Fr Ted creator/writer Graham Linehan Arrested over posts on Transgender issues

Its all based on a social agreement that men (with man bits) use this toilet 🚹️

And ladies/girls with female bits & bobs use the facilities marked 🚺️

Men & women have different needs (obviously), men stand up, ladies sit down. Same for boys & girls. We are a binary species, so we come in two varieties, male & female. It's all very basic stuff really, unless of course you are into transgender ideology, in which case anything goes.

If a man can identify as a woman, and a woman can identify as a man then the social agreement regarding toilets, showers, changing rooms, etc could be broken - if we allowed it to be broken ……

But we won't.

The flip side is that most people who identify as trans get on with their daily lives in peace & quiet, they don't cause a cafuffle and they do what they do without advertising it. The problem we have in recent years is the trans activists Demanding this and Demanding that. Demanding that those men who identify as female female MUST be allowed to use the ladies!

Once we stop that nonsense, the better things will be for all.

Graham is correct on this issue 👍️

The bang of 'Women, know your limits' off this, that trans people are 'allowed' to exist by you, but only if they're quiet and meek and demure and tug their forelock. We don't want any of those mouthy, loud trans people who actually speak up and speak out.

Was this a problem before men started invading women's spaces? Or did it only become a problem after men broke the social contract by which they stayed out of women's toilets and changing rooms, thus causing women, especially those with a history of abuse by men, to become hypervigilant?

Because multiple TW such as India Willoughby claim to have used the women's loos systematically for decades without problem - so are we really expected to believe that there are women who look less female than the average TW? I'm calling BS on that.

(I haven't clicked on the links, but I've seen that middle one before, and the issue was that the two women were suspected of having sex in the toilets. Hence people thought it was a man and woman having sex and called the cops to say so. I'm betting the others are equally nonsensical. Probably made up by TRAs.)

Trans men are no threat? Have you really thought this through. Even trans men who actually threaten violence against politicians?

Obviously, now that I've found one case of a threatening trans man anywhere in the world, we HAVE to conclude that ALL trans men are a threat, and must be kept separate from other men. That's how it works around here, right?

There are very very few gender neutral toilets in Ireland. I was in a TUD building earlier this year, and what used to be gender neutral toilets had been rolled back to gendered toilets.

There are some disabled toilets, though they're far from as prevalent as standard toilets. Are you saying that being trans is a disability? And that people with disabilities with medical needs now have to wait for trans people?

It's got everything to do with you wanting to keep trans people in their place, compliant and submissive, only 'allowing' them to exist if they don't question or challenge you.

I didn't come up with those rules: they are the ECHR's proposals following the UK SC ruling on FWS's case. If they don't want to use the facilities of their birth sex, they can use the gender neutral ones. How is that a problem to anyone?

You didn't answer my question as to how come TW like India Willoughby claim to have been using women's toilets undetected for years if women are suddenly unable to detect actual women in front of their very eyes if their hair is too short?

Are you saying that being trans is a disability?

Why would they need medication and surgery if it's not an illness/disability?

And that people with disabilities with medical needs now have to wait for trans people?

I thought there were so few trans people that they wouldn't affect anyone else? I've literally never seen someone waiting outside a disabled toilet, except when the ladies' was so jammed that loads of women had started using the disabled one in desperation. Apart from that scenario, and when they double as family toilets, I've rarely ever seen a disabled toilet in use.

So I can't imagine a tiny percentage more is going to make a difference. TBH even the times when I've seen women using the disabled loos, I think I've never seen a visibly disabled person among them having to wait in line. Because they would always be given priority by able-bodied women, same as they do when someone comes in with a small child.

So if a trans person needs the loo faster (post surgery I gather that urinary impairment is commonplace so that might be) then they would presumaby be entitled to do that. Otherwise they could do like women do, and let the disabled person go first.

What I can't grasp is you getting upset with people who 'demand' things while you're OK to turn a blind eye with people who get on with their lives and use the bathroom of their choice anyway.