I won't have to do as much weaving to find space.


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭wobblemouth


    Really enjoyed this race. Very smoothly ran event as far as I could see.

    Good atmosphere, plenty of supporters, plenty of stewards along the course.

    The course was dead flat, and loads of people seemed to manage good times or PBs (managed to get under 38.30 for a PB myself).


    I generally only run in the mornings, so was a bit pissed off hanging around all Sunday avoiding booze and crap food 'cos I was running that evening! But really glad I wasn't put off by the negative comments on last years race, and hope that this one becomes a regular event.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    Yes it was very, very congested. But numbers was the name of the game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 ✭✭✭✭Mint Sauce


    Mixed reactions after last night. Very windy and congested in places, felt I sometimes couldn't find my stride. No toilets at the bag drop and alot of waiting about at the start and finish. New PB though so still happy enough with that, great crowd and support though out.

    However, my Garmin also recorded a slightly longer course, 250 metres to be exact. I read the points about how all the twists, turns and back tracking might have added, but with an average pace of 4:59 through out, and an overall time if just over 51:00 perhaps there was an extra 1/4km somewhere. Feels like I was slighty robbed of my desired sub 50.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 924 ✭✭✭Vico1612


    Enjoyed the race , great atmosphere , managed to knock off time of my PB :-)
    The last 2k were a bit congested but who cares ...
    Highlight for me : Lovely lady in her PJs on Sheriff Street [ 2.7k ? ] ' Come on Luv ! Ya nearly there !!!! ' - put a smile on my face for the rest of the route :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭sgarvan


    Vico1612 wrote: »
    Enjoyed the race , great atmosphere , managed to knock off time of my PB :-)
    The last 2k were a bit congested but who cares ...
    Highlight for me : Lovely lady in her PJs on Sheriff Street [ 2.7k ? ] ' Come on Luv ! Ya nearly there !!!! ' - put a smile on my face for the rest of the route :-)

    There was some characters along the way. What I had expected last year but the weather put a damper on that.

    Comparing this year to last year, the smooth running of the event this year was fantastic. Great to see the barriers along the course so one could actually see the course. The volunteer steward were fantastic again. Their encouragement to all the runners was brilliant. I would of preferred to run last years course again but in the city centre closing off all those roads must of been a no no.

    All in all, I set a new PB yesterday of 43:10. Delighted with that as I do not train specifically for running events. I just run them in my spare time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭AdrianII


    Parking was a nightmare. I tried the parks aon Abbey street and along the quays all closed or the road was blocked.
    Had to settle for the one at cleary's.

    As for the race, the pen's were to varied everyone seemed to be in the 45-60 one, should have had 45-48 /49-54 /55-60 pens as the first 2km was like playing dodgem's. Apart from that and the fact i got a stitch after 5km it was a nice run. Finished on 46:46


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭Mr Jinx


    AdrianII wrote: »
    Parking was a nightmare. I tried the parks aon Abbey street and along the quays all closed or the road was blocked.
    Had to settle for the one at cleary's.


    As for the race, the pen's were to varied everyone seemed to be in the 45-60 one, should have had 45-48 /49-54 /55-60 pens as the first 2km was like playing dodgem's. Apart from that and the fact i got a stitch after 5km it was a nice run. Finished on 46:46

    There was a load of parking on Seville place and behind Connolly station, and it was only 5 mins walk from the finish line.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 123 ✭✭omeatheopian


    Really enjoyed this, and was very pleasantly surprised given the poor reviews on here from last year.

    I've done 3 10k's and I have to say I thought this was the best in terms of organisation, running route etc. Granted it was dear though!

    Did a time of 41.18, so think I'll keep going and try break 40 in a couple of months


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭miller82


    was the distanmce right ? i.e 10km


  • Registered Users Posts: 525 ✭✭✭fluff_daddy


    the last 2/3k was a nightmare, just when i thought we were on the home stretch there was a turn in the opposite direction. Have a runners knee which kicked in about 2k so the turns were killing me with pain :)

    Got in at 53 so happy enough with that considering the Jega bombs at 6am on sat nite /Sun Morn :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,260 ✭✭✭donnacha


    Really enjoyed last night - and like others glad I signed up even after reading the comments on here. The support from the volunteers was amazing. Had a few close calls with potholes and speed ramps but thankfully survived them.

    Set a new PB of 49:25 but could of taken another minute of that based on nearly perfect weather conditions on the night had there not been so much weaving required. My garmin clocked 10.29km and was 1 sec off the chip time.

    For next year I'd like to see a few more groupings rather than the 4 they set-up for the staggered start - or at least break them up differently. The green group (45mins to 55mins) was way too big - and if you look at the times on precisiontiming nearly half of all the runners came in that time.

    My other observation is one of thanks that they only managed to get 5,400 runners to sign up to this. They had targetted 10,000 - there is no way that course can hold 10,000 runners unless they space out the start times for groupings and sort out the congestion at the finish line.

    A personal lesson learnt is not to arrive 90 mins early for an event like this!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    donnacha wrote: »
    My other observation is one of thanks that they only managed to get 5,400 runners to sign up to this. They had targetted 10,000 - there is no way that course can hold 10,000 runners unless they space out the start times for groupings and sort out the congestion at the finish line.

    Just saw on the news that they are reporting a turnout of 7000.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,416 ✭✭✭fletch


    Just saw on the news that they are reporting a turnout of 7000.
    That's a lot of DNFs! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 500 ✭✭✭sumsar


    Had a great night last night, first race I've entered so I'm delighted with myself for that, the support there and the characters was brilliant and hilarious hearing some of the folks, especially the lads blaring Chariots of Fire out their apartment window!

    Well done to everyone including the supporters/volunteeers was brilliant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭sgarvan


    5689 position is the last on the list.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    fletch wrote: »
    That's a lot of DNFs! :D

    What's a DNF?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,416 ✭✭✭fletch


    What's a DNF?
    Did Not Finish


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    fletch wrote: »
    Did Not Finish

    Ah I see.
    Well that's unfortunate.


  • Registered Users Posts: 215 ✭✭Craptacular


    I enjoyed the run last night despite the congestion at the start. Really it was a minor inconvenience and I still managed a PB. Unfortunately the results have given my clock time and no split so there must have been something wrong with my chip. I'll just have to go out and set another PB to correct the google record.

    I'd have no problem running this again next year. Hopefully they'll drop the cost to draw in a few more since it didn't sell out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 65 ✭✭gigtown


    Just saw on the news that they are reporting a turnout of 7000.

    Was it on TV news?


  • Registered Users Posts: 198 ✭✭npresto


    AdrianII wrote: »
    Finished on 46:46

    I shared 932nd place with you ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,054 ✭✭✭✭Professey Chin


    Have to say I really enjoyed it. My 1st ever 10k (or distance race of any kind....or race of any kind since school sports 15 years ago :/).
    Managed in 56:07 which since I could barely run 3k a month ago im delighted with :pac:
    I actually enjoyed most of the turns since they broke things up nicely even though I did get caught in traffic more then once. Will be doing it next year again :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭sgarvan


    Anyone know anyway to get pictures from the race? Seen many photographs out on the course.

    Came across 3 albums, all but one are pretty much pictures of yellows streams!

    www.independent.ie/photos/samsung-dublin-night-run-29228610.html

    http://www.racepix.com/Samsung-Night-Run/racephotos/874/

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/chedyus/sets/72157633374343916/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭cloneslad


    Don't wear a yellow top next time....you'll be easier to spot in photos ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 152 ✭✭green_dub_girl


    Well for my first race, I have to say I had a ball! I was delighted with my 50' 40 sec time, bit congested in parts but overall very well organised and the marshals were great.

    Can anyone tell me what the split time means on the results? I've done a google and it's still no cleared to me.

    Thanks!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭sgarvan


    Can anyone tell me what the split time means on the results? I've done a google and it's still no cleared to me.

    Thanks!

    I make it that the split time is your first 5k time.

    I think it was as you passed the right side of the finish line before crossing the river.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,591 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    I enjoyed the race last night and the stewards were great however I did feel that they were too many turns and having roads split made them too narrow and caused lots of congestion.

    Going around some bends I almost had to walk sometimes to avoid collisions.

    Also the start system needs revamping. I couldn't get into my pen as they were closed off,and had to eventually jump the barrier.

    Anyhow, it was a great event with a great atmosphere.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement