Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Should Irish be an optional subject not a cumpulsory one

1181921232436

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭Dostoevsky


    PK2008 wrote: »
    Useless language in the real world-

    ....purely for romantics and people with misplaced insecurities around patriotism and heritage.

    I suppose most people who study an Arts subject would be dismissed as "romantic"? Students of history? of French literature? of English literature? ...

    In contrast to you, I find the people most rabidly against Irish tend to be in two categories, the first of which is those with issues about their own place in Irish culture, usually due to having a closer connection to Britain than most people here. To say they have a chip on their shoulder about Irishness and Irish culture is an obvious understatement. Witness the venom from that earlier poster who brought her child from Britain and was ranting that, in Ireland, her child had to study Irish at school. Really, if I had that much hatred for an indigenous culture and identity, I'd avoid moving there.

    The second category of people who have a chip on their shoulder about Irish are those people who struggle to master English. The substandard level of their English is consistently the outstanding mark of online Hibernophobes. It really is shocking the lack of pride they have in their own English, while uttering diatribes against Irish. I love English, and pride myself in my ability to communicate well in it. I also love Irish, and pride myself in my ability to communicate well in it. Most people who work at perfecting a language can only empathise with somebody who loves a language, any language. It is invariably the same undereducated, close-minded, benighted types who get the boot in against Irish. The threat they feel is usually summed up by an "I can't speak it, ergo it's a useless/stupid language" disposition or a "he speaks it ergo he must be derided/dehumanised" disposition.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,250 ✭✭✭lividduck


    Dostoevsky wrote: »
    I suppose most people who study an Arts subject would be dismissed as "romantic"? Students of history? of French literature? of English literature? ...

    In contrast to you, I find the people most rabidly against Irish tend to be in two categories, the first of which is those with issues about their own place in Irish culture, usually due to having a closer connection to Britain than most people here. To say they have a chip on their shoulder about Irishness and Irish culture is an obvious understatement. Witness the venom from that earlier poster who brought her child from Britain and was ranting that, in Ireland, her child had to study Irish at school. Really, if I had that much hatred for an indigenous culture and identity, I'd avoid moving there.

    The second category of people who have a chip on their shoulder about Irish are those people who struggle to master English. The substandard level of their English is consistently the outstanding mark of online Hibernophobes. It really is shocking the lack of pride they have in their own English, while uttering diatribes against Irish. I love English, and pride myself in my ability to communicate well in it. I also love Irish, and pride myself in my ability to communicate well in it. Most people who work at perfecting a language can only empathise with somebody who loves a language, any language. It is invariably the same undereducated, close-minded, benighted types who get the boot in against Irish. The threat they feel is usually summed up by an "I can't speak it, ergo it's a useless/stupid language" disposition or a "he speaks it ergo he must be derided/dehumanised" disposition.
    What "venom" what "hatred", I read and reread her post and can find no hint of venom or hatred in it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭Dostoevsky


    lividduck wrote: »
    What "venom" what "hatred", I read and reread her post and can find no hint of venom or hatred in it.

    :rolleyes:. Given your own malevolence towards the Irish language, I wouldn't expect you to have anything but admiration for that poster's views. Just because venom is directed against something you hate doesn't negate its venom.
    'I was always sorry to hear his utterances on this subject... because it seemed to me unworthy of him to share a prejudice, essentially English and vulgar'
    - Oscar Wilde, 1892.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,250 ✭✭✭lividduck


    Dostoevsky wrote: »
    :rolleyes:. Given your own malevolence towards the Irish language, I wouldn't expect you to have anything but admiration for that poster's views. Just because venom is directed against something you hate doesn't negate its venom.
    'I was always sorry to hear his utterances on this subject... because it seemed to me unworthy of him to share a prejudice, essentially English and vulgar'
    - Oscar Wilde, 1892.
    wot-eva!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,298 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    DDC1990 wrote:
    Why put any stock into any part of Irish culture. Why support the upkeap of Irish Castles, Newgrange, Rock of Cashel. Im sure Millions are being spent on these Heritage Sites, for no reason other then the fact that they are part of our culture. Would you support leaving those sites go into ruin, as they would if the government cut funding.
    Indeed, however we don't spend millions rebuilding such heritage sites to their former original state. In any case it would be a bad comparison as they're outdoor museums of our past and no language should be reduced to that.
    You have selected one aspect of Irish life that you do not support personally, and chose to call it a waste of money. Its not ok to let people die through lack of Government funding, but it is ok to let a Language, which has survived thousands of years die.

