Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
GTA V Pre-release Discussion - ***DO NOT POST SPOILERS*** (Mod warning in first post)
Comments
-
-
it's been San Andreas, Liberty and Vice City since day 1. Bar the London expansion and 'Anywhere USA' from GTA 2 every GTA has been set in those 3 locations. It has hardly hampered the series. The San Andreas from this game will be vastly different to the one we've seen previously too.Deleted User wrote: »This will be the second San Andreas
When they try something new, they usually get onto a winner. Vice City was something new and different - everyone loved it.
San Andreas was somewhere new and different - everyone loved it.
As I said before, I'm sure if V was Liberty again, they'd still find a way to make it look amazing, so I'm not saying the game will be bad or anything, but I just think they're getting too comfortable. I don't want to play Liberty City, Vice City and San Andreas for the rest of my life because Rockstar have their tried and tested formula.
I'm certain that if they went somewhere new, they'd do a killer map, and they'd get people very excited.
Discovery is the biggest part of GTA. Storylines, missions and vehicles/weapons are secondary. It's all about exploring and discovering. It's hard to not feel like the series is a bit stale when you're 'exploring' the same place over and over again
0 -
-
I noticed the 2405 thing on the pavement when i looked at the video a couple of times. Also if you look at the homeless holding the sign he is holding the left side with 2 fingers and the right side with 4.....
Well he's hardly going to be holding it with 6 fingers on his left hand. :pac::pac:
But no, seriously, its an odd coincidence.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
Really don't know why people say this. GTA IV was a huge step forward in the series physics-wise. Driving, character models, shooting, NPCs etc were so much better. OK so you can't fly around in a jetpack but the fun element came back in the DLCs. They had to build GTA IV from the ground up. A lot of things were lacking and they had to delay it, to release a product like they did was a fantastic achievement and if it was anything other than a GTA title then people would have loved it imo.
Liam, you've been posting every now and again here for awhile now. You know people will not give credit where credit is due and will make sweeping, ludicrous statements for the sake of it. IV will be made out to be simply crap by a few here and they'll no way accept that progression was made and that GTA IV laid the foundation for GTA V in a significant way. As you, and lord knows I have as well, said above.. if it wasn't titled GTA. I don't think many here would be whining about it. IV was by no means perfect before anyone starts Long story short, you are wasting you're time trying to rationalise and bring sense into this 
0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
Deleted User wrote: »This will be the second San Andreas
No,this will be the third San Andreas as CMpunked rightly pointed out.The first San Andreas was in GTA 1 and the second San Andreas was in GTA San Andreas so GTA V will hopefully be the third incarnation of San Andreas0 -
Started playing San Andreas again in the last few hours. Its crazy that I never really played the game while I played every other GTA game to bits ...
And san andreas is actually a good game
I totally forgot about the ability to bulk CJ up, to rob buildings in side missions, The lo-rider cars, pimpin' side missions, the vast scale of it ... How come alot of this wasnt in GTA4? ... i know there was some negative feedback with it. But they really slashed alot with GTA4.0 -
-
LighterGuy wrote: »Started playing San Andreas again in the last few hours. Its crazy that I never really played the game while I played every other GTA game to bits ...
And san andreas is actually a good game
I totally forgot about the ability to bulk CJ up, to rob buildings in side missions, The lo-rider cars, pimpin' side missions, the vast scale of it ... How come alot of this wasnt in GTA4? ... i know there was some negative feedback with it. But they really slashed alot with GTA4.
As said before, GTAIV was a progressive title that was built from scratch.
GTA IV is a brilliant game, great story and the mechanics are sublime. I really don't get the criticism.
San Andreas I think was the best GTA story and gamewise, I mean it had it all, but it wouldn't have been possible without building the preceding GTAs.0 -
Apologies for the terrible quality of the pic below...
But if you can make it out, it shows the sign for Interstate 5. Now from my own research (I'm bored), it is indeed a real highway and is one that runs from San Fran to LA, down to San Diego and into Tijuana, Mexico..... Hype machine has gone into overdrive! :pac:0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
Have to keep you and Penn on yer toes
400 or so posts in 12 hours, i dont even think i done that much reading for my leaving cert! :pac:
Heres a fun thought.
Look at this picture, look at the more level parts of the slope.
Can you imagine barrelling down that in a car?! :eek::eek::eek:0 -
400 or so posts in 12 hours, i dont even think i done that much reading for my leaving cert! :pac:
Heres a fun thought.
Look at this picture, look at the more level parts of the slope.
Can you imagine barrelling down that in a car?! :eek::eek::eek:
put a hooker in the car... drive over the edge.. bail out.. parachute down after, have your way with her!!
Free prostitute acquired!! 0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
![[Deleted User]](/applications/dashboard/design/images/defaulticon.png)
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement