Racism - Mod Note on 1st Post - Read before posting.

Fuhrer · 16-12-2011 05:33PM

opr wrote: »

Fingers crossed!

Opr

Didnt that come from the fake Commoli account?

Turtyturd · 16-12-2011 05:34PM

Obviously Suarez was found innocent during the hearing and we are now in Fergie Time to see if the panel will change their mind.

opr · 16-12-2011 05:35PM

Fuhrer wrote: »

Didnt that come from the fake Commoli account?

No idea I don't follow him on twitter. I have no idea who the other guy is I posted the tweet from. I presume I followed him at some stage during the transfer nonsense over the summer :pac:

Opr

NabyLadistheman · 16-12-2011 05:35PM

There's a number of people out for revenge after United crumbled out of the Champions League. There was alot said in the match thread that night & this is the first available opportunity for a come-back. It's the way boards operates. .

On the bright side, Im off on my Christmas party, enjoy you cool cats

JimsAlterEgo · 16-12-2011 05:35PM

opr wrote: »

Fingers crossed!

Opr

another one saying 6 match ban and heavy fine, pinch of salt

Ordinary man · 16-12-2011 05:36PM

tommyhaas wrote: »

That's about as ridiculous as suggesting that if he's found not guilty, all Evra's backers should accept he be charged with making false claims

If he's found not guilty then we have to accept that it was a misunderstanding or evra was crying wolf. But if guilty it means there was enough evidence there and all the people who defended him have to come out and admit he was wrong. The only people who can defend him after that is a supporter who agrees with his views. {IF HE IS FOUND GUILTY}

Fuhrer · 16-12-2011 05:36PM

Dalglish to stand shoulder to shoulder with Suarez after the hearing, Suarez to go down after the contact and demand a penalty.

SlickRic · 16-12-2011 05:38PM

i love the extremists on either side of this divide.

they're the best.

you know why? they'll be the angriest when the verdict comes

16-12-2011 05:39PM

Ordinary man wrote: »

If he's found not guilty then we have to accept that it was a misunderstanding or evra was crying wolf. But if guilty it means there was enough evidence there and all the people who defended him have to come out and admit he was wrong. The only people who can defend him after that is a supporter who agrees with his views. {IF HE IS FOUND GUILTY}

His views?

What nonsense are you posting?

tommyhaas · 16-12-2011 05:40PM

Ordinary man wrote: »

If he's found not guilty then we have to accept that it was a misunderstanding or evra was crying wolf. But if guilty it means there was enough evidence there and all the people who defended him have to come out and admit he was wrong. The only people who can defend him after that is a supporter who agrees with his views. {IF HE IS FOUND GUILTY}

He could be found guilty as a result of the cultural misunderstanding. Or is that only an acceptable excuse to you for Man Utd players?

My point is, whether or not he's found guilty isn't conclusive proof that Suarez is racist or Evra was lying

Handsome Bob · 16-12-2011 05:41PM

Ordinary man wrote: »

If he's found not guilty then we have to accept that it was a misunderstanding or evra was crying wolf. But if guilty it means there was enough evidence there and all the people who defended him have to come out and admit he was wrong. The only people who can defend him after that is a supporter who agrees with his views. {IF HE IS FOUND GUILTY}

Por que?

16-12-2011 05:42PM

tommyhaas wrote: »

He could be found guilty as a result of the cultural misunderstanding. Or is that only an acceptable excuse to you for Man Utd players?

My point is, whether or not he's found guilty isn't conclusive proof that Suarez is racist or Evra was lying

This, but blinkered folk don't understand this.

SlickRic · 16-12-2011 05:42PM

"have to"?

seriously?

nobody has to do anything.

this is football, fans are fans. some people supported their man fervently to the end. that's what fans do.

some may have been stupid in hindsight, but fúck it, that's life. we move on.

i don't expect any apologies or retractions from anyone no matter the verdict.

Kess73 · 16-12-2011 05:44PM

Nothing to worry about. Agent Fonda is in place.

Last time out he beat 11 to 1 odds, so a three person panel should be a doddle.

manual_man · 16-12-2011 05:44PM

Some people LOVE to condemn others

Question is, what are they hiding themselves?

Jesus Wept · 16-12-2011 05:44PM

Supposedly a warning about future conduct and will be no excuses now he's aware of the language difference. Statement to follow no ban

Just on this, I think there is close to zero chance that if innocent - that the FA will find him 'innocent/not guilty.
In order to save face there will be some sort of statement/warning attached that leaves ambiguity and the impression that he has skirted on the edges of what is proper but gotten away with it this time.

Mud, essentially.

Fuhrer · 16-12-2011 05:46PM

The-Rigger wrote: »

Just on this, I think there is close to zero chance that if innocent - that the FA will find him 'innocent', in order to save face there will be some sort of warning that leaves ambiguity and the impression that he has skirted on the edges of what is proper but gotten away with it this time.

Mud, essentially.

So, basically Suarez has no chance of a fair trial, at all?

Ordinary man · 16-12-2011 05:47PM

So just to be clear here - if it is PROVEN that suarez used racist language, it's ok and nobody would think of him differently?

Turtyturd · 16-12-2011 05:48PM

The-Rigger wrote: »

Just on this, I think there is close to zero chance that if innocent - that the FA will find him 'innocent/not guilty.
In order to save face there will be some sort of statement/warning attached that leaves ambiguity and the impression that he has skirted on the edges of what is proper but gotten away with it this time.

Mud, essentially.

Plus if he is found innocent on this expect him to be hammered for the Fulham incident.

J. Marston · 16-12-2011 05:49PM

manual_man wrote: »

Some people LOVE to condemn others

Question is, what are they hiding themselves?

I'm actually in the klan.

16-12-2011 05:49PM

Ordinary man wrote: »

So just to be clear here - if it is PROVEN that suarez used racist language, it's ok and nobody would think of him differently?

As a footballer no

As a person yeah, if I knew the chap.

Kess73 · 16-12-2011 05:49PM

Ordinary man wrote: »

So just to be clear here - if it is PROVEN that suarez used racist language, it's ok and nobody would think of him differently?

If it was clearly proven with no reasonable doubt that he made one or more racist comments, then I am sure that how many people view him as a person will change a lot.

Fuhrer · 16-12-2011 05:49PM

J. Marston wrote: »

I'm actually in the klan.

Im Hitler

YouTookMyName · 16-12-2011 05:50PM

This Is Anfield @thisisanfield 6m
Love how many Mancs are taking the high horse on the Suarez case. Calling someone negro is the same as calling someone caucasian. Or blonde.

Hhmmmm.

K-9 · 16-12-2011 05:50PM

Ordinary man wrote: »

So just to be clear here - if it is PROVEN that suarez used racist language, it's ok and nobody would think of him differently?

Nobody is biting.

Well except Suarez, but that's in the past.

The haters are too obvious.

16-12-2011 05:51PM

YouTookMyName wrote: »

Hhmmmm.

who posted that?

ilovelamp2000 · 16-12-2011 05:51PM

It's depressing how stupid some LFC fans are.

tommyhaas · 16-12-2011 05:51PM

Ordinary man wrote: »

So just to be clear here - if it is PROVEN that suarez used racist language, it's ok and nobody would think of him differently?

It depends entirely on the circumstances, and how the verdict was arrived at. If its a case of him unintentionally using it, as has been rumoured with the negrito rumour, then no I wouldn't think any differently of him. If however it were proven that there were far more sinister motives, then of course I, and I assume many others would think differently of him

mormank · 16-12-2011 05:53PM

This is crazy. Surely they can't actualy ban Luis for this. 1. It will set a huge precedent. 2. Terry better get banned also.

Fuhrer · 16-12-2011 05:55PM

mormank wrote: »

This is crazy. Surely they can't actualy ban Luis for this. 1. It will set a huge precedent. 2. Terry better get banned also.

Why would it be crazy to set a precedent for Racism getting you a ban?

Racism - Mod Note on 1st Post - Read before posting.

Comments