    Ireland isn't in the Shít because of Irish, why should the language now suffer because of financial difficulties caused by other aspects of Irish society?
    Gaelic games are going from strength to strength and are very popular throughout our culture. Irish music has pretty much gone global. Simply because rather then blathering about support, we as a nation actively support these aspects of our culture in essence by putting our money where our mouths are. Irish language support is different. A majority say we support it, but the same majority frame this support as Bearla. The Irish language has continued to contract in spite of the effort and funds and legislation thrown at it. Beyond the Gaelgoiri flying their holier than thou cultural flag and their opposites who see it as a backward and wasteful cultural irrelevance lies the greater sea of Irish people whose opinion on the matter might be summed up in one shrugged word: Meh.
    I appreciate the language, and don't want to be part of the generation that let the language die. This language has outlasted wars, famines, countless recessions and hard times.
    This aspect of the languages looming extinction found in quite a lot of Gaelgoiri thought always puzzled me. Mostly because I can't see it going extinct any time soon, so why the gloom and doom and hyperbole? It's yet another example of an emotional appeal to culture, rather than the reality on the ground. It's almost as if they will this extinction into life, as some daft emotive Pearsian glorious failure waiting to happen. If all funding was removed tomorrow, the Irish language would still be out there. The actual Irish speakers out there who do use it daily in communication wouldn't stop doing so and their children would still pick it up at home. That's an absolute worse case scenario too.
    Dostoevsky wrote: »
    In contrast to you, I find the people most rabidly against Irish tend to be in two categories, the first of which is those with issues about their own place in Irish culture, usually due to having a closer connection to Britain than most people here. To say they have a chip on their shoulder about Irishness and Irish culture is an obvious understatement. Witness the venom from that earlier poster who brought her child from Britain and was ranting that, in Ireland, her child had to study Irish at school. Really, if I had that much hatred for an indigenous culture and identity, I'd avoid moving there.

    The second category of people who have a chip on their shoulder about Irish are those people who struggle to master English. The substandard level of their English is consistently the outstanding mark of online Hibernophobes. It really is shocking the lack of pride they have in their own English, while uttering diatribes against Irish. I love English, and pride myself in my ability to communicate well in it. I also love Irish, and pride myself in my ability to communicate well in it. Most people who work at perfecting a language can only empathise with somebody who loves a language, any language. It is invariably the same undereducated, close-minded, benighted types who get the boot in against Irish. The threat they feel is usually summed up by an "I can't speak it, ergo it's a useless/stupid language" disposition or a "he speaks it ergo he must be derided/dehumanised" disposition.
    For brevity's sake one could reduce those two paragraphs down to: West Brits. Ignorant morons. Just as daft, divisive and dismissive as the position that holds Irish speakers/supporters to be either narrow headed nouveau Celtic revivalists or backward culchies with an axe to grind. Indeed for all your talk of venom, your own quoted post doesn't exactly see you coming up smelling of roses on that score.

    I would however agree with you on this point.
    Really, if I had that much hatred for an indigenous culture and identity, I'd avoid moving there.
    Whatever about it's usage and relevance to wider Irish culture it would be odd indeed to be surprised that a child enrolling in a school in Irish wouldn't be taking an Irish class.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    DDC1990 wrote: »
    You mightn't agree but in my opinion, Irish will die out because of Laziness on all sides. Laziness of people who have it, and don't use it because they aren't bothered, or are ashamed to use it. But also Laziness of those who have the ability to learn the language, and decide that they won't because of a preconcieved notion that the language is a pointless one.

    I have no problem with a person who stuggles with linguistics, or just with Irish itself not being able to speak Irish well. Likewise I don't discriminate against people who are illiterate or innumerate, and cannot write in English or do Maths. As I said before, my gripe is against students who can learn it, who are able to learn it, who have 6 classes a week to learn it, and decide to sit back and waste the class because "Its a dead language anyway." I know some of you will agree with that sentiment and support people like that, but I don't.

    Just on the point of it being our national language. According to Bunreacht na hÉireann (1937) Article 8. "The Irish language as the national language is the first official language." Paragraph 2 states: "The English language is recognized as a second official language".
    That is why I refer to Gaeilge as our national language. I understand English is recognized as an official language also, but Gaeilge is the national language of the state. I know times have changed since 1937 and the language has waned since, but until it is changed in the Constitution, Gaeilge is still our national language.

    I have a proposal. Why not change all the schools into Gaelscoileanna? Then the children learn through Irish from Day 1. They become nearly fluent by 3rd class. Every school in Ireland is doing it, so there are more children around speaking Irish, so they interact with each other in Irish. The language grows. It stops being a dead language and becomes the language used in homes, shops and businesses. Yes I know its a rediculous situation to imagine, but would you have major objections to this, and why?

    I was educated in a Gaelscoil, and love the language. I didn't have anyone brainwash me into loving Gaeilge. We didn't have video's of the Black and Tans shooting up villages, to develop a hate for the Sasanaigh. It wa a happy healthy education, which lead to me becoming Bi-Lingual.

    On the point of why children are "forced" to take Irish in secondary school, i'd make the point why is any subject compulsory in school? Why is English compulsory or Maths?
    You hear students say "I will never use differenciation in my life" as well as "I will never speak Irish again in my life".

    I know there will be people who work in Science or Mathematics, and they will use the complex Maths learned in Secondary school. However the majority of people will not use differenciation on a daily basis, or quadratic equasions.

    Likewise, most people don't care about Keats, Shakespeare, Brian Friel etc. after Leaving Cert. Granted English scholars, and Writers will use it, but outside of that, who quotes Hamlet on a Daily basis?

    You can make a case for every subject being optional, but the chances are that wouldn't be so good for the Irish Education system.

    My thoughts on the situation are farther back in the thread. Course should be split in 2. One paper compulsory, so that all students learn enough Irish to use it effectively, and another for those who want to study the literature, poetry etc.

    At some point, people have to realise that forcing it down reluctatn troats might not kill it, but it will kill any chacne of a revival. If it dies out, it wil ldo so because so many people compeltely failed to realise that flogging a dying horse was never going to work and reviving and caring for it was never attempted.

    Again, there is a MASSIVE difference between laziness and disinterest. The latter, which you see is laziness, is a perfectly acceptable responce. That goddammaed right to disagree and say no, once again.

    Make every primary school a gaelscoil? Are you serious? It's not the worst idea I've heard on boards, but it's in the top three.

    Make every subject optinoal? I compeltely agree with you here.

    What ever you do to the course, you're going to have to accept that people see the language in a different light to you. Hard-working, studious people who just have interests elsewhere. You've going to have to accept that these people have rights, as do you, and you're goign to have to respect that they will make choices you disagree with and form opinions you don't like. Live with it.
    DDC1990 wrote: »

    I understand it isn't your culture, but I consider it part of mine, as do many others.

    This is lip-ervice. You don't genuinely respect that it's not someone else's or that someone else doesn't relate to it. Certainly not if they're only 15.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,607 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    Pretty sure for something to constitute being a native language it has to be spoken as the first language of the majority of the population.

    I digress however, I don't see the harm in it being compulsory, but the way its taught needs to change otherwise there's no point. Being compulsory is a waste of time of the majority of folks still can't speak it by the end of secondary school.

    They could set aside an hour of class time just to actually converse in irish rather than rhyme off poems and verbs, hell get rid of the actual exams altogether and just get people speaking it, its a farce you can get a good grade in a language and not actually be a competent speaker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,619 ✭✭✭SeanW


    DDC1990 wrote:
    in Secondary school, students will not take it. They will have their parents telling them its a pointless subject.
    If a students' parents consider the Irish language not to be part of their heritage, traditions or identity, then it follows that it cannot by any honest measure be a part of the students heritage, culture, traditions or identity either. I.E. it's an imposition, no more and no less than any other.
    Dostoevsky wrote: »
    Witness the venom from that earlier poster who brought her child from Britain and was ranting that, in Ireland, her child had to study Irish at school. Really, if I had that much hatred for an indigenous culture and identity, I'd avoid moving there.
    That would indeed be a compelling argument, but there's just one tiny problem.

    It's total nonsense.

    First of all, the poster you quoted does not directly hate the Irish language, any more than an Italian person hates Latin. What they have a problem with, is that their child will be stuck in school until they are 20 (whereas most finish at 17) BECAUSE OF THE LANGUAGE.

    That would be fine in Germany, or France, or Eastern Europe, though I suspect even in those countries they might have programs to teach the native language as a second language to the student either before admission to the local school or as extra help.

    But we as a nation generally speak English, and by the admission of other gaelgoirs on this thread like DDC1990, a lot of parents do no consider the Irish language to be a part of their identity or culture at all as far as they're concerned, and they make that position clear to their children.

    Hence the imposition of compulsory Gaeilge is an imposition from a vested interest group with a hobby horse. Nothing else.

    So while an average parent might have a gripe being subjected the same irrelevant nonsense as they were, the poster you quoted has a problem with their child being held back 3 years because of it. Their so-called "venom," as you put it, is entirely understandable.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,656 ✭✭✭C14N


    DDC1990 wrote: »
    What you are saying is akin to, well I don't use the Dole, so it should be abolished.
    I have never been to a Hospital in Ireland so I think all funding towards Hospitals should be cut. Why not get the people who use the Hospitals to pay for their treatment, that is a fairer system. Wasting money on sick people, shur we all die in the end anyway.
    You are suggesting that a service that doesn't cater to you is a waste of money.

    If I may offer a counter-analogy regarding keeping Irish compulsory for all, it would be the following.

    "I use the dole, and I really like it. Rather than just giving the dole to me and my unemployed brethren who need it, I think it should be mandatory to give the dole to everyone in the country."

    "Hey this hospital thing is great. Lets put everyone in here, even if there's nothing wrong with them! And if they don't want to go here, we'll question their patriotism and say they're a bunch of Brit-loving deserters."

    Alternatively, imagine our constitution said that our "national food" was to be cream crackers and as a result, everyone in the country was required to spend years eating cream crackers every day, no matter how much they dislike the taste. In addition, if their cream-cracker eating performance (which is for many is one of the tougher things they have to do) is not up to scratch by the time they're 17, they don't get to go to university, just coz.

    Nobody is saying it should be banned, outlawed, criminalized or whatever. The justification for cutting funding is that the service is not needed or wanted by the majority of people who make use of it and the ones who DO want to use it (and kudos to them) could get by just as well with the reduced money.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,069 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Optional.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    FRENCH is a modern language,millions of people speak it ,whereas irish is spoken by maybe 1 per cent of people, it has no practical application unless you intend to work for tg4 ,irish language ,or you maybe intend to translate documents into irish for the civil service.
    IF you are going for an interview have french or german might be seen as a plus especially if the company has branches in europe.
    MOST people have a little bit of irish, so its not gonna help you re getting a job.
    Theres only so many people that can work in tg4 or irish radio.
    THATS why most kids put little effort into learning irish ,most will never use it after the leaving cert.
    IF i want to be a computer programmer what is the point of spending
    hundreds of hours learning irish.
    For most people its pointless ,do we ask every child to learn
    to play the harp or fiddle just because its part of are culture.
    WE dont because that would be wasteful and ridiculous.
    I view irish the same way,it should be a personal choice.
    thats the great thing about human nature,we all have different skills,
    no point in forcing people to do art or music if they have no interest in it.

    ITS stupid that someone cant get a place in uni to be a doctor or chemist,
    because they got a c in the irish test,.
    IN an ideal world everyone would take 2 languages in the leaving , but we cannot afford
    it so we must use our educational budget in a rational manner.

    OR even try it,for 5 years as an experiment ,1st year in secondary school,
    fill in form, i want to study ,irish ,yes or no .I reckon 90 per cent would say no.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭WillieFlynn


    riclad wrote: »
    ITS stupid that someone cant get a place in uni to be a doctor or chemist,
    because they got a c in the irish test,.
    IN an ideal world everyone would take 2 languages in the leaving , but we cannot afford
    it so we must use our educational budget in a rational manner.
    Currently most people have to do 3 languages to get a place in university (Irish, English and a modern european language).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 777 ✭✭✭H2UMrsRobinson


    Dostoevsky wrote: »
    :rolleyes:. Given your own malevolence towards the Irish language, I wouldn't expect you to have anything but admiration for that poster's views. Just because venom is directed against something you hate doesn't negate its venom.
    'I was always sorry to hear his utterances on this subject... because it seemed to me unworthy of him to share a prejudice, essentially English and vulgar'
    - Oscar Wilde, 1892.

    I expressed no venom towards the Irish Language, I did however express frustration at a school system that puts the learning of a language over all other subjects, puts a child into a class where she is 2 years older than the other pupils (I only found out this was happening on her first day at school) and then six months later tells me she's not mixing well with the other students. Fortunately she is doing much better in her secondary school, 2 years is not such a big gap when they're teenagers. She could of course skip transition year but it's actually a part of the Irish education system that I think is a really good thing and I don't want her to miss out on this part of "Irish culture" - we don't have transition year in the UK, and more's the pity. When we moved to Ireland, we tried to embrace as many traditions and nuances of the culture that we can, but due to our experience I believe compulsory Irish is a wee bit restrictive and sometimes damaging to the cause. If you mistook my frustration for venom and hatred then I'm sorry, but your command of this islands "other" language is lacking and all the Oscar Wilde quotes in the world won't convince me otherwise.

    The thread title is Should Irish be an optional subject not a compulsory one ? - I gave my answer, with a bit of background as to why I thought that. If everyone just put No or Yes, would make for a very short boring thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,808 ✭✭✭Stained Class


    Am I right in thinking that 20% of the entire educational budget is spent on the Irish Language?


    If this is true................well, it's utterly insane that this madness continues in this day & age.

    Or any age, come to think of it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 439 ✭✭Ms.M


    The Equal Status Act stemmed from a need to ensure civil rights for people in Gaeltacht communities. It is not in existence to merely promote a hobby. Calling the language useless or dying is disrespectful to a culture that is indigenous to this island. It doesn't exist anywhere else and hence needs to be protected. I feel similarly about Catalan and Briton.

    I understand that for many Irish people, the Irish language is not part of their culture but it is important not to underestimate its importance to other Irish people. Even for many who speak it little, the want to revive it is what matters. The naysayers are actually in the minority, so that argument is not valid. (See MRBI poll 2010; 65% of 15-24 year olds in favour of retaining Irish as compulsory to Leaving Cert). Although frankly I wouldn't agree with Spanish people who made remarks about Catalan inspite of them being a minority.

    The percentage of people with a European language is much higher in the Irish speaking community than it is in the non-Irish speaking community (I couldn't find the exact percentage on-line but I think it was a substantial difference). In my opinion, having a healthy respect for native culture is a mind-set that tends to pair well with having respect for other cultures. I don't think you can blame Irish for any shortfalls in students knowledge of French or Scientific subjects for that matter. Students that do honours Irish, as you might expect, tend to do honours Maths as well.

    I would ask people who make disparaging remarks about the place of this language on our island to remember that for some this is their culture. This is what they understand to be "Irish". Why should they be made to feel like foreigners in their own country? They have done no harm to you and are not attacking you. Please research the percentage of expenditure on the English speaking community and compare it with what is spent on the Irish speaking community, take population percentages into account... you'll still see a massive inequality, and not one that will support your argument. Having respect for a minority culture does not infer that by not speaking Irish you are less Irish, it just means you're not a bigot.

    Sorry if I seem to be talking to myself... too many posts to respond to at once... Evocative stuff!

    Hey, maybe we just need another partition? Can we have Galway? I like the bay... :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Ms.M wrote: »
    The Equal Status Act stemmed from a need to ensure civil rights for people in Gaeltacht communities. It is not in existence to merely promote a hobby. Calling the language useless or dying is disrespectful to a culture that is indigenous to this island. It doesn't exist anywhere else and hence needs to be protected. I feel similarly about Catalan and Briton.

    I understand that for many Irish people, the Irish language is not part of their culture but it is important not to underestimate its importance to other Irish people. Even for many who speak it little, the want to revive it is what matters. The naysayers are actually in the minority, so that argument is not valid. (See MRBI poll 2010; 65% of 15-24 year olds in favour of retaining Irish as compulsory to Leaving Cert). Although frankly I wouldn't agree with Spanish people who made remarks about Catalan inspite of them being a minority.

    The percentage of people with a European language is much higher in the Irish speaking community than it is in the non-Irish speaking community (I couldn't find the exact percentage on-line but I think it was a substantial difference). In my opinion, having a healthy respect for native culture is a mind-set that tends to pair well with having respect for other cultures. I don't think you can blame Irish for any shortfalls in students knowledge of French or Scientific subjects for that matter. Students that do honours Irish, as you might expect, tend to do honours Maths as well.

    I would ask people who make disparaging remarks about the place of this language on our island to remember that for some this is their culture. This is what they understand to be "Irish". Why should they be made to feel like foreigners in their own country? They have done no harm to you and are not attacking you. Please research the percentage of expenditure on the English speaking community and compare it with what is spent on the Irish speaking community, take population percentages into account... you'll still see a massive inequality, and not one that will support your argument. Having respect for a minority culture does not infer that by not speaking Irish you are less Irish, it just means you're not a bigot.

    Sorry if I seem to be talking to myself... too many posts to respond to at once... Evocative stuff!

    The thing to remember here that the majority of us are simply being rational and saying let the kid decide for him or herself. What's wrong with choice?

    The oes saying kill the language and let it die are both extremist and ignorant and not worthy of your time.
    Hey, maybe we just need another partition? Can we have Galway? I like the bay... :D

    No. You can have Mayo, though. Please take Mayo.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,298 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I don't understand why Catalan is brought up in these debates. It's in zero danger of dying out. Over twice the population of Ireland can speak it. It's a language of daily life, employment, higher education and mass media. What's chalk and cheese as Gaelige?
    Ms.M wrote:
    Why should they be made to feel like foreigners in their own country?
    That argument can go both ways. In fact it's more often you get the vibe that Irish people who don't speak the language are the "foreigners". Hence the veiled or overt calls of West Brit. You'll hear that far more than any claims that Irish speakers aren't Irish.
    Hey, maybe we just need another partition? Can we have Galway? I like the bay... :D
    :D I'm with ya. I'll get started on the Pale.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 439 ✭✭Ms.M


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I don't understand why Catalan is brought up in these debates. It's in zero danger of dying out. Over twice the population of Ireland can speak it. It's a language of daily life, employment, higher education and mass media. What's chalk and cheese as Gaelige?

    Sorry, maybe Catalan isn't an ideal argument. And not even an original one apparently. :D Thought I was being quite clever. Hebrew was more 'dead' than Irish (though that's a highly reductive term) and now it's a National language. Stephen Fry speaks about the decline of minority languages as "lingocide". I quite like that. I don't think something being in danger of dying out is a reason to abandon it. I'm too sleepy to read back over your posts so I don't know if that's what you're advocating, apologies if it's not.

    That argument can go both ways. In fact it's more often you get the vibe that Irish people who don't speak the language are the "foreigners". Hence the veiled or overt calls of West Brit. You'll hear that far more than any claims that Irish speakers aren't Irish.

    I take your perception that Irish people who don't speak the language can be made to feel less Irish but I would say the elitist snobbery tends to come from picker-uppers of the language and not Native speakers. (I'm a picker-upper myself and I do slag my husband for being a West Brit, but he is also amoured with the Royal family :rolleyes:) I do think the more 'evocative' language from both sides of the argument tends to disimprove the quality of these discussions. And although people may not claim that Irish speakers aren't Irish, many of the arguments on this thread do take as given that Irish is less important to our culture than English is. This opinion seems far more widely held than 'the non-Gaeilgeoirs are West Brits' one, and it is just as bigoted in my opinion.

    The thing to remember here that the majority of us are simply being rational and saying let the kid decide for him or herself. What's wrong with choice?

    It's not that I want to punish kids. I just think of myself after the JC. Irish was my weakest subject, if I'd been given the option I know I wouldn't have picked it. The education system is too point driven. Even if 1 out of every 50 kids gain something from it, I think it's worth keeping. (Obviously the ratio is far higher). It doesn't infer I'm being a dictator to the 49 that wouldn't. There aren't a high percentage of kids that continue with Mathematical studies or ever use anything learnt in LC Maths but again, even if it was only 1 out of 50 it would be worth it for the one in my opinion. If they made either of these subjects non-compulsory educators would have to lower the standard of the higher level course to attract more candidates. People in the Gaeltacht would indeed see their culture devalued. If it is made non-compulsory, if we agree with the Equal Status Act English would be made non-compulsory too. I have no issue with the opinion that all subjects should be optional though I disagree with it for practical reasons. I do have an issue with the argument that Irish should be made non-compulsory while English remains compulsory. I perceive this as cultural bias, oooh, and carrying an element of "lingocide" :D I do still love the English language.

    No. You can have Mayo, though. Please take Mayo.

    Oi, leave Mayo alone. :eek: New thread please!


    P.S:
    See Stephen Fry on youtube. He's a cool dude. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_07-ApFV0w Although Donegal is the biggest Gaeltacht and Irish doesn't have less words than English. Still, the fuzzy feeling you get in your belly listening to non-nationals talking fondly about Irish is a quick leigheas to any Gaeilge lovers gortaithe by comments on these threads. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 439 ✭✭Ms.M


    Sorry, I never tried to quote before :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,656 ✭✭✭C14N


    Ms.M wrote: »
    I don't think you can blame Irish for any shortfalls in students knowledge of French or Scientific subjects for that matter. Students that do honours Irish, as you might expect, tend to do honours Maths as well.

    This is entirely anecdotal, but that's not the case in my experience. When I did the Leaving Cert there was one higher Irish class and one higher maths class and there wasn't that much overlap in who did both subjects. I can also say that Irish is such an intensive course that I had to drop to ordinary level at a late stage because the workload was too much. After dropping, I didn't spend a day studying Irish because I just didn't have time.
    Ms.M wrote: »
    Even if 1 out of every 50 kids gain something from it, I think it's worth keeping. (Obviously the ratio is far higher). It doesn't infer I'm being a dictator to the 49 that wouldn't. There aren't a high percentage of kids that continue with Mathematical studies or ever use anything learnt in LC Maths but again, even if it was only 1 out of 50 it would be worth it for the one in my opinion. If they made either of these subjects non-compulsory educators would have to lower the standard of the higher level course to attract more candidates. People in the Gaeltacht would indeed see their culture devalued. If it is made non-compulsory, if we agree with the Equal Status Act English would be made non-compulsory too. I have no issue with the opinion that all subjects should be optional though I disagree with it for practical reasons. I do have an issue with the argument that Irish should be made non-compulsory while English remains compulsory. I perceive this as cultural bias, oooh, and carrying an element of "lingocide" :D I do still love the English language.

    While I think the maths course does need some revisions, it isn't accurate to compare it to the Irish course. There are economic reasons for keeping maths compulsory. Any university course in commerce, science or engineering WILL require LC maths and these are the ones the government is pushing now because they are the best employment areas in the country. In any case, the maths course at the moment for people who do not go on to study any of those subjects is largely to improve students' ability to think analytically and logically. I haven't studied Project Maths at all but as I understand, it's a lot more practical than the previous course too.

    I would be a bit more on the fence about keeping English compulsory (at least as an exam subject) but the English course is also very different to the Irish one. Almost everyone who takes LC English can speak and write perfectly fine when they want to, the course is about studying literature and developing a writing style, it's not really about the language itself. Irish is about the language. My Irish teacher (who was a very good teacher) constantly pushed the point that it doesn't matter if the story in your essay was awful, all that matters is that you show the examiner that you have a good grasp of the language and this was or the higher level paper. Even the poetry and prose were just about being able to understand the questions and form an answer, there was none of the level of detail you get in studying the comparative or single text in English. The Irish course was very similar to the German/French course in how you had to think and learn.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 439 ✭✭Ms.M


    Can I just clarify that what I was comparing was the impact that removing the status of any of the core subjects would have on that subject. I was not comparing their importance at all. I never implied that Irish was more important than Maths. I didn't even imply that Irish was as important as Maths. Indeed I don't think Irish, English or Maths should become optional courses. This thread is about whether Irish should be kept compulsory and I've outlined my opinions above. A discussion that neglects mentioning native speakers or the Equal Status Act is not really a fair discussion about the language.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 956 ✭✭✭RiseToTheTop


    Damn treason...it would be against our Heritage! Our HER-I-TAG-EE!!

    (wish I could say that in Irish)


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,298 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Ms.M wrote: »
    Sorry, maybe Catalan isn't an ideal argument. And not even an original one apparently. :D
    :) naw M it's not you, it's just that Catalan is brought up on a regular basis as a comparison, but it's not even close to one given the vast numbers who actually speak it. It's not a "hobby"/tiny minority/compulsory education language
    Hebrew was more 'dead' than Irish (though that's a highly reductive term) and now it's a National language.
    Funny enough it's also an example that comes up from time to time :o:D. There are many reasons for it's success, most of all the building of a new country that required a common language for it' immigrant citizens from all over the world. We already have a common language here.
    Stephen Fry speaks about the decline of minority languages as "lingocide". I quite like that. I don't think something being in danger of dying out is a reason to abandon it. I'm too sleepy to read back over your posts so I don't know if that's what you're advocating, apologies if it's not.
    Well Mr Fry while being a wonderful and erudite man does tend towards the over sensitivity, luvviness and hyperbole of his trade. Lingocide as he terms it has gone on since man first strung a a line of whistles and grunts together in some semblance of grammatical order. Languages die out, or change all the time. With few exceptions. Chinese would be close to one in that it's rate of change is very slow compared to say English or indeed Irish. Bardic Irish would be hard to grasp for even a native Irish speaker. Old Irish even more so.

    I certainly would not advocate abandoning the language. However I would remove much of it's protected status in law, education and funding. This would include removing it as a compulsory subject in secondary education. I'd have no issue at all keeping for primary. That should be enough to engender a love for the language in those who would feel that.
    I take your perception that Irish people who don't speak the language can be made to feel less Irish but I would say the elitist snobbery tends to come from picker-uppers of the language and not Native speakers.
    That ahs been my experience too. The nouveau Gaelgoiri tend to have much more of a chip on the shoulder about it than native speakers. A deflection of personal guilt about themselves and their culture? Who knows. That said one other poster who had direct experience of going out with a native speaker found them to be way more militant so individuals differ I suppose.
    I do think the more 'evocative' language from both sides of the argument tends to disimprove the quality of these discussions.
    +1
    And although people may not claim that Irish speakers aren't Irish, many of the arguments on this thread do take as given that Irish is less important to our culture than English is. This opinion seems far more widely held than 'the non-Gaeilgeoirs are West Brits' one, and it is just as bigoted in my opinion.
    Well as a language, a method of communication it is more important to our culture. This is a pretty unassailable view. The wealth of output in the arts and sciences and wider culture by Irish people doing so through English dwarfes similar output as Gaelige. Part of it's problem is that it's called English, with all the bad odour that follows that word, though it's no longer a language that belongs to England the country.
    The thing to remember here that the majority of us are simply being rational and saying let the kid decide for him or herself. What's wrong with choice?
    I agree.
    Irish doesn't have less words than English.
    Eh it kinda does. That's nothing against Irish, it's just that English has one of the biggest vocabs of any language on the planet.
    Still, the fuzzy feeling you get in your belly listening to non-nationals talking fondly about Irish is a quick leigheas to any Gaeilge lovers gortaithe by comments on these threads. ;)
    One could suggest that's a very "Irish" way to look at things. It seems we still have the tendency to look outside to justify our own confidences. We're not alone in that, the Brits do it too, but we're among the worst for it as a nation.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,298 ✭✭✭Namlub


    Damn treason...it would be against our Heritage! Our HER-I-TAG-EE!!

    (wish I could say that in Irish)

    Oidhreacht :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 439 ✭✭Ms.M


    "Well as a language, a method of communication it is more important to our culture. This is a pretty unassailable view. The wealth of output in the arts and sciences and wider culture by Irish people doing so through English dwarfes similar output as Gaelige. Part of it's problem is that it's called English, with all the bad odour that follows that word, though it's no longer a language that belongs to England the country."

    I agree that more people speak English presently. But to say that our output in the Arts and Sciences is overwhelmingly English-based is completely untrue! I respectfully disagree sir. It is most definitely overwhelmingly Irish-based. Certainly the Arts are. Surely everyone knows that? Don't they? :(

    I think an English person might be insulted by you claiming English does not belong to them. Of course it does. Places like Australia and America have a massive British heritage. Most post-colonial peoples who are not of British descent; all over Africa and the Middle-East have managed to keep their language. We are an exception to the rule, not the norm. There's nothing normal about lingo-suicide. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 439 ✭✭Ms.M


    Namlub wrote: »
    Oidhreacht :cool:
    Ár n-oidhreacht!

    (Awr noi-rokt) Find an Irish speaker and guilt them into teaching you for free. It happens to me all the time!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,298 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Ms.M wrote: »
    I agree that more people speak English presently. But to say that our output in the Arts and Sciences is overwhelmingly English-based is completely untrue! I respectfully disagree sir. It is most definitely overwhelmingly Irish-based. Certainly the Arts are. Surely everyone knows that? Don't they? :(
    Are you serious? Maybe we're confusing different things here, or living in a parallel dimension.:confused: The sciences have feck all, I mean damn near zero output as Gaelige. It hasn't been a language of higher learning since the 1600's. Try doing a doctorate in say engineering exclusively through the language. About the only university level course you can take in Irish is further study of the language itself. Commerce? Overwhelmingly through English except in very small proportions of local transactions. Arts? Some of the greatest writers in any language of the last 200 years have been Irish people writing in English. This continues to the present. The vast majority of commercial publishing output in this nation and exported from this nation is as Bearla. Take school textbooks out of the mix and it would be truly miniscule. Theatre? Small minority output. Film? Beyond made for TG4 stuff again tiny. Music? More output there, but beyond Enya throwing a cupla focal in her soundscapes there's eff all Irish language pop/rock/contemporary music by comparison.
    I think an English person might be insulted by you claiming English does not belong to them. Of course it does.
    No it really doesn't bar the name. It's a truly international language. Spanish and French would be similar. There are a great multitude of english speakers that aren't English. Indeed the vast majority aren't*. Many times more people speak english as their native language than live in or have an ancestral link to England. Ditto for French and Spanish.
    Places like Australia and America have a massive British heritage.
    In that case so have we. More indeed. These two islands have been joined at the hip for nigh on 8000 years with influence going back and forth throughout that time. By your argument we're significantly more "British" than Australia and America. We're not by the way and neither are they beyond the very surface. The amount of Americans who could claim British ancestry is pretty tiny. There are far more Irish, French, Scandinavian, Polish, German, Hispanic, Jewish, Italian, African etc populations. All speaking English(and Spanish). Australia would have more, but also has big Chinese, Italian, Greek and native populations and indeed Irish, Scots and Welsh.
    Most post-colonial peoples who are not of British descent; all over Africa and the Middle-East have managed to keep their language.
    Some have, some have not, some are bilingual. EG there is an awful lot of French and English spoken in the African continent, either as a primary language or a lingua franca.
    We are an exception to the rule, not the norm. There's nothing normal about lingo-suicide. ;)
    The rule is that over time some languages thrive, some die out. Most die out. The better communications became, or empires spread this was played out throughout human history. There was at least one ancient language here before Irish and it's no more. Just the barest hints of it's survival in some rare Irish words. Scotland had IIRC three distinct Pictish languages. In that case it was us the Irish who went over there and on the back of the sword or the cross or the coin replaced it with Irish(Scots Gaelic). We even changed the very name of the country itself. It became "little Ireland" Scotia Minor. It went from Caledonia(in the Roman mind) to the land of the "Scotti" which refers to one name of Irish people. English took out other languages on the back of the Saxon invasions. Swings and roundabouts. It depends on your times. I mean it would have been a lot more useful to have Irish in the 8th century than Saxon as there would have been fewer of the latter speaking it and significantly fewer of the educated class. Very very few languages have survived this. Basque is pretty much the only one in Europe that has avoided cultural "contamination" and extinction for the longest time(it's totally unrelated to any indo European language and likely has very ancient roots.)

    Short answer, languages develop, grow and usually die off, it just depends how quickly.



    *It's why I scratch my head when people suggest learning Mandarin as a useful language. I'll make a prediction. It'll never be an international language. As it is it's widely spoken but in the vast vast majority of cases by Chinese folks. Plus it's unnecessarily complicated and tonal, so a nightmare to pick up for non natives.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭WillieFlynn


    While it is possible to force a school to make student to attend Irish classes, as condition of the schools capitation grant. It isn't possible to force a student to study it.......

    When I was doing the LC the work load got so high (doing 9 subjects), that towards the end I would go to Irish class and just say I didn't have time to do my homework. If I could go back in time, I wouldn't have waited until close to to the exams before effectively dropping out of Irish classes...

    The impression, that people must dislike Irish or be lazy if they don't want to study Irish at LC, is wrong in many cases.

    Another point some people seem to miss is that Irish is the only compulsory subject, that students must study in school for the LC. They don't need to do it in the LC just attend classes. Why not make English compulsory as well?

    I know in practice nearly everyone does English and Maths, but strictly speaking they are optional subjects.

    BTW While I am Irish with Irish parents, I was lucky to be born in Wales, so I didn't need to worry about passing Irish to get into an NUI college. As it turned out I passed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,048 ✭✭✭✭Snowie


    It is optional, I dont know a word of it never did an exam on it. Couldn't understand I spent hours at home trying to learn that god for Saken pain in the ass and for what? To be told well snowie the government has officially exempted you from irish...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,656 ✭✭✭C14N


    Ms.M wrote: »
    I agree that more people speak English presently. But to say that our output in the Arts and Sciences is overwhelmingly English-based is completely untrue! I respectfully disagree sir. It is most definitely overwhelmingly Irish-based. Certainly the Arts are. Surely everyone knows that? Don't they? :(

    How do you figure? How many internationally known poems, plays, songs or books were written in Irish (even if they were later translated)? Or how many scientific papers were done through Irish? This isn't me taking a dig at the Irish language, I just don't see how you could compare our output in Irish to that in English:confused:
    Ms.M wrote: »
    I think an English person might be insulted by you claiming English does not belong to them. Of course it does. Places like Australia and America have a massive British heritage. Most post-colonial peoples who are not of British descent; all over Africa and the Middle-East have managed to keep their language. We are an exception to the rule, not the norm. There's nothing normal about lingo-suicide. ;)

    They might be insulted, but it's quite true. The majority of Americans have as much descent in other nationalities as they do in English, many have very little English heritage if any. There are an overwhelming number of Irish, German, Italian, Hispanic and African descendants. Not to mention that English has become a sort of middle language for many other people to speak. A lot of the time if Germans and French (for example) are talking, they will do so through English because its a common second language for European and Asian countries. It's why English was retained as the first language of Singapore.

    Most of the other colonies don't get the same practical benefits out of speaking the same language as their invaders. They don't depend on them for trade like we do, or have the geographical convenience where they need to communicate with the English regularly.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement